Literature DB >> 31210611

Predicting Breast Cancer by Applying Deep Learning to Linked Health Records and Mammograms.

Ayelet Akselrod-Ballin1, Michal Chorev1, Yoel Shoshan1, Adam Spiro1, Alon Hazan1, Roie Melamed1, Ella Barkan1, Esma Herzel1, Shaked Naor1, Ehud Karavani1, Gideon Koren1, Yaara Goldschmidt1, Varda Shalev1, Michal Rosen-Zvi1, Michal Guindy1.   

Abstract

Background Computational models on the basis of deep neural networks are increasingly used to analyze health care data. However, the efficacy of traditional computational models in radiology is a matter of debate. Purpose To evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of a combined machine and deep learning approach for early breast cancer detection applied to a linked set of digital mammography images and electronic health records. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, 52 936 images were collected in 13 234 women who underwent at least one mammogram between 2013 and 2017, and who had health records for at least 1 year before undergoing mammography. The algorithm was trained on 9611 mammograms and health records of women to make two breast cancer predictions: to predict biopsy malignancy and to differentiate normal from abnormal screening examinations. The study estimated the association of features with outcomes by using t test and Fisher exact test. The model comparisons were performed with a 95% confidence interval (CI) or by using the DeLong test. Results The resulting algorithm was validated in 1055 women and tested in 2548 women (mean age, 55 years ± 10 [standard deviation]). In the test set, the algorithm identified 34 of 71 (48%) false-negative findings on mammograms. For the malignancy prediction objective, the algorithm obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.93), with specificity of 77.3% (95% CI: 69.2%, 85.4%) at a sensitivity of 87%. When trained on clinical data alone, the model performed significantly better than the Gail model (AUC, 0.78 vs 0.54, respectively; P < .004). Conclusion The algorithm, which combined machine-learning and deep-learning approaches, can be applied to assess breast cancer at a level comparable to radiologists and has the potential to substantially reduce missed diagnoses of breast cancer. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31210611     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

Review 1.  CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Ravi K Samala; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Deep Learning Predicts Interval and Screening-detected Cancer from Screening Mammograms: A Case-Case-Control Study in 6369 Women.

Authors:  Xun Zhu; Thomas K Wolfgruber; Lambert Leong; Matthew Jensen; Christopher Scott; Stacey Winham; Peter Sadowski; Celine Vachon; Karla Kerlikowske; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Automated Dental Cavity Detection System Using Deep Learning and Explainable AI.

Authors:  Niharika Bhattacharjee
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Artificial Intelligence Evaluation of 122 969 Mammography Examinations from a Population-based Screening Program.

Authors:  Marthe Larsen; Camilla F Aglen; Christoph I Lee; Solveig R Hoff; Håkon Lund-Hanssen; Kristina Lång; Jan F Nygård; Giske Ursin; Solveig Hofvind
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 29.146

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence and imaging for risk prediction of pancreatic cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  Touseef Ahmad Qureshi; Sehrish Javed; Tabasom Sarmadi; Stephen Jacob Pandol; Debiao Li
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-09

6.  Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Classification.

Authors:  Clement G Yedjou; Solange S Tchounwou; Richard A Aló; Rashid Elhag; BereKet Mochona; Lekan Latinwo
Journal:  Int J Sci Acad Res       Date:  2021-10-30

7.  External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.

Authors:  Mattie Salim; Erik Wåhlin; Karin Dembrower; Edward Azavedo; Theodoros Foukakis; Yue Liu; Kevin Smith; Martin Eklund; Fredrik Strand
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence: A Primer for Breast Imaging Radiologists.

Authors:  Manisha Bahl
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2020-06-19

9.  Artificial Intelligence, Real-World Automation and the Safety of Medicines.

Authors:  Andrew Bate; Steve F Hobbiger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.

Authors:  Thomas Schaffter; Diana S M Buist; Christoph I Lee; Yaroslav Nikulin; Dezso Ribli; Yuanfang Guan; William Lotter; Zequn Jie; Hao Du; Sijia Wang; Jiashi Feng; Mengling Feng; Hyo-Eun Kim; Francisco Albiol; Alberto Albiol; Stephen Morrell; Zbigniew Wojna; Mehmet Eren Ahsen; Umar Asif; Antonio Jimeno Yepes; Shivanthan Yohanandan; Simona Rabinovici-Cohen; Darvin Yi; Bruce Hoff; Thomas Yu; Elias Chaibub Neto; Daniel L Rubin; Peter Lindholm; Laurie R Margolies; Russell Bailey McBride; Joseph H Rothstein; Weiva Sieh; Rami Ben-Ari; Stefan Harrer; Andrew Trister; Stephen Friend; Thea Norman; Berkman Sahiner; Fredrik Strand; Justin Guinney; Gustavo Stolovitzky; Lester Mackey; Joyce Cahoon; Li Shen; Jae Ho Sohn; Hari Trivedi; Yiqiu Shen; Ljubomir Buturovic; Jose Costa Pereira; Jaime S Cardoso; Eduardo Castro; Karl Trygve Kalleberg; Obioma Pelka; Imane Nedjar; Krzysztof J Geras; Felix Nensa; Ethan Goan; Sven Koitka; Luis Caballero; David D Cox; Pavitra Krishnaswamy; Gaurav Pandey; Christoph M Friedrich; Dimitri Perrin; Clinton Fookes; Bibo Shi; Gerard Cardoso Negrie; Michael Kawczynski; Kyunghyun Cho; Can Son Khoo; Joseph Y Lo; A Gregory Sorensen; Hwejin Jung
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.