Literature DB >> 31218418

The impact of cervical lymph node dissection on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux after intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy following transthoracic esophagectomy.

Soichiro Asai1, Masahide Fukaya2, Kazushi Miyata1, Keita Itatsu1, Ryoji Miyahara3, Kazuhiro Furukawa3, Tomoki Ebata1, Masato Nagino1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cervical lymph node dissection on acid reflux and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) in patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients receiving transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction by intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy were divided into the following two groups: a two-field lymph node dissection group (2F group) and a three-field lymph node dissection group (3F group). All patients underwent 24-h pH and bilirubin monitoring and gastrointestinal endoscopy at 1 year after surgery. The 24-h pH and bilirubin monitoring results, endoscopic findings, and reflux symptoms were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: No acid reflux was observed in the 2F group, whereas it was observed in 6 (40%) patients in the 3F group (p = 0.007). DGER was found in 2 patients (13%) in the 2F group and in 8 (53%) in the 3F group (p = 0.023). Four patients (25%) in the 2F group and 9 (60%) in the 3F group (p = 0.048) had reflux esophagitis.
CONCLUSION: Cervical lymph node dissection increases acid reflux and DGER and can lead to an increase in the incidence of reflux esophagitis in patients undergoing intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical lymph node dissection; Duodenogastroesophageal reflux; Intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31218418     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01835-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of neck lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  H Kato; H Watanabe; Y Tachimori; T Iizuka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  The Impact of the Location of Esophagogastrostomy on Acid and Duodenogastroesophageal Reflux After Transthoracic Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction and Intrathoracic Esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Hiroaki Usui; Masahide Fukaya; Keita Itatsu; Kazushi Miyata; Ryoji Miyahara; Kohei Funasaka; Masato Nagino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Evaluation of dysphagia and diminished airway protection after three-field esophagectomy and a remedy.

Authors:  Takushi Yasuda; Masahiko Yano; Hiroshi Miyata; Makoto Yamasaki; Shuji Takiguchi; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Supraclavicular node metastasis from thoracic esophageal carcinoma: A surgical series from a Japanese multi-institutional nationwide registry of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Tachimori; Soji Ozawa; Hodaka Numasaki; Hisahiro Matsubara; Masayuki Shinoda; Yasushi Toh; Harushi Udagawa
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M F Vaezi; J E Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique.

Authors:  P Bechi; F Pucciani; F Baldini; F Cosi; R Falciai; R Mazzanti; A Castagnoli; A Passeri; S Boscherini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Outcomes of extended radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  T Nishimaki; T Suzuki; S Suzuki; S Kuwabara; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction after 2-field versus 3-field lymph node dissection in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Misuzu Nakamura; Yoshihiro Kido; Yoshinori Hosoya; Masahiko Yano; Hideo Nagai; Morito Monden
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility.

Authors:  J R Jamieson; H J Stein; T R DeMeester; L Bonavina; W Schwizer; R A Hinder; M Albertucci
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  H Fujita; T Kakegawa; H Yamana; I Shima; Y Toh; Y Tomita; T Fujii; K Yamasaki; K Higaki; T Noake
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.