Zhigang Li1, Huirong Li2, Xu Xu1, Lingling Wang1, Bo Liu2, Weixin Zheng1, Lili Lian2, Ying Song1, Xizhong Xia1, Ling Hou2, Hanhua Cheng3, Rongjia Zhou4. 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Opthalmology, Optometry and Vision Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325003, China. 3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China. hhcheng@whu.edu.cn. 4. Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China. rjzhou@whu.edu.cn.
Abstract
Retinopathy, owing to damage to the retina, often causes vision impairment, and the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Using a gene targeting strategy, we generated mice with the essential gene Tubgcp4 knocked out. Homozygous mutation of Tubgcp4 resulted in early embryonic lethality due to abnormal spindle assembly caused by GCP4 (gamma-tubulin complex protein 4, encoded by Tubgcp4) depletion. Heterozygotes were viable through dosage compensation of one wild-type allele. However, haploinsufficiency of GCP4 affected the assembly of γ-TuRCs (γ-tubulin ring complexes) and disrupted autophagy homeostasis in retina, thus leading to photoreceptor degeneration and retinopathy. Notably, GCP4 exerted autophagy inhibition by competing with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7, thus interfering with lipidation of LC3B. Our findings justify dosage effects of essential genes that compensate for null alleles in viability of mutant mice and uncover dosage-dependent roles of GCP4 in embryo development and retinal homeostasis. These data have also clinical implications in genetic counseling on embryonic lethality and in development of potential therapeutic targets associated with retinopathy.
Retinopathy, owing to damage to the retina, often causes vision impairment, and the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Using a gene targeting strategy, we generated mice with the essential gene Tubgcp4 knocked out. Homozygous mutation of Tubgcp4 resulted in early embryonic lethality due to abnormal spindle assembly caused by GCP4 (gamma-tubulin complex protein 4, encoded by Tubgcp4) depletion. Heterozygotes were viable through dosage compensation of one wild-type allele. However, haploinsufficiency of GCP4 affected the assembly of γ-TuRCs (γ-tubulin ring complexes) and disrupted autophagy homeostasis in retina, thus leading to photoreceptor degeneration and retinopathy. Notably, GCP4 exerted autophagy inhibition by competing with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7, thus interfering with lipidation of LC3B. Our findings justify dosage effects of essential genes that compensate for null alleles in viability of mutant mice and uncover dosage-dependent roles of GCP4 in embryo development and retinal homeostasis. These data have also clinical implications in genetic counseling on embryonic lethality and in development of potential therapeutic targets associated with retinopathy.
In mammals, loss-of-function mutations often lead to early embryonic lethality, also a major cause of infertility. More than 50 million people globally have infertility and cannot access the essential interventions [1]. Despite viable pregnancies with embryos carrying gene mutations, a considerable number of newborns (~303,000) die within 4 weeks of birth each year worldwide, owing to congenital anomalies [2].Considerable efforts have been made in screening for genes essential for cell survival in genomes. In mice, 489 genes have been knocked out by gene targeting in ES cells; 29% are lethal at postnatal day 14 and 13% are survivable (less homozygotes than predicted), whereas 58% are viable [3]. Multiplex RNAi screening has generated 166 important genes for growth in two human mammary cell lines [4]. Systematic pooled shRNA screening efforts have expanded to cancer cell lines [5-7]. A number of commonly essential genes and cell lineage-specific essential genes have been identified, thus facilitating identification of drivers of cancer cell growth and development of anti-cancer strategies. Through a CRISPR/Cas9 approach, screens have revealed differences in gene essentiality specific to cell lines and cancer types in addition to overlapping essential genes in leukemia cell lines [8]. Further functional identification has determined essential gene networks and synthetic lethal interactions in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines [9]. Gene essentiality appears to be conditional, and it may depend on mutation strategies, growth conditions, cell lineages, and the compensation of paralogous genes or parallel pathways. Studies in yeast have shown that gene essentiality can be adaptive to various environments and evolvable, probably through whole-chromosome and segmental aneuploidy [10, 11]. The distinction between essential genes and non-essential genes does not appear to be very strict. A quantitative assessment has been proposed to determine gene essentiality [12]. However, in vivo functional insights into gene essentiality remain to be explored in animal models.Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic process, which degrades toxic aggregates and damaged organelles and recycles them as basic building blocks in order to maintain cellular homeostasis [13-15]. Dysregulations of autophagy were associated with neurodegenerative diseases, including retinopathy [16]. Under most pathological conditions affecting the optic nerve, including optic nerve transection, glaucoma, and retinal ischemia, a marked increase in autophagic markers in the RGC has been described [17-21]. However, it remains unclear whether this increase plays a protective or detrimental role under these conditions and whether therapeutic approaches should foster or inhibit autophagy. It seems that maintenance of autophagy homeostasis is important for normal physiological functions of retina.GCP4 (gamma-tubulin complex protein 4, encoded by TUBGCP4) belongs to γ-tubulin ring complexes (γ-TuRCs) [22], which includes GCP4, 5 and 6, and γ-tubulin small complexes (γ-TuSCs: GCP2, GCP3, and γ-Tubulin). Gfh1 (homolog of humanTUBGCP4) mutants are viable in fission yeast [23, 24]. Many individuals with the Dgrip75 (homolog of TUBGCP4) mutation are viable; some larvae die after hatching, but both sexes are sterile and have defects in abdominal morphology and the thoracic bristle pattern in Drosophila [25, 26]. In an assessment of essentiality for cell survival in the Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line, the CRISPR score has been defined as the average log2-fold-change in the abundance of all sgRNAs targeting a given gene, and genes with a CS < −0.1 and a corrected p < 0.05 have been defined as cell essential. On the basis of the cutoff values, 1878 genes have been identified as candidate essential genes, including TUBGCP4 [8].In humans, TUBGCP4 mutations have been identified in patients with autosomal-recessive microcephaly and chorioretinopathy [27]. However, GCP4’s essentiality for embryo survival is unknown. Using knockout mouse models, we determined the gene essentiality of Tubgcp4 for embryo survival. Haploinsufficiency and dosage compensation of Tubgcp4 was determined in heterozygous mice. The dosage effect of GCP4 was then assessed in both cell lines and mice. The functions of GCP4 in maintenance of retina homeostasis were determined. We additionally demonstrated GCP4 pathways in regulation of autophagy in the retina.
Results
Tubgcp4 knockout results in early embryonic lethality
To explore the physiological functions of Tubgcp4 in embryo development, we first generated Tubgcp4 knockout mice. Gene targeting in ES cells was performed, which generated exon 2–6 deletion and a frameshift after exon 1 (Supplementary Fig. S1a). Two lines of heterozygous mutant mice (Tubgcp4) were generated separately. These Tubgcp4mice were viable and fertile. There were no differences in growth rate, body fat or lean mass between heterozygous mice and their wild-type littermates (Supplementary Fig. S2), whereas protein levels of GCP4 were not markedly lower in Tubgcp4mice than wild type (Supplementary Fig. S3a). Genotype analysis of progeny from heterozygote intercrosses revealed that 36.1% were wild type, 63.9% were heterozygous, and none were homozygous (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1b). This abnormal ratio phenomenon was identical to that in mutant lines derived from two independent ES clones. These results indicated that the Tubgcp4 homozygous mutation resulted in embryonic lethality.
Table 1
Genotyping analysis of the progeny from Tubgcp4 heterozygous intercrosses
Embryo Stage
Total Number
Genotype (Ratio)
N.D.
Resorption
+ / +
+ /−
−/−
E3.5
63
16 (1)
34 (2.1)
11 (0.89)
2
0
E4.5
35
9 (1)
17 (1.9)
7 (0.78)
2
0
E5.5
31
8 (1)
18 (2.3)
4 (0.5)
1
0
E6.5
51
14 (1)
26 (1.9)
6 (0.4)
0
5
E7.5
41
10 (1)
24 (2.4)
0 (0)
0
7
Adult
191
69 (1)
122 (1.8)
0 (0)
0
0
Genotyping analysis of the progeny from Tubgcp4 heterozygous intercrossesTo assess the specific period of Tubgcp4 knockout-induced developmental failure, embryos from heterozygous mating were collected at various periods of gestation, and their genotypes were determined by PCR (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1b). The number of homozygous mutant embryos decreased at E5.5, and no homozygous mutant embryos were detected after E7.5, thus indicating an embryonic death in peri-implantation of Tubgcp4-deficient embryos.To characterize the structural abnormality of Tubgcp4−/− embryos, we sectioned intact deciduas of E5.5 and E6.5 from heterozygous intercrosses. Sectioned embryonic tissues were collected by microdissection for PCR genotyping. All embryos appeared morphologically normal at E5.5, although the proportion of Tubgcp4−/− embryos was lower than that in wild type. However, Tubgcp4−/− embryos at E6.5 displayed a developmental retardation with a short embryonic region (Fig. 1a, b). To further determine the developmental defects of Tubgcp4-deficient embryos, blastocysts were recovered at E3.5 and cultured in vitro for 1–3 days. After culturing for 2 days, abnormal development was observed in Tubgcp4-deficient embryos. After day 3, the number of Tubgcp4−/− outgrowths decreased, thus indicating that the proliferation of embryonic cells was arrested at E6.5 (Fig. 1c). These results were consistent with the high expression level of GCP4 at E6.5 (Supplementary Fig. S3b).
