Literature DB >> 3121424

A review of minor surgery in general practice in the United Kingdom.

D W Wall.   

Abstract

Few general practitioners in the United Kingdom do minor surgery, in contrast to their colleagues in other countries. The reasons are largely historical and relate to the structure and function of the National Health Service. This history of minor surgery describes its common occurrence before the NHS, its virtual disappearance after the NHS came about, and later revival by a few enthusiasts. The state of the art describes the wide range of surgical procedures in general surgery, orthopaedics, ear-nose-and-throat, gynaecology and ophthalmology. There are few complications, and very short waiting times in general practice minor surgery. The workload is not great. Economic studies show great saving may be made. Patients strongly prefer general practice minor surgery. In conclusion, despite many advantages, there remain major financial disadvantages for general practitioners in the United Kingdom to provide minor surgery for their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3121424     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/4.4.322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  6 in total

1.  [Small surgical interventions in general medicine].

Authors:  Gustav Kamenski; Robert N Braun; Beate Zoehrer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2003

2.  Training for minor surgery in general practice during preregistration surgical posts.

Authors:  M Pringle; J Hasler; P De Marco
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-06

3.  Effect of general practitioner contract on referral of specimens for histological examination.

Authors:  K J Hillan; C P Johnson; R Morton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09

4.  Performance of skin biopsies by general practitioners.

Authors:  L J McWilliam; F Knox; N Wilkinson; P Oogarah
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09

5.  General practitioners as providers of minor surgery--a success story?

Authors:  J S Brown; R R Smith; T Cantor; D Chesover; R Yearsley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Cost effectiveness of minor surgery in general practice: a prospective comparison with hospital practice.

Authors:  A O'Cathain; J E Brazier; P C Milner; M Fall
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.386

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.