Ting Wu1,2, Meng Wang1,2, Wenfang Wu1, Qianxuan Luo1, Liping Jiang3, Huai Tao4, Meichun Deng1. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China. 2. Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China. 3. Department of Parasitology, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China. 4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, China.
Abstract
Spider venoms are known to contain proteins and polypeptides that perform various functions including antimicrobial, neurotoxic, analgesic, cytotoxic, necrotic, and hemagglutinic activities. Currently, several classes of natural molecules from spider venoms are potential sources of chemotherapeutics against tumor cells. Some of the spider peptide toxins produce lethal effects on tumor cells by regulating the cell cycle, activating caspase pathway or inactivating mitochondria. Some of them also target the various types of ion channels (including voltage-gated calcium channels, voltage-gated sodium channels, and acid-sensing ion channels) among other pain-related targets. Herein we review the structure and pharmacology of spider-venom peptides that are being used as leads for the development of therapeutics against the pathophysiological conditions including cancer and pain.
Spider venoms are known to contain proteins and polypeptides that perform various functions including antimicrobial, neurotoxic, analgesic, cytotoxic, necrotic, and hemagglutinic activities. Currently, several classes of natural molecules from spider venoms are potential sources of chemotherapeutics against tumor cells. Some of the spider peptide toxins produce lethal effects on tumor cells by regulating the cell cycle, activating caspase pathway or inactivating mitochondria. Some of them also target the various types of ion channels (including voltage-gated calcium channels, voltage-gated sodium channels, and acid-sensing ion channels) among other pain-related targets. Herein we review the structure and pharmacology of spider-venom peptides that are being used as leads for the development of therapeutics against the pathophysiological conditions including cancer and pain.
Entities:
Keywords:
antitumor; drug candidates; pain; spider venom peptides
Spiders are air-breathing arthropods belonging to the subphylum Chelicerata and have
been on Earth for at least 300 million years [1]. Spiders are one of the most successful venomous animals and, with
the exception of predatory beetles, they are the most abundant terrestrial predators
that can cause detrimental effects on humans from their venomous bite [2]. Some spider species possess chelicerae that
are strong enough to penetrate the human skin during a bite, followed by injection
of venom into the body [3]. Spider
envenomation can become a public health hazard by causing pain, swelling,
diaphoresis, hypertension, patchy paralysis around the site of bitten area and other
systematic symptoms [4]. Although a spider
bite rarely causes death, extreme discomfort is a common result.On the other hand, spiders are also potentially beneficial to humans given that a
great number of their peptides present some potential therapeutic applications due
to their anticancer and analgesic activities. Compounds identified in recent years
from spider venoms include polypeptide toxins that contain a specific structural
motif known as an inhibitor cystine knot (ICK). Pharmacologically, these toxins have
been reported to exert a variety of neuroprotective, antimicrobial, anticancer and
antinocieptive effects [5-9]. Furthermore, antimicrobial peptides, which
are short proteins, have also been the focus of research over the past two decades
[10-14]. Spider peptide toxins have also been recognized as useful agents
for their anticancer, hemolytic, analgesic and antiarrhythmic properties [15-18].
In this review, we focus on the potential therapeutic applications and mechanisms of
spider peptides, particularly with respect to their anticancer and antinociceptive
activity (Table 1).
Table 1.
Some examples of spider venom peptides as potential drug candidates
with anticancer and antinociceptive properties.
Peptide name
Spider
Amino acids
cell/target mechanisms
Action mechanism/ types of pain
Ref
Antitumor activity
PcTx-1
Psalmopoeus cambridgei
40
malignant glioma cells
elevation of CKI proteins by activating ERK1/2
after inhibiting the ASIC
Cancers have become the leading cause of death around the world and have a
significant impact on public health [19].
In 2012, an estimated 14.1 million new cancer cases were diagnosed while 8.2
million died of the disease worldwide. The National Cancer Institute reported
that in 2016, there were about 1.7 million new cancer cases in the United States
and 0.6 million cancer deaths [20]. Over
the past few decades, significant advancements in the treatment of cancer have
included chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy and surgery.