Fig. 1
Tubgcp4 knockout leads to early embryonic lethality. a, b Histological sections of wild-type and Tubgcp4−/− embryos grown in utero. Tubgcp4-null and wild-type embryos at E5.5 (a) and E6.5 (b) were dissected from heterozygous intercrosses. Embryonic tissues were isolated by laser captured microdissection from the sections and were genotyped by nested PCR. Short embryonic region was observed in Tubgcp4−/− embryos. Scale bar: 50 µm. c Outgrowth of wild-type, heterozygote, and mutant blastocysts in vitro. Blastocysts recovered at E3.5 were cultured in vitro for 3 days and subsequently genotyped by nested PCR. After 3 days of in vitro culture (E3.5+3), outgrowths composed of an ICM on top of a layer of trophoblastic giant cells (TGC) were detected in WT and heterozygous embryos. Tubgcp4 embryos that reach this stage consist either of a very small ICM, remnant TGC or a combination of both. Scale bar: 100 µm
Tubgcp4 knockout leads to early embryonic lethality. a, b Histological sections of wild-type and Tubgcp4−/− embryos grown in utero. Tubgcp4-null and wild-type embryos at E5.5 (a) and E6.5 (b) were dissected from heterozygous intercrosses. Embryonic tissues were isolated by laser captured microdissection from the sections and were genotyped by nested PCR. Short embryonic region was observed in Tubgcp4−/− embryos. Scale bar: 50 µm. c Outgrowth of wild-type, heterozygote, and mutant blastocysts in vitro. Blastocysts recovered at E3.5 were cultured in vitro for 3 days and subsequently genotyped by nested PCR. After 3 days of in vitro culture (E3.5+3), outgrowths composed of an ICM on top of a layer of trophoblastic giant cells (TGC) were detected in WT and heterozygous embryos. Tubgcp4 embryos that reach this stage consist either of a very small ICM, remnant TGC or a combination of both. Scale bar: 100 µm
GCP4 affects mitotic spindle formation in a dose-dependent manner
The developmental retardation of Tubgcp4-deficient early embryos suggested a cell division defect. We thus investigated the potential role of GCP4 during mitosis. We attempted to construct a Tubgcp4 knockout cell line by using CRISP/Cas9 technology but obtained only non-functional mutations (deletions of multiple 3 bases) (Supplementary Fig. S4), thus suggesting an essential role of GCP4 in mitosis. To confirm this possibility, we further constructed Tubgcp4 knockdown cell lines (Fig. 2a). Immunofluorescence analysis of GCP4 and β-tubulin showed abnormal spindle assembly in these knockdown cell lines, including monopolar spindles, unbalanced bipolar spindles and multipolar spindles (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. S5a). The proportion of normal bipolar balanced spindles was significantly lower in Tubgcp4 knockdown cell lines than in controls, and the proportion of abnormal spindle types was significantly higher (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. S5b). In particular, the monopolar spindle type increased to 20% (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. S5b). Together, these results suggested a dose-dependent role of GCP4 during mitosis. RNA interference decreased the protein level of GCP4 and affected mitotic spindle formation, whereas complete knockout of GCP4 prevented cell survival and led to embryonic lethality.
Fig. 2
GCP4 knockdown disturbs mitotic spindle formation. a GCP4 expression in three mir-GCP4 stably expressing cell lines (1#, 2# and 3#). LacZ miRNA was used as a knockdown control. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Quantification of GCP4 expression is indicated in the bottom panel. GCP4 was efficiently knocked down in both 2# and 3# cell lines. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest was used for statistical analysis. **p < 0.01. b Representative images of impaired mitotic spindles. mir-GCP4 stably expressing cell line 2# was used. Endogenous GCP4 and β-TUBULIN were examined by indirect immunofluorescence using anti-GCP4 (red) and anti-β-TUBULIN (green) antibodies. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst reagent. Images were acquired as z-stacks from the top to the bottom of each cell by confocal microscopy. The images are maximum intensity projections from deconvolved z stacks of representative cells. Arrowhead indicates a potential spindle pole; Arrows indicate spindle poles. Bipolar balanced, cells with a broad-based bipolar spindle; Monopolar, cells with only one spindle pole; Bipolar unbalanced, cells with an unequal bipolar spindle; Multipolar, cells with ≥ 3 spindle poles. Scale bar: 5 µm. c Quantification of the mitotic spindle types in (b). Data were represented as means ± SD (n = 3 experiments, with 50 cells/experiment). p values were calculated by two-tailed t-test: *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01
GCP4 knockdown disturbs mitotic spindle formation. a GCP4 expression in three mir-GCP4 stably expressing cell lines (1#, 2# and 3#). LacZ miRNA was used as a knockdown control. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Quantification of GCP4 expression is indicated in the bottom panel. GCP4 was efficiently knocked down in both 2# and 3# cell lines. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest was used for statistical analysis. **p < 0.01. b Representative images of impaired mitotic spindles. mir-GCP4 stably expressing cell line 2# was used. Endogenous GCP4 and β-TUBULIN were examined by indirect immunofluorescence using anti-GCP4 (red) and anti-β-TUBULIN (green) antibodies. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst reagent. Images were acquired as z-stacks from the top to the bottom of each cell by confocal microscopy. The images are maximum intensity projections from deconvolved z stacks of representative cells. Arrowhead indicates a potential spindle pole; Arrows indicate spindle poles. Bipolar balanced, cells with a broad-based bipolar spindle; Monopolar, cells with only one spindle pole; Bipolar unbalanced, cells with an unequal bipolar spindle; Multipolar, cells with ≥ 3 spindle poles. Scale bar: 5 µm. c Quantification of the mitotic spindle types in (b). Data were represented as means ± SD (n = 3 experiments, with 50 cells/experiment). p values were calculated by two-tailed t-test: *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01
Retinopathy in Tubgcp4+/− mice
Because GCP4 has a dosage effect on exerting its roles in development, we explored the pathological phenotypes of Tubgcp4+/− mice in detail. The head size of heterozygous mice, measured by X-ray imaging of bones, was smaller than that of their wild-type littermates (Fig. 3a–c), an effect mimicking TUBGCP4 mutant autosomal-recessive microcephaly in humans [27]. We further detected pathological lesions of sensitive tissue retina by using electroretinography (ERG). Under scotopic conditions, standard responses showed that the average saturated a-wave and b-wave decreased ~40% in the heterozygous mice compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 3d, e). These results indicated that the rod- and cone-driven circuits were significantly affected in the retinas of Tubgcp4+/− mice (Fig. 3d, e). The rod responses confirmed this result (Fig. 3f, g). Similarly to the scotopic ERG responses, photopic ERG responses were weakened in the b-wave in Tubgcp4+/− mice, decreasing approximately 50% compared with that in wild-type mice (Fig. 3h, i). To exclude the possibility that the overserved phenotypes were due to rd8-associated retinal degeneration [28], we conducted a PCR screening for rd8 and found that the mice were free of background mutation of rd8 (Supplementary Fig. S6). These results indicated that haploinsufficiency of Tubgcp4 led to retinopathy.
