Literature DB >> 31221468

18F-FDG-PET/MRI in preoperative staging of oesophageal and gastroesophageal junctional cancer.

G Linder1, N Korsavidou-Hult2, T Bjerner2, H Ahlström3, J Hedberg2.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate integrated 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in comparison with the standard technique, integrated 18F-FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT), in preoperative staging of oesophageal or gastroesophageal junctional cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the preoperative staging of 16 patients with oesophageal or gastroesophageal junctional cancer, 18F-FDG-PET/MRI was performed immediately following the clinically indicated 18F-FDG-PET/CT. MRI-sequences included T1-weighted fat-water separation (Dixon's technique), T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) imaging. PET was performed with 18F-FDG. Two separate teams of radiologists conducted structured blinded readings of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI or 18F-FDG-PET/CT, which were then compared regarding tumour measurements and characteristics as well as assessment of inter-rater agreement (Cohen's kappa) for the clinical tumour, nodal and metastatic (TNM) stage.
RESULTS: There were no medical complications. Comparison of tumour measurements revealed high correlations without significant differences between modalities. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) values of the primary tumour with 18F-FDG-PET/MRI had excellent correlation to those of 18F-FDG-PET/CT (0.912, Spearman's rho). Inter-rater agreement between the techniques regarding T-stage was only fair (Cohen's kappa, 0.333), arguably owing to relative over-classification of the T-stage using 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Agreements in the assessment of N- and M-stage were substantial (Cohen's kappa, 0.849 and 0.871 respectively).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative staging with 18F-FDG-PET/MRI is safe and promising with the potential to enhance tissue resolution in the area of interest. 18F-FDG-PET/MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT correlated well for most of the measured values and discrepancies were seen mainly in the assessment of the T-stage. These results facilitate further studies investigating the role of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI in, e.g., predicting or determining the response to neoadjuvant therapy.
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31221468     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  4 in total

Review 1.  Does radiomics play a role in the diagnosis, staging and re-staging of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Martina Mori; Diego Palumbo; Francesco De Cobelli; Claudio Fiorino
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-09-17

2.  Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI.

Authors:  Amy R Sharkey; Bert-Ram Sah; Samuel J Withey; Shaheel Bhuva; Radhouene Neji; Sami Jeljeli; Adrian Green; Gary J R Cook; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2021-12-13

3.  Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and Contrast-Enhanced CT.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Rui Guo; Yan Zhang; Boqi Yu; Xiangxi Meng; Hanjing Kong; Yang Yang; Zhi Yang; Nan Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Quantitative comparison of data-driven gating and external hardware gating for 18F-FDG PET-MRI in patients with esophageal tumors.

Authors:  Sofia Kvernby; Nafsika Korsavidou Hult; Elin Lindström; Jonathan Sigfridsson; Gustav Linder; Jakob Hedberg; Håkan Ahlström; Tomas Bjerner; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2021-03-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.