Literature DB >> 31220260

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, in healthy adult subjects.

Takayuki Katsube1, Yutaka Saisho2, Jingoro Shimada3, Hidetoshi Furuie4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, has shown potent activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including MDR pathogens. Cefiderocol is under clinical investigation for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections including nosocomial pneumonia.
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed intrapulmonary penetration after a single intravenous dose of cefiderocol (2000 mg infused over 60 min) in healthy adult males.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each subject underwent one bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to collect BAL fluid (BALF). Fifteen subjects were assigned to one of three collection timepoints (1, 2 or 4 h from start of infusion). Five additional subjects were assigned to a collection timepoint at 6 h, which was added based on concentration data between 1 and 4 h predicting measurable BALF cefiderocol concentrations at 6 h.
RESULTS: Cefiderocol concentrations in plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophages (AMs) were calculated for each subject. The ELF concentration of cefiderocol was 13.8, 6.69, 2.78 and 1.38 mg/L at 1, 2, 4 and 6 h after single intravenous dosing, respectively. Over 6 h, geometric mean concentration ratios ranged from 0.0927 to 0.116 for ELF to total plasma and from 0.00496 to 0.104 for AMs to total plasma. AUC ratios of ELF and AMs to plasma were 0.101 and 0.0177 based on total drug in plasma, respectively, and 0.239 and 0.0419 based on free drug in plasma, respectively. There were no major drug-related adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate that cefiderocol penetrates into ELF, and ELF and plasma concentrations appear to be parallel.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31220260      PMCID: PMC6587409          DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


Introduction

The treatment of infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria, including Enterobacteriaceae and the non-fermenting bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, is an important unmet medical need. Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, has shown potent in vitro activity against Gram-negative bacteria [Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, including MDR pathogens (MIC90, 0.5 to 4 mg/L)]. Efficacy in a rat pneumonia model where cefiderocol exposures reproduced the human free drug plasma concentrations of a 2 g dose every 8 h infused over 3 h has been demonstrated against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Cefiderocol is currently under clinical investigation for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections, including nosocomial pneumonia (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02714595, NCT03032380)., A dose adjustment of 2 g every 8 h based on renal function was predicted to provide adequate exposure to cefiderocol in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling and simulation. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of human subjects is known to offer information on drug distribution in the lower respiratory tract. By using the BAL method, this study was designed to assess the intrapulmonary penetration after a single intravenous dose of cefiderocol in healthy adult male subjects in order to support the utility of cefiderocol for the treatment of respiratory infections.

Materials and methods

Ethics

The clinical study was conducted in compliance with International Conference on Harmonisation Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice. The protocol was approved by institutional review boards (approval reference number: 12–14). Subjects were able to understand the study and comply with all study procedures, and provided written informed consent prior to screening.

Study design and subjects

This was a Phase I, single-centre, open-label study in healthy adult male subjects 20 to 40 years of age, with body weight from 50.0 to 80.0 kg, and BMI from 18.5 to <25.0 kg/m2. Cefiderocol was administered by a single intravenous infusion over 60 min at a dose of 2000 mg.

PK assessments

Each subject underwent one bronchoscopy with BAL to collect BAL fluid (BALF), and blood was collected prior to the beginning of the bronchoscopy for measurements of urea and red blood cell counts. Fifteen subjects were assigned to one of the three BALF collection timepoints: 1 (just after the completion of the infusion), 2 or 4 h from the start of the infusion. After the study started, it was determined that the BALF concentrations of cefiderocol were predicted to be measurable at 6 h from the start of the infusion based on the concentration data available between 1 and 4 h from the start of the infusion. Taking this into consideration, the BALF collection at 6 h was added, and five subjects were assigned to the additional BALF collection timepoint. BAL was carried out by the infusion of four 50 mL volumes of sterile saline into the subsegmental bronchus of the right middle lobe, and each specimen was immediately aspirated. The BAL procedure was performed within 1 min. The first aliquot recovered was discarded and the last three were pooled. Alveolar macrophages (AMs; cell pellet) were separated from BALF via centrifugation (400 g for 5 min at 4°C). Each subject underwent blood sampling pre-dose (0 h) and then 1 (just before completion of infusion), 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 h from the start of the infusion. Analyses of cefiderocol in plasma were performed using a validated LC/MS/MS method. This analytical method was applied to determine cefiderocol concentrations in BALF and AMs after preparing samples with the process reported previously. The lower limit of quantification for cefiderocol was 0.1 mg/L in plasma and 0.005 mg/L in both BALF and AMs. Urea concentrations in serum and BALF were measured using a spectrophotometer based on a previous report. The precision and accuracy of the urea assay were 1.3% to 12.0% and −12.0% to 15.0%, respectively.

