Literature DB >> 31211890

Identification and characterization of yeasts from bovine rumen for potential use as probiotics.

T Fernandes1, B F Carvalho2, H C Mantovani3, R F Schwan2, C L S Ávila1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim was to isolate, identify and characterize yeasts present in rumen fluid and to select strains showing potential as probiotics. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Rumen fluid was sampled from 4 herds of dairy and beef cattle and 77 yeast isolates were identified. Initial screening was based on the capacity to maintain viability in a medium with different ruminal conditions. A second screening in fresh rumen fluid to assess the growth of inoculated yeasts and evaluate in vitro neutral detergent fibre digestibility (NDF-D), pH and acid accumulation was conducted. The yeast population ranged from 3·84 to 6·76 log10 CFU per ml. The main species of yeast found were Pichia kudriavzevii, Candida rugosa, C. pararugosa, C. ethanolica and Magnusiomyces capitatus. Strains CCMA 933 (C. rugosa) and CCMA 970 (C. pararugosa) showed greater ability to survive in ruminal fluid and stimulated the production of acids. Isolate CCMA 967 (C. ethanolica) survived and improved the NDF-D.
CONCLUSION: Pichia kudriavzevii was the dominant yeast found in the cattle herds. Strains CCMA 933, CCMA 970 and CCMA 967 showed properties that could be useful as potential probiotics for cattle. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study was the first to select yeasts from the rumen fluid, with the potential to be used as probiotic, based on the ruminal conditions.
© 2019 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Candidazzm321990; zzm321990Pichiazzm321990; neutral detergent fibre digestibility; rumen; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31211890     DOI: 10.1111/jam.14350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  5 in total

1.  Effect of co-fermentation system with isolated new yeasts on soymilk: microbiological, physicochemical, rheological, aromatic, and sensory characterizations.

Authors:  Sameh A Korma; Li Li; Mohamed Ghamry; Qiyang Zhou; Peipei An; Khaled A E Abdrabo; Muhammad Faisal Manzoor; Abdur Rehman; Sobia Niazi; Ilaria Cacciotti
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 2.  Impact of Probiotics on Dairy Production Efficiency.

Authors:  Kirankumar Nalla; Naresh Kumar Manda; Harmeet Singh Dhillon; Santosh R Kanade; Namita Rokana; Matthias Hess; Anil Kumar Puniya
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Effects of Bovine Pichia kudriavzevii T7, Candida glabrata B14, and Lactobacillus plantarum Y9 on Milk Production, Quality and Digestive Tract Microbiome in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Yali Ji; Xin Dong; Zhimin Liu; Weijun Wang; Hai Yan; Xiaolu Liu
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  Safety Evaluation of Yeasts With Probiotic Potential.

Authors:  Pilar Fernández-Pacheco; Inés María Ramos Monge; Mónica Fernández-González; Justa María Poveda Colado; María Arévalo-Villena
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 5.  Probiotics: Symbiotic Relationship with the Animal Host.

Authors:  Elvia Guadalupe Melara; Mavir Carolina Avellaneda; Manuel Valdivié; Yaneisy García-Hernández; Roisbel Aroche; Yordan Martínez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.