Literature DB >> 31213174

Consensus and polarization in competing complex contagion processes.

Vítor V Vasconcelos1, Simon A Levin1, Flávio L Pinheiro2,3.   

Abstract

The rate of adoption of new information depends on reinforcement from multiple sources in a way that often cannot be described by simple contagion processes. In such cases, contagion is said to be complex. Complex contagion happens in the diffusion of human behaviours, innovations and knowledge. Based on that evidence, we propose a model that considers multiple, potentially asymmetric and competing contagion processes and analyse its respective population-wide dynamics, bringing together ideas from complex contagion, opinion dynamics, evolutionary game theory and language competition by shifting the focus from individuals to the properties of the diffusing processes. We show that our model spans a dynamical space in which the population exhibits patterns of consensus, dominance, and, importantly, different types of polarization, a more diverse dynamical environment that contrasts with single simple contagion processes. We show how these patterns emerge and how different population structures modify them through a natural development of spatial correlations: structured interactions increase the range of the dominance regime by reducing that of dynamic polarization, tight modular structures can generate structural polarization, depending on the interplay between fundamental properties of the processes and the modularity of the interaction network.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complex contagion processes; information diffusion; population dynamics; social influence; social networks; spatial correlations

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31213174      PMCID: PMC6597764          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  37 in total

1.  Local frequency dependence and global coexistence.

Authors:  J Molofsky; R Durrett; J Dushoff; D Griffeath; S Levin
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Heterogeneous voter models.

Authors:  Naoki Masuda; N Gibert; S Redner
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2010-07-28

3.  Coevolutionary dynamics: from finite to infinite populations.

Authors:  Arne Traulsen; Jens Christian Claussen; Christoph Hauert
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations.

Authors:  F C Santos; J M Pacheco; Tom Lenaerts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Voter models on heterogeneous networks.

Authors:  V Sood; Tibor Antal; S Redner
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2008-04-22

6.  Emergence and decline of scientific paradigms.

Authors:  S Bornholdt; M H Jensen; K Sneppen
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Optimal network modularity for information diffusion.

Authors:  Azadeh Nematzadeh; Emilio Ferrara; Alessandro Flammini; Yong-Yeol Ahn
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 8.  Climate change governance, cooperation and self-organization.

Authors:  Jorge M Pacheco; Vítor V Vasconcelos; Francisco C Santos
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Competition among memes in a world with limited attention.

Authors:  L Weng; A Flammini; A Vespignani; F Menczer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Default cascades in complex networks: topology and systemic risk.

Authors:  Tarik Roukny; Hugues Bersini; Hugues Pirotte; Guido Caldarelli; Stefano Battiston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks.

Authors:  Fernando P Santos; Yphtach Lelkes; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Segregation and clustering of preferences erode socially beneficial coordination.

Authors:  Vítor V Vasconcelos; Sara M Constantino; Astrid Dannenberg; Marcel Lumkowsky; Elke Weber; Simon Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Universality, criticality and complexity of information propagation in social media.

Authors:  Daniele Notarmuzi; Claudio Castellano; Alessandro Flammini; Dario Mazzilli; Filippo Radicchi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  The popularity of contradictory information about COVID-19 vaccine on social media in China.

Authors:  Dandan Wang; Yadong Zhou
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2022-05-05

5.  Failures to disagree are essential for environmental science to effectively influence policy development.

Authors:  Jon Norberg; Thorsten Blenckner; Sarah E Cornell; Owen L Petchey; Helmut Hillebrand
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 11.274

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.