| Literature DB >> 31216617 |
Xinqi Hu1, Hongqi Wang2, Yi Zhu3, Gang Xie4, Huijian Shi5.
Abstract
Spatial patterns of water quality trends for 45 stations in control units of the Shandong Province, China during 2009-2017 were examined by a non-parametric seasonal Mann-Kendall's test (SMK) for dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), permanganate index (CODMn), total phosphorus (TP) and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N). The DO concentration showed significant upward trends at approximately half of the stations, while other parameters showed significant downward trends at more than 40% of stations. The stations with downward trends presented significant spatial autocorrelation, and were mainly concentrated in the northwest and southwest regions. The relationship between the landscape characteristics and water quality was explored using stepwise multiple regression models, which indicated the water quality was better explained using landscape pattern metrics compared to the percentage of land use types. Decreased mean patch area and connectedness of farmland will promote the control of BOD, COD and CODMn, whereas the increased landscape percentage of urban areas were not conducive to the water quality improvement, which suggested the sprawling of farmland and urban land was not beneficial to pollution control. Increasing the grassland area was conducive to the reduction of pollutants, while the effect of grassland fragmentation was reversed.Entities:
Keywords: landscape patterns; spatial analysis; water quality management; water quality trends
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31216617 PMCID: PMC6617499 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16122149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Location of water quality monitoring stations and control units.
Figure 2Land use classification of the Shandong province in 2010, 2015, 2018.
Abbreviations and descriptions of landscape configuration metrics.
| Metrics Category | Landscape Metrics | Abbreviation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Area and Edge metrics | Mean Patch Area | AREA_MN | The average mean surface of patches |
| Total Class Area | CA | Measures the total area of all patches of the corresponding patch type | |
| Percentage of Landscape | PLAND | Proportion of the landscape occupied by patch type | |
| Largest Patch Index | LPI | Area of the largest patch of the corresponding patch type | |
| Edge Density | ED | Total length of all edge segments, divided by the total landscape area | |
| Shape metrics | Area-Weighted Mean Shape Index | SHAPE_AM | A larger value of SHAPE_AM means the area is more complex and irregular in shape |
| Area-Weighted Mean Fractal Dimension Index | FRAC_AM | Fractal dimension: ratio of perimeter per unit area. Increases as patches become more irregular | |
| Aggregation metrics | Mean Euclidean nearest-neighbor distance | ENN_MN | The average distance to the nearest neighboring patch of the same type |
| Interspersion and juxtaposition index | IJI | Proximity of patches in each class. High values correspond to proportionate distribution of patch type adjacencies | |
| Landscape Shape Index | LSI | A standardized measure of total edge or edge density that adjusts for the size of the landscape. | |
| Patch Cohesion Index | COHESION | Patch cohesion index at the class level measures the physical connectedness of the corresponding patch type. | |
| Patch Density | PD | Number of patches per 100 ha |
Figure 3Temporal trends observed upon seasonal Mann-Kendall’s (SMK) testing for water quality parameters at 45 monitoring stations during 2009–2017.
Z values of Global Moran’s I spatial autocorrelation of the trend.
| Index | DO | CODMn | BOD | NH3-N | COD | TP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z values | 4.56 ** | 2.23 * | 3.40 ** | 2.28 * | 4.68 ** | 0.73 |
| Moran’s Index | 0.511 | 0.24 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.53 | 0.06 |
* Significant at the 0.05 level. ** Significant at the 0.01 level.
Figure 4Spatial distribution of Local Moran’s I for water quality trends at 45 monitoring stations.
Figure 5Spatial variations in water quality current status at 45 control units in wet and dry season from 2015 to 2017 (A: the variation of DO in Dry Season; B: the variation of DO in Wet Season; C: the variation of BOD in Dry Season; D: the variation of BOD in Wet Season; E: the variation of COD in Dry Season; F: the variation of COD in Wet Season; G: the variation of CODMn in Dry Season; H: the variation of CODMn in Wet Season; I: the variation of NH3-N in Dry Season; J: the variation of NH3-N in Wet Season; K: the variation of TP in Dry Season; L: the variation of TP in Wet Season).
National quality standards for surface waters in China (GB3838-2002).
| Parameters | Firs Level | Second Level | Third Level | Fourth Level | Fifth Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DO | ≥7.5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| BOD | ≤3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| COD | ≤15 | 15 | 20 | 30 | 40 |
| CODMn | ≤2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 15 |
| NH3-N | ≤0.15 | 0.5 | 1 | 105 | 2 |
| TP | ≤0.02 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
Pearson correlation coefficients between land use types and water quality.