Nevertheless, major problems of these conventional therapies include a
relatively low success rate, serious side effects and drug resistance [21, 22]. Therefore, an unmet need in this field is to develop treatments
for cancerpatients that are more effective and less toxic. In recent years, a
large number of studies have shown that biotoxins - which are produced by
snakes, spiders, bees, scorpions, wasps and ants - have anti-tumor potential
[23-26]. The peptides isolated from their venoms can impair tumor cell
membrane, inhibit cancer cell growth or induce apoptosis [27, 28]. Elucidation
of the anti-tumor effect of spider venom is still in its infancy although its
pharmacological activity is well documented. Spider venom peptides have been
confirmed as killing tumor cells or inhibiting their proliferation. At the same
time, many experiments have detected the cytotoxicity of spider peptides to
normal cells and the results are encouraging.Psalmotoxin 1(PcTx1) (Figure 1A) is a
specific acid-sensitive ion-channel-1 (ASIC1) blocker from the venom of the
South American tarantula Psalmopoeus cambridgei (Figure 2A). PcTx1 effectively inhibited
basally active cation currents in malignant astroglioma cells [29, 30]. Similar results were observed in freshly resected glioblastoma
multiforme (GBM) cells but not in normal human astrocytes. These results are
encouraging because gliomas are highly invasive while ion transport can play a
critical role in both migration and proliferation of glioma cells [31]. PcTx1 may be a good candidate that can
improve the currently poor prognosis for the treatment of patients with
glioblastoma multiforme. Subsequently, Arun K et al. also found
that PcTx1 arrests the cell cycle in the G0/G1 phase and upregulates the
expression of two proteins, p21 and p27, due to a reduction of the
phosphorylation of ERK1/2. Similar results were also observed in other lines of
GBM cells (Figure 3) [32]. Interestingly, gliomapatients often suffer from
epileptic seizures, which are due to neurotransmitter release from the tumor
cells [33]. In normal cells, the release
of neurotransmitters is controlled by membrane depolarization events. Similarly,
electrical bursting activity in brain tumor cells may be also be induced by
extracellular pH change that enhances Na+ ion flux through the
PcTx1-sensitive ASICs [34]. These
findings demonstrate that PcTx1 may be useful as a drug candidate to reduce the
occurrence rate of epileptic seizures in gliomapatients.
Pictures of spiders.(A),
Psalmopoeus cambridgei, the picture was
provided by Micha L Rieser; (B), Lycosa
singoriensis, the picture was provided by
Avereanu; (C), Lachesana
tarabaevi, the picture was provided by Alexey
et al. [40] ; (D),
Ornithoctonus huwena; (E)
Phoneutria nigriventer, the picture was
provided by Peigneur et al. [56]; (F),
Ornithoctonus hainana; (G),
Thrixopelma pruriens, the picture was provided
by Vanessa S.
Figure 3.
The anti-tumor mechanism of PcTx1. PcTx1 can suppress
activation of ERK1/2 by inhibiting ASIC1 channels, followed by
upregulating p21 and p27 protein expression to arrest the cell
cycle. The level of p21 mRNA increases, but that of p27 mRNA does
not change. The inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation also restricts
migration, but the mechanism remains unclear. ASIC1: Acid-sensitive
ion channel 1; PcTx1: Psalmotoxin1.
Lycosin-I is a cationic peptide isolated from Lycosa
singoriensis (Figure 2B).
There is sufficient evidence to prove that lycosin- I can inhibit tumor growth
in vitro and in vivo by activating dual
signaling pathways, including inhibition of proliferation and induction of
apoptosis. Treatment with lycosin- I (40 μM) resulted in more than 90% cell
death in the following humantumor cell lines: colon adenocarcinoma (HCT-116),
cervix carcinoma (HeLa), fibrosarcoma (H1080), hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2),
lung adenocarcinoma (H1299, A549), and prostate carcinoma (DU145). In contrast,
the same dose of lycosin-I was less toxic to non-tumor cells. Lycosin- I
activated the mitochondria-mediated death pathway to sensitize cancer cells for
apoptosis, and upregulated p27 to inhibit cell proliferation (Figure 4) [35]. In order to produce effects, it is necessary for lycosin-I to
bind and penetrate the cell membrane. Besides the electrostatic attraction
between tumor cell membranes and lycosin-I, Tan et al. found
that lycosin-I gradually aggregated upon contacting the lipid membrane, followed
by its absorption and structural change, which reduced its diffusion dynamics.
