Literature DB >> 31211592

High Rate of Failure After Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation in Osteoarthritic Knees at 15 Years of Follow-up.

Luca Andriolo1, Davide Reale1, Alessandro Di Martino1, Stefano Zaffagnini1, Francesca Vannini2, Alberto Ferruzzi2, Giuseppe Filardo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chondral and osteochondral lesions in osteoarthritic knees of young patients remain challenging for orthopaedic surgeons, due to a combination of high functional demands and limited indications for joint replacement in this population. The possibility of extending the indication of cartilage regenerative procedures to these patients may allow the delay of metal resurfacing.
PURPOSE: To analyze the potential of a cartilage regenerative approach to provide clinical benefits in young patients with osteoarthritic knees, documenting outcomes in terms of clinical improvement as well as failures, in particular regarding knee replacement, at long-term follow-up. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A total of 41 patients (mean ± SD age, 43 ± 9 years) who had cartilage lesions (4 ± 2 cm2) in osteoarthritic knees (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3) underwent matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) as a salvage procedure. Patients were evaluated with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), and Tegner scores before surgery; at 1, 2, 5, and 9 years after surgery; and at a final follow-up at a mean of 15 years after surgery (range, 14-18 years). Failures were also recorded.
RESULTS: An improvement was observed in all scores after surgery, but a progressive worsening over time was noted. The mean ± SD IKDC score improved from 38.6 ± 16.2 to a maximum of 66.0 ± 18.6 at 2 years (P < .0005), with a subsequent deterioration until the final evaluation at 56.2 ± 21.7 (P = .024). A similar trend was confirmed by EQ-VAS scores. Tegner scores improved at all follow-up points but did not reach the preinjury level. Patients who underwent combined surgery obtained significantly lower results. Only 13 patients (32%) had an IKDC score higher than 70. During the follow-up period, 21 patients underwent reoperation (18 with knee replacement) and 3 more patients experienced clinical failure, for a total surgical and clinical failure rate of 59% at 15 years.
CONCLUSION: The use of cartilage regenerative surgical procedures, such as MACT, as salvage procedures for young, active patients affected by chondral and osteochondral lesions in osteoarthritic knees led to a limited improvement, with the majority of patients experiencing failure at long-term follow-up. Although a minor subpopulation experienced favorable and stable improvement, the use of MACT for such a challenging indication remains questionable until responding patients can be profiled.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cartilage; failure; knee; matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation; osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31211592     DOI: 10.1177/0363546519855029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Guidelines for the treatment of unicompartmental cartilage defects of the knee-Cartilage repair, osteotomy, mini-implant or arthroplasty?]

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Andreas Imhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Cartilage repair procedures for early osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Kaywan Izadpanah; Stephan Vogt; Julian Mehl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Third-Generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation at the Knee Joint Using the Igor Scaffold: A Case Series With 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Lukas Zak; Anne Kleiner; Christian Albrecht; Brigitte Tichy; Silke Aldrian
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-22

4.  Excellent histological results in terms of articular cartilage regeneration after spheroid-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI).

Authors:  David Grevenstein; Andreas Mamilos; Volker H Schmitt; Tanja Niedermair; Willi Wagner; C James Kirkpatrick; Christoph Brochhausen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation in Knee Osteoarthritis: Midterm Outcomes and Survival Analysis in 467 Patients.

Authors:  Yong Sang Kim; Dong Suk Suh; Dae Hyun Tak; Pill Ku Chung; Yong Gon Koh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-17

6.  Scaffolds for Knee Chondral and Osteochondral Defects: Indications for Different Clinical Scenarios. A Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Luca Andriolo; Peter Angele; Massimo Berruto; Mats Brittberg; Vincenzo Condello; Susan Chubinskaya; Laura de Girolamo; Alessandro Di Martino; Berardo Di Matteo; Justus Gille; Alberto Gobbi; Christian Lattermann; Norimasa Nakamura; Stefan Nehrer; Giuseppe M Peretti; Nogah Shabshin; Peter Verdonk; Kenneth Zaslav; Elizaveta Kon
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Effectiveness and safety of polydioxanone thread-embedding acupuncture (TEA) and electroacupuncture (EA) treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients with postoperative pain: An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Ye Ji Lee; Chang-Hyun Han; Ju Hyun Jeon; Eunseok Kim; Jin Youp Kim; Ki Hyun Park; Ae Ran Kim; Eun Jung Lee; Young Il Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.