Literature DB >> 31215242

The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer.

Sven Tyge Langkjer1, Julia Kenholm2, Jeanette Dupont Jensen3, Kim Wedervang4, Annette Torbøl Brixen5, Mie Grunnet6, Lars Stenbygaard7, Bjørnar Gilje8, Hella Danø9, Vesna Glavicic10, Erik Hugger Jacobsen11, Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen1, Helle Lemvig Kruse1, Trine Dongsgaard2, Jeppe Neimann1, Jürgen Geisler12,13.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NAME; Navelbine; Phase II trial; breast cancer; chemotherapy; metronomic; vinorelbine

Year:  2019        PMID: 31215242     DOI: 10.2217/fon-2019-0124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Oncol        ISSN: 1479-6694            Impact factor:   3.404


  3 in total

1.  International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer, Lisbon 2019: ABC5 Consensus - Assessment by a German Group of Experts.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssen; Diana Lüftner; Michael Untch; Renate Haidinger; Rachel Würstlein; Nadia Harbeck; Doris Augustin; Susanne Briest; Johannes Ettl; Peter A Fasching; Frank Förster; Christian M Kurbacher; Hans-Joachim Lück; Norbert Marschner; Lothar Müller; Volkmar Müller; Lidia Perlova-Griff; Isabel Radke; Eugen Ruckhäberle; Iris Scheffen; Eva Schumacher-Wulf; Moritz Schwoerer; Dieter Steinfeld-Birg; Katja Ziegler-Löhr
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  De-escalating cancer treatments during COVID 19 pandemic: Is metronomic chemotherapy a reasonable option?

Authors:  Palma Fedele; Valeria Sanna; Alessandro Fancellu; Antonella Marino; Nicola Calvani; Saverio Cinieri
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Promoter polymorphisms of TOP2A and ERCC1 genes as predictive factors for chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Anna Grenda; Justyna Błach; Michał Szczyrek; Paweł Krawczyk; Marcin Nicoś; Barbara Kuźnar Kamińska; Monika Jakimiec; Grażyna Balicka; Izabela Chmielewska; Halina Batura-Gabryel; Marek Sawicki; Janusz Milanowski
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.