Literature DB >> 31219303

Measuring task set preparation versus mind wandering using pupillometry.

Keith A Hutchison1, Chad C Moffitt1, Katie Hart1, Audrey V B Hood1, Jason M Watson1, Frank M Marchak1.   

Abstract

We investigated participants' task set preparation by measuring changes in pupil diameter during a blank interval as they prepared for an easy (i.e., prosaccade) or difficult (i.e., antisaccade) trial. We used occasional thought probes to gauge "on-task" thoughts versus mind wandering. In both studies, participants' pupil diameters were larger when anticipating an antisaccade, relative to a prosaccade, trial. In contrast, their self-reported mind wandering depended upon whether the thought probes occurred after their target detection response (Experiment 1) or occurred in lieu of target detection (Experiment 2). In the latter case, self-reported mind wandering echoed the pupil diameter changes in demonstrating greater off-task behavior when preparing for a prosaccade trial. More important, trial type effects in pupil diameter emerged only when participants reported being "on-task," but disappeared during periods of mind wandering. These results demonstrate that changes in pupil diameter reflect the degree of preparatory control exerted for an upcoming trial, but only when attention is actively focused on the upcoming task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31219303     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  3 in total

1.  Patience is a virtue: Individual differences in cue-evoked pupil responses under temporal certainty.

Authors:  Audrey V B Hood; Katherine M Hart; Frank M Marchak; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.

Authors:  Lou Seropian; Mathieu Ferschneider; Fanny Cholvy; Christophe Micheyl; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Annie Moulin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Matthew S Welhaf; Natalie E Phillips
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.