| Literature DB >> 31219230 |
Weixia Gao1,2, Yulian He3, Fang Zhang1, Fengjie Zhao1, Chao Huang1, Yiting Zhang1, Qiang Zhao2, Shufang Wang2, Chao Yang1.
Abstract
Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) is a biocompatible and biodegradable polypeptide with wide-ranging applications in foods, cosmetics, medicine, agriculture and wastewater treatment. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LL3 can produce γ-PGA from sucrose that can be obtained easily from sugarcane and sugar beet. In our previous work, it was found that low intracellular glutamate concentration was the limiting factor for γ-PGA production by LL3. In this study, the γ-PGA synthesis by strain LL3 was enhanced by chromosomally engineering its glutamate metabolism-relevant networks. First, the downstream metabolic pathways were partly blocked by deleting fadR, lysC, aspB, pckA, proAB, rocG and gudB. The resulting strain NK-A6 synthesized 4.84 g l-1 γ-PGA, with a 31.5% increase compared with strain LL3. Second, a strong promoter PC 2up was inserted into the upstream of icd gene, to generate strain NK-A7, which further led to a 33.5% improvement in the γ-PGA titre, achieving 6.46 g l-1 . The NADPH level was improved by regulating the expression of pgi and gndA. Third, metabolic evolution was carried out to generate strain NK-A9E, which showed a comparable γ-PGA titre with strain NK-A7. Finally, the srf and itu operons were deleted respectively, from the original strains NK-A7 and NK-A9E. The resulting strain NK-A11 exhibited the highest γ-PGA titre (7.53 g l-1 ), with a 2.05-fold improvement compared with LL3. The results demonstrated that the approaches described here efficiently enhanced γ-PGA production in B. amyloliquefaciens fermentation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31219230 PMCID: PMC6680638 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Figure 1The metabolic pathway designed for improving the titre of γ‐PGA and key metabolic engineering strategies in B. amyloliquefaciens LL3Δupp strain. Thick green arrows indicate overexpression of the relevant genes by stronger promoter insertion in one's upstream in the chromosome. The red ‘X’ indicates deletion of the corresponding gene. The blue ‘T’ indicates suppression of the genes via weaker promoter replacement in the chromosome. The red ‘T’ indicates suppression of the relevant gene using sRNAs. The structure of the anti‐argJ‐purF sRNA expression vector, pWH‐sargJ‐spurF is shown beside the metabolic pathway.
Figure 2A. Transformation efficiency of B. amyloliquefaciens LL3Δupp (control strain), LL3ΔBamR (NK‐A0), LL3Δ4074P, LL3ΔBamRΔ4074P. pKSU and pWH1520 were extracted from E. coli JM110 without any treatment in vitro, and pKSU‐BM and pWH1520‐BM were treated by Bam HI transmethylase after extracted from E.coli JM110.
B. Comparison of DCW and γ‐PGA yield of the wild‐type strain and the mutant strains after 48 h of cultivation in the fermentation medium. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the error bars denote standard deviation of the mean.
Figure 3Comparison of γ‐PGA production (A), γ‐PGA‐specific production (B) and intracellular glutamate concentration (C), among NK‐A0, NK‐A1 (NK‐A0 ΔfadR), NK‐A2 (NK‐A1 ΔlysC), NK‐A3 (NK‐A2 Δpro), NK‐A4 (NK‐A3 ΔgudB) and NK‐A5 (NK‐A4 ΔrocG) after 20, 37 and 48 h of cultivation in the fermentation medium. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the error bars denote standard deviation of the mean.
Figure 4Comparison of γ‐PGA production (A), intracellular glutamate concentration (B), cell growth (C) and γ‐PGA‐specific production (D) among NK‐A5, NK‐A6 (NK‐A5 ΔpckA) and NK‐A7 (NK‐A6 P 2up‐icd) after 20, 37 and 48 h of cultivation in the fermentation medium. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the error bars denote standard deviation of the mean.
