Literature DB >> 31219229

The effect of early mobilization in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis.

Kui Zang1, Beibei Chen1, Min Wang1, Doudou Chen1, Liangliang Hui1, Shiguang Guo1, Ting Ji1, Futai Shang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess if early mobilization and rehabilitation in the intensive care unit (ICU) could reduce ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), improve functional recovery, improve muscle strength, shorten the length of ICU and hospital stays, and reduce the mortality rate.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed (Chinese BioMedical Literature Service System, China), and National Knowledge Infrastructure, China (CNKI) was performed. Results were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) or weight mean difference (WMD) with 95% CIs. Pooled estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model according to the heterogeneity among studies.
RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials involving a total of 1941 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled estimates suggested that early mobilization significantly reduced the incidence of ICU-AW (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.91; P = .025), shortened the length of ICU (WMD = -1.82 days, 95% CI: -2.88, -0.76; P = .001) and hospital (WMD = -3.90 days, 95% CI: -5.94, -1.85; P < .001) stays, and improved the Medical Research Council score (WMD = 4.47, 95% CI: 1.43, 7.52; P = .004) and Barthel Index score at hospital discharge (WMD = 21.44, 95% CI: 10.97, 31.91; P < .001). Moreover, early mobilization also decreased complications such as deep vein thrombosis (RR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.59; P = .006), ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.63; P = .003), and pressure sores (RR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.44; P = .001). However, early mobilization did not reduce the ICU mortality rate (RR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.76; P = .074), improve the handgrip strength (WMD = 4.03 kg, 95% CI: -0.68, 8.74; P = .094), and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD = 0.20 days, 95% CI: -0.10, 0.50; P = .194).
CONCLUSION: This study indicated that early mobilization was effective in preventing the occurrence of ICU-AW, shortening the length of ICU and hospital stay, and improving the functional mobility. However, it had no effect on the ICU mortality rate and ventilator-free days. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: ICU-AW is a common neuromuscular complication of critical illness, and it is predictive of adverse outcomes. Early mobilization of critically ill patients is a candidate intervention to reduce the incidence and severity of ICU-AW. Some clinical studies have demonstrated this, whereas others found opposite results. The aim of our study is to assess if early mobilization and rehabilitation in the ICU could reduce the ICU-AW, improve functional recovery, improve muscle strength, shorten length of ICU and hospital stay, and reduce the mortality rate.
© 2019 British Association of Critical Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early mobilization; intensive care unit; meta-analysis; rehabilitation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31219229     DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Crit Care        ISSN: 1362-1017            Impact factor:   2.325


  20 in total

1.  A retrospective study of physiotherapy management for patients with pneumonia requiring invasive ventilation in a single-center Australian ICU.

Authors:  Baldwin Pok Man Kwan; Anne-Marie Hill; Mercedes Elliott; Lisa van der Lee
Journal:  Hong Kong Physiother J       Date:  2022-04-06

2.  Effects of Early Bedside Cycle Exercise on Gastrointestinal Function in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

Authors:  Tingting Yu; Fuliang Cai; Rong Jiang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 3.  Effectiveness, Safety, and Barriers to Early Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Gopala Krishna Alaparthi; Aishwarya Gatty; Stephen Rajan Samuel; Sampath Kumar Amaravadi
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2020-11-26

4.  Beliefs, attitudes and knowledge of cardiovascular healthcare providers on mobilization.

Authors:  Caroline Najjar; Diana Dima; Jane de Boer; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-02-05

5.  Can an early mobilisation programme prevent hospital-acquired pressure injures in an intensive care unit?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leticia Nieto-García; Adela Carpio-Pérez; María Teresa Moreiro-Barroso; Montserrat Alonso-Sardón
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Early Mobilization in a PICU: A Qualitative Sustainability Analysis of PICU Up!

Authors:  Ruchit V Patel; Juliana Redivo; Archana Nelliot; Michelle N Eakin; Beth Wieczorek; Julie Quinn; Ayse P Gurses; Michele C Balas; Dale M Needham; Sapna R Kudchadkar
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.971

7.  Systematic early versus late mobilization or standard early mobilization in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dominik Menges; Bianca Seiler; Yuki Tomonaga; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Milo A Puhan; Henock G Yebyo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Can AM-PAC "6-Clicks" Inpatient Functional Assessment Scores Strengthen Hospital 30-Day Readmission Prevention Strategies?

Authors:  Scott M Arnold; James M Naessens; Kimberly McVeigh; Launia J White; James W Atchison; James Tompkins
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-12

9.  Early versus delayed mobilization for in-hospital mortality and health-related quality of life among critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yohei Okada; Takeshi Unoki; Yujiro Matsuishi; Yuko Egawa; Kei Hayashida; Shigeaki Inoue
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2019-12-09

10.  Effect of Early Mobilization on Physical Function in Patients after Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuji Kanejima; Takayuki Shimogai; Masahiro Kitamura; Kodai Ishihara; Kazuhiro P Izawa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.