| Literature DB >> 31214631 |
Jason P Burnham1, Mario F Feldman2, Juan J Calix1.
Abstract
Temporal analysis of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex isolates in a large, US healthcare system demonstrated decreased occurrence of antibiotic-susceptible isolates between November and May, while resistant isolate occurrence was temporally stable. This resulted in 50%-100% seasonal increases of resistance rates. This work offers insight into the phenomenon of Gram-negative pathogen seasonality.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; multidrug resistance; seasonality
Year: 2019 PMID: 31214631 PMCID: PMC6563941 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis ISSN: 2328-8957 Impact factor: 3.835
Figure 1.Seasonality among antibiotic-susceptible, but not -resistant, Abc isolates. A, The cumulative total (solid lines, left axis) and antibiotic resistance rates (dotted lines, right axis) of isolates obtained in each month (1–12, January through December) over the study period. Graphs depict numbers of isolates that are susceptible (gray line) or resistant (black line) to each antibiotic or antibiotic class (GM, gentamicin; MEM/IPM, meropenem/imipenem; CIP/LVX, ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin; SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole); B, Total, hospital-acquired (HA), and nonhospital-acquired (nHA) Abc cases per quarter (YY–QQ) are plotted with solid lines. Corresponding quarterly MEM/IPM resistance rates are plotted with dotted lines. Shaded areas highlight peaks in seasonal occurrence in Q3 and Q4. C,D,E, Average proportion of annual isolates occurring in each quarter, according to Abc subgroups. In panel C, isolates were grouped into total, HA, and nHA cases. In panels D and E, HA and nHA isolates (panel D) and isolates from each anatomical source (panel E), were grouped into total (all isolates with susceptibility data), MEM/IPM resistant (R) and susceptible (S) isolates. Color key for panels C–E is located in panel C. Error bars represent standard deviations. Multi-year averages for each quarter were compared to corresponding Q1 average by independent t test. *, P < 0 .05; #, P ≤ 0 .001.