Literature DB >> 31209434

[Two procedures for ridge preservation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis].

L P Zhao1,2, W J Hu1, T Xu1,2, Y L Zhan1,3, Y P Wei1, M Zhen1, C Wang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and to compare dimensional alterations of hard and soft tissues in molar extraction sites with irregular deficiency of bone plates due to advanced periodontitis receiving two different procedures, namely the flapped and flapless techniques with Bio-Gide membrane covering the Bio-Oss material for ridge preservation.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients with 24 infected-molar extraction sites received ridge preservation procedure, the first consecutive 12 sites belonged to the flap group (a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap and primary soft tissue closure) and the following 12 sites belonged to the flapless group (minimal flap with a collagen sponge and a secondary soft tissue closure). Width of keratinized tissue was evaluated before tooth extraction and after 6-month healing. Parallel periapical radiographs were taken immediately and 6 months after extraction to evaluate vertical bone changes. The width of the ridge was measured in the center of the ridge at the time of tooth extraction and after 6 months at implant placement.
RESULTS: After 6 months, width of keratinized tissue decreased (1.6±1.5) mm in the flap group (P=0.004) when compared with (0.3±1.6) mm in the flapless group (P>0.05). Both groups showed increases in ridge height from the central aspect, (5.53±4.20) mm for flap group and (7.70±4.35) mm for flapless group. These differences between the groups were not statistically significant (P=0.226). The ridge widths were (9.5±2.2) mm for flap group and (9.3±1.0) mm for flapless group at the time of implant insertion, and no statistical significance was observed between the flap and flapless groups.
CONCLUSION: The study points out that both ridge preservation techniques were effective in increasing ridge height and minimizing ridge resorption after tooth extraction, and the ridge width allowed the placement of implants 6 months after ridge preservation. The flapless technique gave positive outcome in terms of the keratinized gingival width than that of the flap technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31209434      PMCID: PMC7439019          DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets.

Authors:  Christoph H F Hämmerle; Mauricio G Araújo; Massimo Simion
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fridus Van der Weijden; Federico Dell'Acqua; Dagmar Else Slot
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 3.  Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Shantanu Jambhekar; Florian Kernen; Avinash S Bidra
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Changes in alveolar process dimensions following extraction of molars with advanced periodontal disease: A clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Liping Zhao; Yiping Wei; Tao Xu; Bo Zhang; Wenjie Hu; Kwok-Hung Chung
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Implants failures related to endodontic treatment. An observational retrospective study.

Authors:  Fanny López-Martínez; Gerardo Gómez Moreno; Patricia Olivares-Ponce; David Eduardo Jaramillo; José Eduardo Maté Sánchez de Val; José Luis Calvo-Guirado
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 6.  Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: Therapeutic concepts & methods.

Authors:  Nikos Mardas; Anna Trullenque-Eriksson; Neil MacBeth; Aviva Petrie; Nikolaos Donos
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog.

Authors:  Mauricio G Araújo; Jan Lindhe
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Antonio Barone; Paolo Toti; Adriano Piattelli; Giovanna Iezzi; Giacomo Derchi; Ugo Covani
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mauricio G Araújo; João Carlos Costa da Silva; Arthur Furtado de Mendonça; Jan Lindhe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study.

Authors:  Lars Schropp; Ann Wenzel; Lambros Kostopoulos; Thorkild Karring
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Biocompatibility and effect on bone formation of a native acellular porcine pericardium: Results of in vitro and in vivo].

Authors:  P Y You; Y H Liu; X Z Wang; S W Wang; L Tang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-08-18

2.  Buccal periosteal inversion (BUPI) for defect closure and keratinized gingiva width preservation after tooth extraction - technique modification.

Authors:  Ivan Hristov Arabadzhiev; Peter Maurer; Eber Luis de Lima Stevao
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2021-06-01

3.  CGF-HLC-I repaired the bone defect repair of the rabbits mandible through tight junction pathway.

Authors:  Yalin Mao; Miaoling Hu; Li Chen; Xiao Chen; Maohua Liu; Menglian Zhang; Minhai Nie; Xuqian Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.