Literature DB >> 31219078

Mismatch amplification mutation assay-polymerase chain reaction: A method of detecting fluoroquinolone resistance mechanism in bacterial pathogens.

Vijaya Kumar Deekshit1, Kadeeja Jazeela1, Gunimala Chakraborty1, Anusha Rohit2, Anirban Chakraborty1, Indrani Karunasagar3.   

Abstract

The mismatch amplification assay is a modified version of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) that permits specific amplification of gene sequences with single base pair change. The basis of the technique relies on primer designing. The single nucleotide mismatch at the 3' proximity of the reverse oligonucleotide primer makes Taq DNA polymerase unable to carry out extension process. Thus, the primers produce a PCR fragment in the wild type, whereas it is not possible to yield a product with a mutation at the site covered by the mismatch positions on the mismatch amplification mutation assay (MAMA) primer from any gene. The technique offers several advantages over other molecular methods, such as PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and oligonucleotide hybridization, which is routinely used in the detection of known point mutations. Since multiple point mutations in the quinolone resistance determining region play a major role in high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, the MAMA-PCR technique is preferred for detecting these mutations over PCR-RFLP and sequencing technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluoroquinolone resistance; mismatch amplification mutation assay; polymerase chain reaction; quinolone resistance determining region mutations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31219078      PMCID: PMC6563742          DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2091_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Res        ISSN: 0971-5916            Impact factor:   2.375


Introduction

The PCR is a powerful standard tool for the in vitro amplification of specific DNA sequences in molecular biology. In the allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) the modification allows the specific amplification of DNA sequences with single-point mutation with the help of reverse primer harbouring a mismatch at the 3’ end; hence, it is also widely known as mismatch amplification mutation assay-PCR (MAMA-PCR). The technique was well established and experimented in the late 1980s in the detection of point mutation of several disease conditions, such as German familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy type II1 and sickle cell anemia2. Over the years, many methods have been developed to detect such mutations34. The MAMA-PCR technique is also widely used for the detection of point mutations in the quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs) of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacterial pathogens5678. Fluoroquinolones are the drug of choice for most of the urinary tract infections caused by bacterial pathogens. However, resistance to these drugs has been frequently reported and further resulted in treatment failures. Fluoroquinolones are synthetic class of antibacterials that act on both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV and have many clinical applications. Topoisomerases play a prominent role in DNA replication where DNA gyrase or topoisomerase II (2 gyrA and 2 gyrB subunits) introduces negative supercoils into DNA and topoisomerase IV (2 parC and 2 parE subunits) responsible for removing the interlinking structure between the two newly produced DNA strands during replication9. Mutations in the QRDR of bacterial pathogens inhibit the binding of fluoroquinolone to DNA and enzyme (topoisomerase targets) complex and are the major cause of fluoroquinolone resistance. Hence, it is important to identify these mutations to introduce suitable therapeutic strategies in severe bacterial infections. Several point mutations in QRDR have been attributed to fluoroquinolone resistance in bacterial pathogens. These mutations are found most frequently in the Ser 83 and Asp 87 codons of the gyrA and Ser 80 and Glu 84 codons of parC in Escherichia coli as well as in other microorganisms101112. Although sequencing technique is the most appropriate method for identifying point mutations in any gene, its high cost and extensive process have led to the development of cost-effective methods such as MAMA-PCR and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). The modified MAMA techniques have also been successfully applied to viruses13 and eukaryotic species14. However, the specificity of oligonucleotide primers designed for MAMA-PCR is still a challenge for the development of this protocol for use in disease diagnosis.

Principle of MAMA-PCR

MAMA-PCR works on the principle of standard PCR in which amplification of target DNA sequences is mainly facilitated by the oligonucleotide reverse primer with single nucleotide mismatch at the 3’ end. A single primer-template mismatch at the 3’ proximity of oligonucleotide primer just before the last nucleotide will have little or no effect on the amplification of genes during PCR provided there is no mutation in the target gene. Thus, wild-type genes can be amplified efficiently6. However, a point mutation in the target gene will create additional mismatch with the oligonucleotide primer during the amplification process. The mismatch generated at the 3’-OH end makes Taq DNA polymerase unable to extend the primer for further amplification. Hence, the gene with point a mutation generates double mismatch at 3’-OH end is responsible for inhibition of the PCR amplification process15 (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Principle of the mismatch amplification mutation assay-polymerase chain reaction.