PK analyses

Individual plasma cefiderocol concentrations were summarized by nominal sampling time. For each subject, concentrations of cefiderocol in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and AMs were calculated according to the procedures reported previously. The PK parameters for plasma, ELF and AMs were calculated by the non-compartmental method using WinNonlin (Version 6.2.1). The PK parameters for ELF and AMs were estimated from the geometric mean concentrations in ELF and AMs. Concentration ratios in ELF and AMs to total plasma and AUC ratios in ELF and AMs to total or free plasma were also calculated.

Safety assessments

Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions, vital signs, 12-lead ECG and standard clinical laboratory safety tests (haematology and blood chemistry tests and urinalysis). The number and percentage of subjects reporting AEs were summarized.

Results

All 20 subjects who received cefiderocol were included in the PK evaluations. Subject demographic and baseline characteristics are shown in Table S1 (available as Supplementary data at JAC Online). The mean dilution factor calculated by UreaBALF/UreaSERUM was 0.018. Mean total plasma and ELF or AM concentration profiles following a single intravenous infusion of cefiderocol are shown in Figure 1. The ELF concentration profile appeared to be parallel to the total plasma concentration profile. Individual and mean total plasma, ELF or AM concentrations at BALF collection time are presented in Figure S1.
Figure 1.

(a) Mean (SD) total plasma and ELF cefiderocol concentration profiles following a single intravenous infusion of 2000 mg of cefiderocol. (b) Mean (SD) total plasma and AM cefiderocol concentration profiles following a single intravenous infusion of 2000 mg of cefiderocol. Arithmetic mean concentrations of cefiderocol in plasma, ELF and AMs were calculated by nominal sampling time. N = 20 at each timepoint for plasma; N = 5 at each timepoint for ELF and AMs. Logarithmic y-axis.

(a) Mean (SD) total plasma and ELF cefiderocol concentration profiles following a single intravenous infusion of 2000 mg of cefiderocol. (b) Mean (SD) total plasma and AM cefiderocol concentration profiles following a single intravenous infusion of 2000 mg of cefiderocol. Arithmetic mean concentrations of cefiderocol in plasma, ELF and AMs were calculated by nominal sampling time. N = 20 at each timepoint for plasma; N = 5 at each timepoint for ELF and AMs. Logarithmic y-axis. The geometric mean concentrations of cefiderocol in ELF and AMs and the concentration ratios of ELF and AMs to total plasma (RC, E/P and RC, A/P) are summarized in Table S2. The geometric mean ELF concentrations were 13.8, 6.69, 2.78 and 1.38 mg/L at 1, 2, 4 and 6 h from the start of the infusion, respectively. The concentrations ratios of ELF to total plasma over 6 h ranged from 0.0927 to 0.116. The concentration ratios of AMs to total plasma over 6 h ranged from 0.00496 to 0.104. A summary of the plasma, ELF and AM PK parameters is presented in Table 1. The AUC ratios in ELF and AMs to total plasma (RAUC, E/P and RAUC, A/P) were 0.101 and 0.0177, respectively, and 0.239 and 0.0419 based on free plasma, respectively, using a plasma protein unbound fraction of 0.422 (protein-binding study sponsored by Shionogi & Co., Ltd and tested by Sekisui Medial Co., Ltd; study number: R-649266-PF-037-L; date of report: 31 January 2012).
Table 1.

Cefiderocol pharmacokinetic parameters following single intravenous infusion of 2000 mg of cefiderocol

Specimen C max (mg/L) T max (h)AUC0–6 (mg·h/L)AUC0–∞ (mg·h/L) t ½, z (h)AUC ratio (total)aAUC ratio (free)b
Plasma1421.0294.5328.51.79NANA
ELF13.81.029.6233.121.760.1010.239
AM1.236.05.203NENE0.01770.0419

Geometric mean pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma are shown except for median Tmax.

AUC0–6, area under the concentration–time curve over the last nominal sampling time (i.e. 6 h); NA, not applicable; NE, not estimated; t½, z, terminal elimination half-life.