Fig. 3
Microcephaly with retinopathy phenotypes in Tubgcp4 mice. a X-ray images of Tubgcp4 mice and their wild-type littermates. The biparietal diameter (horizontal dotted line, head width) and the length between distal nasal bone and interparietal bone (vertical dotted line, head length) were measured to analyze size of head. b, c Statistical analyses of head length (b) and head width (c). Short head length was observed in Tubgcp4 mice. Data were represented as means ± SD of ten mice. **p < 0.01. d, f, h Saturating ERG responses of the retinas of the mice as indicated to 510 nm flashes at an intensity of −35 log scot. cd. s/m2 under scotopic (d, f) and photopic (h) conditions. Each trace is the average of individual records from five mice. e, g, i Statistical analysis of the saturating amplitude of a- and b-waves of the mice as indicated under scotopic (e, g) and photopic (i) conditions. Amplitude levels of a- and b-waves were significantly reduced in Tubgcp4 mice. The Tubgcp4 and Tubgcp4 mice were 6-month-old littermates. Data were represented as means ± SD of five mice. p-values were calculated by two-tailed t-test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Microcephaly with retinopathy phenotypes in Tubgcp4mice. a X-ray images of Tubgcp4mice and their wild-type littermates. The biparietal diameter (horizontal dotted line, head width) and the length between distal nasal bone and interparietal bone (vertical dotted line, head length) were measured to analyze size of head. b, c Statistical analyses of head length (b) and head width (c). Short head length was observed in Tubgcp4mice. Data were represented as means ± SD of ten mice. **p < 0.01. d, f, h Saturating ERG responses of the retinas of the mice as indicated to 510 nm flashes at an intensity of −35 log scot. cd. s/m2 under scotopic (d, f) and photopic (h) conditions. Each trace is the average of individual records from five mice. e, g, i Statistical analysis of the saturating amplitude of a- and b-waves of the mice as indicated under scotopic (e, g) and photopic (i) conditions. Amplitude levels of a- and b-waves were significantly reduced in Tubgcp4mice. The Tubgcp4 and Tubgcp4mice were 6-month-old littermates. Data were represented as means ± SD of five mice. p-values were calculated by two-tailed t-test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Haploinsufficiency of GCP4 leads to structure disorganization of retina
We then assessed retina morphology in Tubgcp4+/− and age-matched Tubgcp4mice. Histologic analysis of heterozygous retinas at the age of 6 months revealed a decrease (10–20%) in the thickness of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) in heterozygous mice compared with wild-type littermates (Fig. 4a, b). Ultrastructural analysis of photoreceptors in mutant retinas showed a disorganized outer segment morphology and disrupted lamellar structure of the outer segment (OS) (Fig. 4c).
Fig. 4
Disorganization of the outer segment (OS) and disassembly of γ-TuRC in retinas of Tubgcp4 mice. a Histologic analysis of wild-type and heterozygous retinas at age of 6 month. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 20 µm. b Statistical analysis of ONL thickness in Tubgcp4 and Tubgcp4 mice (n = 3). The ONL thickness was measured along the vertical meridian at each defined distance from the optic nerve head. Data were represented as mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest was used for statistical analysis. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. c Transmission electron microscopy of heterozygous (top) and wild-type (bottom) photoreceptors showed a disorganized OS in the heterozygous retinas. Ultrathin sections were made to show the longitudinal axis of the photoreceptor cell. Red arrowheads indicated degenerated OS discs in the heterozygous retinas; Scale bar:1 µm. d Immunoblots of extracts from wild-type and heterozygous retinas after fractionation in gradients of 5–40% sucrose. Antibodies against γ-TUBULIN and GCP2, GCP4, and GCP5 were used for visualizing γ-TuRC components. e Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 interaction with GCP2, GCP5, and γ-TUBULIN was impaired in retinas of Tubgcp4 mice in comparison with wildtype. Retina cell lysates were extracted for immunoprecipitation with anti-GCP4 (Mouse IgG for control) followed by immunoblotting with antibody against γ-TUBULIN and GCP2, GCP4, and GCP5 for visualizing γ-TuRC components. GAPDH was used as an internal control
Disorganization of the outer segment (OS) and disassembly of γ-TuRC in retinas of Tubgcp4mice. a Histologic analysis of wild-type and heterozygous retinas at age of 6 month. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 20 µm. b Statistical analysis of ONL thickness in Tubgcp4 and Tubgcp4mice (n = 3). The ONL thickness was measured along the vertical meridian at each defined distance from the optic nerve head. Data were represented as mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest was used for statistical analysis. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. c Transmission electron microscopy of heterozygous (top) and wild-type (bottom) photoreceptors showed a disorganized OS in the heterozygous retinas. Ultrathin sections were made to show the longitudinal axis of the photoreceptor cell. Red arrowheads indicated degenerated OS discs in the heterozygous retinas; Scale bar:1 µm. d Immunoblots of extracts from wild-type and heterozygous retinas after fractionation in gradients of 5–40% sucrose. Antibodies against γ-TUBULIN and GCP2, GCP4, and GCP5 were used for visualizing γ-TuRC components. e Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 interaction with GCP2, GCP5, and γ-TUBULIN was impaired in retinas of Tubgcp4mice in comparison with wildtype. Retina cell lysates were extracted for immunoprecipitation with anti-GCP4 (Mouse IgG for control) followed by immunoblotting with antibody against γ-TUBULIN and GCP2, GCP4, and GCP5 for visualizing γ-TuRC components. GAPDH was used as an internal controlBecause GCP4 localizes with γ-tubulin as γ-TuRC in centrosomes [22], we examined whether GCP4 depletion might affect γ-TuRC formation in Tubgcp4 retinas. Extracts from wild-type and heterozygous retinas were subjected to sucrose gradient sedimentation and subsequent western blot analysis to detect different γ-TuRC components. In wild-type, GCP4 was detected mainly in higher molecular weight fractions, together with GCP2 and γ-tubulin (Fig. 4d, top). However, in Tubgcp4 retinas, GCP4 protein shifted to lower molecular weight fractions, thus indicating the disassembly of γ-TuRC (Fig. 4d, bottom). Further co-immunoprecipitation analysis confirmed the disassembly of γ-TuRC in retinas of Tubgcp4mice (Fig. 4e). These results suggested that the haploinsufficiency of GCP4 affected the assembly of γ-TuRC and led to photoreceptor degeneration in retina.
Upregulation of autophagy in Tubgcp4+/− retinas
To further investigate molecular mechanisms of photoreceptor degeneration in the retina, we detected autophagy in retinas of mice at different ages. The GCP4 protein level was slightly lower in heterozygous retinas than wild-type retinas, particularly at 4 months (Fig. 5a–e). Western blot analysis showed that LC3B-II, a key autophagy protein, was upregulated and its downstream substrate SQSTM1 was downregulated in the heterozygous retinas in comparison with the wild-type retinas (Fig. 5a–c). Given that Sqstm1 expression is regulated at transcriptional level when prolong starvation treatment [29], we performed qPCR assay to assess Sqstm1 transcription and found that there was no significant change between these groups (Fig. 5d). Further, the retinal cells were used to assess GCP4-involved autophagic flux. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, an autophagy flux inhibitor in vivo [30]) treatment resulted in accumulation of both LC3-II and SQSTM1 proteins in both wild-type and heterozygous retinas (Fig. 5f–i). In addition, over-expression of GCP4 inhibited autophagy in the 293T cell line (Supplementary Fig. S7). Thus, the decrease in GCP4 protein levels was associated with the upregulation of autophagy in the heterozygous retinas. Furthermore, in Tubgcp4 retinas, LC3B puncta were detected at photoreceptor inner segments and near the nuclei, thus indicating autophagosome formation in the segment (Fig. 5j). The numbers of LC3B puncta were significantly higher in Tubgcp4 retinas than wild-type retinas (Fig. 5k). Transmission electron microscopy of Tubgcp4 retinas confirmed the formation of autophagosomes in the photoreceptor inner segment (Fig. 5l). In addition, nuclear autophagy could probably occur in photoreceptor cell segments (Supplementary Fig. S8). To address whether depletion of GCP4 affects phagocytic ability in heterozygous retinas [31], we performed an immunofluorescent examination on both retinal sections and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) flat mounts, and observed no significant change in the phagocytic ability of RPE between heterozygous and wild-type retinas (Supplementary Fig. S9). These results suggested that autophagy was upregulated in the Tubgcp4mouse retinas and GCP4 was involved in autophagy regulation in retina.
