Literature DB >> 31210013

Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided, drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis of randomised control trials and systematic review. Data from registries in a meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

Ashish Kumar1, Mariam Shariff1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31210013      PMCID: PMC7948735          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance vs. Angiographic Guidance in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Long-Term Clinical Outcomes From the CREDO-Kyoto AMI Registry.

Authors:  Kenji Nakatsuma; Hiroki Shiomi; Takeshi Morimoto; Kenji Ando; Kazushige Kadota; Hiroki Watanabe; Tomohiko Taniguchi; Takashi Yamamoto; Yutaka Furukawa; Yoshihisa Nakagawa; Minoru Horie; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.993

2.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis of randomised control trials and systematic review.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Tan; Xia-Xia Man; Ling-Yun Liu; Hui Xu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance Improves the Long-term Prognosis in Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Jian Tian; Changdong Guan; Wenyao Wang; Kuo Zhang; Jue Chen; Yongjian Wu; Hongbing Yan; Yanyan Zhao; Shubin Qiao; Yuejin Yang; Gary S Mintz; Bo Xu; Yida Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.