| Literature DB >> 31215343 |
Shan Wang1, Yun Li1, Feng Xue1, Jian Liu1, Weiwei Yang1, Jia Zhang1, Martin Glenschek-Sieberth2, Yuan Lyu1.
Abstract
We compared the kill-curve activity of tedizolid and linezolid at clinically relevant (total or free plasma, lung) concentrations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) isolated from Chinese patients. Tedizolid had greater in vitro potency than linezolid against staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci species (tedizolid minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range: ≤ 0.016-0.5 µg/mL; linezolid MIC range: 0.25-2 µg/mL). In kill-curve experiments, growth of MRSA was inhibited at tedizolid concentration of 0.6 µg/mL (i.e. 4.8 × MIC; MIC = 0.125 µg/mL) and linezolid concentration of 2 µg/mL (2× MIC; MIC = 1 µg/mL). Against PRSP, tedizolid at a concentration of 0.25 µg/mL (representing its MIC) was bacteriostatic, but exerted a bactericidal effect at higher concentrations. Results were similar for linezolid, however, even at 21 µg/mL, a small proportion of organisms survived beyond 24 h. The results demonstrated the potency of tedizolid against clinical strains of Gram-positive pathogens supporting its use as a suitable alternative to linezolid in Chinese patients.Entities:
Keywords: Clinically relevant concentrations; linezolid; methicillin-resistant ; penicillin-resistant ; tedizolid; time-kill curve activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31215343 DOI: 10.1080/1120009X.2019.1623968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Chemother ISSN: 1120-009X Impact factor: 1.714