Angela G Juby1, Diana R Mager2. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Facuty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: angela.juby@albertahealthservices.ca. 2. Agriculture Food and Nutrition Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition and sarcopenia are common in older adults. A new clinical syndrome has been suggested - the Malnutrition Sarcopenia Syndrome (MSS) - that may provide improved management, by highlighting two older adult conditions that can interact in a cumulative way to affect functional independence and health outcomes. This paper evaluates the published literature reporting data on both nutrition and sarcopenia evaluation simultaneously in the population studied, and creates a diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: An inclusive, systematic literature search was done for articles including a simultaneous standardised evaluation of sarcopenia and nutritional status, from 1990-date. Sarcopenic status needed to be evaluated using accepted guidelines published by international guideline committees which include a functional muscle evaluation and a quantitative evaluation using bioimpedence assay or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Nutritional status needed to evaluated with a standardised, validated nutritional screening tool that was not disease specific. RESULTS: 11 studies met these criteria. They differed in their methodology for screening both sarcopenia and nutritional issues. They differed as to the population studied (community versus institutionalised versus hospitalised). CONCLUSIONS: No one methodology was consistent for evaluation of sarcopenia or malnutrition. The concept of the Malnutrition Sarcopenia Syndrome intuitively makes sense to clinicians. This opinion paper suggests a possible clinical approach. The management and interventions for both conditions are likely to have considerable overlap. There needs to be some consensus on how to evaluate it, in order to be able to accurately interpret the impact of interventions that may be undertaken for one or both conditions simultaneously.
BACKGROUND:Malnutrition and sarcopenia are common in older adults. A new clinical syndrome has been suggested - the Malnutrition Sarcopenia Syndrome (MSS) - that may provide improved management, by highlighting two older adult conditions that can interact in a cumulative way to affect functional independence and health outcomes. This paper evaluates the published literature reporting data on both nutrition and sarcopenia evaluation simultaneously in the population studied, and creates a diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: An inclusive, systematic literature search was done for articles including a simultaneous standardised evaluation of sarcopenia and nutritional status, from 1990-date. Sarcopenic status needed to be evaluated using accepted guidelines published by international guideline committees which include a functional muscle evaluation and a quantitative evaluation using bioimpedence assay or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Nutritional status needed to evaluated with a standardised, validated nutritional screening tool that was not disease specific. RESULTS: 11 studies met these criteria. They differed in their methodology for screening both sarcopenia and nutritional issues. They differed as to the population studied (community versus institutionalised versus hospitalised). CONCLUSIONS: No one methodology was consistent for evaluation of sarcopenia or malnutrition. The concept of the Malnutrition Sarcopenia Syndrome intuitively makes sense to clinicians. This opinion paper suggests a possible clinical approach. The management and interventions for both conditions are likely to have considerable overlap. There needs to be some consensus on how to evaluate it, in order to be able to accurately interpret the impact of interventions that may be undertaken for one or both conditions simultaneously.
Authors: Agnieszka Guligowska; Andrea Corsonello; Małgorzata Pigłowska; Regina Roller-Wirnsberger; Gerhard Wirnsberger; Johan Ärnlöv; Axel C Carlsson; Lisanne Tap; Francesco Mattace-Raso; Francesc Formiga; Rafael Moreno-Gonzalez; Ellen Freiberger; Cornel Sieber; Pedro Gil Gregorio; Sara Laínez Martínez; Rada Artzi-Medvedik; Ilan Yehoshua; Paolo Fabbietti; Fabrizia Lattanzio; Tomasz Kostka Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 3.921