AUC ratio in ELF or AMs to total plasma AUC (RAUC, E/P or RAUC, A/P) was calculated as AUC0–6 in ELF or AM/AUC0–6 in total plasma.

AUC ratio in ELF or AMs to free plasma AUC was calculated as AUC0–6 in ELF or AM/AUC0–6 in free plasma using a plasma protein unbound fraction of 0.422.

Cefiderocol pharmacokinetic parameters following single intravenous infusion of 2000 mg of cefiderocol Geometric mean pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma are shown except for median Tmax. AUC0–6, area under the concentration–time curve over the last nominal sampling time (i.e. 6 h); NA, not applicable; NE, not estimated; t½, z, terminal elimination half-life. AUC ratio in ELF or AMs to total plasma AUC (RAUC, E/P or RAUC, A/P) was calculated as AUC0–6 in ELF or AM/AUC0–6 in total plasma. AUC ratio in ELF or AMs to free plasma AUC was calculated as AUC0–6 in ELF or AM/AUC0–6 in free plasma using a plasma protein unbound fraction of 0.422. All 20 subjects who received a dose of cefiderocol were included in the safety evaluations. The incidence of AEs is summarized in Table S3. In total, 14 of the 20 subjects (70.0%) reported 27 AEs. All of the AEs were judged to be due to the BAL procedure and not considered drug related, except for one AE (vomiting), which occurred just after drug administration. All AEs were mild in severity, except for one moderate AE (respiratory tract infection). All AEs resolved by the end of the study.

Discussion

Cefiderocol was discovered by modifying the C-3 side chain from cefepime and the C-7 side chain from ceftazidime, and it is expected that the cefiderocol intrapulmonary PK profile is similar to that of cefepime or ceftazidime. The cefepime concentration ratio in ELF to total plasma in healthy subjects was 0.39. Cefepime ELF concentrations administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients were similar to the total plasma concentrations. The ratios of ELF to the total plasma ceftazidime concentrations were 0.31 and 0.21 in healthy volunteers and patients with infection, respectively., The physiological condition is different between healthy subjects and critically ill patients with pulmonary infections, and there have been reports of both higher and similar intrapulmonary PK of cephalosporins in the infected condition compared with the uninfected condition. The ELF concentrations of cefiderocol were 13.8, 6.69, 2.78 and 1.38 mg/L at 1, 2, 4 and 6 h after single intravenous dosing, respectively. These ELF concentrations of cefiderocol were similar to those of other β-lactams that are used for respiratory infections. The ELF concentration appears to be parallel to the total plasma concentration, suggesting that cefiderocol was distributed rapidly from plasma to ELF. The AUC ratios of ELF were 0.101 to total plasma and 0.239 to free plasma. The penetration ratio of cefiderocol into ELF was comparable with that of ceftazidime in critically ill patients (0.229 based on free plasma using a protein unbound fraction of 0.9)., The fraction of time during the dosing interval where free concentration exceeded the MIC (fT>MIC) for a PD target was reported to be 75%. This study assessed ELF concentrations after a single intravenous dose over 60 min, which was different from a 3 h infusion time for severe infections, including nosocomial pneumonia., The 3 h infusion is expected to extend fT>MIC in ELF and have more potency. PK modelling for ELF concentrations would be useful to consider cefiderocol exposure in ELF with the 3 h infusion. Although BALF concentrations would be measurable at 8 h, it was determined that no further timepoints for BALF sampling were added. The parallel PK in plasma and ELF was observed over 6 h, and we presumed that ELF concentrations should be predictable based on plasma concentrations. This study revealed that cefiderocol penetrates into ELF, and the ELF concentration appears to be parallel to the plasma concentration. The results of this study and animal studies may support the further investigation of cefiderocol in nosocomial pneumonia, including Phase III clinical studies. Click here for additional data file.
  16 in total

1.  High extracellular levels of cefpirome in unaffected and infected lung tissue of patients.

Authors:  Jörg Lindenmann; Sylvia A Kugler; Veronika Matzi; Christian Porubsky; Alfred Maier; Peter Dittrich; Wolfgang Graninger; Freyja M Smolle-Jüttner; Christian Joukhadar
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Penetration of anti-infective agents into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid: focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Keith A Rodvold; Jomy M George; Liz Yoo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Carbapenemase genes and genetic platforms in Gram-negative bacilli: Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species.