Fig. 5
Upregulation of autophagy in the heterozygous retinas. a Western blot analysis showed that LC3B-II was upregulated and SQSTM1 was downregulated in the heterozygous retinas in comparison with the wild-type retinas. GAPDH was used as an internal control. b, c Quantification of LC3B-II and SQSTM1 expression levels in retinas in (a). The results were representative of 3 independent experiments and represented as means ± SD. The data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. d Real-time quantitative PCR of Sqstm1 in these retinas. β-actin was used as an internal control. e Immunofluorescence analysis of GCP4 in wild-type and heterozygous retinas using anti-GCP4 antibody. GCP4 was mainly expressed in OS, IS, OPL, IPL, and GCL of retina in both wild-type and heterozygous mice. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst reagent. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 50 μm. f–i HCQ treatment resulted in accumulation of both LC3-II and SQSTM1 proteins in both wild-type and heterozygous retinas. The retina lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies as indicated. GAPDH was used as an internal control. g, h Quantification of LC3B-II and SQSTM1 protein levels in retinas in (f). The results were representative of 3 independent experiments and represented as means ± SD. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. i Real-time quantitative PCR of Sqstm1 in retinas in (f). β-actin was used as an internal control. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest. j Immunofluorescence analysis of the LC3B puncta in the heterozygous and wild-type retinas of 2, 4, and 8 months using anti-LC3B antibody. LC3B puncta were mainly located in the cytoplasm of photoreceptor cells in both heterozygous and wild-type retinas (red arrows). Some LC3B puncta were also observed in the nuclei of ONL in heterozygous retinas (red arrowheads). The nuclei were stained with Hoechst reagent. The enlarged images were originated from the white squares. k Statistic analysis of LC3 puncta per cell using Student’s t-test. Three retinas from three mice were sectioned at indicated age and three sections were counted per retina. Data were represented as means ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. l Transmission electron microscopy of autophagosomes in photoreceptor cells. Representative images of autophagosomes in the cytoplasm of photoreceptor cells. The images in the white squares in panels l1, l3, l5, and l7 were enlarged and showed in panels l2, l4, l6, and l8, respectively. Avi, initial autophagic vacuole; Avd, degradative autophagic vacuole. Scale bars are indicated in each image
Upregulation of autophagy in the heterozygous retinas. a Western blot analysis showed that LC3B-II was upregulated and SQSTM1 was downregulated in the heterozygous retinas in comparison with the wild-type retinas. GAPDH was used as an internal control. b, c Quantification of LC3B-II and SQSTM1 expression levels in retinas in (a). The results were representative of 3 independent experiments and represented as means ± SD. The data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. d Real-time quantitative PCR of Sqstm1 in these retinas. β-actin was used as an internal control. e Immunofluorescence analysis of GCP4 in wild-type and heterozygous retinas using anti-GCP4 antibody. GCP4 was mainly expressed in OS, IS, OPL, IPL, and GCL of retina in both wild-type and heterozygous mice. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst reagent. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 50 μm. f–i HCQ treatment resulted in accumulation of both LC3-II and SQSTM1 proteins in both wild-type and heterozygous retinas. The retina lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies as indicated. GAPDH was used as an internal control. g, h Quantification of LC3B-II and SQSTM1 protein levels in retinas in (f). The results were representative of 3 independent experiments and represented as means ± SD. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. i Real-time quantitative PCR of Sqstm1 in retinas in (f). β-actin was used as an internal control. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest. j Immunofluorescence analysis of the LC3B puncta in the heterozygous and wild-type retinas of 2, 4, and 8 months using anti-LC3B antibody. LC3B puncta were mainly located in the cytoplasm of photoreceptor cells in both heterozygous and wild-type retinas (red arrows). Some LC3B puncta were also observed in the nuclei of ONL in heterozygous retinas (red arrowheads). The nuclei were stained with Hoechst reagent. The enlarged images were originated from the white squares. k Statistic analysis of LC3 puncta per cell using Student’s t-test. Three retinas from three mice were sectioned at indicated age and three sections were counted per retina. Data were represented as means ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. l Transmission electron microscopy of autophagosomes in photoreceptor cells. Representative images of autophagosomes in the cytoplasm of photoreceptor cells. The images in the white squares in panels l1, l3, l5, and l7 were enlarged and showed in panels l2, l4, l6, and l8, respectively. Avi, initial autophagic vacuole; Avd, degradative autophagic vacuole. Scale bars are indicated in each image
Autophagy inhibition reduces retinal degeneration in Tubgcp4+/− retina
Given the photoreceptor degeneration when autophagy was increased, we test whether autophagy inhibition can rescue the retinopathy phenotypes in heterozygous mice. To decrease autophagy activity in the retinas of Tubgcp4+/− mice, we administered mice with HCQ via the drinking water for 2 months. HCQ was effective in reducing the flux as evidenced by accumulation of LC3-II and SQSTM1, but there was no significant change at transcription levels of Sqstm1 (Fig. 6a–c). HCQ treatment resulted in an obvious increase of ONL thickness in both the superior and inferior retina (approximately 40% after 2 months of HCQ-treatment in comparison with controls) (Fig. 6d, e). Moreover, ERG showed a significant increase in retinal function in HCQ-treatment mice (Fig. 6f–k). These findings suggested that decrease of autophagy activity in the heterozygous retinas increased photoreceptor survival and rescued retinal function.
Fig. 6
Autophagy inhibition by HCQ treatment in vivo increased photoreceptor survival and rescued retinal function in GCP4 heterozygotes. a Western blot analysis showed that LC3B-II and SQSTM1 was accumulated in heterozygous retinas after 2 months of HCQ treatment via the drinking water. GAPDH was used as an internal control. b Quantification of LC3B-II and SQSTM1 expression levels in retinas in panel a. c Real-time quantitative PCR of Sqstm1 in retinas in (a). β-actin was used as an internal control. The results were representative of 3 independent experiments and represented as means ± SD. The data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. d Histologic analysis of heterozygous retinas with or without HCQ treatment at age of 8 month. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 20 µm. e Statistical analysis of ONL thickness in Tubgcp4 mice with or without HCQ treatment (n = 3). The ONL thickness was measured along the vertical meridian at each defined distance from the optic nerve head. Data were represented as mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest was used for statistical analysis. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. f, h, j Saturating ERG responses of the retinas of the mice as indicated to 510 nm flashes at an intensity of −35 log scot. cd. s/m2 under scotopic (f, h) and photopic (j) conditions. Each trace is the average of individual records from five mice. g, i, k Statistical analysis of the saturating amplitude of a- and b-waves of the mice as indicated under scotopic (g, i) and photopic (k) conditions. Amplitude levels of a- and b-waves were significantly rescued in the HCQ-treated Tubgcp4 mice. The mice were 8-month-old littermates. Data were represented as means ± SD of five mice. p-values were calculated by two-tailed t-test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Autophagy inhibition by HCQ treatment in vivo increased photoreceptor survival and rescued retinal function in GCP4 heterozygotes. a Western blot analysis showed that LC3B-II and SQSTM1 was accumulated in heterozygous retinas after 2 months of HCQ treatment via the drinking water. GAPDH was used as an internal control. b Quantification of LC3B-II and SQSTM1 expression levels in retinas in panel a. c Real-time quantitative PCR of Sqstm1 in retinas in (a). β-actin was used as an internal control. The results were representative of 3 independent experiments and represented as means ± SD. The data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. d Histologic analysis of heterozygous retinas with or without HCQ treatment at age of 8 month. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 20 µm. e Statistical analysis of ONL thickness in Tubgcp4mice with or without HCQ treatment (n = 3). The ONL thickness was measured along the vertical meridian at each defined distance from the optic nerve head. Data were represented as mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest was used for statistical analysis. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. f, h, j Saturating ERG responses of the retinas of the mice as indicated to 510 nm flashes at an intensity of −35 log scot. cd. s/m2 under scotopic (f, h) and photopic (j) conditions. Each trace is the average of individual records from five mice. g, i, k Statistical analysis of the saturating amplitude of a- and b-waves of the mice as indicated under scotopic (g, i) and photopic (k) conditions. Amplitude levels of a- and b-waves were significantly rescued in the HCQ-treated Tubgcp4mice. The mice were 8-month-old littermates. Data were represented as means ± SD of five mice. p-values were calculated by two-tailed t-test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
GCP4 inhibits autophagy by competing with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7
To explore the molecular mechanisms of GCP4 in the regulation of autophagy, we analyzed autophagy flux through a tandem fluorescent indicator, mCherry-GFP-LC3. Because green fluorescence of the fusion protein is very sensitive to the acidic environment of lysosomes and is quickly quenched in autolysosomes, only red fluorescence could be detected in the autolysosomes [32, 33]. Confocal microscopy analysis using the indicator system in COS-7 cells showed that GCP4 knockdown promoted the formation of autophagosomes after starvation induction. With BAF treatment, autophagosomes clearly accumulated, and the number of autolysosomes decreased (Fig. 7a, b and Supplementary Fig. S10). These results suggested that GCP4 inhibits autophagosome formation.
