María Lizondo1, Artur Latorre-Musoll2, Montserrat Ribas2, Pablo Carrasco2, Nuria Espinosa2, Anna Coral2, Nuria Jornet2. 1. Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, Barcelona 08025, Spain. Electronic address: maria.lizondo.gisbert@gmail.com. 2. Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, Barcelona 08025, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Optimisation strategies for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in most treatment planning systems for breast cancer do not account for patient positioning, breathing, or anatomical changes. To overcome this limitation, a pseudo-skin flash strategy using a virtual bolus has been proposed. Using this strategy, we determined optimal thickness and value of Hounsfield units (HU) assigned to the virtual bolus to ensure adequate CTV irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We modified the original computed tomography data (CT0) by adding combinations of thicknesses and densities of a virtual bolus on PTVs (CT') of seven bilateral breast cancer patients. Using a single optimization objective template, we obtained a VMAT plan on CT' and recalculated this on the CT0. Optimal CT' parameters were defined as those that minimized dose differences between CT' and CT0 plans regarding PTV and OAR dose-volume parameters. We studied bolus parameters regarding robustness by shifting the isocenter 5 and 10 mm in the breathing direction for each CT0 plan. RESULTS: The minimal dosimetric impact was between -400 and -600 HU depending on bolus thickness. OARs doses were not significantly affected. Best robustness was found for -500 HU and 15 mm bolus thickness against shifts of up to 10 mm in the breathing direction. CONCLUSION: Our results support a bolus thickness equal to the CTV-PTV margin plus 5 mm and a virtual bolus HU value around -500 and -400 depending on the bolus thickness chosen. These findings could play a useful role in maximisingrobustness and minimising the need for plan renormalization.
PURPOSE: Optimisation strategies for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in most treatment planning systems for breast cancer do not account for patient positioning, breathing, or anatomical changes. To overcome this limitation, a pseudo-skin flash strategy using a virtual bolus has been proposed. Using this strategy, we determined optimal thickness and value of Hounsfield units (HU) assigned to the virtual bolus to ensure adequate CTV irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We modified the original computed tomography data (CT0) by adding combinations of thicknesses and densities of a virtual bolus on PTVs (CT') of seven bilateral breast cancerpatients. Using a single optimization objective template, we obtained a VMAT plan on CT' and recalculated this on the CT0. Optimal CT' parameters were defined as those that minimized dose differences between CT' and CT0 plans regarding PTV and OAR dose-volume parameters. We studied bolus parameters regarding robustness by shifting the isocenter 5 and 10 mm in the breathing direction for each CT0 plan. RESULTS: The minimal dosimetric impact was between -400 and -600 HU depending on bolus thickness. OARs doses were not significantly affected. Best robustness was found for -500 HU and 15 mm bolus thickness against shifts of up to 10 mm in the breathing direction. CONCLUSION: Our results support a bolus thickness equal to the CTV-PTV margin plus 5 mm and a virtual bolus HU value around -500 and -400 depending on the bolus thickness chosen. These findings could play a useful role in maximisingrobustness and minimising the need for plan renormalization.
Authors: Sara Poeta; Younes Jourani; Alex De Caluwé; Robbe Van den Begin; Dirk Van Gestel; Nick Reynaert Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Roberta Castriconi; Pier Giorgio Esposito; Alessia Tudda; Paola Mangili; Sara Broggi; Andrei Fodor; Chiara L Deantoni; Barbara Longobardi; Marcella Pasetti; Lucia Perna; Antonella Del Vecchio; Nadia Gisella Di Muzio; Claudio Fiorino Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-08-24 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Cameron Stanton; Linda J Bell; Andrew Le; Brooke Griffiths; Kenny Wu; Jessica Adams; Leigh Ambrose; Denise Andree-Evarts; Brian Porter; Regina Bromley; Kirsten van Gysen; Marita Morgia; Gillian Lamoury; Thomas Eade; Jeremy T Booth; Susan Carroll Journal: J Med Radiat Sci Date: 2021-08-12