Literature DB >> 31216603

Body pedagogics: embodied learning for the health professions.

Martina Kelly1, Rachel Ellaway2, Albert Scherpbier3, Nigel King4, Tim Dornan5.   

Abstract

MEDICINE AS EMBODIED PRACTICE: Bodily dysfunctions bring patients to their doctors and even diseases of the mind can originate in patients' bodies. Doctors respond by using their own bodies - hands, eyes, ears and sometimes noses - to make diagnoses and treat diseases. Yet, despite the embodied nature of practice, medicine typically treats the body as an object, paying scant attention to the subjective embodied experiences of patients and doctors. Much health professions education (HPE) reflects this, prioritising cognition over learners' sense of embodiment. Hence there is a gap between the embodied realities of practice and the disembodied nature of medical education. This article introduces readers to 'body pedagogics' as a framework that can help to re-establish embodiment as a central principle of HPE. BODY PEDAGOGICS: This embodiment theory, drawn from sociology, anthropology and phenomenology, has informed such disparate fields as glassblowing education and military training. Body pedagogics emphasises learning as a physically embodied process. It illustrates how multisensory experience causes embodied changes that become an automatic part of physician expertise. We introduce core body pedagogic concepts using physical examination as an example, examining the bodily means of HPE, students' bodily experiences and the resulting bodily changes. IMPLICATIONS: Body pedagogics can help us to focus attention on embodiment as a central principle of HPE that transcends the discipline-specific teaching of clinical skills. Moreover, it provides a set of conceptual foundations for an interdisciplinary practice within HPE with implications for instructional design. Body pedagogics can also help us to make strange the habits and disregarded aspects of embodied learning and in so doing help us to consider embodiment more critically and directly in practice and education, and in the ways we research them.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31216603     DOI: 10.1111/medu.13916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  4 in total

1.  Touch matters: COVID-19, physical examination, and 21st century general practice.

Authors:  Paquita de Zulueta
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Learning through the senses.

Authors:  Marieke van der Schaaf
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS) - development, validity and reliability study.

Authors:  Ozan Karaca; S Ayhan Çalışkan; Kadir Demir
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Implementation of an interactive virtual microscope laboratory system in teaching oral histopathology.

Authors:  Jia Qing; Gu Cheng; Xiao-Qi Ni; Yi Yang; Wei Zhang; Zhi Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.