| Literature DB >> 31210436 |
Zahra Borzouie1,2, Majid Naghibzadeh2, Ali Reza Talebi2, Fatemeh Pourrajab3, Ali Jebali4, Habib Nikukar1,4, Hosein Molla Hoseini5, Arezoo Khoradmehr2, Arezoo Khoradmehr2, Fatemeh Sadeghian-Nodoushan6, Behrouz Aflatoonian7,4,8, Seyedhossein Hekmatimoghaddam9,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent achievements in stem cell biotechnology, nanotechnology and tissue engineering have led to development of novel approaches in regenerative medicine. Azoospermia is one of the challenging disorders of the reproductive system. Several efforts were made for isolation and culture of testis-derived stem cells to treat male infertility. However, tissue engineering is the best approach to mimic the three dimensional microenvironment of the testis in vitro. We investigated whether human testis-derived cells (hTCs) obtained by testicular sperm extraction (TESE) can be cultured on a homemade scaffold composed of electrospun nanofibers of homogeneous poly (vinyl alcohol)/human serum albumin/gelatin (PVA/HSA/gelatin).Entities:
Keywords: Azoospermia; Human Serum Albumin; Testis; Tissue Engineering
Year: 2019 PMID: 31210436 PMCID: PMC6582427 DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2019.6120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell J ISSN: 2228-5806 Impact factor: 2.479
Fig.1Physical analysis of electrospun scaffold. A. Scanning electron micrographof poly (vinyl alcohol)/human serum albumin/gelatin (PVA/HSA/gelatin) fibers(scale bar: 1 µm), B. Fiber diameter distribution of PVA/HSA/gelatin scaffold, and C. Fiber pore diameters of PVA/HSA/gelatin scaffold.
Fig.2Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of the scaffold and its constituents.
Fig.3H&E staining of 7-day cultured cells seeded on poly (vinyl alcohol)/ human serum albumin/gelatin fibers (scale bar: 200 µm).
Comparison of viability between testis cells cultured on scaffold and monolayer-cultured ones
| Parameters | Optical density (7th day) | Viability (7th day) | Optical density (14th day) | Viability (14th day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | ||||
| Monolayer | 0.20 ± 0.1 | - | 0.23 ± 0.07 | - |
| Electrospun scaffold | 0.17 ± 0.06 | 85 | 0.18 ± 0.06 | 78.26 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD (for optical density, triplicate) and percentage (for viability).