| Literature DB >> 31214050 |
Xi Zhang1, Jingwei Wang1, Rong Tang1, Xugang He1, Li Li1, Yasuaki Takagi2, Dapeng Li1.
Abstract
Muscle quality and the physiological condition of fish are affected greatly by the culture environment. In aquaculture ponds, a bio-floating bed planted with vegetation is often used to improve water quality. This study investigated the growth and muscle quality of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) cultured in ponds equipped with bio-floating beds. Fish were cultured in two replicated pond groups from May to November. Fish in the first group were cultured in experimental ponds equipped with a bio-floating bed planted with Ipomoea aquatica, whereas fish in the other group were reared in control ponds without a bio-floating bed. Compared with control ponds, the experimental ponds had better water quality with significantly lower concentrations of nitrite and ammonia. Grass carp in the experimental group had greater muscle weight gain, a significantly higher content of crude protein, and a significantly lower crude fat level than fish in the control group. The levels of pH, water-holding capacity, and antioxidant capacity of muscle decreased significantly in the control group compared to the experimental group. Texture profile analysis revealed higher values of hardness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness and lower values of cohesiveness and resilience of white muscle in the experimental group compared to the control group. The filets of fish in the experimental group also received higher grades in the sensory evaluation of springiness, overall acceptability, aroma, and palatability. These results indicate that growth performance and muscle quality of grass carp were improved by the presence of bio-floating beds in the culture ponds.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant capacity; fish; muscle quality; texture profiles analysis; water environment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31214050 PMCID: PMC6555157 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of equipping the bio-floating bed in the pond (A) and the scenery of bio-floating bed planted with Ipomoea aquatica (B).
Fish species, size, and amount cultured in one pond.
| Species | Size (g) | Amount (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | 190 | |
| 400 | 40 | |
| 1460 | 50 | |
| 700 | 12.5 | |
| 100 | 8 | |
| 1060 | 40 | |
FIGURE 2Water quality parameters of PO43--P and TP of experimental and control ponds. Chemical elements PO43--P and total phosphorus (TP) were tested in every month from May to November. Vertical bars indicate significant deviation. Meanwhile, letters of a and b indicate the significant difference (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Water quality parameters of nitrogen of experimental and control ponds. Chemical elements of three various forms of nitrogen (NH3/NH4+, NO3-, NO2-) were tested in every month from May to November. Vertical bars indicate significant deviation. Meanwhile, letters of a and b indicate the significant difference (P < 0.05).
Parameters of sensory evaluation of cooked muscle.
| Parameter | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| White | 1: Very weak | 9: Intense |
| Gloss | 1: Very weak | 9: Intense |
| Texture | 1: Loosely | 9: Very firming |
| Springiness | 1: Not elastic | 9: Very elastic |
| Juiciness | 1: Dry | 9: Very juicy |
| Palatability | 1: Distasteful | 9: Very palatable |
| Aroma | 1: Not detected | 9: Very fragrant |
| Chewiness | 1: Not chewy | 9: Very chewy |
| Sourish smell | 1: Sourish smell | 9: Not detected |
| Residues | 1: Many residues | 9: Not detected |
| Acceptability | 1: Distasteful | 9: Love |
Growth performance of the grass carp from the experimental and control ponds.
| Experimental | Control | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (g) | 723.06 ± 77.20* | 641.40 ± 37.40 |
| Length (cm) | 35.09 ± 4.66 | 33.58 ± 0.47 |
| Height (cm) | 7.47 ± 1.18 | 7.27 ± 0.05 |
| Width (cm) | 5.23 ± 0.81 | 5.17 ± 0.05 |
| Multiples of weight gain | 12.06 ± 0.62* | 10.69 ± 0.12 |
| Visceral mass ratio (%) | 12.21 ± 0.16 | 12.24 ± 0.90 |
| Liver somatic index (%) | 2.19 ± 0.30 | 2.40 ± 0.01* |
| Condition factor (g/cm3) | 1.72 ± 0.02 | 1.70 ± 0.01 |
Composition and cooked rate of muscle in grass carps from experimental and control ponds.
| Water content (%) | Fat (%) | Crude protein (%) | Crude ash (%) | Flesh content (%) | Cooked rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | 79.66 ± 0.30 | 1.13 ± 0.06 | 17.75 ± 0.13* | 1.09 ± 0.01 | 63.91 ± 0.23 | 76.74 ± 1.59** |
| Control | 80.12 ± 0.09 | 1.41 ± 0.06** | 17.33 ± 0.07 | 1.10 ± 0.01 | 63.64 ± 0.09 | 74.33 ± 0.17 |
pH and water holding capacity of muscle in grass carps from experimental and control ponds.
| pH | Drip loss (%) | Stored loss (%) | Frozen leakage rate 0 h (%) | Frozen leakage rate 1 h (%) | Frozen leakage rate 2 h (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | 6.06 ± 0.04* | 1.77 ± 0.13 | 1.07 ± 0.05 | 1.06 ± 0.01 | 1.47 ± 0.06 | 2.10 ± 0.06 |
| Control | 5.92 ± 0.04 | 2.11 ± 0.08** | 1.33 ± 0.14** | 1.26 ± 0.13* | 1.94 ± 0.01** | 3.04 ± 0.10** |
FIGURE 4Antioxidant capacity of the grass carp from experimental and control ponds. Significant difference is indicated by ∗P < 0.05.
Texture profile analysis of muscle in grass carps from experimental and control ponds.
| Hardness | Springiness | Cohesiveness | Gumminess | Chewiness | Resilience | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | 5269.84 ± 1047.52 | 0.63 ± 0.06 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 1473.83 ± 325.55 | 934.53 ± 242.50 | 0.18 ± 0.03 |
| Control | 4767.08 ± 596.97 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 1358.57 ± 193.55 | 832.57 ± 152.99 | 0.20 ± 0.03 |
FIGURE 5Radar diagram of the average values of sensory properties for the grass carp from experimental and control ponds. Significant difference is indicated by ∗P < 0.05.