| Literature DB >> 31212630 |
Pengpeng Hua1,2, Yu Xiong3, Zhiying Yu4, Bin Liu5,6, Lina Zhao7.
Abstract
In our current investigation, we evaluated the effect of <Entities:
Keywords: Chlorella pyrenoidosa protein hydrolysate (CPPH); Chlorella pyrenoidosa protein hydrolysate-calcium chelate (CPPH-Ca); calcium absorption; gene expression; gut microbiota
Year: 2019 PMID: 31212630 PMCID: PMC6628084 DOI: 10.3390/md17060348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Changes in the body weight of rats in the different groups during the experimental period.
| Groups | Weight (g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Weeks | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | Weight Gain | |
| Control | 120.04 ± 4.66a | 303.62 ± 10.43a | 371.21 ± 14.01a | 245.13 ± 9.00a |
| Model | 125.19 ± 4.79a | 267.32 ± 5.62b | 308.56 ± 4.58e | 189.36 ± 8.33f |
| HCaCO3 | 120.39 ± 9.22a | 269.63 ± 14.27b | 326.33 ± 19.47bcd | 211.42 ± 9.63bcd |
| HGCa | 122.70 ± 2.19a | 271.54 ± 13.35b | 331.92 ± 11.43bc | 221.79 ± 10.96bc |
| LCPPH + LCaCO3 | 122.443 ± 4.75a | 266.95 ± 11.27b | 320.97 ± 14.36cde | 196.53 ± 11.53ef |
| MCPPH + MCaCO3 | 119.72 ± 5.43a | 271.54 ± 17.60b | 328.01 ± 24.35bcd | 208.23 ± 21.50cde |
| HCPPH + HCaCO3 | 123.94 ± 4.76a | 269.85 ± 12.52b | 333.47 ± 17.22bc | 214.70 ± 11.34bcd |
| LCPPH-Ca | 123.34 ± 4.49a | 267.35 ± 9.50b | 325.72 ± 20.89bcd | 202.38 ± 17.97def |
| MCPPH-Ca | 121.65 ± 4.63a | 269.20 ± 6.67b | 332.21 ± 11.45bc | 204.33 ± 15.22de |
| HCPPH-Ca | 121.85 ± 7.19a | 270.62 ± 13.87b | 340.02 ± 20.01a | 223.41 ± 13.03b |
Note: control, normal group; model, low calcium group; HCaCO3, high dosage of CaCO3 group; HGCa, high dosage of calcium gluconate group; LCPPH + LCaCO3, low dosage of CPPH supplemented with low dosage of CaCO3 group; MCPPH + MCaCO3, model dosage of CPPH supplemented with model dosage of CaCO3 group; HCPPH + HCaCO3, high dosage of CPPH supplemented with high dosage of CaCO3 group; LCPPH-Ca, low dosage of CPPH-Ca group; MCPPH-Ca, model dosage of CPPH-Ca group; HCPPH-Ca, high dosage of CPPH-Ca group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Different letters indicate significant effect with p < 0.05.
Figure 1Biochemical parameters in the serum of Ca-deficient rats after oral gavage with different Ca. Serum Ca (A), Serum P (B), Serum alkaline phosphatase (Serum ALP) (C). Note: control, normal group; model, low calcium group; HCaCO3, high dosage of CaCO3 group; HGCa, high dosage of calcium gluconate group; LCPPH + LCaCO3, low dosage of CPPH supplemented with low dosage of CaCO3 group; MCPPH + MCaCO3, model dosage of CPPH supplemented with model dosage of CaCO3 group; HCPPH + HCaCO3, high dosage of CPPH supplemented with high dosage of CaCO3 group; LCPPH-Ca, low dosage of CPPH-Ca group; MCPPH-Ca, model dosage of CPPH-Ca group; HCPPH-Ca, high dosage of CPPH-Ca group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Different letters indicate significant effect with p < 0.05.
Figure 2Weight index, length and diameter of femurs and tibias of Ca-deficient rats after treatment with different Ca. Femur weight index (A), Femur length (B), Femur diameter (C), Tibia weight index (D), Tibia length (E), Tibia diameter (F). Note: control, normal group; model, low calcium group; HCaCO3, high dosage of CaCO3 group; HGCa, high dosage of calcium gluconate group; LCPPH + LCaCO3, low dosage of CPPH supplemented with low dosage of CaCO3 group; MCPPH + MCaCO3, model dosage of CPPH supplemented with model dosage of CaCO3 group; HCPPH + HCaCO3, high dosage of CPPH supplemented with high dosage of CaCO3 group; LCPPH-Ca, low dosage of CPPH-Ca group; MCPPH-Ca, model dosage of CPPH-Ca group; HCPPH-Ca, high dosage of CPPH-Ca group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Different letters indicate significant effect with p < 0.05.
