| Literature DB >> 31215242 |
Sven Tyge Langkjer1, Julia Kenholm2, Jeanette Dupont Jensen3, Kim Wedervang4, Annette Torbøl Brixen5, Mie Grunnet6, Lars Stenbygaard7, Bjørnar Gilje8, Hella Danø9, Vesna Glavicic10, Erik Hugger Jacobsen11, Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen1, Helle Lemvig Kruse1, Trine Dongsgaard2, Jeppe Neimann1, Jürgen Geisler12,13.
Abstract
Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.Entities:
Keywords: NAME; Navelbine; Phase II trial; breast cancer; chemotherapy; metronomic; vinorelbine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31215242 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2019-0124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Future Oncol ISSN: 1479-6694 Impact factor: 3.404