This new insight on lycosin-I may help us understand how lycosin-I interacts
with the tumor cell membrane [36]. To
enhance the cellular entry and efficacy in solid tumor, the method of
substituting one amino acid (from Lys to Arg) was utilized to design a synthetic
cationic peptide (Lycosin- I to R- Lycosin-I). Compared with lycosin-I,
R-lycosin-I demonstrated higher inhibitory activity and selectivity toward
cancer cells [37]. Based on its
characteristics mentioned above, lycosin- I is recognized as a cell-penetrating
peptide that can be used for the intracellular delivery of functional materials
to circumvent the biomembrane barrier by conjugating with spherical gold
nanoparticles. This conjunction will provide a stable, efficient and higher
selective platform to diagnose and treat cancers correctly in the future [6, 37].
Figure 4.
The anti-tumor mechanism of Lycosin-I. Lycosin-I
penetrates into cytoplasm and upregulates p27 mRNA and protein
expression to inhibit the cell cycle. Lycosin-I can bind with
mitochondria membrane and promote a mitochondria-mediated death
pathway to induce tumor cell apoptosis. Cyt c: cytochrome c.
Latarcin 2a (Figure 1B), a short linear
antimicrobial peptide, is purified from the Central Asian spider
Lachesana tarabaevi (Figure
2C) and displays in vitro cytotoxicity against humanerythroleukemia (K562) cells. Latarcin 2a induced changes in cell membrane, to
which it was closely bound, then rapidly penetrated into the cytoplasm and
accumulated in perinuclear structures. Latarcin 2a induced membrane blebbing and
swelling of K562 cells followed by cell death. The formation of small pores on
the cell membrane during the development of blebs plays an important role in the
peptide’s induction of cytotoxicity in K562 cells. Formation of small membrane
pores leads to internalization of latarcin 2a, which induces inactivation of
mitochondria and externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS). The process was a
positive feedback with latarcin 2a internalization and PS externalization
further promoting the accumulation of latarcin 2a. When the growth rate of cell
and cell membrane through development of blebs did not match the intracellular
high osmotic pressure, K562 cells membrane totally disintegrated (Figure 5). Surprisingly, externalization of
PS did not induce activation of the apoptosis pathway [38-40].
Figure 5.
The mechanism of Latarcin 2a interaction with K562
cells.Latarcin 2a bound to membrane and small pores
reform in cells membrane. The latarcin 2a penetrated into cytoplasm,
which induced inactivation of mitochondria and externalization of
PS. There was a positive feedback between externalization of PS and
internalization of latarcin 2a. At last, the cell disintegrated due
to the high intracellular osmotic pressure caused by accumulation of
the peptide. PS: Phosphatidyl serine.
The venom of the spider Macrotheleraven has an effect on
proliferation and apoptosis of different types of tumor cells. The venom
promotes HeLa cell apoptosis and necrosis in a time- and dose-dependent manner.
Elevation of caspase-3 activity plays a critical role in apoptosis with complete
or partial suppression of tumor size observed in vivo in nude
mice. Further examination showed that G0/G1 cell cycle arrest may contribute to
the inhibitory effect of venom on the growth of HeLa cells [41]. The venom of M.
raveni also exhibited dose-dependent antitumor activity in humanbreast carcinoma (MCF-7) cells, inhibiting DNA synthesis, affecting cell
viability, and inducing apoptosis and necrosis. The venom arrested the cell
cycle in the G2/M and G0/G1 phases and upregulated p21 in the human breast
carcinoma cell line MCF-7 [42]. The venom
also inhibited the proliferation of myelogenous leukemia cell line K562 and
activated caspase 3 and caspase 8 pathway to induce K562 cell apoptosis [43]. In an in vitro and
in vivo experiment, the venom upregulated the expression of
PTEN and BAX to inhibit the growth of subcutaneous H22tumors in mice
and downregulated PI3K, AKT and mTOR to inhibit tumor cell proliferation [44]. A similar pathway was confirmed in
extrahepatic metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma whereas the Bad protein level
was also upregulated to antagonize the anti-apoptotic effects of Bcl-2 and
induce tumor cell apoptosis [45].