Principle of the mismatch amplification mutation assay-polymerase chain reaction.

Primer designing protocol

The MAMA-PCR primers can be designed either to amplify the region with specific mutations and no amplification for wild types516 or wild types can be amplified and no PCR product can be generated in the case of point mutations at specific sites617. The primers are carefully designed considering all aspects such as specificity and sensitivity of the technique using Primer3 software (). One forward primer and two reverse primers are used for PCR amplification. The normal forward and reverse primers are used to amplify the gene in both mutant and wild types and the second reverse primer will act as a MAMA reverse primer with single nucleotide mismatch at 3’ end (Fig. 2). For detecting QRDR mutations, the method usually follows a duplex PCR technique wherein two bands can be obtained in wild type and a single band can be seen in mutant version same gene9.
Fig. 2

Illustration of mismatch amplification mutation assay-polymerase chain reaction primers for gyrA (A) and parC (B) mutation detection. The underlined nucleotides are mismatched nucleotides at 3’ end of each mismatch amplification mutation assay primer. The amino acid found in the native protein and the changed amino acid due to point mutation are indicated above the corresponding nucleotide sequences.

Illustration of mismatch amplification mutation assay-polymerase chain reaction primers for gyrA (A) and parC (B) mutation detection. The underlined nucleotides are mismatched nucleotides at 3’ end of each mismatch amplification mutation assay primer. The amino acid found in the native protein and the changed amino acid due to point mutation are indicated above the corresponding nucleotide sequences.

Preparation of bacterial DNA and MAMA-PCR protocol

Bacterial DNA isolation can be done by using cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method described by Ausubel18. The quantification of DNA is generally performed by spectrophotometric measurement of the absorption at 260 nm. A common MAMA-PCR 30 μl volumes of master mix contains 3 μl of 10× Taq buffer, 83 μM of each of the four deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, 30 pmol of forward primer, 20 pmol of MAMA reverse primer, 10 pmol control reverse primer and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase with 2 μl of template DNA. The MAMA-PCR cycling conditions commonly starts with an initial dissociation step at 95°C for 5 min to ensure the complete separation of the DNA strands followed by initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min and 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C, annealing at required temperature (55-65°C) and extension at 72°C each for 40 sec, respectively. A final extension step of 5-10 min at 72°C ensures complete extension of all amplicons. To measure the success of PCR amplification, 8-10 μl of PCR product with gel loading buffer is run on 2 per cent agarose gel pre-stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml) in 1× TAE buffer and observed under ultraviolet light in a gel documentation system to confirm the results.

Modifications of MAMA-PCR

Melt MAMA-PCR is the modification of MAMA-PCR that utilizes labelled two AS primers with a mismatch at the 3’ end. One of the AS primers also differs with GC clamp at the 5’ end to increase the melting temperature of the corresponding amplicons to enable the easy differentiation of AS-PCR products through melt curve analysis19. AS probe and primer amplification assay-PCR technique uses four AS TaqMan MGB probes along with mismatched AS primers and a common forward primer. These primers selectively amplify each allele in independent runs of real-time PCR, resulting in fluorescence corresponding to the increased DNA concentration20. AS blocker-PCR is an improvement of AS-PCR so that amplification of primer-template mismatches would be suppressed. The shortened mutant AS primer at the 5’ end reduced the Tm (melting temperature) and a second blocking oligonucleotide is complementary to the wild type but phosphorylated at 3’ end to prevent extension and suppresses non-specific amplification of wild types with AS primers21.

Comparison of MAMA-PCR with other methods

MAMA-PCR is one of the rapid, simple and cost-effective methods for the detection of known single-point mutations in the QRDRs of fluoroquinolone resistance bacterial pathogens. Although the methods such as gene sequencing and PCR-RFLP can be used for the detection and analysis of point mutations, the importance of MAMA-PCR over gene sequencing can be justified when a large number of bacterial isolates need to be screened for resistance characteristics during epidemiologic investigations. Further, PCR-RFLP can be used only if the point mutations generate or abolish the restriction site for the available restriction enzymes. A precise comparison of all these methods is shown in Table.
Table