Fig. 7
Autophagy flux associated with GCP4. a Detection of autophagy flux using fluorescent confocal microscopy. Stable miR-Gcp4-2# and miR-LacZ COS-7 cells were transfected with a tandem expression vector mCherry-GFP-LC3 and cultured in normal and EBSS medium for 2 h. In the BAF + EBSS group, the cells were treated with BAF for 4 h to suppress the fusion between autophagosome and lysosome. Yellow or green puncta indicated autophagosomes, while red puncta include autophagosomes and autolysosomes, because GFP protein is sensitive and attenuated in an acidic environment of autolysosome. Scale bar: 10 μm. b The tandem structure of mCherry-GFP-LC3 and statistical analysis of LC3 puncta per cell (n = 3 experiments, with 40 cells/experiment). Data were represented as means ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest was used for statistical analysis. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Autophagy flux associated with GCP4. a Detection of autophagy flux using fluorescent confocal microscopy. Stable miR-Gcp4-2# and miR-LacZ COS-7 cells were transfected with a tandem expression vector mCherry-GFP-LC3 and cultured in normal and EBSS medium for 2 h. In the BAF + EBSS group, the cells were treated with BAF for 4 h to suppress the fusion between autophagosome and lysosome. Yellow or green puncta indicated autophagosomes, while red puncta include autophagosomes and autolysosomes, because GFP protein is sensitive and attenuated in an acidic environment of autolysosome. Scale bar: 10 μm. b The tandem structure of mCherry-GFP-LC3 and statistical analysis of LC3 puncta per cell (n = 3 experiments, with 40 cells/experiment). Data were represented as means ± SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest was used for statistical analysis. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01To further investigate how GCP4 regulates autophagy, GCP4 interacting proteins involved in autophagy initiation were identified through co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization analysis. We determined that ATG7, a key protein for autophagy initiation, can interact with GCP4 in 293T cells (Fig. 8a, b). Truncation mutation analysis showed that GCP4 bound to the N-terminal domain of ATG7 but not to the C-terminal region (Fig. 8c, d).
Fig. 8
GCP4 inhibits autophagy by competing with ATG3 to interact with ATG7. a, b Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 interacted with ATG7 in HEK293T cells. The 293T cells were transiently transfected with both pMyc-ATG7 and p3xFlag-TUBGCP4, and after transfection for 48 h, the whole cell lysates were extracted for co-immunoprecipitation with anti-MYC (a) or anti-FLAG (b). Anti-FLAG (a) or anti-MYC (b) antibody was used for Western blotting. c Schematic diagram of the ATG7 domains. NTD, N-terminal domain; CTD, C-terminal domain; AD, adenylation domain; ECTD, extreme C-terminal domain. d Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 interacted with the NTD of ATG7. p3xFlag-TUBGCP4 was co-transfected with pMyc-ATG7-NTD, pMyc-ATG7-CTD into 293T cells. For co-immunoprecipitation, the lysates were immunoprecipitated with the anti-MYC antibody, followed by immunoblotting with the anti-FLAG antibody. The result showed that FLAG-GCP4 can interact with MYC-ATG7-NTD. e GCP4 can interact with ATG7 in vivo. Retina cell lysates were extracted for immunoprecipitation with anti-ATG7 (Rabbit IgG for control) followed by immunoblotting with antibody against GCP4. f, g GST-pulldown assay showed GCP4 interaction with the N-terminal of ATG7. Coomassie gel showed expression of His-GCP4, GST-ATG7, GST-ATG7-N, GST-ATG7-C, and GST in supernatant of E. coli culture (f). His-tagged GCP4 was incubated with GST-ATG7, GST-ATG7-N, GST-ATG7-C and GST respectively. Proteins pulled down with glutathione-agarose were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with anti-GCP4 antibody (g). h Co-localization of ATG7 and GCP4 in OS, IS, OPL, IPL, and GCL of retinas by immunofluorescence analysis using anti-GCP4 (second antibody, Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated-goat anti-Rabbit) and Alex488-labeled anti-ATG7. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst reagent. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 50 μm. i GCP4 competes with ATG3 to interact with ATG7. pMyc-ATG7 was co-transfected with p3xFlag-ATG3 (1 μg) or p3xFlag-TUBGCP4 (1 μg) and an increasing amount (0, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 μg) of p3xFlag-TUBGCP4 (left panel) or p3xFlag-ATG3 (right panel). The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with the anti-MYC antibody, followed by immunoblotting with the anti-FLAG antibody. The whole cell lysates were examined by western blotting using the anti-FLAG or anti-MYC antibody (input). j A model of GCP4 inhibiting autophagy through competing with ATG3 to interact with ATG7. The free ATG7, which is a key autophagy protein to initiate the formation of phagophores, can interact with either ATG3 or GCP4 through its NTD. When Tubgcp4 is knocked out, ATG3 interacts with ATG7 to promote lipidation of LC3B and autophagy. In wild-type cells, GCP4 can compete ATG3 to interact with ATG7, which inhibits lipidation of LC3B and autophagy. Thus, GCP4 balances functions of ATG3 in autophagy regulation
GCP4 inhibits autophagy by competing with ATG3 to interact with ATG7. a, b Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 interacted with ATG7 in HEK293T cells. The 293T cells were transiently transfected with both pMyc-ATG7 and p3xFlag-TUBGCP4, and after transfection for 48 h, the whole cell lysates were extracted for co-immunoprecipitation with anti-MYC (a) or anti-FLAG (b). Anti-FLAG (a) or anti-MYC (b) antibody was used for Western blotting. c Schematic diagram of the ATG7 domains. NTD, N-terminal domain; CTD, C-terminal domain; AD, adenylation domain; ECTD, extreme C-terminal domain. d Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 interacted with the NTD of ATG7. p3xFlag-TUBGCP4 was co-transfected with pMyc-ATG7-NTD, pMyc-ATG7-CTD into 293T cells. For co-immunoprecipitation, the lysates were immunoprecipitated with the anti-MYC antibody, followed by immunoblotting with the anti-FLAG antibody. The result showed that FLAG-GCP4 can interact with MYC-ATG7-NTD. e GCP4 can interact with ATG7 in vivo. Retina cell lysates were extracted for immunoprecipitation with anti-ATG7 (Rabbit IgG for control) followed by immunoblotting with antibody against GCP4. f, g GST-pulldown assay showed GCP4 interaction with the N-terminal of ATG7. Coomassie gel showed expression of His-GCP4, GST-ATG7, GST-ATG7-N, GST-ATG7-C, and GST in supernatant of E. coli culture (f). His-tagged GCP4 was incubated with GST-ATG7, GST-ATG7-N, GST-ATG7-C and GST respectively. Proteins pulled down with glutathione-agarose were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with anti-GCP4 antibody (g). h Co-localization of ATG7 and GCP4 in OS, IS, OPL, IPL, and GCL of retinas by immunofluorescence analysis using anti-GCP4 (second antibody, Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated-goat anti-Rabbit) and Alex488-labeled anti-ATG7. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst reagent. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 50 μm. i GCP4 competes with ATG3 to interact with ATG7. pMyc-ATG7 was co-transfected with p3xFlag-ATG3 (1 μg) or p3xFlag-TUBGCP4 (1 μg) and an increasing amount (0, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 μg) of p3xFlag-TUBGCP4 (left panel) or p3xFlag-ATG3 (right panel). The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with the anti-MYC antibody, followed by immunoblotting with the anti-FLAG antibody. The whole cell lysates were examined by western blotting using the anti-FLAG or anti-MYC antibody (input). j A model of GCP4 inhibiting autophagy through competing with ATG3 to interact with ATG7. The free ATG7, which is a key autophagy protein to initiate the formation of phagophores, can interact with either ATG3 or GCP4 through its NTD. When Tubgcp4 is knocked out, ATG3 interacts with ATG7 to promote lipidation of LC3B and autophagy. In wild-type cells, GCP4 can compete ATG3 to interact with ATG7, which inhibits lipidation of LC3B and autophagy. Thus, GCP4 balances functions of ATG3 in autophagy regulationWe further confirmed the interaction in vivo. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 interacted with ATG7 in mouse retinas (Fig. 8e). GST-pulldown assays were used to test whether the interaction was direct or indirect. The direct association was observed between GCP4 and ATG7, particularly its N-terminal (Fig. 8f, g). Immunofluorescence analysis of the retinal sections showed that both GCP4 and ATG7 proteins co-localized in the outer segment, inner segment, outer plexiform layer, inner plexiform layer and ganglion cell layer of retina (Fig. 8h). Because ATG3 interacts with the N-terminal domain of ATG7 and consequently promotes autophagy, we further determined the interaction modes of GCP4, ATG3, and ATG7. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 competed with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7 (Fig. 8i, j). Together, these results suggested that GCP4 inhibits autophagy by competing with ATG3 to interact with ATG7.