Authors:  S M Diene; J-M Rolain
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation of Cefiderocol, a Parenteral Siderophore Cephalosporin, for Dose Adjustment Based on Renal Function.

Authors:  Takayuki Katsube; Toshihiro Wajima; Toru Ishibashi; Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira; Roger Echols
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activity of cefiderocol (S-649266) against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria collected from inpatients in Greek hospitals.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Tilemachos Skalidis; Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Nicholas J Legakis
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Phase 1 study assessing the steady-state concentration of ceftazidime and avibactam in plasma and epithelial lining fluid following two dosing regimens.

Authors:  David P Nicolau; Leonard Siew; Jon Armstrong; James Li; Timi Edeki; Maria Learoyd; Shampa Das
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations of cefepime administered in continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  Emmanuel Boselli; Dominique Breilh; Frédéric Duflo; Marie-Claude Saux; Richard Debon; Dominique Chassard; Bernard Allaouchiche
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of S-013420, a novel bicyclolide antibacterial, in healthy Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Furuie; Yutaka Saisho; Takayoshi Yoshikawa; Jingoro Shimada
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Plasma and lung concentrations of ceftazidime administered in continuous infusion to critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  Emmanuel Boselli; Dominique Breilh; Thomas Rimmelé; Jean-Charles Poupelin; Marie-Claude Saux; Dominique Chassard; Bernard Allaouchiche
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Comparison of 99mTc-DTPA and urea for measuring cefepime concentrations in epithelial lining fluid.

Authors:  S Bayat; K Louchahi; B Verdière; D Anglade; A Rahoui; P M Sorin; M Tod; O Petitjean; F Fraisse; F A Grimbert
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  16 in total

1.  Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Tebipenem following Oral Administration of Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide to Healthy Adult Subjects.

Authors:  Keith A Rodvold; Mark H Gotfried; Vipul Gupta; Amanda Ek; Praveen Srivastava; Angela Talley; Jon Bruss
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  Cefiderocol- Compared to Colistin-Based Regimens for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Marco Falcone; Giusy Tiseo; Alessandro Leonildi; Leonardo Della Sala; Alessandra Vecchione; Simona Barnini; Alessio Farcomeni; Francesco Menichetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.938

3.  Cefiderocol for the Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Achromobacter xylosoxidans Infections.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Warner; Luther A Bartelt; Anne M Lachiewicz; Kathleen M Tompkins; Melissa B Miller; Kevin Alby; Melissa B Jones; Amy L Carr; Jose Alexander; Andrew B Gainey; Robert Daniels; Anna-Kathryn Burch; David E Brown; Michael J Brownstein; Faiqa Cheema; Kristin E Linder; Ryan K Shields; Sarah Longworth; David van Duin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  Cefiderocol: A Review in Serious Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Yahiya Y Syed
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: Considerations for Treatment in the Era of New Antimicrobials and Evolving Enzymology.

Authors:  Maxwell J Lasko; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 6.  Evaluating Cefiderocol in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Review of the Emerging Data.

Authors:  Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Eugenio Ciacco; Corrado Girmenia; Federico Pea; Gian Maria Rossolini; Giovanni Sotgiu; Carlo Tascini; Mario Tumbarello; Pierluigi Viale; Matteo Bassetti
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analyses of Cefiderocol, a Parenteral Siderophore Cephalosporin, in Patients with Pneumonia, Bloodstream Infection/Sepsis, or Complicated Urinary Tract Infection.

Authors:  Nao Kawaguchi; Takayuki Katsube; Roger Echols; Toshihiro Wajima
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  An Evidence-Based Multidisciplinary Approach Focused on Creating Algorithms for Targeted Therapy of Infection-Related Ventilator-Associated Complications (IVACs) Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in Critically Ill Adult Patients.

Authors:  Milo Gatti; Bruno Viaggi; Gian Maria Rossolini; Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28

9.  Cefiderocol for Severe Carbapenem-Resistant A. baumannii Pneumonia: Towards the Comprehension of Its Place in Therapy.

Authors:  Emanuele Rando; Francesco Vladimiro Segala; Joel Vargas; Cristina Seguiti; Gennaro De Pascale; Rita Murri; Massimo Fantoni
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21

10.  Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of cefiderocol in mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia.

Authors:  Takayuki Katsube; David P Nicolau; Keith A Rodvold; Richard G Wunderink; Roger Echols; Yuko Matsunaga; Anju Menon; Simon Portsmouth; Toshihiro Wajima
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.