Bone marrow transplantation in miniature swine. II. Effect of selective genetic differences on marrow engraftment and recipient survival.

In order to study the effect of defined genetic differences on bone marrow transplantation in miniature swine, five different combinations of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched and mismatched bone marrow transplants were performed. Eight of nine fully MHC-mismatched allogeneic bone marrow transplants failed to reconstitute, and one animal reconstituted briefly but then died quickly thereafter. Five of six class I-matched/class II-mismatched (g----c) bone marrow transplants engrafted, showed a skin rash typical of graft-versus-host (GVH) reaction, and died 3 weeks after the marrow transplantation. None of five class II-matched/class I-mismatched (g----d) transplants engrafted. Parental marrow transplants into F1 hosts engrafted and caused GVH skin rash, with survivals from 1 to 9 months (n = 5). Serologic typing of the F1 recipients of parental marrow showed only donor-type peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), suggesting complete marrow replacement. Conversely, F1 into parental marrow transplants showed no engraftment (n = 6). These results indicate that resistance to MHC-mismatched allogeneic bone marrow engraftment in swine represents a host response recognizing donor class I MHC differences. This response appears to interfere with engraftment of donor bone marrow cells despite host preparation with 900-1100 rads total-body irradiation. In the absence of donor MHC class I differences, engraftment was seen despite the existence of multiple non-MHC differences, and even in the presence of class II differences. Such engraftment also led to GVH, varying in intensity according to the strength of genetic disparity (i.e., worst in parent----F1 combination). These results suggest that miniature swine should provide an effective model for study of both GVH elimination (in the parent----F1 combination) and problems of engraftment (in the F1----parent combination), the two most important obstacles to clinical allogeneic transplantation.