Literature DB >> 31211676

Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Dynamics in International Travelers.

Charles Langelier, Michael Graves, Katrina Kalantar, Saharai Caldera, Robert Durrant, Mark Fisher, Richard Backman, Windy Tanner, Joseph L DeRisi, Daniel T Leung.   

Abstract

We used metagenomic next-generation sequencing to longitudinally assess the gut microbiota and antimicrobial resistomes of international travelers to clarify global exchange of resistant organisms. Travel resulted in an increase in antimicrobial resistance genes and a greater proportion of Escherichia species within gut microbial communities without impacting diversity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESBL; Enterobacteriaceae; antimicrobial resistance; bacteria; extended-spectrum β-lactamase; microbiome; resistome; travel medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31211676      PMCID: PMC6590773          DOI: 10.3201/eid2507.181492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


International travel is a known contributor to the emergence of organisms with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) (–). Colonization with resistant microbes acquired during travel can persist asymptomatically for extended periods and result in transmission into the environment and susceptible populations (). The mechanisms underlying acquisition of AMR bacteria during travel are incompletely understood, although changes in the intestinal microbiota are hypothesized to play a role (). To clarify AMR exchange during global travel, we used metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to assess gut microbiota composition and the antimicrobial resistome.

The Study

During March 2016–2018, we recruited adults with planned travel to Asia or Africa for healthcare-related work. Participants introduced 1 tablespoon of stool into vials with either RNAprotect (QIAGEN, http://www.qiagen.com) or Cary-Blair (CB) media and then submitted samples and surveys pretravel, posttravel, 30 days posttravel, and 6 months posttravel. Upon receipt, we stored RNAprotect samples at −80°C and CB samples at 4°C until inoculation onto chromogenic agar plates selective for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing bacteria (CHROMagar ESBL) and incubation overnight at 37°C. We then inoculated single colonies into LB broth and incubated overnight at 37°C. If multiple morphotypes were identified, we conducted separate subcultures. We performed speciation by using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. DNA and RNA extracted using the QIAGEN Powerfecal kit underwent metagenomic sequencing as previously described (). Raw data are available publicly (Bioproject PRJNA509512). We detected enteric microbiota using a recently developed bioinformatics pipeline (). We aggregated microbial alignments at the genus level before downstream analyses. To control for background environmental and reagent contaminants, we incorporated no-template water control samples alongside extracted nucleic acid and carried them forward throughout library preparation and sequencing. We then performed direct subtraction of total reads aligning to each microbial genus present in controls from each study sample before downstream analyses. We used the SRST2 computational tool and ARGannot_r2 database (https://github.com/katholt/srst2) to identify AMR genes with allele coverage of >20% (). Although a precise definition of ESBL has not been established, we used a working definition of Ambler class A–D β-lactamases with known or predicted ability to confer resistance to first- through third-generation cephalosporins (,). We required detection of chromosomally encoded Ambler class C β-lactamases (i.e., AmpC) by both DNA-Seq and RNA-Seq to capture actively expressed genes. Nine of 10 participants were culture-positive for ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-PE) upon return, including 8 persons who traveled to Nepal and 1 who went to Nigeria. One traveler was found to be colonized before departure (traveler 3 [T3]); 3 travelers had persistent carriage at the 30-day visit (T2, T3, and T5) and 2 at 6 months (T3 and T5) (Table 1). Although 4 participants experienced diarrheal symptoms during travel, only 1 (T5) had persistent diarrheal symptoms at 6 months. Diarrheal symptoms were not associated with persistent ESBL-PE colonization at any point, and no travelers reported antibiotic use or receipt of healthcare in an inpatient setting while traveling. All travelers were exposed to inpatient healthcare facilities, and 3 travelers reported street food consumption.
Table 1

Selected characteristics of 10 travelers and assessment of ESBL-producing Enterobacteraciae*

TravelerDestinationDuration, dDiarrheaPretravelPosttravel30 d posttravel6 mo posttravel
T1Nepal30N AmpC OXA-209 OXA-209
T2Nepal30N AmpC, CTX-M1 AmpC
T3Nepal30N OXA-209 AmpC, CTX-M1, OXA-209 OXA-209 OXA-209
T4Nepal16N AmpC NR
T5Nepal30Y AmpC, SHV-12 AmpC AmpC, CTX-M-1
T6Nepal15Y AmpC, CTX-M-1
T7Nepal18N AmpC, CTX-M-1 NRNR
T8Uganda14N– (AmpC)†
T9Nigeria60Y AmpC
T10Nepal30Y AmpC, CTX-M-1 NR

*Participants submitted samples pretravel (within 1 week before departure), posttravel (within 1 week after return), 30 days posttravel, and 6 months posttravel. ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; N, no; NR, no sample received; Y, yes; –, ESBL-negative by culture.
†T8 was the only participant who was phenotypically ESBL-negative after travel.