However, it is worth noting that whether the effects of this venom are due to
peptides remains unknown and requires further research.There are different mechanisms involved in anticancer activity of spider
peptides. On the one hand, the peptide produces effects by itself through
directly increasing intracellular osmotic pressure, as a result of its
internalization [38]. On the other hand,
the peptides play an important role in inhibiting the growth of tumor cells by
regulating downstream signal molecules, especially proliferative and apoptotic
pathways. These results suggest that spider peptides may serve as anticancer
drug candidates. However, in our point of view, because of its penetrating
ability, accumulation near nuclear membrane and effects on transcriptional
level, we can hypothesize that some peptides may enter the nucleus and bind with
specific DNA sites to regulate transcription. The mechanism should be the focus
of future research.
Antinociceptive peptides from spider venom
Pain is the main reason that persons seek medical care and a major problem that
continues to challenge the medical profession. There are several types of pain
that seriously affect patients’ quality of life and cause economic burden. It is
estimated that chronic pain affects ~15% of the adult population, while the
annual economic burden caused by chronic pain is approximately $600 billion in
the United States, which exceeds the sum of economic costs caused by cancer,
diabetes and stroke [46]. While a variety
of drugs, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, are
utilized to prevent and treat different types of pain, they may cause side
effects. Moreover, it is reported that chronic opioid treatment leads to
development of drug resistance [47, 48]. Therefore, it is an urgent need to
seek new antinociceptive drugs to increase efficacy and reduce side effects.
Recent studies have indicated that peptides isolated from spiders can function
as antinociceptive drugs by acting on ion channels [7, 17, 49].
Calcium channel inhibitors and analgesia
Pain information processing starts from the activation of peripheral nociceptors,
causing action potentials to propagate along the primary afferent nerve fibers
into sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglia (DRG). They are further relayed to
the spinal dorsal horn through the central axons of sensory neurons. The action
potentials reaching the central terminals of sensory afferents cause membrane
depolarization, activation of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs), and
calcium influx, which triggers synaptic vesicle exocytosis. This then leads to
the release of excitatory neurotransmitters including glutamate, pain-inducing
peptides such as substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) into the
synaptic cleft. These neurotransmitters then cause activation of post-synaptic
dorsal horn projection neurons and interneurons, leading to spinal modulation of
sensory signals [50]. Thus, changes in
the expression and functions of VGCCs in pain-inducing conditions can be
potential targets for pain management. VGCCs comprise a family of ion channels
divided into low-threshold (T-type) and high-threshold (L-, N-, P/Q-, and
R-type) voltage-gated channels. Based on the sequence homology of the main
pore-formed α1 subunit, VGCCs are divided into 3 families: Cav1, Cav2, and Cav3
[51]. VGCCs emerged as potential
targets to treat severe pain conditions, as for example by the extraction of a
peptide toxin from the venom of the cone snail Conus magus, the
ω-conotoxin MVIIA, as a treatment for severe pain refractory to other
treatments. The ω-conotoxin MVIIA (synthetic form known as ziconotide, Prialt)
produces pain relief by blocking N-type VGCC [52-54].Huwentoxin-XVI (HWTX-XVI), which is purified from the venom of the spider
Ornithoctonus huwena (Figure
2D), is a specific blocker of N-type VGCCs in rat DRG neurons.
HWTX-XVI contains 39 amino-acid residues including six cysteines that form three
disulfide bridges. In formalin tests with rats, intraperitoneal injection of
HWTX-XVI produced potent dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in phase II but
not in phase I. The post-incision pain reduction by intramuscular injection of
HWTX-XVI occurred immediately and lasted longer, while morphine-induced pain
reduction was also immediate but lasted for a shorter time. Moreover, HWTX-XVI
also induced a slight but significant antinociceptive effect on thermal pain but
had no effect on the motor coordination of animals without inducing any obvious
side effects, such as serpentine tail movements or whole body shaking caused by
ziconotide, even at the highest dose tested [49]. The antinociceptive effect and minimal side effects of the
toxin demonstrate that HWTX-XVI can be a potent candidate for the control of
pain.The venom from the Brazilian armed spider, Phoneutria
nigriventer (Figure 2E),
includes many peptides that have different functions [55, 56].
