Svetlana Alekseenko1,2, Sergey Karpishchenko3. 1. I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia. 2. K. A. Rauhfus Children's City Multidisciplinary Clinical Center for High Medical Technologies, St. Petersburg, Russia. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, First Pavlov State Medical University of Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency and safety of endonasal endoscopic maxillary surgery and the Caldwell-Luc approach in children. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: A total of 121 children aged 9 to 17 years with chronic rhinosinusitis were included in the study. The patients were operated on using Caldwell-Luc (n = 36) and endoscopic maxillary surgery (n = 85) procedures. Efficiency and safety of the surgeries were assessed using pre- and postoperative endoscopic evaluation of the mucosa of the nasal cavity, 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20), and subjective (both children's and parents') evaluation of the outcomes. RESULTS: Endoscopic investigation of the mucosa of the nasal cavity demonstrated a significant improvement after both Caldwell-Luc and endoscopic surgery, although the Caldwell-Luc procedure did not result in significant improvement in mucosal color. However, no significant group difference was observed. Both techniques resulted in a significant improvement of mucosal edema and fluid characteristics. Based on the results of the SNOT-20, endoscopic maxillary surgery was characterized by a significant improvement in headache frequency, waking up at night, reduced concentration, ear pain, and emotional suppression as compared to Caldwell-Luc surgery. Although no significant group difference in efficiency between the Caldwell-Luc approach and endoscopic surgery was observed, the latter was characterized by a lower rate of scar formation, and reduced sensitivity, local painfulness, lacrimation, and psychologic discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained data demonstrate the higher efficiency and safety of endoscopic sinus surgery as compared to the Caldwell-Luc approach in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1056-1063, 2020.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency and safety of endonasal endoscopic maxillary surgery and the Caldwell-Luc approach in children. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: A total of 121 children aged 9 to 17 years with chronic rhinosinusitis were included in the study. The patients were operated on using Caldwell-Luc (n = 36) and endoscopic maxillary surgery (n = 85) procedures. Efficiency and safety of the surgeries were assessed using pre- and postoperative endoscopic evaluation of the mucosa of the nasal cavity, 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20), and subjective (both children's and parents') evaluation of the outcomes. RESULTS: Endoscopic investigation of the mucosa of the nasal cavity demonstrated a significant improvement after both Caldwell-Luc and endoscopic surgery, although the Caldwell-Luc procedure did not result in significant improvement in mucosal color. However, no significant group difference was observed. Both techniques resulted in a significant improvement of mucosal edema and fluid characteristics. Based on the results of the SNOT-20, endoscopic maxillary surgery was characterized by a significant improvement in headache frequency, waking up at night, reduced concentration, ear pain, and emotional suppression as compared to Caldwell-Luc surgery. Although no significant group difference in efficiency between the Caldwell-Luc approach and endoscopic surgery was observed, the latter was characterized by a lower rate of scar formation, and reduced sensitivity, local painfulness, lacrimation, and psychologic discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained data demonstrate the higher efficiency and safety of endoscopic sinus surgery as compared to the Caldwell-Luc approach in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1056-1063, 2020.
Authors: Svetlana I Alekseenko; Anatoly V Skalny; Sergey A Karpischenko; Alexey A Tinkov Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.738