Comparison of different methods used for the detection of point mutations

MethodsConceptAdvantagesLimitations
MAMA-PCRAn oligonucleotide with single mismatch binds weakly to its imperfect complementSingle step, rapid, sensitive and specific method for single base pair substitution, can used to screen large number of samplesCan be used to identify only the known mutations, a specific primer is needed for detecting each mutation
PCR-RFLPTwo-step method involving uniplex PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphismTwo-step, sensitive and specific method, utilizes restriction enzymesDepends on the efficiency of restriction enzyme digestion, all possible point mutations cannot be detected due to the absence of restriction sites
DNA sequencingProcess of determining the precise order of nucleotides using automated techniquesMore accurate, specific, enables the detection of mutation at unknown siteCost and time intensive

MAMA-PCR, mismatch amplification mutation assay-polymerase chain reaction; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism

Comparison of different methods used for the detection of point mutations MAMA-PCR, mismatch amplification mutation assay-polymerase chain reaction; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism

Conclusion

Emergence of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens is a cause of concern and can be a serious public health threat. Point mutations in the specific genes are found to be the main reason responsible for the increased resistance to some otherwise potent antimicrobial agents in microorganisms. Hence, the MAMA-PCR technique may serve as a powerful tool to identify these point mutations in a large population of microorganisms.
  20 in total

1.  4-Quinolone resistance mutations in the DNA gyrase of Escherichia coli clinical isolates identified by using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  M Oram; L M Fisher
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Multiple Antimicrobial Resistance and Novel Point Mutation in Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from Mangalore, India.

Authors:  Kogaluru Shivakumaraswamy Santhosh; Vijaya Kumar Deekshit; Moleyuru Nagarajappa Venugopal; Iddya Karunasagar; Indrani Karunasagar
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.431

3.  Interleukin-28B genotyping by melt-mismatch amplification mutation assay PCR analysis using single nucleotide polymorphisms rs12979860 and rs8099917, a useful tool for prediction of therapy response in hepatitis C patients.

Authors:  Salvador Fonseca-Coronado; Gilberto Vaughan; Mayra Yolanda Cruz-Rivera; Juan Carlos Carpio-Pedroza; Karina Ruiz-Tovar; Juan Alberto Ruiz-Pacheco; Alejandro Escobar-Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Allele-specific enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic DNA for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  D Y Wu; L Ugozzoli; B K Pal; R B Wallace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Individual single tube genotyping and DNA pooling by allele-specific PCR to uncover associations of polymorphisms with complex diseases.

Authors:  Antonio Casado-Díaz; Rafael Cuenca-Acevedo; José Manuel Quesada; Gabriel Dorado
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  The allele-specific probe and primer amplification assay, a new real-time PCR method for fine quantification of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in pooled DNA.

Authors:  A Billard; V Laval; S Fillinger; P Leroux; H Lachaise; R Beffa; D Debieu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Characterization of gyrA mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter coli by DNA sequence analysis and MAMA PCR.

Authors:  G Zirnstein; L Helsel; Y Li; B Swaminathan; J Besser
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  Use of a rapid mismatch PCR method to detect gyrA and parC mutations in ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Yan Zhi Qiang; Tong Qin; Wang Fu; Wu Pei Cheng; Yang Sheng Li; Gong Yi
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Comparison of Mismatch Amplification Mutation Assay PCR and PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism for Detection of Major Mutations in gyrA and parC of Escherichia coli Associated with Fluoroquinolone Resistance.

Authors:  Kadeeja Jazeela; Gunimala Chakraborty; Shruthi Seetharam Shetty; Anusha Rohit; Indrani Karunasagar; Deekshit Vijaya Kumar
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.431

10.  Mutation detection by real-time PCR: a simple, robust and highly selective method.

Authors:  John Morlan; Joffre Baker; Dominick Sinicropi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Mutations on PCR Assay Sequence Alignment.

Authors:  Daniel Antonio Negrón; June Kang; Shane Mitchell; Mitchell Y Holland; Stephen Wist; Jameson Voss; Lauren Brinkac; Katharine Jennings; Stephanie Guertin; Bruce G Goodwin; Shanmuga Sozhamannan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Development of a mismatch amplification mutation assay to correctly serotype isolates of Streptococcus suis serotypes 1, 2, 1/2, and 14.

Authors:  Sonia Lacouture; Masatoshi Okura; Daisuke Takamatsu; Lorelei Corsaut; Marcelo Gottschalk
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 1.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.