Phoneutria nigriventer toxin3-6 (Tx3-6), one of the six
peptide isoforms of fraction PhTx3 in the venom, preferentially blocks N-type
VGCCs [57]. Tx3-6 exhibits an
antinociceptive effect on inflammatory and neuropathic pain and has a wide
therapeutic window [58]. Tx3-6 also shows
a strong and dose-dependent antinociceptive effect on cancer-related pain and
causes minimal side at high doses. Besides minimal side effects, Tx3-6 indicated
a good tolerability and a higher therapeutic index [59]. These results suggest that additional mechanisms
besides N-type VGCCs contribute to its antinociceptive effect. The transient
receptor potential cation channel subfamily A member 1 (TRPA1) channel is
primarily localized to a subpopulation of primary sensory neurons of the
trigeminal, vagal, and DRG. It is activated by reactive endogenous and exogenous
substances and noxious cold. This subset of nociceptors produces and releases
two neuropeptides, substance P and CGRP, which make TRPA1 channel associate with
a series of pains [60-62]. Tx3-6 selectively inhibited calcium
responses and currents evoked by the TRPA1 agonist, allyl isothiocyanate (AITC).
Low doses of Tx3-6 attenuated acute nociception as well as the mechanical and
cold hyperalgesia evoked by AITC [63]. It
is apparent that Tx3-6 also produced antinociceptive effects by acting on the
TRPA1 channel.Phoneutria nigriventer toxin 3-5(Tx3-5) is a blocker of L-type
VGCCs and produces an antinociceptive effect in postoperative models about 180
times more potent than that of ziconotide [64]. This effect was reversed by the selective activator of L-type
VGCCs Bay-K8644. Moreover, Tx3-5 was effective in reducing cancer-related pain
and could be utilized to treat cancerpatients who are resistant to morphine.
However, the antinociceptive effect caused by Tx3-5 in neuropathic pain models
was limited [57]. Several studies have
indicated that the role of L-type VGCCs in neuropathic pain is not as important
as those of other types of calcium channels, such as P/Q, N or R-type VGCCs
[65-67]. The effect induced by Tx3-5 was related to subtype L-type
VGCCs, Cav1.2 [68, 69]. Additionally, Tx3-5 did not cause
adverse motor effects at efficacious doses [57]. These results imply that L-type VGCCs can be used as a target
for pain relief.Phoneutria nigriventer toxin3-3 (Tx3-3) blocks P/Q- and R-type
VGCCs. The peptide caused a short-lasting antinociceptive effect in the
nociceptive pain test and a long-lasting antinociceptive effect in neuropathicpain rather than inflammatory pain [70].
More importantly, Tx3-3 indicated a better safety profile when compared to the
P/Q-blocker ω-conotoxin MVIIC, which elicits serious motor dysfunctions. It is
tempting to speculate that additional affinity of Tx3-3 for R-type VGCCs plays a
potential role in nociception but not in motor functions [70]. Furthermore, Tx3-3 exhibited greater inhibitory
effects on dorsal horn neuronal responses under neuropathic pain condition
compared to normal physiological conditions. However, ω-agatoxin-IVA (Figure 1C), a blocker of spinal P/Q-type
VGCCs, attenuates neuronal responses in physiological conditions rather than
neuropathic conditions [67]. These
results suggest that Tx3-3 inhibits neuropathic pain and that R-type VGCCs a
important target for neuropathic pain relief [71].
Sodium channel inhibitors and analgesia
Nociceptors detect noxious conditions to produce the sensation of pain, and this
signal is conveyed to the CNS by means of action potentials. In all electrically
excitable cells in mammals, the fast upstroke of action potentials is mediated
by voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs). Therefore, VGSCs inhibitors are
capable of blocking the conduction of an electrical signal and producing an
antinociceptive effect [72]. At least
nine mammalian subtypes (Nav1.1-1.9) have been identified in the nervous system
[73]. Among these, the
tetrodotoxin-sensitive (TTX-S) sub-types, Nav1.1, Nav1.6, and Nav1.7, and the
TTX-resistant (TTX-R) sub-types, Nav1.8 and Nav1.9, are expressed in adult
nociceptive DRG neurons. In light of the genetic evidence that specific VGSCs
sub-types are related to specific types of pain, it is now evident clear that
Nav1.7 is an important player in the generation of nociceptive sensations in
humans [48, 74, 75].Hainantoxin-IV (HNTX-IV) (Figure 1D), a
35-amino acid peptide purified from the venom of Chinese bird spider,
Ornithoctonus hainana (Figure
2F), suppressed TTX-Ssodium channels current [76]. In this peptide, four residues (Lys27, His28, Arg29
and Lys32) are observed forming a positively charged patch on the molecular
surface, which is critical for the inhibitory activity of HNTX-IV by interacting
directly with the acidic residues in the DII S3-S4 linker of TTX-Ssodium
channels and stabilizing the DII S4 voltage sensor [77-80]. HNTX-IV
efficiently reversed inflammatory and neuropathic pain. The efficiency of
HNTX-IV in both models equivalent to that of morphine. In the spinal nerve
model, the antinociceptive effect of HNTX-IV on allodynia was longer and more
potent than mexiletine. These results demonstrate that HNTV-IV efficiently
alleviates acute inflammatory pain and chronic neuropathic pain and provides an
attractive template for further clinical antinociceptive drug design [79]. Besides the Nav1.7 channel, HNTX-IV
also blocked other subtypes of VGSCs, such as Nav1.6, which was related to the
symptoms of oxaliplatinneuropathy [81].
