Frances M Cowan1,2, Sushena Reza-Paul3, Manjula Ramaiah4, Deanna L Kerrigan5. 1. International Department of Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. 2. Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe. 3. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 4. Ashodaya Samithi, Mysore, India. 5. Center on Health, Risk and Society, Department of Sociology, American University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review the recent evidence regarding strategies for engaging sex workers in HIV prevention and care programs. We searched Pub Med on 19 March 2019 using terms 'Sex Work' And 'HIV infections'. Our search was limited to articles published since 2017. RECENT FINDINGS: Community empowerment approaches where sex workers work collaboratively to address their specific priorities and concerns, including those beyond HIV, are those most likely to meaningfully engage sex workers. Community-driven programs that combine structural, behavioral and biomedical approaches can facilitate improved HIV outcomes by tackling barriers to uptake and retention of services along all steps in the prevention and care cascades. Microplanning, network-based recruitment and mobile-phone interventions can also help reach and support sex workers to mobilize and to engage with a range of services. Sex worker-led groups and initiatives including economic strengthening and community drug refill groups can both build social cohesion and address structural barriers to HIV outcomes including financial insecurity. Interventions which focus narrowly on increasing uptake of specific steps in prevention and care cascades outside the context of broader community empowerment responses are likely to be less effective. SUMMARY: Comprehensive, community-driven approaches where sex workers mobilize to address their structural, behavioral and biomedical priorities work across HIV prevention and treatment cascades to increase uptake of and engagement with prevention and care technologies and promote broader health and human rights. These interventions need to be adequately supported and taken to scale.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review the recent evidence regarding strategies for engaging sex workers in HIV prevention and care programs. We searched Pub Med on 19 March 2019 using terms 'Sex Work' And 'HIV infections'. Our search was limited to articles published since 2017. RECENT FINDINGS: Community empowerment approaches where sex workers work collaboratively to address their specific priorities and concerns, including those beyond HIV, are those most likely to meaningfully engage sex workers. Community-driven programs that combine structural, behavioral and biomedical approaches can facilitate improved HIV outcomes by tackling barriers to uptake and retention of services along all steps in the prevention and care cascades. Microplanning, network-based recruitment and mobile-phone interventions can also help reach and support sex workers to mobilize and to engage with a range of services. Sex worker-led groups and initiatives including economic strengthening and community drug refill groups can both build social cohesion and address structural barriers to HIV outcomes including financial insecurity. Interventions which focus narrowly on increasing uptake of specific steps in prevention and care cascades outside the context of broader community empowerment responses are likely to be less effective. SUMMARY: Comprehensive, community-driven approaches where sex workers mobilize to address their structural, behavioral and biomedical priorities work across HIV prevention and treatment cascades to increase uptake of and engagement with prevention and care technologies and promote broader health and human rights. These interventions need to be adequately supported and taken to scale.
Authors: Zoé Mistrale Hendrickson; Anna M Leddy; Noya Galai; S Wilson Beckham; Wendy Davis; Jessie K Mbwambo; Samuel Likindikoki; Deanna L Kerrigan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joseph Kamanga; Kayla Stankevitz; Andres Martinez; Robert Chiegil; Lameck Nyirenda; Florence Mulenga; Mario Chen; Mulamuli Mpofu; Sam Lubasi; Moses Bateganya Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: George Ayala; Laurel Sprague; L Leigh-Ann van der Merwe; Ruth Morgan Thomas; Judy Chang; Sonya Arreola; Sara L M Davis; Aditia Taslim; Keith Mienies; Alessandra Nilo; Lillian Mworeko; Felicita Hikuam; Carlos Garcia de Leon Moreno; José Antonio Izazola-Licea Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: S Wilson Beckham; Andrea Mantsios; Noya Galai; Samuel Likindikoki; Jessie Mbwambo; Wendy Davis; Deanna Kerrigan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.006