Literature DB >> 31217755

The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?

Paul A Oakley1, Niousha Navid Ehsani1, Deed E Harrison2.   

Abstract

X-rays have been the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of spinal scoliosis for decades as other assessment methods are indirect, too expensive, or not practical in practice. The average scoliosis patient will receive 10 to 25 spinal X-rays over several years equating to a maximum estimated dose of 10 to 25 mGy. Some patients, those getting diagnosed at a younger age and receiving early and ongoing treatments, may receive up to 40 to 50 X-rays, approaching at most 50 mGy. There are concerns that repeated radiographs given to patients are carcinogenic. Some studies have used the linear no-threshold model to derive cancer-risk estimates; however, it is invalid for low-dose irradiation (ie, X-rays); these estimates are untrue. Other studies have calculated cancer-risk ratios from long-term health data of historic scoliosis cohorts. Since data indicate reduced cancer rates in a cohort receiving a total radiation dose between 50 and 300 mGy, it is unlikely that scoliosis patients would get cancer from repeated X-rays. Moreover, since the threshold for leukemia is about 1100 mGy, scoliosis patients will not likely develop cancers from spinal X-rays. Scoliosis patients likely have long-term health consequences, including cancers, from the actual disease entity itself and not from protracted X-ray radiation exposures that are essential and indeed safe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LNT; X-ray; cobb angle; dose threshold; radiogenic cancer; scoliosis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31217755      PMCID: PMC6560808          DOI: 10.1177/1559325819852810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  13 in total

1.  How frequent should the radiographic examination be to monitor magnetically controlled growing rods? A retrospective look two to seven years postoperatively.

Authors:  Altug Yucekul; Hatice Tanriover; Kadir Abul; Ashfaq Ahmed; Tais Zulemyan; Caglar Yilgor; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of Posture Parameters in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis with the Use of 3D Ultrasound Diagnostics-Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Sandra Trzcińska; Michał Kuszewski; Kamil Koszela
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  The reduction of high thoracic scoliosis in adults by mirror image® blocking: a Chiropractic BioPhysics® case series.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Sean Z Kallan; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2022-06-06

4.  Non-surgical reduction of lumbar hyperlordosis, forward sagittal balance and sacral tilt to relieve low back pain by Chiropractic BioPhysics® methods: a case report.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Niousha Navid Ehsani; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2019-10-19

5.  Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Are Restrictive Medical Radiation Imaging Campaigns Misguided? It Seems So: A Case Example of the American Chiropractic Association's Adoption of "Choosing Wisely".

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Reduction of thoraco-lumbar junctional kyphosis, posterior sagittal balance, and increase of lumbar lordosis and sacral inclination by Chiropractic BioPhysics® methods in an adolescent with back pain: a case report.

Authors:  Christopher M Gubbels; Joshua T Werner; Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2019-10-19

8.  X-ray Hesitancy-Response to Jargin and Sohrabi.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery.

Authors:  P R Loughenbury; S L Gentles; E J Murphy; J E Tomlinson; V H Borse; R A Dunsmuir; N W Gummerson; P A Millner; A S Rao; E Rowbotham; A L Khan
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-03-03

10.  3D ultrasound imaging provides reliable angle measurement with validity comparable to X-ray in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy Tin-Yan Lee; Kelly Ka-Lee Lai; Jack Chun-Yiu Cheng; René Marten Castelein; Tsz-Ping Lam; Yong-Ping Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.