Discussion
The retina consists of highly specialized and multilayered neural tissue for initial capture and processing of visual signals. Maintenance of retinal homeostasis is critical for normal physiological function of retina, which is often affected by a variety of both physiological and pathological conditions, including genotoxicity, age-associated alterations, light damage, abnormal apoptosis and autophagy [16, 34]. Using knockout mouse models, we have found that GCP4 depletion affected the assembly of γ-TuRC, which led to abnormal spindle formation, thus structure disorganization of the retina. On the other hand, GCP4 can down-regulate autophagy by competing with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7 and interferes with the lipidation of LC3B. In Tubgcp4 heterozygous retina, haploinsufficiency of GCP4 releases more ATG7 proteins for interaction with ATG3 to up-regulate autophagy. HCQ treatment in vivo to decrease autophagy activity in the heterozygous retinas can increase photoreceptor survival and rescue retinal function. Thus, GCP4 may play bi-functional roles in maintenance of retinal homeostasis, through participating in assembly of γ-TuRC, on the other side, in regulating autophagy in retina. In line with these results, inhibition of autophagy reduced retinal degeneration by pharmacological treatment and Atg5 knockout in mice [30].Assessment of gene essentiality in vivo has posed technical and conceptual challenges in mammals. Here, we demonstrated that Tubgcp4 is an essential gene for early embryo survival in mice. Gene essentiality was assessed in terms of the dosage effect of Tubgcp4 on mitosis and retina homeostasis. GCP4 regulates autophagy through the ATG3/GCP4-ATG7-LC3B pathway, which plays key roles in the maintenance of retina architecture in a dose-dependent manner. Accordingly, we propose that the essential gene Tubgcp4 has dose-dependent effects from tissue homeostasis to early embryo survival.An intriguing finding in this study is the dosage effect of essential genes. In mammals, two copies of gene products are essential for embryo survival. In heterozygotes, embryo survival can be rescued by the wild-type allele through dosage compensation. When an essential gene is lacking, the early embryo can still survive until implantation because of the compensation by maternally inherited gene products. In addition, a mammalian pre-implantation embryo has a certain degree of plasticity and an ability to efficiently adapt to its development before implantation [35]. However, haploid dosage is insufficient for the functions of sensitive tissues, such as in the maintenance of retinal homeostasis. The viability of yeast cells with disruptions in components of essential pathways was rescued by aneuploidy of specific chromosomes [11], thereby supporting the dosage compensation effect of essential genes observed in mammals. Thus, gene essentiality should be assessed as a dosage effect.Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying embryo lethality are not well understood, although several scenarios have been proposed, such as impaired expansion of the primitive streak with Oct4 depletion [36], impaired placental development caused by insufficient oxygen and nutrient transfer in Pdcd5-deficient embryos [37], and lesions in inner cell mass proliferation in mTOR knockout embryos [38]. Here, we propose that GCP4 is essential for mitotic spindle assembly in a dose-dependent manner and that depletion of GCP4 leads to abnormal spindle assembly and thus embryonic lethality. GCP4, together with other subunits of γ-TuRC, participate in the nucleation of spindle microtubules [39, 40]. In fission yeast cells, Gfh1 (homolog of TUBGCP4) mutants are viable, but with quantitatively less nucleation [23, 24]. In Drosophila, most of Dgrip75 (homolog of TUBGCP4) mutants are viable, but both males and females are sterile [25, 41]. TUBGCP4 siRNA affects spindle orientation in HeLa cells [42, 43]. Our study demonstrated that Tubgcp4 knockout in mice resulted in embryonic lethality; concordantly, no homozygous mutants have been observed in human families with autosomal-recessive microcephaly and chorioretinopathy [27]. These data suggest that the gene essentiality of Tubgcp4 in embryonic survival is specific to mammals. However, in fission yeast and Drosophila, Gfh1/Dgrip75 mutants can survive even though microtubule nucleation is impaired in culture cells, thus suggesting that its function can be compensated by other microtubule-associated pathways. Thus, our study reveals a novel genetic cause of embryonic lethality, partially explains the etiology of infertility, and suggests that essential genes can be used as candidate markers in genetic counseling.The light-sensitive tissue, retina, links the optic nerve to the brain. Various environmental insults often impair retinal function and lead to retinal diseases. Autophagy is an essential mechanism for cellular renovation in maintaining retinal homeostasis [16, 44]. Under most pathological conditions affecting the optic nerves, including optic nerve transection, glaucoma, and retinal ischemia, an upregulation of autophagy in the retina has been detected [17-21]. Autophagy deficiency due to depletion of Beclin1 or Atg7 results in light-induced retinal degeneration [45]. Thus, homeostasis of autophagic activity is essential to supporting retinal function. Nevertheless, regulation mechanisms of autophagy in maintaining retinal homeostasis remain elusive. Here, we have identified a pathway of ATG3/GCP4-ATG7-LC3B in the regulation of autophagy in retina, which is schematically shown in Fig. 8j. GCP4 inhibits autophagy by competing with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7 and interferes with the lipidation of LC3B. The autophagic regulation pathway has both physiological and pathologic implications in understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying retina degeneration. Our results also have clinical significance in the potential treatment of retinopathy through the dosage effect of essential gene GCP4.
Materials and methods
Animals
Wild-type C57BL/6J and CD-1mice were purchased from Shanghai Biomodel Organism Science & Technology Development (Shanghai, China). All animal experiments and methods were performed in accordance with the relevant approved guidelines and regulations, as well as under the approval of the Ethics Committee of Wuhan University.
Generation of Tubgcp4 knockout mice and genotyping
A 5.2-kb DNA fragment containing a region of exon 2 to exon 6 of Tubgcp4 was replaced with a 1.9-kb Kanamycin-Neomycin cassette and was used as a dominant selection marker (Supplementary Fig. S1a). The herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) was used as a negative selection marker. Gene targeting was performed in SCR012 ES cells (129/S6/SvEv). ES cell culture and electroporation were performed as previously described [46]. The targeted ES clones were verified by PCR (Table S1). Two independent targeted ES clones were injected into C57BL/6 J blastocysts, which were transferred into a CD-1 foster mother. The resulting male chimeras were mated with C57BL/6J females to establish knockout mouse lines. Both lines exhibited identical phenotypes.Genotyping was carried out with the nested PCR method. Genotyping of adult and post-implantation embryos was performed by multiplex PCR using a mixture of three primers: GT-f1 + GT-r and GT-f2 + GT-r (Table S1), whereby the wild-type alleles yielded a band of 421 bp and the knockout allele produced a band of 585 bp. Genotyping of pre-implantation embryos was performed using a nested PCR strategy, whereby 1 µl from the first round of PCR amplification was used as a template for the second round of PCR amplification using primers GT-nest-f1 + GT-nest-r and GT-nest-f2 + GT-nest-r (Table S1). The wild-type Tubgcp4 allele yielded a 360-bp product and the knockout alleles yielded a 485-bp product (Supplementary Fig. S1b).For genotyping of in situ embryos in utero, embryo tissues were cryosectioned (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Some sections were used for H.E. staining, and others were dissected by laser captured microdissector (LMD6500, Leica). Then, embryo samples were collected in PCR tubes and were lysed in 10 μL lysis buffer (0.005% SDS + 1 mg/mL protein kinase K) for 1 h at 55 °C and then 10 min at 98 °C. Approximately 1 μL lysate was used as a template for genotyping as described above for pre-implantation embryos.
Antibodies
The primary antibodies were as follows: anti-GCP4 (D-5) (sc-271876, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, USA) for western blotting, immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) analysis; Alexa Fluor488-ATG7 (ab214867, Abcam) and anti-GCP4 (GTX115949, Gene Tex, Irvine, USA) for immunofluorescence analysis of histological section of the retina; and anti-GCP5 (14620-1-AP, Proteintech Group, Rosemont, USA), anti-γ-tubulin (15176-1-AP, Proteintech Group), anti-GCP2 (AP12746C, Abgent, San Diego, USA), anti-ATG7 (ab133528, Abcam, Cambridge, USA) for western blotting and co-IP; anti-LC3B (3868 s, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA) and anti-TUBB3 (AC008, ABclonal Biotechnology, Wuhan, China) for immunofluorescence and Western blotting; anti-p62 (SQSTM1) (18420-1-AP, Proteintech Group), anti-GAPDH (CW0100, CWBIO, Beijing, China), anti-FLAG (F3165, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA), and anti-MYC/c-MYC (11667149001, Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, USA) for Western blotting and co-immunoprecipitation.The following secondary antibodies were used: peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG, light chain specific (115-035-174, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, USA), horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated-goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (31430, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA), and HRP conjugated-goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (31460, Invitrogen).The following fluorescent antibodies were used: Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated-goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (R37117, Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated-goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (R37116, Invitrogen), and TRITC conjugated-goat anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (A16071, Invitrogen).