| Parameters | Season | Farmland | Forest | Grassland | Water | Urban Land |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DO | dry | 0.035 | 0.008 | 0.213 | 0.114 | −0.456 ** |
| wet | −0.196 | 0.262 | 0.340 * | 0.317 * | −0.514 ** | |
| CODMn | dry | 0.304 * | −0.26 | −0.407 ** | −0.138 | 0.291 |
| wet | 0.213 | −0.185 | −0.301 * | −0.15 | 0.249 | |
| BOD | dry | 0.299 * | −0.221 | −0.375 * | −0.323 * | 0.233 |
| wet | 0.373 * | −0.279 | −0.408 ** | −0.375 * | 0.213 | |
| COD | dry | 0.374 * | −0.234 | −0.419 ** | −0.216 | 0.119 |
| wet | 0.347 * | −0.224 | −0.414 ** | −0.239 | 0.173 | |
| NH3-N | dry | −0.008 | 0.02 | −0.286 | −0.111 | 0.439 ** |
| wet | −0.088 | 0.087 | −0.226 | −0.04 | 0.426 ** | |
| TP | dry | 0.037 | 0.011 | −0.252 | −0.046 | 0.288 |
| wet | 0.082 | −0.006 | −0.245 | −0.026 | 0.19 |
* Significant at the 0.05 level. ** Significant at the 0.01 level.
Regression analysis of water quality parameters and land use percentage.
| Parameters | Season | Function | R2 | Fsig | VIFmax |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DO | dry | −0.456UR | 0.189 | 0.002 | 1 |
| wet | −0.491UR + 0.275WA | 0.308 | 0 | 1.007 | |
| CODMn | dry | −0.407GR | 0.146 | 0.006 | 1 |
| wet | −0.301GR | 0.070 | 0.044 | 1 | |
| BOD | dry | −0.365GR − 0.312WA | 0.202 | 0.003 | 1.001 |
| wet | −0.397GR − 0.362WA | 0.265 | 0.001 | 1.001 | |
| COD | dry | −0.419GR | 0.156 | 0.004 | 1 |
| wet | −0.414GR | 0.152 | 0.005 | 1 | |
| NH3-N | dry | 0.439UR | 0.174 | 0.003 | 1 |
| wet | 0.426UR | 0.162 | 0.004 | 1 | |
| TP | dry | — | — | — | — |
| wet | — | — | — | — |
WA: water; UR: urban; GR: grassland; Fsig: the significance of F-tests; VIFmax: the maximum variance inflation factor.
Relationships between configuration of land use patterns and water quality parameters.
| Parameters | Season | R2 | CA | PLAND | PD | LPI | ED | LSI | AREA_MN | SHAPE_AM | FRAC_AM | ENN_MN | IJI | COHESION |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DO | wet | 0.583 | FO | −UR | −FO | |||||||||
| dry | 0.293 | −UR | ||||||||||||
| CODMn | wet | 0.254 | WA | |||||||||||
| dry | 0.632 | −FO | WA, FA | −FO | ||||||||||
| BOD | wet | 0.605 | −FA | GR | FA | |||||||||
| dry | 0.788 | −FO | WA, FA | FO | GR | |||||||||
| COD | wet | 0.345 | −FA | |||||||||||
| dry | 0.544 | −FA | GR | FA | ||||||||||
| NH3-N | wet | 0.254 | UR | |||||||||||
| dry | 0.552 | −WA | UR, FO | FA | ||||||||||
| TP | wet | — | ||||||||||||
| dry | — |
FO: forests; FA: farmland.
Regression analysis of water quality parameters and landscape pattern metrics.
| Parameters | Season | Equation | R2 | Fsig. | VIFmax |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOD | dry | 0.453 AREA_MN_WA + 0.499 ENN_MN_GR + 0.592SHAPE_AM_FO − 0.373LPI_FO + 0.256 AREA_MN_FA | 0.788 | 0 | 1.568 |
| CODMn | dry | 0.536AMEA_MN_WA + 0.46AMEA_MN_FA − 0.566ENN_MN_FO − 0.437PD_FO | 0.632 | 0 | 2.081 |
| BOD | wet | −0.603ED_FA + 0.483COHESION_FA + 0.341IJI_GR | 0.605 | 0 | 1.309 |
| DO | wet | −0.371PLAND_UR − 0.59SHAPE_AM_FO + 0.697CA_FO | 0.583 | 0 | 1.975 |
| NH3-N | dry | 0.536AREA_MN_UR + 0.948COHESION_FA + 0.619AREA_MN_FO − 0.407LSI_WA | 0.552 | 0 | 2.942 |
| COD | dry | −0.533ED_FA + 0.531COHESION_FA + 0.321IJI_GR | 0.544 | 0 | 1.309 |
| COD | wet | −0.609ED_FA | 0.345 | 0.001 | 1 |
| DO | dry | −0.566PLAND_UR | 0.293 | 0.002 | 1 |
| CODMn | wet | 0.532SHAPE_AM_WA | 0.254 | 0.004 | 1 |
| NH3-N | wet | 0.532PLAND_UR | 0.254 | 0.004 | 1 |
| TP | wet | — | — | — | — |
| TP | dry | — | — | — | — |