| Literature DB >> 31223327 |
Yilan Sheng1,2, Shifeng Kan2,3, Zixing Wen2, Wenhua Chen1,2, Qi Qi4, Qiang Qu2, Bo Yu1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of kinesio taping on the walking ability in patients with foot drop after stroke.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31223327 PMCID: PMC6541939 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2459852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
General characteristics of subjects.
| Parameters | EG (n=30) | CG (n=30) | Χ2/t | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 18/12 (60.00%/40.00%) | 20/10 (66.67%/33.33%) | 0.287 | 0.592 |
| Male/Female (%) | ||||
| Age, years | 53.63 ± 9.08 | 51.89 ± 8.48 | 0.765 | 0.447 |
| BMI, kg/ | 24.23 ± 3.08 | 23.97 ± 2.50 | 0.353 | 0.725 |
| Course of Disease, Months | 7.79 ± 2.10 | 7.91 ± 2.65 | 0.200 | 0.842 |
| Involved side | 21/9 (70.00%/30.00%) | 14/16 (46.67%/53.33%) | 3.360 | 0.067 |
| Left/Right(%) | ||||
| Types of Stroke | 15/15 (50.00%/50.00%) | 11/19 (36.67%/63.33%) | 1.086 | 0.297 |
| Cerebral hemorrhage/Cerebral infraction(%) |
Data are expressed as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. EG, experimental group; CG, control group.
Figure 1Kinesiology taping technique.
Figure 2Assessments using the German ZEBRIS gait running platform analysis system.
Comparison of 10MWT within groups and between groups.
| Parameter | EG (n=30) | CG (n=28) | t | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10MWT(sec) | Pre | 41.17 ± 2.41 | 40.85 ± 3.43 | 0.415 | 0.680 |
| Post | 37.28 ± 2.89 | 40.03 ± 3.43 | 3.315 | 0.002 | |
| t | 11.709 | 6.474 | |||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. p<0.05. EG, experimental group; CG, control group; Pre, before experiment; Post, after experiment.
Comparison of TUGT within groups and between groups.
| Parameter | EG (n=30) | CG (n=28) | t | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUGT(sec) | Pre | 40.09 ± 4.53 | 40.32 ± 4.52 | 0.194 | 0.847 |
| Post | 35.56 ± 4.64 | 39.88 ± 4.52 | 3.592 | 0.001 | |
|
| 8.434 | 3.335 | |||
|
| <0.001 | 0.002 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. p<0.05. EG, experimental group; CG, control group; Pre, before experiment; Post, after experiment.
Comparison of the stride length, as well as stance phase, swing phase of the involved side, and foot rotation of the involved side within groups and between groups.
| Parameter | EG (n=30) | CG (n=28) | t | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SL (cm) | Pre | 60.02 ± 9.55 | 57.70 ± 9.40 | 0.932 | 0.356 |
| Post | 67.00 ± 10.03 | 58.10 ± 9.39 | 3.484 | 0.001 | |
|
| 26.277 | 4.621 | |||
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| STP(%) | Pre | 75.80 ± 4.59 | 74.69 ± 6.39 | 0.766 | 0.447 |
| Post | 78.92 ± 5.20 | 75.55 ± 6.28 | 2.234 | 0.029 | |
|
| 8.506 | 6.982 | |||
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| SWP (%) | Pre | 24.20 ± 4.59 | 25.31 ± 6.39 | 0.766 | 0.447 |
| Post | 21.08 ± 5.20 | 24.45 ± 6.28 | 2.234 | 0.029 | |
|
| 8.506 | 6.982 | |||
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| FR | Pre | 8.83 ± 3.57 | 9.58 ± 2.94 | 0.870 | 0.388 |
| Post | 5.92 ± 2.68 | 8.94 ± 2.85 | 4.155 | <0.001 | |
|
| 9.028 | 6.174 | |||
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. p<0.05. Abbreviation: EG, experimental group; CG, control group; Pre, before experiment; Post, after experiment; SL, stride length; STP, stance phase of the involved side; SWP, swing phase of the involved side; FR, foot rotation of the involved side.