*Participants submitted samples pretravel (within 1 week before departure), posttravel (within 1 week after return), 30 days posttravel, and 6 months posttravel. ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; N, no; NR, no sample received; Y, yes; –, ESBL-negative by culture.
†T8 was the only participant who was phenotypically ESBL-negative after travel. We first examined changes in gut microbiome α diversity after international travel (Figure, panel A) and found that the Shannon diversity index (SDI) did not significantly change upon return (p = 0.674 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test) or at day 30 posttravel (p = 0.250 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test). We then assessed whether microbial community composition differed across all participants at their posttravel versus pretravel visit but found no difference (Bray Curtis Index p = 0.23 by permutational multivariate analysis of variance). Although global composition and diversity of gut microbiota did not significantly change after travel, we observed significant differences in the abundance of discrete genera. Across all participants, Enterobacteriaceae demonstrated the greatest fold change in abundance posttravel; Escherichia was the genus most differentially increased (p<0.001 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test) (Figure, panel B; Appendix Figures 1, 2).
Figure

Microbiome and AMR gene dynamics in international travelers. A) Longitudinal profile of traveler gut microbiome diversity measured by Shannon diversity Index. Traveler 5 (T5) had a Shannon diversity index >3 SDs below the mean when measured at 30 days and 6 months posttravel. B) Microbes, by genus, demonstrating the greatest fold change in abundance after travel on the basis of DNA sequencing nucleotide alignments. C) Total number of AMR genes identified with >20% allele coverage by DNA sequencing. D) Total number of AMR genes identified with >20% allele coverage by RNA sequencing. AGLY, aminoglycoside; AMR, antimicrobial resistance; BLA, β-lactamase; FLQ, fluoroquinolone; MLS, macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramin; PRE, pretravel (within 1 week before departure); PST, posttravel (within 1 week after return); TMP/SUL, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TET, tetracycline; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.

Microbiome and AMR gene dynamics in international travelers. A) Longitudinal profile of traveler gut microbiome diversity measured by Shannon diversity Index. Traveler 5 (T5) had a Shannon diversity index >3 SDs below the mean when measured at 30 days and 6 months posttravel. B) Microbes, by genus, demonstrating the greatest fold change in abundance after travel on the basis of DNA sequencing nucleotide alignments. C) Total number of AMR genes identified with >20% allele coverage by DNA sequencing. D) Total number of AMR genes identified with >20% allele coverage by RNA sequencing. AGLY, aminoglycoside; AMR, antimicrobial resistance; BLA, β-lactamase; FLQ, fluoroquinolone; MLS, macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramin; PRE, pretravel (within 1 week before departure); PST, posttravel (within 1 week after return); TMP/SUL, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TET, tetracycline; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase. Analysis of the antimicrobial resistome revealed an increase in AMR genes and transcripts after return from travel (p<0.01 for DNA and p = 0.03 for RNA sequencing, both by Wilcoxon rank-sum test) (Table 2; Figure, panels C–D; Appendix Figure 3). ESBL-encoding genes, AmpC-encoding genes, or both were identified in 100% of samples with an ESBL culture-determined phenotype and in 14% of samples without, including 1 participant (T8) who was phenotypically ESBL-negative after travel (Table 1). β-lactam–resistance genes increased posttravel, including AmpC, CTX-M, OXA, and SHV gene families known or predicted to confer ESBL production, as well as diverse additional β- lactamase genes (Appendix Figure 3). Travel also resulted in an increase in qnr plasmid–mediated quinolone-resistance genes, as well as trimethoprim (dfr)-, sulfa-, macrolide-, and aminoglycoside-resistance genes (Table 2). Genes conferring resistance to tetracyclines and aminoglycosides were most abundant in travelers at baseline and remained stable or decreased during travel (Table 2).
Table 2