Plasmid constructs
MouseTubgcp4CDS (NM_153387.3) was cloned into pCMV-3xFlag using EcoRI and XhoI to generate FLAG-Tubgcp4. HumanATG7CDS (NM_006395.2) was cloned into pEGFP-N1 (GM-1013P031, Clontech, Mountain View, USA) and pcDNA3.0-myc using EcoRI and SalI to generate pMyc-ATG7. ATG7 fragments consisting of MYC-ATG7 residues 1 to 359 or 360 to 741 were amplified using the PCR primers described in Table S1. These fragments were digested with EcoRI and SalI and ligated into pcDNA3.0-myc to generate pMyc-ATG7-NTD and pMyc-ATG7-CTD, respectively. HumanATG3CDS (NM_022488.4) was cloned into pCMV-3xFlag using EcoRI and XhoI to generate FLAG-ATG3. LentiCRISPRv2-GCP4-gRNA was constructed as described previously [47]. Briefly, GCP4-gRNAs were designed according to the CRISPR Design Tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/) and synthesized with a BsmB I sticky end, then annealed and inserted into the lentiCRISPRv2 plasmid (52961, Addgene, Cambridge, USA), which had been digested with Bsmb I (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania). The target sequences are described in Table S1. pcDNA6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR (Invitrogen) was digested by DraI (Fermentas) to remove GFP to generate pcDNA6.2-GW-miR plasmid. To generate the miR-Tubgcp4 plasmid, Tubgcp4 specific miRNA and control miRNA target sequences were synthesized and cloned into pcDNA6.2-GW-miR. The target sequences for Tubgcp4 and LacZ are described in Table S1. The plasmid mCherry-GFP-LC3 was a kind gift from Dr. Mingzhou Chen.
Cell culture, treatment, and transfection
HEK293T, COS-7, and MEF cells were cultured in DMEM (SH30022.01B, HyClone, Logan, USA) with 10% FBS (P30-330250, PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany). Cells were transfected in 12/24-well plates by using Lipofectamine 2000 (11668027, Invitrogen) according to the routine protocol. To establish stable Tubgcp4 knockdown cell lines, COS-7 cells were transfected with miR-Tubgcp4 1#, miR- Tubgcp4 2# and miR- Tubgcp4 3# plasmids by using Lipofectamine 2000. Stably expressing cells were screened with blasticidin (15205, Sigma-Aldrich) at a final concentration of 20 µg/mL for 2 weeks. For starvation treatment, the cells were cultured in EBSS medium (SH30029.02, HyClone). For BAF treatment, Bafilomycin A1 (B1793, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the culture for 4 h before harvesting.
Western blot analysis and co-immunoprecipitation assays
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously [48]. Briefly, protein extracts (50 μg) from tissues and cell lines were separated in 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred onto 0.45-µm membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Hybond-P). Primary antibodies were incubated with the membranes overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were washed in TBST (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) 3–5 times, incubated with the indicated HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature and then washed in TBST 3–5 times. A Super Signal Chemiluminescent Substrate system (K-12045-D50, Advansta, Menlo Park, USA) was used to detect the signals.Co-immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously [49]. Briefly, 293T cells were co-transfected with related plasmids by using Lipofectamine 2000. The cells or tissues were lysed in HEPES buffer (50 mM HEPES at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.5% NP-40 with protease inhibitor cocktail (04693159001, Roche Applied Science)). Cell lysates were incubated with the specified antibodies and Protein G agarose (Roche) overnight at 4 °C. The resins were collected by centrifugation and then washed four times with HEPES buffer. Bound proteins were eluted with loading buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 2% SDS, 1% mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 0.1% bromophenol blue, pH 6.8), separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with appropriate antibodies.
GST pull-down assays
GST pull-down experiments were performed as described previously [50]. Briefly, GST, GST-ATG7, GST-ATG7-N, GST-ATG7-C or His-GCP4 were introduced into E.coli BL21 (DE3) pLyS, and the fusion proteins were induced with 0.1 mM IPTG at 16 °C for 24 h. 10 μg supernatants of GST-fusion proteins were mixed with glutathione-agarose beads (Cat# P2020, Solarbio, Beijing, China) for 4 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times with HEPES buffer. Then the beads were incubated with 10 μg supernatants of His-GCP4 and rotated at 4 °C overnight respectively. Finally, the glutathione-agarose beads were washed four times with HEPES buffer, and then subjected to Western blot analysis.
Immunofluorescence analysis
Immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described previously [51]. Briefly, retina tissues were embedded in OCT medium (4583, Tissue-Tek, Miles, USA) and cut into a series of 8-µm sections using a cryostat (Leica). The sections were fixed with pre-cooled methanol for 20 min at −20 °C and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (9002–93–1, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 10 min. Alternatively, COS-7 cells on coverslips were extracted with microtubule stabilization buffer (80 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA and 0.5% Triton X-100) and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. Both tissue sections and cells on coverslips were treated with 2% BSA for 20 min at room temperature and incubated with indicated primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. After being washed 3 times with PBS, the samples were subjected to appropriate fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody at 37 °C for 1 h. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst33258. Images were taken by confocal fluorescence microscopy (SP8, Leica). Optical z-sections were acquired in 0.4 μm steps. Z-stacks were deconvolved in LAS X software (Leica) using default parameters. All presented maximum intensity projections of deconvolved z-stacks were prepared in ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, USA).
In vitro culture of blastocysts
All blastocysts were generated by natural mating of Tubgcp4 heterozygous mice. The morning of the day on which a vaginal plug was detected was designated day 0.5. Blastocysts were collected on E3.5 by flushing the uterus with M2 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) and cultured in ES medium (DMEM, 15% FBS (SH30070.02E, HyClone), 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 units/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 55 µM 2-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen), and 103 units/ml leukemia inhibitory factor (ESG1106, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany)). Outgrowths were photographed under an inverted microscope (DM IRB, Leica) each day and harvested for genotyping.
X-ray imaging
Adult mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (85 mg/kg body weight). X-ray imaging was performed using a Bruker In-Vivo Xtreme imaging system (Bruker Xtreme BI, Bruker, Madison, USA). The images were captured by a 4 MP back-illuminated cooled CCD and a f-stop 1.1–16 lens (Bruker Molecular Imaging, Billerica, USA) with the following parameters: 1.2 sec exposure time, f-stop 2.0, binning 1 × 1, X-ray filter: 0.4 mm, X-ray energy: 45kVp. Body indexes were measured by Image-pro plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, USA).
Mouse electroretinography
Mouse ERG measurement was performed according to previously described procedures with modifications [52]. Mice were dark adapted overnight and anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (75 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine (5 mg/kg body weight) under dim red light. The pupils were dilated with a single drop of 1% atropine sulfate. A drop of 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride was applied for corneal anesthesia. A small amount of 2.5% methylcellulose gel was applied to the eye. Mice were placed on the heating pad (37 °C) of a Ganzfeld dome (Roland Q400, Wiesbaden, Germany). A silver loop electrode was placed over the cornea to record the ERGs. Needle reference and ground electrodes were placed in the cheek and tail, respectively. All stimuli were presented in the Ganzfeld dome. Light was spectrally filtered with a 500-nm interference filter. The intensities of flashes were −5, −15, −25, and −35 log scotopic candela-sec/m2 (cd. s/m2). For photopic ERG, mice were recovered at intensities of 30 cd. s/m2 for 10 min, and then tested at the intensity of 3.0 cd. s/m2. Data were collected and analyzed with Port32.exe.
HCQ treatment in Tubgcp4+/− mice
Mice were given treatment at the age of 6 months. For hydroxychloroquine (HCQ; H1306, Tokyo Chemical Industry, Japan) treatment [30], HCQ was administered in the drinking water at a concentration of 1.2 mg/ml. In the control group, mice were raised at the same condition except no HCQ administered.
Electron microscopy
Electron microscopy analysis was performed as described previously [53]. Briefly, eye samples were enucleated, and the anterior segment and the lens were removed. Eye cups were fixed in fixative buffer (4% paraformaldehyde and 3% glutaraldehyde for 4 h in 0.1 M sodium-phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) at 4 °C for at least 24 h, and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4 °C. After a stepwise ethanol and acetone dehydration and infiltration with Spurr’s epoxy resin, the samples were embedded and polymerized in Spurr’s epoxy resin at 60 °C for 48 h. Then, the samples were sectioned at a thickness of 70 nm using an ultramicrotome (EM UC7, Leica). The sections were contrasted with 5% uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined under a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai G2 20, FEI, Oregon, USA).