Figure 3Femurs bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of Ca-deficient rats after oral gavage with different Ca in the experimental period. Proximal BMC (A), Central BMC (B), Distal BMC (C), Proximal BMD (D), Centrality BMD (E), Distal BMD (F). Note: control, normal group; model, low calcium group; HCaCO3, high dosage of CaCO3 group; HGCa, high dosage of calcium gluconate group; LCPPH + LCaCO3, low dosage of CPPH supplemented with low dosage of CaCO3 group; MCPPH + MCaCO3, model dosage of CPPH supplemented with model dosage of CaCO3 group; HCPPH + HCaCO3, high dosage of CPPH supplemented with high dosage of CaCO3 group; LCPPH-Ca, low dosage of CPPH-Ca group; MCPPH-Ca, model dosage of CPPH-Ca group; HCPPH-Ca, high dosage of CPPH-Ca group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Different letters indicate significant effect with p < 0.05.
Figure 4Histopathological analysis of rat kidney tissues in different groups at 100× magnification. control (A), model (B), HCaCO3 (C), HGCa (D), LCPPH + LCaCO3 (E), MCPPH + MCaCO3 (F), HCPPH + HCaCO3 (G), LCPPH-Ca (H), MCPPH-Ca (I), HCPPH-Ca (J).
Figure 5Apparent calcium absorption rate (ACAR) and calcium accumulation rate (CAR) of Ca-deficient rats after oral gavage with different Ca. ACAR (A), CAR (B). Note: control, normal group; model, low calcium group; HCaCO3, high dosage of CaCO3 group; HGCa, high dosage of calcium gluconate group; LCPPH + LCaCO3, low dosage of CPPH supplemented with low dosage of CaCO3 group; MCPPH + MCaCO3, model dosage of CPPH supplemented with model dosage of CaCO3 group; HCPPH + HCaCO3, high dosage of CPPH supplemented with high dosage of CaCO3 group; LCPPH-Ca, low dosage of CPPH-Ca group; MCPPH-Ca, model dosage of CPPH-Ca group; HCPPH-Ca, high dosage of CPPH-Ca group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Different letters indicate significant effect with p < 0.05.
Figure 6mRNA expression levels of genes involved in calcium-promoting mechanism as determined using real-time PCR. Transient receptor potential cation V6 (TRPV6) (A), Transient receptor potential cation V5 (TRPV5) (B), calcium-binding protein-D9k (CaBP-D9K) (C), plasma membrane Ca-ATPase (PMCA1b) (D). Note: control, normal group; model, low calcium group; HCaCO3, high dosage of CaCO3 group; HGCa, high dosage of calcium gluconate group; LCPPH + LCaCO3, low dosage of CPPH supplemented with low dosage of CaCO3 group; MCPPH + MCaCO3, model dosage of CPPH supplemented with model dosage of CaCO3 group; HCPPH + HCaCO3, high dosage of CPPH supplemented with high dosage of CaCO3 group; LCPPH-Ca, low dosage of CPPH-Ca group; MCPPH-Ca, model dosage of CPPH-Ca group; HCPPH-Ca, high dosage of CPPH-Ca group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Different letters indicate significant effect with p < 0.05.
Figure 7Changes in the bacterial composition of rat intestinal contents according to different genera. Composition of gut microbiota at the genus level. Note: control, normal group; model, low calcium group; HCaCO3, high dosage of CaCO3 group; HGCa, high dosage of calcium gluconate group; LCPPH + LCaCO3, low dosage of CPPH supplemented with low dosage of CaCO3 group; MCPPH + MCaCO3, model dosage of CPPH supplemented with model dosage of CaCO3 group; HCPPH + HCaCO3, high dosage of CPPH supplemented with high dosage of CaCO3 group; LCPPH-Ca, low dosage of CPPH-Ca group; MCPPH-Ca, model dosage of CPPH-Ca group; HCPPH-Ca, high dosage of CPPH-Ca group. T-test was used to calculate significant differences between group.
Figure 8Heatmap of Spearman’s correlation between caecal microbiota of significant differences and biochemical indexes. The depth of the color corresponds the extent of relevance between caecal microbiota and biochemical indexes. (FDR adjusted p < 0.05).
Oral administration dosages of peptides and Ca for each group.
| No. | Group | n | Given Dosage of N Content and Ca, mg/kg bw |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | 10 | Deionized water |
| 2 | Model | 10 | Deionized water |
| 3 | HCaCO3 | 10 | Ca 119.97 |
| 4 | HGCa | 10 | Ca 119.97 |
| 5 | LCPPH + LCaCO3 | 10 | CPPH 465 + Ca 39.99 |
| 6 | MCPPPH + MCaCO3 | 10 | CPPH 930 + Ca 79.98 |
| 7 | HCPPH + HCaCO3 | 10 | CPPH1395 + Ca 119.97 |
| 8 | LCPPH-Ca | 10 | Ca 39.99 |
| 9 | MCPPH-Ca | 10 | Ca 79.98 |
| 10 | HCPPH-Ca | 10 | Ca 119.97 |
Note: Control, normal group; model, low-calcium group; HCaCO3, high dosage of CaCO3 group; HGCa, high dosage of calcium gluconate group; LCPPH + LCaCO3, low dosage of CPPH and low dosage of CaCO3 group; MCPPH + MCaCO3, middle dosage of CPPH and middle dosage of CaCO3 group; HCPPH + HCaCO3, high dosage of CPPH and high dosage of CaCO3 group; LCPPH-Ca, low dosage of CPPH-Ca group; MCPPH-Ca, middle dosage of CPPH-Ca group; HCPPH-Ca, high dosage of CPPH-Ca group.