Fold change in abundance of AMR genes found in Enterobacteraciae with >20% allele coverage compared with pretravel, by resistance gene or drug class*

Resistance gene or drug class
Fold change compared with pretravel
Posttravel

30 d

6 mo
DNA
RNA
DNA
RNA
DNA
RNA
β-lactam AMR genes
AmpC >100>100>1001>1002
AmpH >100>100>1002>1001
CTX >100>100>100>100>100>100
MrdA 50>1000>1005>100
OXA 211010
SHV >100>100>100>100>100>100
TEM
>100
64

54
0

15
1
Other antibiotic classes
Aminoglycoside231000
Fluoroquinolone>100>100>100>100>100>100
Glycopeptide010000
Macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramin231311
Sulfa22291000
Tetracycline111010
Trimethoprim>10088>1000>1001

*Among 10 participants who submitted samples pretravel (within 1 week before departure), posttravel (within 1 week after return), 30 days posttravel, and 6 month posttravel. AMR, antimicrobial resistance.

*Among 10 participants who submitted samples pretravel (within 1 week before departure), posttravel (within 1 week after return), 30 days posttravel, and 6 month posttravel. AMR, antimicrobial resistance. We found no significant differences in SDI between persistent carriers and those who lost carriage at 30 days (n = 3; p = 0.56 by t-test) or at 6 months (n = 2; p = 0.27 by t-test) posttravel. T5, who was colonized at both time points and who was the only traveler with persistent diarrheal symptoms, had an SDI >3 SDs below the mean at 6 months (Figure, panel A). Bray-Curtis distance measured pretravel or posttravel did not differ between travelers who were ESBL-PE positive by culture at 30 days or 6 months posttravel (p = 0.32 by permutational multivariate analysis of variance). No individual taxa were associated with posttravel ESBL positivity on the basis of an adjusted p value <0.05 (t-test) at 30 days or 6 months posttravel.

Conclusions

International travel is a well-recognized contributor to the global spread of emerging infectious diseases, including AMR bacteria (,). We analyzed the enteric microbiota and resistomes of returned travelers and found a marked increase in AMR genes that was associated with an increased proportion of Escherichia bacteria. At baseline, few participants had evidence of ESBL colonization; however, after travel, ESBL and actively transcribed AmpC genes were notably increased, consistent with previous reports (,). Both mNGS and culture-based methods found evidence of persistent ESBL colonization after 6 months, suggesting that travel can induce long-term changes in the antimicrobial resistome (). In addition to β-lactamase genes, mNGS identified a diversity of other AMR gene classes that increased in abundance after travel. For example, 80% of participants acquired horizontally transferable qnr genes after travel, reflecting the limited utility of quinolones for treatment of traveler’s diarrhea (). Although we did not detect genes known to encode carbapenemases, participants might have harbored carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteraciae, given that a combination of an ESBL or AmpC gene with a porin mutation or efflux pump can lead to carbapenem resistance (). Changes in microbiome diversity were not associated with ESBL positivity at 30 days or 6 months posttravel, suggesting that disruption of the antimicrobial resistome can occur in the setting of a preserved microbial community structure. We observed a high rate of ESBL-PE acquisition in this cohort, most of whom traveled to the Indian subcontinent, consistent with previous studies of travelers returning from this region (). Notably, none of the travelers in this cohort reported antibiotic use, suggesting that substantial ESBL-PE colonization can occur even in the absence of antibiotic-related disruption of commensal gut microbiota. Because this study is limited by small sample size, relevant associations might have been missed. In addition, we could not assess the presence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by using culture-based methods. mNGS and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance need assessment in larger cohorts traveling to more destinations. Nonetheless, our findings highlight the pervasiveness of AMR microbe exchange during international travel and the promise of mNGS for assessing the global exchange of antimicrobial resistance.

Appendix

Additional information on microbiome and antimicrobial resistance gene dynamics in international travelers.
  13 in total

Review 1.  International travel and acquisition of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Jan Hassing; Jelmer Alsma; Maris S Arcilla; Perry J van Genderen; Bruno H Stricker; Annelies Verbon
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2015

2.  Redefining extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: balancing science and clinical need.

Authors:  Christian G Giske; Arnfinn S Sundsfjord; Gunnar Kahlmeter; Neil Woodford; Patrice Nordmann; David L Paterson; Rafael Cantón; Timothy R Walsh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Updated functional classification of beta-lactamases.

