Rachna Agarwal1, Rajesh Kumar Yadav1, Medha Mohta2, Meera Sikka3, Gita Radhakrishnan1. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur, Delhi, India. 2. Department of Anaesthesia, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur, Delhi, India. 3. Department of Pathology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur, Delhi, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Illness severity scores commonly used in critical care settings are not considered appropriate in obstetric practice as they do not account for pregnancy physiology. A new illness severity score called the 'Sepsis in Obstetrics Score' (SOS) was introduced by Albright et al. for triaging patients with sepsis in pregnancy in an emergency department setting. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether this score could predict the need for critical care support using the presence of organ failure as the identification criteria. Severity and culture positivity in pregnancy-associated sepsis was also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All pregnant, postabortal and postpartum women with suspected sepsis were enrolled (as per systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria) were enrolled. Severe pregnancy-associated sepsis was defined as dysfunction of one or more organs due to sepsis. The severity of pregnancy-associated sepsis was graded according to the number of organ failures. A SOS cut off of 6 was taken for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Out of 100 women with pregnancy-associated sepsis, 'severe sepsis' was present in 58%. When the SOS test performance was compared with the severity of pregnancy-associated sepsis, it had sensitivity of 68.9% and specificity of 80.9%, positive predictive value of 83% and negative predictive value 65% to predict severe sepsis. The area under curve for the SOS detecting severe pregnancy-associated sepsis was 0.810. SOS predicted organ failure in pregnancy-associated sepsis and this was statistically significant for all organs involved. Culture positivity did not correlate with the SOS in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis in Obstetrics Score correlated well with organ failure in pregnancy-associated sepsis. It had a high positive predictive value (83%) for severe sepsis.
BACKGROUND: Illness severity scores commonly used in critical care settings are not considered appropriate in obstetric practice as they do not account for pregnancy physiology. A new illness severity score called the 'Sepsis in Obstetrics Score' (SOS) was introduced by Albright et al. for triaging patients with sepsis in pregnancy in an emergency department setting. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether this score could predict the need for critical care support using the presence of organ failure as the identification criteria. Severity and culture positivity in pregnancy-associated sepsis was also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All pregnant, postabortal and postpartum women with suspected sepsis were enrolled (as per systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria) were enrolled. Severe pregnancy-associated sepsis was defined as dysfunction of one or more organs due to sepsis. The severity of pregnancy-associated sepsis was graded according to the number of organ failures. A SOS cut off of 6 was taken for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Out of 100 women with pregnancy-associated sepsis, 'severe sepsis' was present in 58%. When the SOS test performance was compared with the severity of pregnancy-associated sepsis, it had sensitivity of 68.9% and specificity of 80.9%, positive predictive value of 83% and negative predictive value 65% to predict severe sepsis. The area under curve for the SOS detecting severe pregnancy-associated sepsis was 0.810. SOS predicted organ failure in pregnancy-associated sepsis and this was statistically significant for all organs involved. Culture positivity did not correlate with the SOS in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis in Obstetrics Score correlated well with organ failure in pregnancy-associated sepsis. It had a high positive predictive value (83%) for severe sepsis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Illness severity scores; Sepsis in Obstetrics Score; sepsis
Authors: Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Catherine M Albright; Tariq N Ali; Vrishali Lopes; Dwight J Rouse; Brenna L Anderson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Alice B R Aarvold; Helen M Ryan; Laura A Magee; Peter von Dadelszen; Chris Fjell; Keith R Walley Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 7.598