Literature DB >> 3122478

From DNA transcription to visible structure: what the development of multicellular animals teaches us.

R Chandebois1, J Faber.   

Abstract

This article is concerned with the problem of the relation between the genetic information contained in the DNA and the emergence of visible structure in multicellular animals. The answer is sought in a reappraisal of the data of experimental embryology, considering molecular, cellular and organismal aspects. The presence of specific molecules only confers a tissue identity on the cells when their concentration exceeds the 'threshold of differentiation'. When this condition is not fulfilled the activity of the genes that code for the specific molecules in question only confers on them a histogenetic potency, i.e. the capacity to form the corresponding tissue in further development (or to trans-differentiate to that tissue). The progressive restriction of histogenetic potencies during development reflects the irreversible repression of more and more genes. The establishment of a given tissue identity under the influence of an inducing tissue (or a morphogenetic hormone) is only possible when the cells have acquired the competence to respond. Tissue differentiation proceeds progressively during development thanks to the cytoplasmic 'memory' that cells retain collectively (or sometimes individually) of the items of information successively registered by their ancestors cells. The increasing complexity of visible structure emerging during development results only from the progression of tissue differentiation. This involves continual exchange of information among the cells and leads to (1) cell displacements and rearrangements, particularly during organogenesis and (2) extreme diversification of cell individualities within tissues, particularly during postembryonic growth. A mutation (just as a teratogenic factor) evokes an anomaly that is localized in both space and time because it alters a certain aspect of cell behaviour (particularly cell surface adhesiveness or mitotic activity) at the time when this is involved in the establishment of a particular structural trait. Neither the organization of the adult nor the modalities of development are encoded in the DNA. The automatic concatenation of cell interactions in the embryo and the structural amplification it entails is conditioned by the specific biochemical composition of the cytoplasm of the egg and by the heterogeneous distribution of its inclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3122478     DOI: 10.1007/bf00049353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biotheor        ISSN: 0001-5342            Impact factor:   1.774


  47 in total

1.  The formation of the mesoderm in urodelean amphibians : I. Induction by the endoderm.

Authors:  P D Nieuwkoop
Journal:  Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org       Date:  1969-12

2.  Expression of an epidermal antigen used to study tissue induction in the early Xenopus laevis embryo.

Authors:  R M Akers; C R Phillips; N K Wessells
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The kinetic behaviour of the cranial neural epithelium during neurulation in the rat.

Authors:  F Tuckett; G M Morriss-Kay
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1985-02

4.  Relationship between crystallin mRNA expression in retina cells and their capacity to re-differentiate into lens cells.

Authors:  R M Clayton; I Thomson; D I de Pomerai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-12-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Towards a classification of evidence in biological and medical research in respect of its validity.

Authors:  H Hillman
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.774

6.  Abnormalities of cells and extracellular matrix of T/T embryos.

Authors:  R J Jacobs-Cohen; M Spiegelman; D Bennett
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.880

7.  Extracellular matrix synthesis in the chick embryo lateral plate prior to and during limb outgrowth.

Authors:  T D Stephens; N S Vasan; J W Lash
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1980-10

8.  Why is development so illogical?

Authors:  R Lewin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  [Constancy, variation and type of determination and differentiation in cells from male genitalia rudiments of Drosophila melanogaster in permanent culture in vivo].

Authors:  E Hadorn
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Somitogenesis in amphibia. II. Origins in early embryogenesis of two factors involved in somite specification.

Authors:  T Elsdale; M Pearson
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1979-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  The role of self-organization in developmental evolution.

Authors:  Joseph E Hannon Bozorgmehr
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.