Authors:  Karen Bush; George A Jacoby
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Import and spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by international travellers (COMBAT study): a prospective, multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Maris S Arcilla; Jarne M van Hattem; Manon R Haverkate; Martin C J Bootsma; Perry J J van Genderen; Abraham Goorhuis; Martin P Grobusch; Astrid M Oude Lashof; Nicky Molhoek; Constance Schultsz; Ellen E Stobberingh; Henri A Verbrugh; Menno D de Jong; Damian C Melles; John Penders
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Healthcare personnel intestinal colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms.

Authors:  B K Decker; A F Lau; J P Dekker; C D Spalding; N Sinaii; S Conlan; D K Henderson; J A Segre; K M Frank; T N Palmore
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Long-term Carriage of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the General Population in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Engeline van Duijkeren; Cornelia C H Wielders; Cindy M Dierikx; Angela H A M van Hoek; Paul Hengeveld; Christiaan Veenman; Alice Florijn; Aniek Lotterman; Lidwien A M Smit; Jaap T van Dissel; Catharina B M Maassen; Sabine C de Greeff
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  The Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: The Impact and Evolution of a Global Menace.

Authors:  Latania K Logan; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  SRST2: Rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs.

Authors:  Michael Inouye; Harriet Dashnow; Lesley-Ann Raven; Mark B Schultz; Bernard J Pope; Takehiro Tomita; Justin Zobel; Kathryn E Holt
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  High rates of antimicrobial drug resistance gene acquisition after international travel, The Netherlands.

Authors:  Christian J H von Wintersdorff; John Penders; Ellen E Stobberingh; Astrid M L Oude Lashof; Christian J P A Hoebe; Paul H M Savelkoul; Petra F G Wolffs
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Integrating host response and unbiased microbe detection for lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Charles Langelier; Katrina L Kalantar; Farzad Moazed; Michael R Wilson; Emily D Crawford; Thomas Deiss; Annika Belzer; Samaneh Bolourchi; Saharai Caldera; Monica Fung; Alejandra Jauregui; Katherine Malcolm; Amy Lyden; Lillian Khan; Kathryn Vessel; Jenai Quan; Matt Zinter; Charles Y Chiu; Eric D Chow; Jenny Wilson; Steve Miller; Michael A Matthay; Katherine S Pollard; Stephanie Christenson; Carolyn S Calfee; Joseph L DeRisi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Examining horizontal gene transfer in microbial communities.

Authors:  Ilana Lauren Brito
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Current Capabilities of Gut Microbiome-Based Diagnostics and the Promise of Clinical Application.

Authors:  Gregory L Damhorst; Max W Adelman; Michael H Woodworth; Colleen S Kraft
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  Metagenomics for neurological infections - expanding our imagination.

Authors:  Prashanth S Ramachandran; Michael R Wilson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  Travel-Related Antimicrobial Resistance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hamid Bokhary; Krisna N A Pangesti; Harunor Rashid; Moataz Abd El Ghany; Grant A Hill-Cawthorne
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-16

5.  Microbiota-associated risk factors for asymptomatic gut colonisation with multi-drug-resistant organisms in a Dutch nursing home.

Authors:  Quinten R Ducarmon; Elisabeth M Terveer; Romy D Zwittink; Ed J Kuijper; Sam Nooij; Michelle N Bloem; Karuna E W Vendrik; Monique A A Caljouw; Ingrid M J G Sanders; Sofie M van Dorp; Man C Wong
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 11.117

6.  Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroidaceae provide resistance to travel-associated intestinal colonization by multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Matthew Davies; Gianluca Galazzo; Jarne M van Hattem; Maris S Arcilla; Damian C Melles; Menno D de Jong; Constance Schultsz; Petra Wolffs; Alan McNally; Willem van Schaik; John Penders
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

7.  Destination shapes antibiotic resistance gene acquisitions, abundance increases, and diversity changes in Dutch travelers.

Authors:  Alaric W D'Souza; Manish Boolchandani; Sanket Patel; Gianluca Galazzo; Jarne M van Hattem; Maris S Arcilla; Damian C Melles; Menno D de Jong; Constance Schultsz; Gautam Dantas; John Penders
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 11.117

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.