Literature DB >> 31215713

Outcomes of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Refractory Overactive Bladder Among Octogenarians.

Daniel R Greenberg1, Raveen Syan1, Nichole Young-Lin2, Craig V Comiter1, Ekene Enemchukwu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an effective treatment for refractory overactive bladder (OAB). However, advanced age is often cited as a reason to avoid SNS in the elderly. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of SNS for refractory OAB among our octogenarian population.
METHODS: A retrospective review from a single institution was performed on all SNS lead placements from December 1998 to June 2017 for refractory OAB. Octogenarians were characterized as 80 years of age or older at the time of Stage I. Efficacy and safety were determined by the rate of progression to Stage II, subsequent need for multimodal therapy, and rate of surgical revision and explantation. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months.
RESULTS: Of 374 patients in this study, 37 (9.9%) were octogenarians. There was no difference in gender, race, smoking history, or prior OAB treatment regimens between cohorts. The rate of progression to Stage II was 56.8% for octogenarians compared to 60.5% for nonoctogenarians (p = 0.66). The rate of surgical revision, explantation, and need for multimodal therapy did not differ between groups. Subgroup analysis of octogenarians did not reveal any significant differences between successful and nonsuccessful Stage I patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of SNS was similar between cohorts. This result suggests that SNS is a safe and effective therapy that should be considered among the treatment options for refractory OAB in octogenarian patients. Further studies are needed to determine predictive factors of Stage I success in elderly patients.
© 2019 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; octogenarian; refractory overactive bladder; sacral nerve stimulation; sacral neuromodulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31215713     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  5 in total

1.  Predictive Factors in Sacral Neuromodulation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranjana Jairam; Jamie Drossaerts; Tom Marcelissen; Gommert van Koeveringe; Desiree Vrijens; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 1.934

Review 2.  New Implantable Tibial Nerve Stimulation Devices: Review of Published Clinical Results in Comparison to Established Neuromodulation Devices.

Authors:  Justine Yamashiro; Werner de Riese; Cornelia de Riese
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-12-23

3.  Does age alone negatively predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation? A single-centre retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Sandra Schönburg; Tobias Bukethal; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Efficacy of Yun-Type Optimized Pelvic Floor Training Therapy for Middle-Aged Women With Severe Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Chaoliang Shi; Dan Zhou; Wandong Yu; Wei Jiao; Guowei Shi; Yangyun Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-07-14

Review 5.  Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Dudding; Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Stefan Engelberg; Maria Paola Bertapelle; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Karel Everaert; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Charles H Knowles; Lilli Lundby; Klaus E Matzel; Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos; Mona B Rydningen; Stefan de Wachter
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.