Charlotte L Hall1, Susan Brown2, Marilyn James3, Jennifer L Martin2, Nikki Brown2, Kim Selby4, Julie Clarke5, Laura Williams2, Kapil Sayal6, Chris Hollis7, Madeleine J Groom2. 1. Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. charlotte.hall@nottingham.ac.uk. 2. Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. 3. Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. 4. Department of Community Paediatrics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK. 5. Acting Consultant Community Paediatrics, Grantham and District Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Grantham, UK. 6. Child and Adolescent, Developmental Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and CANDAL (Centre for ADHD and Neuro-developmental Disorders across the Lifespan), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. 7. Devlopmental Psychiatry Queens Medical Centre, School of Medicine, and MindTech, Institute of Mental, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study design and protocol that underpin a randomised controlled trial (RCT) are critical for the ultimate success of the trial. Although RCTs are considered the gold standard for research, there are multiple threats to their validity such as participant recruitment and retention, identifying a meaningful change, and non-adherence to the protocol. For clinical RCTs, involving patients and clinicians in protocol design provides the opportunity to develop research protocols that are meaningful to their target audience and may help overcome some of the inherent threats in conducting RCTs. However, the majority of protocols do not describe the methodology underpinning their development, limiting the amount of learned experience shared between research groups. METHOD: With the purpose of reporting a collaborative approach towards developing a protocol, we present the findings from three sequential workshops that were conducted with the aim of developing a protocol to investigate the feasibility of adding a computerised test of attention, impulsivity and activity (QbTest) to medication management of children and young people with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Based on previous qualitative interviews with clinicians and families, each workshop prioritised topics for focused discussion. Information from the workshops was fed back to the participants for reflection in advance of the next workshop. RESULTS: The workshops involved 21 multi-disciplinary ADHD experts, including clinicians, patient and public involvement (PPI) members, parents of young people with ADHD and researchers. The consensus workshops addressed key research issues such as: the most relevant outcome measures/ resource drivers; methods and time points for data collection; and the clinical protocol for utilising the QbTest, including when best to use this within the medication management process. The resulting protocol details a feasibility RCT design describing these factors. CONCLUSION: Protocols which are co-developed may help overcome some of the risks associated with RCT completion (e.g. recruitment, retention, protocol adherence) and help prioritise outcomes of greater relevance to the populations under study. The methodology has potential value for researchers and organisations developing clinical guidelines, and offers insights into the valuable impact of PPI upon trial design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03368573, 11th December 2017 (retrospectively registered).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The study design and protocol that underpin a randomised controlled trial (RCT) are critical for the ultimate success of the trial. Although RCTs are considered the gold standard for research, there are multiple threats to their validity such as participant recruitment and retention, identifying a meaningful change, and non-adherence to the protocol. For clinical RCTs, involving patients and clinicians in protocol design provides the opportunity to develop research protocols that are meaningful to their target audience and may help overcome some of the inherent threats in conducting RCTs. However, the majority of protocols do not describe the methodology underpinning their development, limiting the amount of learned experience shared between research groups. METHOD: With the purpose of reporting a collaborative approach towards developing a protocol, we present the findings from three sequential workshops that were conducted with the aim of developing a protocol to investigate the feasibility of adding a computerised test of attention, impulsivity and activity (QbTest) to medication management of children and young people with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Based on previous qualitative interviews with clinicians and families, each workshop prioritised topics for focused discussion. Information from the workshops was fed back to the participants for reflection in advance of the next workshop. RESULTS: The workshops involved 21 multi-disciplinary ADHD experts, including clinicians, patient and public involvement (PPI) members, parents of young people with ADHD and researchers. The consensus workshops addressed key research issues such as: the most relevant outcome measures/ resource drivers; methods and time points for data collection; and the clinical protocol for utilising the QbTest, including when best to use this within the medication management process. The resulting protocol details a feasibility RCT design describing these factors. CONCLUSION: Protocols which are co-developed may help overcome some of the risks associated with RCT completion (e.g. recruitment, retention, protocol adherence) and help prioritise outcomes of greater relevance to the populations under study. The methodology has potential value for researchers and organisations developing clinical guidelines, and offers insights into the valuable impact of PPI upon trial design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03368573, 11th December 2017 (retrospectively registered).
Entities:
Keywords:
Expert workshop; Management; Medication; Patient and public involvement; Protocol development; QbTest; Titration
Authors: Charlotte L Hall; Althea Z Valentine; Madeleine J Groom; Gemma M Walker; Kapil Sayal; David Daley; Chris Hollis Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: J M Swanson; H C Kraemer; S P Hinshaw; L E Arnold; C K Conners; H B Abikoff; W Clevenger; M Davies; G R Elliott; L L Greenhill; L Hechtman; B Hoza; P S Jensen; J S March; J H Newcorn; E B Owens; W E Pelham; E Schiller; J B Severe; S Simpson; B Vitiello; K Wells; T Wigal; M Wu Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Chris Hollis; Charlotte L Hall; Boliang Guo; Marilyn James; Janet Boadu; Madeleine J Groom; Nikki Brown; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Maria Moldavsky; Althea Z Valentine; Gemma M Walker; David Daley; Kapil Sayal; Richard Morriss Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Charlotte L Hall; Gemma M Walker; Althea Z Valentine; Boliang Guo; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Marilyn James; David Daley; Kapil Sayal; Chris Hollis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: S Staniszewska; J Brett; I Simera; K Seers; C Mockford; S Goodlad; D G Altman; D Moher; R Barber; S Denegri; A Entwistle; P Littlejohns; C Morris; R Suleman; V Thomas; C Tysall Journal: Res Involv Engagem Date: 2017-08-02
Authors: Laura Williams; Charlotte L Hall; Sue Brown; Boliang Guo; Marilyn James; Matilde Franceschini; Julie Clarke; Kim Selby; Hena Vijayan; Neeta Kulkarni; Nikki Brown; Kapil Sayal; Chris Hollis; Madeleine J Groom Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2021-03-16
Authors: Shazmin Majid; Stuart Reeves; Grazziela Figueredo; Susan Brown; Alexandra Lang; Matthew Moore; Richard Morriss Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2021-12-20