| Literature DB >> 31214128 |
Adriana Rego1,2, Francisco Raio1, Teresa P Martins1, Hugo Ribeiro1,2, António G G Sousa1, Joana Séneca1, Mafalda S Baptista1,3, Charles K Lee3,4, S Craig Cary3,4, Vitor Ramos1, Maria F Carvalho1, Pedro N Leão1, Catarina Magalhães1,5.
Abstract
Bacterial diversity from McMurdo Dry Valleys in Antarctica, the coldest desert on earth, has become more easily assessed with the development of High Throughput Sequencing (HTS) techniques. However, some of the diversity remains inaccessible by the power of sequencing. In this study, we combine cultivation and HTS techniques to survey actinobacteria and cyanobacteria diversity along different soil and endolithic micro-environments of Victoria Valley in McMurdo Dry Valleys. Our results demonstrate that the Dry Valleys actinobacteria and cyanobacteria distribution is driven by environmental forces, in particular the effect of water availability and endolithic environments clearly conditioned the distribution of those communities. Data derived from HTS show that the percentage of cyanobacteria decreases from about 20% in the sample closest to the water source to negligible values on the last three samples of the transect with less water availability. Inversely, actinobacteria relative abundance increases from about 20% in wet soils to over 50% in the driest samples. Over 30% of the total HTS data set was composed of actinobacterial strains, mainly distributed by 5 families: Sporichthyaceae, Euzebyaceae, Patulibacteraceae, Nocardioidaceae, and Rubrobacteraceae. However, the 11 actinobacterial strains isolated in this study, belonged to Micrococcaceae and Dermacoccaceae families that were underrepresented in the HTS data set. A total of 10 cyanobacterial strains from the order Synechococcales were also isolated, distributed by 4 different genera (Nodosilinea, Leptolyngbya, Pectolyngbya, and Acaryochloris-like). In agreement with the cultivation results, Leptolyngbya was identified as dominant genus in the HTS data set. Acaryochloris-like cyanobacteria were found exclusively in the endolithic sample and represented 44% of the total 16S rRNA sequences, although despite our efforts we were not able to properly isolate any strain from this Acaryochloris-related group. The importance of combining cultivation and sequencing techniques is highlighted, as we have shown that culture-dependent methods employed in this study were able to retrieve actinobacteria and cyanobacteria taxa that were not detected in HTS data set, suggesting that the combination of both strategies can be usefull to recover both abundant and rare members of the communities.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctic microenvironments; Antarctic soil; McMurdo Dry Valleys; actinobacteria; bacteria diversity; bacterial cultivability; cyanobacteria; endolitic microbiota
Year: 2019 PMID: 31214128 PMCID: PMC6555387 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Location of sampling points in Victoria Valley (transect soil samples marked in red and endolithic sample in green). The map was generated using QGIS v2.8.2 and the Quantarctica data set (Matsuoka et al., 2018).
Variation of soil characteristics across the Dry Valley soil transect, including water availability (Aw), pH and conductivity (cond).
| Sample code | Latitude | Longitude | Aw | pH | Cond (μS/cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | S77 20.241 | E161 38.593 | 1,06 | 7,09 | 61 |
| T2 | S77 20.240 | E161 38.584 | 1,02 | 8,02 | 314 |
| T3 | S77 20.238 | E161 38.578 | 1,01 | 7,36 | 2530 |
| T4 | S77 20.237 | E161 38.565 | 0,6 | 8,39 | 21 |
| T5 | S77 20.235 | E161 38.547 | 0,15 | 8,41 | 122 |
| T6 | S77 20.232 | E161 38.526 | 0,28 | 8,39 | 21 |
FIGURE 2(A) Alpha-diversity metrics Chao1 and Shannon. (B) PcoA plots using the weighted UniFrac metrics. (C) PcoA plots using the unweighted.
FIGURE 3(A) Taxonomy summary bar chart of relative frequency of 10 most abundant phyla per sampling point. (B) Summary bar chart of 10 most abundant taxonomic frequency distributions at Family level from cyanobacteria phylum. (C) Summary bar chart of 10 most abundant taxonomic frequency distributions at Family level from actinobacteria phylum.
FIGURE 4Taxonomy summary bar chart of relative frequency of the most abundant cyanobacterial genus.
Summary of obtained isolates.
| Isolate | Accession number | Closest relative (identified species) | Number of obtained isolates | Accession number (NCBI) | Query cover (%) | Identity (%) | Isolation source | Phylum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MH741266 | 1 | NR_116578.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T51 | Actinobacteria | ||
| MH741267 | 1 | NR_116578.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T51 | Actinobacteria | ||
| MH741268 | 1 | HE716946.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T51 | Actinobacteria | ||
| MH741269 | 1 | MF952731.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T51 | Actinobacteria | ||
| MH741270 | NR_026452.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T51 | Actinobacteria | |||
| MH741271 | 1 | NR_116578.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T51 | Actinobacteria | ||
| MH741272 | 1 | NR_134088.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T51 | Actinobacteria | ||
| MH741273 | 1 | NR_026452.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T52 | Actinobacteria | ||
| Micrococcus sp. Strain AT19 | MH741274 | 2 | NR_116578.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T53 | Actinobacteria | |
| MH741275 | 1 | NR_151942.1 | 100 | 98 | Soil–T53 | Actinobacteria | ||
| MH741276 | 1 | NR_026452.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil–T52 | Actinobacteria | ||
| MH742927 | 1 | AY493612.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil – T64 | Cyanobacteria | ||
| MH742928 | 2 | AY493612.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil – T14 | Cyanobacteria | ||
| MH742933 | 4 | AY493588.1 | 100 | 98 | Soil – T34 | Cyanobacteria | ||
| MH742934 | 1 | AY493581.1 | 100 | 98 | Soil – T14 and T34 | Cyanobacteria | ||
| MH742929 | 1 | AY493612.1 | 98 | 98 | Soil – T1 | Cyanobacteria | ||
| Unidentified Synechococcales strain AR3-H-2A | MH742931 | 1 | AY493586.1 | 100 | 98 | Soil – T14 | Cyanobacteria | |
| MH742930 | 1 | AY493615.1 | 100 | 99 | Soil – T64 | Cyanobacteria | ||
| MH742932 | 1 | AY493612.1 | 100 | 100 | Soil – T14 | Cyanobacteria | ||
| KT951670.1 | 1 | AY493588.1 | 100 | 99 | END4 | Cyanobacteria | ||
| KU951755.1 | 1 | AY493588.1 | 100 | 99 | END4 | Cyanobacteria |
FIGURE 5(A) Water availability (Aw) distribution chart per sampling point. (B) Taxonomy summary bar chart of total frequency of actinobacterial families present in each sampling point. (C) Taxonomy summary bar chart of total frequency of cyanobacterial families present in each sampling point.
FIGURE 6Phylogenetic tree of the 16S rRNA gene nucleotide sequences of the obtained actinobacterial isolates and their closest matches at NCBI 16S database. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura–Nei model. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites [5 categories (+G, parameter = 0.4569)]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 59 nucleotide sequences. Sequences of strains isolated in Antarctic or cold-environments are highlighted and the sequences obtained in this study are in bold.
FIGURE 7Phylogenetic tree of the 16S rRNA gene nucleotide sequences of the obtained cyanobacterial isolates and their closest matches at NCBI 16S database. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the General Time Reversible model. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites [5 categories (+G, parameter = 0.2861)]. The rate variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable ([+I], 34.68% sites). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 48 nucleotide sequences. Sequences of strains isolated in Antarctic or cold-environments are highlighted and the sequences obtained in this study are in bold.