Figure 5Comparison of γ‐PGA production (A), intracellular glutamate concentration (B) among NK‐A7, NK‐A8 (NK‐A7 P‐pgi) and NK‐A9E (NK‐A8 P 2up‐gndA, with evolution) after 20, 37 and 48 h of cultivation in the fermentation medium; (C) comparison of the ratio of NADPH/NADP + among NK‐A0 (control strain), NK‐A5, NK‐A7, NK‐A9E at early stationary phase; (D) comparison of culture viscosity among all of the mutants after fermentation for 48 h. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the error bars denote standard deviation of the mean.
Figure 6Comparison of relevant genes’ transcription levels among LL3Δupp, NK‐A7, NK‐A9 and NK‐A9E. The numbers are the ratios of the expression levels in the mutant strains vs. LL3Δupp. The first row represents the ratios in LB medium, while the second row represents those in fermentation medium. The first/second/third number of the row reflects the gene transcription levels of NK‐A7/NK‐A9/NK‐A9E respectively. The blue shaded numbers indicate significantly up‐ and down‐regulated genes in NK‐A9E, compared with those in NK‐A9. Data represent the mean values of triplicate measurements from three independent experiments. The standard deviation is not shown in the figure due to the limited space.
Figure 7Comparison of γ‐PGA production (A) and cell growth (B), among NK‐A7, NK‐A10 (NK‐A7 Δitu), NK‐A11 (NK‐A7 Δsrf), NK‐A9E and NK‐A12 (NK‐A9E Δitu) after 37 and 48 h of cultivation in the fermentation medium. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the error bars denote standard deviation of the mean.
Plasmids and strains used in this study
| Plasmids or strains | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Plasmids | ||
| pKSU | pKSV7 carrying the | Zhang |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of gene | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of gene | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of gene | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of gene | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of genes | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of gene cluster | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of genes | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of gene | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of gene | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU derivative for in‐frame deletion of gene | This study |
| pKSU‐C2‐ | pKSU derivative containing C2‐up promoter flanked by upstream and downstream regions of | This study |
| pKSU‐A2‐ | pKSU derivative containing A2‐up promoter flanked by upstream and downstream regions of | This study |
| pKSU‐P | pKSU derivative containing P | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU carrying a mutant copy of the | This study |
| pKSU‐Δ | pKSU carrying a mutant copy of the | This study |
| pWH1520 | Tcr; xylose inducible expression vector for | MoBiTec |
| pWH1520‐s | pWH1520 derivative carrying anti‐ | This work |
| Strains | ||
|
| ||
| LL3Δ | LL3 carrying an in‐frame deletion in the | Zhang |
| LL3Δ | LL3 Δ | This study |
| LL3Δ | LL3Δ | This study |
| LL3Δ | LL3Δ | This study |
| NK‐A0 | LL3Δ | This study |
| LL3‐s | NK‐A0 derivative with expression plasmid pWH1520‐s | This study |
| NK‐A1 | NK‐A0 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A2 | NK‐A1 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A3 | NK‐A2 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A3‐2 | NK‐A2 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A4 | NK‐A3‐1 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A5 | NK‐A4 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A5‐2 | NK‐A4 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A6 | NK‐A5 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A7 | NK‐A6 derivative, overexpression of | This study |
| NK‐A8 | NK‐A7 derivative, suppression of | This study |
| NK‐A9 | NK‐A8 derivative, overexpression of | This study |
| NK‐A9E | NK‐A9 derivative, expression of anti‐argJ and anti‐purF sRNA under the control of promoter PxylA | This study |
| NK‐A10 | NK‐A7 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A11 | NK‐A7 derivative, Δ | This study |
| NK‐A12 | NK‐A9E derivative, Δ | This study |
|
| ||
| DH5α |
| TransGen |
| JM110 | F−
| Fermentas |