This may partly explain the presence of side effects caused by HNTX-IV.Huwentoxin-IV (HWTX-IV) (Figure 1E) is a
35-amino-acid voltage-sensor-gating modifier from the venom of the tarantula
species Ornithoctonus huwena. The peptide has an inhibitory
effect on a TTX-S channel in adult rat DRG neurons with high selectivity towards
Nav1.7. HWTX-IV docks at neurotoxin receptor site 4, located at the
extracellular S3-S4 linker of domain II in Nav1.7, and traps the voltage sensor
of domain II in the inward, closed configuration [82, 83]. HWTX-IV
possessed dose-dependent and statistically significant antinociceptive effects
on acute inflammatory pain and chronic neuropathic pain. However, the effect of
morphine on inflammation pain was 2 times more potent than that of HWTX-IV.
Compared to mexiletine, the peptide produced a longer and greater
antinociceptive effect on allodynia in the SNI model [84]. These results suggest that HWTX-IV is a potential and
efficient candidate for further clinical drug development against inflammatory
and neuropathic pain.ProTx-II (Figure 1F), a 30 amino acid
cystine knot peptide, was purified from the venom of the green velvet tarantula
Thrixopelma pruriens (Figure
2G). ProTx-II traps the domain I, II and IV voltage sensor in the
resting configuration and is at least 100-fold more selective towards
NaV1.7 over other sodium channel subtypes [85]. A patch of amino-acid residues (Lys-4, Trp-5, Met-6,
and Trp-7) on the surface of ProTx-II has been identified as promoting lipid
binding, which is the first step toward exhibiting an inhibitory effect [86]. ProTx-II suppresses VGSCs by
decreasing channel conductance and shifting activation to more positive
potentials [87]. NaV1.7 may
regulate firing thresholds by magnifying generator potentials [88]. As a result, shifting activation to
more positive potentials reduces neuronal excitability and pain sensitivity but
maintained the ability to sense acute painful stimuli. ProTx-II exhibited a
dose-dependent and significant antinociceptive effect on neuropathic and
inflammatory pain without any severe effect on motor function [7, 48]. Furthermore, ProTx-II decreases spontaneous action potentials in
DRGs occurring in rats with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)
and significantly attenuates behavioral signs of CIPN [89]. Moreover, because of the inability of the peptide to
cross the blood-nerve barrier, ProTx-II does not inhibit action potential
propagation in intact nerve [87]. These
findings indicate that ProTx-II is a potential drug for treating different types
of neuropathic pain.
