Literature DB >> 31209981

Transient population dynamics impede restoration and may promote ecosystem transformation after disturbance.

Robert K Shriver1, Caitlin M Andrews1, Robert S Arkle2, David M Barnard2, Michael C Duniway3, Matthew J Germino2, David S Pilliod2, David A Pyke4, Justin L Welty2, John B Bradford1.   

Abstract

The apparent failure of ecosystems to recover from increasingly widespread disturbance is a global concern. Despite growing focus on factors inhibiting resilience and restoration, we still know very little about how demographic and population processes influence recovery. Using inverse and forward demographic modelling of 531 post-fire sagebrush populations across the western US, we show that demographic processes during recovery from seeds do not initially lead to population growth but rather to years of population decline, low density, and risk of extirpation after disturbance and restoration, even at sites with potential to support long-term, stable populations. Changes in population structure, and resulting transient population dynamics, lead to a > 50% decline in population growth rate after disturbance and significant reductions in population density. Our results indicate that demographic processes influence the recovery of ecosystems from disturbance and that demographic analyses can be used by resource managers to anticipate ecological transformation risk. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  big sagebrush; demography; drylands; ecosystem transformation; regime shifts; resilience; restoration; transient population dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31209981     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  4 in total

1.  Statistical considerations of nonrandom treatment applications reveal region-wide benefits of widespread post-fire restoration action.

Authors:  Allison B Simler-Williamson; Matthew J Germino
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Targeting Sagebrush (Artemisia Spp.) Restoration Following Wildfire with Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus Urophasianus) Nest Selection and Survival Models.

Authors:  Cali L Roth; Shawn T O'Neil; Peter S Coates; Mark A Ricca; David A Pyke; Cameron L Aldridge; Julie A Heinrichs; Shawn P Espinosa; David J Delehanty
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.644

3.  Interannual climate variability mediates changes in carbon and nitrogen pools caused by annual grass invasion in a semiarid shrubland.

Authors:  Adam L Mahood; Rachel O Jones; David I Board; Jennifer K Balch; Jeanne C Chambers
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 13.211

4.  Greater sage-grouse respond positively to intensive post-fire restoration treatments.

Authors:  Sharon A Poessel; David M Barnard; Cara Applestein; Matthew J Germino; Ethan A Ellsworth; Don Major; Ann Moser; Todd E Katzner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.