Acid-sensing ion-channel inhibitors and analgesia
Acidosis occurs in different clinical conditions, such as in inflammation,
fractures, lesions and postoperative state. After detecting noxious stimuli, the
peripheral free terminals of nociceptive neurons can be depolarized by
activating ion channels through protons. This is how an acidic pH can produce
algogenic effects. These channels, which can be activated by protons, are
divided into two families. The first is Transient Receptor Potential channels
that play an important role in the Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid
receptor type 1(TRPV1). The second is ASICs, which are widely expressed in the
central and peripheral nervous system. At least nine isoforms (1a-b, 2a-b, 3a-c,
4, 5) encoded by five genes have been detected in mammals [90-92]. ASIC1a,
ASIC2a and ASIC2b are widely expressed in the central nervous system [93, 94]. Recent studies have linked ASICs to pain and used them as a
target for the treatment of pain [95-97]. Some peptides
isolated from spider venoms have been confirmed to regulate ASIC1, including
PcTx1, Hi1a, Hm3a, Ma1-3 and MitTxα/β [9,
98-101].As mentioned above, PcTx1 was able to block ASIC1a in both brain neurons and
spinal neurons [29, 30, 102]. It was
reported that PcTx1 exhibits potent antinociceptive effects on several types of
pain models in rodents. In tail immersion and hot plate tests, PcTx1 induced
obvious antinociceptive effects similar to morphine. In the formalin test, PcTx1
produced an evident antinociceptive effect on irritant chemical nociception and
inflammation. In a persistent pain model caused by chronic constriction injury
of the sciatic nerve in rats, PcTx1 abolished both tactile allodynia and thermal
hyperalgesia. Similarly, PcTx1 reversed thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia
induced by vincristine. Additional research showed that the antinociceptive
effects of PcTx1 and morphine were not addictive and that PcTx1 treatment also
produces tolerance but no side effects. PcTx1 produced its antinociceptive
effect via stimulating the μ- and δ-opioid receptors. Specific molecular
mechanisms need to be revealed by further studies. ASIC1a and Met-enkephalin
were co-expressed in the dorsal horn neurons whereas the block of ASIC1a leads
to the activation of encephalin system. The specific mechanisms need further
study, but may involve ASIC1a in spinal inhibitory interneurons [103]. Thus, in the cerebrospinal fluid,
PcTx1 increased encephalins (endogenous opioid peptides), which were potent
ligands of both μ-and δ- opioid receptors, followed by the activation of μ-and
δ- opioid receptors, leading to antinociceptive effects [104]. Interestingly, it was shown that PcTx1 exerts dual
actions on ASIC1a/2a by using a whole-cell patch clamp. It produced inhibitory
or enhanced effects, determined by the pH. Potentiation was the strongest at
moderate pH by increasing the apparent affinity of channel activation for
protons [89]. These findings help to
elucidate the diverse and complex pharmacology of PcTx1.It is obvious that ion channels contribute to treating different types of pain.
Compared with traditional analgesic drug, spider peptides act immediately and
last for a longer time. Furthermore, the peptides recover the tolerance of
morphine, which indicates that the peptides-morphine constitute a good
combination for future clinical application [49, 57, 79, 84]. Compared
with ziconotide, another animal peptide approved by the Food and Drug
Administration, spider peptides possess similar efficacy and fewer side effects,
which highlights its indication to be applied early in clinic practice [49, 59]. Beyond that, heart failure has become a common condition. Ion
channels perform an enormous function on cardiac electrophysiology, which is the
basis of a normal heartbeat. It is speculated that spider peptides, such as
GsMTx-4 [15] may promote an immense
influence on heart disease.
Other spider peptides showing antinociceptive effects
Besides the spider peptides acting on ionic channels, probably there are other
targets involved in antinociceptive activity of spider venom peptides due to the
complex neural mechanisms of nociceptive processing. There are other spider
toxins, whose mechanisms are not yet demonstrated or do not seem to involve
ionic channels, that will be described herein.Opioid receptors (including three types, μ, δ and κ receptors) and cannabinoid1
(CB1) receptors are expressed in both the central and peripheral nervous
systems. Several studies have demonstrated that endogenous opioids and
cannabinoids are involved in the nociceptive pathway and antinociceptive action
[105-110]. The nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine
monophosphate/ATP-sensitive potassium channel (NO/cGMP/KATP) pathway
has been described as being associated with antinociception induced by different
analgesic drugs [111-113]. Muscarinic and nicotinic
acetylcholine (ACh) receptors are emerging as important targets for the
development of novel treatments for chronic pain [114, 115]. Some of
peptides isolated from the venom of the spider Phoneutria
nigriventer or their modified peptide can exert antinociceptive
effects through the above mentioned pathways.PnPP-19, a synthetic and nontoxic peptide designed from Phoneutria
nigriventer toxin2-6 (PnTx2-6), comprises the potential active core
(19 amino acid residues) of the PnTx2-6 [116, 117]. Recently,
researchers have proven that PnPP-19 exerts profound influence on
antinociceptive functions in both the central nervous system and the peripheral
nervous system [118, 119]. PnPP-19 selectively exerts direct
activation of μ-opioid receptors by inducing indirect inhibition of calcium
channels and thereby impairing calcium influx in DRG neurons [117]. Moreover, the PnPP-19-induced
activation of opioid receptors, but did not stimulate the recruitment of
β-arrestin2. Besides, PnPP-19 was able to indirectly, activate δ opioid
receptors, which may occur though an indirect pathway involved in inhibition of
neutral endopeptidase (NEP), an enzyme imperative for the cleavage of many
endogenous peptides, thus enhancing the endogenous opioid level to strengthen
antinociceptive response [118]. These
reports confirm the role of PnPP-19 in the opioid system. Another study
reinforces the influence of PnPP-19 on antinociceptive responses and highlights
its role in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and neuronal nitric oxide
synthase isoforms in the pain pathway [120]. PnPP-19 caused an increase of NO levels via activating both
neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and eNOS, thus triggering NO/cGMP/KATP
pathway.A 48-amino-acid polypeptide from Phoneutria nigriventer spider
venom [121], known as δ-CNTX-Pn1a (also
called PnTx4(6-1)), whose antinociceptive effects were tested in different pain
models, is associated with the activation of μ, δ opioid receptors and CB1
receptors [122]. The deeper mechanisms,
which may be similar to those of PnPP-19, have not been further clarified. PhKv
(also called Tx3-1), a 4584 Da peptide, was also isolated from the venom of the
armed spider Phoneutria nigriventer. PhKv can inhibit the Ach
enzyme, thus inducing the increase of the ACh content at the neuronal synapses
and thereby leading to the activation of the cholinergic system and the
antinociceptive response [123].Purotoxin-1 (PT1) is a novel peptide isolated from the venom of the Central Asian
spider Geolycosa sp., and is the first natural molecule found
to exert powerful and selective inhibitory action on P2X3 receptors. The peptide
demonstrated potent antinociceptive properties on inflammatory pain in animal
models [124]. Thus, P2X3 receptors also
play a critical role in antinociceptive effects of this spider venom
peptide.It is widely accepted that morphine, as the exogenous μ receptor agonist, can
produce central and peripheral antinociceptive effects mediated by activation of
CB1 receptors [105, 125], which was also presented by PnPP-19.
This finding highlights the tolerability of PnPP-19, which should be further
explored. In addition, PnPP-19 probably causes less sides effects due to the
non-recruitment of β-arrestin2. Beyond that, we should be fully aware of
additional unknown possible mechanisms involved in the pain pathway and also
attend to their side effects by comparing it with other drugs.
Conclusion
Spider venom is a complex mixture comprising a large number of biologically active
peptides, enzymes and organic and inorganic compounds. Some of the spider venom
peptides directly or indirectly participate in regulating growth and death of tumor
cells. They also target the various types of ion channels and other pain pathways to
play an important role in antinociceptive responses. These effects make spider
peptides potential candidates for drug development. Successful examples of snake
venom peptides that manage to reach the market improve confidence to convert spider
venom peptides to drugs. The development and application of new methodologies, such
as high throughput screening, allow us to ascertain more information on the
components of animal venom and to verify their function. By examining the genetic
similarity and dissimilarity between spiders and snakes, the modification of spider
peptides into clinical versions becomes more efficient. Although no spider
venom-derived drug has yet been applied, the situation may be changed completely, if
at least one of the spider genomes were to be sequenced. Conjugation of the peptides
with polymeric materials, such as gold nanoparticles, is essential not only to solve
the problem of cytotoxicity of the toxins but also to obtain modification of
specific sites. Therefore, we are confident that the development of modern
technology and a better understanding of spider toxin peptides will accelerate the
transformation of such peptides into pharmacological leads for the development of
novel therapeutic agents and strategies against clinical diseases.
Authors: Cristian Salinas-Restrepo; Elizabeth Misas; Sebastian Estrada-Gómez; Juan Carlos Quintana-Castillo; Fanny Guzman; Juan C Calderón; Marco A Giraldo; Cesar Segura Journal: Toxins (Basel) Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 5.075
Authors: Tim Lüddecke; Björn M von Reumont; Frank Förster; André Billion; Thomas Timm; Günter Lochnit; Andreas Vilcinskas; Sarah Lemke Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2020-06-30
Authors: Marcus Caballero; Natalia Barreto; Amanda Pires Bonfanti; Jaqueline Munhoz; Thomaz Rocha E Silva; Rafael Sutti; Liana Verinaud; Felipe Cezar Pinheiro de Mato; Guilherme Pauperio Lanfredi; Catarina Rapôso Journal: Front Mol Biosci Date: 2022-03-14