Sucrose density gradient centrifugation analysis
Eye samples were enucleated, and retinas were dissected and homogenized at 4 °C in 0.2 ml of HEPES buffer (50 mM HEPES at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.5% NP-40 with protease inhibitor cocktail (04693159001, Roche Applied Science)). After centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 × g at 4 °C, the supernatant was loaded onto a 3.3 mL 5–40% continuous sucrose gradient in HEPES buffer without 0.5% NP-40. The gradient was then centrifuged in a RPS56T-swing rotor (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) for 4 h at 314,000 × g at 4 °C. Fractions were collected from top to bottom (14 fractions) and analyzed by western blotting.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as the means ± standard deviation. Statistical comparisons were made using Student’s t-test when comparing two groups. One-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni posttest was performed for comparisons among more than two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism 5 software package (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, USA). For all analysis, a p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Ethics statement
All animal experiments and methods were performed in accordance with the relevant approved guidelines and regulations, as well as under the approval of the Ethics Committee of Wuhan University.SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Authors: Tim Wang; Kıvanç Birsoy; Nicholas W Hughes; Kevin M Krupczak; Yorick Post; Jenny J Wei; Eric S Lander; David M Sabatini Journal: Science Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Svetlana Gerdes; Robert Edwards; Michael Kubal; Michael Fonstein; Rick Stevens; Andrei Osterman Journal: Curr Opin Biotechnol Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 9.740
Authors: Richard Marcotte; Kevin R Brown; Fernando Suarez; Azin Sayad; Konstantina Karamboulas; Paul M Krzyzanowski; Fabrice Sircoulomb; Mauricio Medrano; Yaroslav Fedyshyn; Judice L Y Koh; Dewald van Dyk; Bodhana Fedyshyn; Marianna Luhova; Glauber C Brito; Franco J Vizeacoumar; Frederick S Vizeacoumar; Alessandro Datti; Dahlia Kasimer; Alla Buzina; Patricia Mero; Christine Misquitta; Josee Normand; Maliha Haider; Troy Ketela; Jeffrey L Wrana; Robert Rottapel; Benjamin G Neel; Jason Moffat Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Hiu Wing Cheung; Glenn S Cowley; Barbara A Weir; Jesse S Boehm; Scott Rusin; Justine A Scott; Alexandra East; Levi D Ali; Patrick H Lizotte; Terence C Wong; Guozhi Jiang; Jessica Hsiao; Craig H Mermel; Gad Getz; Jordi Barretina; Shuba Gopal; Pablo Tamayo; Joshua Gould; Aviad Tsherniak; Nicolas Stransky; Biao Luo; Yin Ren; Ronny Drapkin; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Jill P Mesirov; Levi A Garraway; Matthew Meyerson; Eric S Lander; David E Root; William C Hahn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tim Wang; Haiyan Yu; Nicholas W Hughes; Bingxu Liu; Arek Kendirli; Klara Klein; Walter W Chen; Eric S Lander; David M Sabatini Journal: Cell Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Biao Luo; Hiu Wing Cheung; Aravind Subramanian; Tanaz Sharifnia; Michael Okamoto; Xiaoping Yang; Greg Hinkle; Jesse S Boehm; Rameen Beroukhim; Barbara A Weir; Craig Mermel; David A Barbie; Tarif Awad; Xiaochuan Zhou; Tuyen Nguyen; Bruno Piqani; Cheng Li; Todd R Golub; Matthew Meyerson; Nir Hacohen; William C Hahn; Eric S Lander; David M Sabatini; David E Root Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jose M Silva; Krista Marran; Joel S Parker; Javier Silva; Michael Golding; Michael R Schlabach; Stephen J Elledge; Gregory J Hannon; Kenneth Chang Journal: Science Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jacqueline K White; Anna-Karin Gerdin; Natasha A Karp; Ed Ryder; Marija Buljan; James N Bussell; Jennifer Salisbury; Simon Clare; Neil J Ingham; Christine Podrini; Richard Houghton; Jeanne Estabel; Joanna R Bottomley; David G Melvin; David Sunter; Niels C Adams; David Tannahill; Darren W Logan; Daniel G Macarthur; Jonathan Flint; Vinit B Mahajan; Stephen H Tsang; Ian Smyth; Fiona M Watt; William C Skarnes; Gordon Dougan; David J Adams; Ramiro Ramirez-Solis; Allan Bradley; Karen P Steel Journal: Cell Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Daniel J Klionsky; Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz; Sara Abdelfatah; Mahmoud Abdellatif; Asghar Abdoli; Steffen Abel; Hagai Abeliovich; Marie H Abildgaard; Yakubu Princely Abudu; Abraham Acevedo-Arozena; Iannis E Adamopoulos; Khosrow Adeli; Timon E Adolph; Annagrazia Adornetto; Elma Aflaki; Galila Agam; Anupam Agarwal; Bharat B Aggarwal; Maria Agnello; Patrizia Agostinis; Javed N Agrewala; Alexander Agrotis; Patricia V Aguilar; S Tariq Ahmad; Zubair M Ahmed; Ulises Ahumada-Castro; Sonja Aits; Shu Aizawa; Yunus Akkoc; Tonia Akoumianaki; Hafize Aysin Akpinar; Ahmed M Al-Abd; Lina Al-Akra; Abeer Al-Gharaibeh; Moulay A Alaoui-Jamali; Simon Alberti; Elísabet Alcocer-Gómez; Cristiano Alessandri; Muhammad Ali; M Abdul Alim Al-Bari; Saeb Aliwaini; Javad Alizadeh; Eugènia Almacellas; Alexandru Almasan; Alicia Alonso; Guillermo D Alonso; Nihal Altan-Bonnet; Dario C Altieri; Élida M C Álvarez; Sara Alves; Cristine Alves da Costa; Mazen M Alzaharna; Marialaura Amadio; Consuelo Amantini; Cristina Amaral; Susanna Ambrosio; Amal O Amer; Veena Ammanathan; Zhenyi An; Stig U Andersen; Shaida A Andrabi; Magaiver Andrade-Silva; Allen M Andres; Sabrina Angelini; David Ann; Uche C Anozie; Mohammad Y Ansari; Pedro Antas; Adam Antebi; Zuriñe Antón; Tahira Anwar; Lionel Apetoh; Nadezda Apostolova; Toshiyuki Araki; Yasuhiro Araki; Kohei Arasaki; Wagner L Araújo; Jun Araya; Catherine Arden; Maria-Angeles Arévalo; Sandro Arguelles; Esperanza Arias; Jyothi Arikkath; Hirokazu Arimoto; Aileen R Ariosa; Darius Armstrong-James; Laetitia Arnauné-Pelloquin; Angeles Aroca; Daniela S Arroyo; Ivica Arsov; Rubén Artero; Dalia Maria Lucia Asaro; Michael Aschner; Milad Ashrafizadeh; Osnat Ashur-Fabian; Atanas G Atanasov; Alicia K Au; Patrick Auberger; Holger W Auner; Laure Aurelian; Riccardo Autelli; Laura Avagliano; Yenniffer Ávalos; Sanja Aveic; Célia Alexandra Aveleira; Tamar Avin-Wittenberg; Yucel Aydin; Scott Ayton; Srinivas Ayyadevara; Maria Azzopardi; Misuzu Baba; Jonathan M Backer; Steven K Backues; Dong-Hun Bae; Ok-Nam Bae; Soo Han Bae; Eric H Baehrecke; Ahruem Baek; Seung-Hoon Baek; Sung Hee Baek; Giacinto Bagetta; Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; Hua Bai; Jie Bai; Xiyuan Bai; Yidong Bai; Nandadulal Bairagi; Shounak Baksi; Teresa Balbi; Cosima T Baldari; Walter Balduini; Andrea Ballabio; Maria Ballester; Salma Balazadeh; Rena Balzan; Rina Bandopadhyay; Sreeparna Banerjee; Sulagna Banerjee; Ágnes Bánréti; Yan Bao; Mauricio S Baptista; Alessandra Baracca; Cristiana Barbati; Ariadna Bargiela; Daniela Barilà; Peter G Barlow; Sami J Barmada; Esther Barreiro; George E Barreto; Jiri Bartek; Bonnie Bartel; Alberto Bartolome; Gaurav R Barve; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Diane C Bassham; Robert C Bast; Alakananda Basu; Henri Batoko; Isabella Batten; Etienne E Baulieu; Bradley L Baumgarner; Jagadeesh Bayry; Rupert Beale; Isabelle Beau; Florian Beaumatin; Luiz R G Bechara; George R Beck; Michael F Beers; Jakob Begun; Christian Behrends; Georg M N Behrens; Roberto Bei; Eloy Bejarano; Shai Bel; Christian Behl; Amine Belaid; Naïma Belgareh-Touzé; Cristina Bellarosa; Francesca Belleudi; Melissa Belló Pérez; Raquel Bello-Morales; Jackeline Soares de Oliveira Beltran; Sebastián Beltran; Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook; Mykolas Bendorius; Bruno A Benitez; Irene Benito-Cuesta; Julien Bensalem; Martin W Berchtold; Sabina Berezowska; Daniele Bergamaschi; Matteo Bergami; Andreas Bergmann; Laura Berliocchi; Clarisse Berlioz-Torrent; Amélie Bernard; Lionel Berthoux; Cagri G Besirli; Sebastien Besteiro; Virginie M Betin; Rudi Beyaert; Jelena S Bezbradica; Kiran Bhaskar; Ingrid Bhatia-Kissova; Resham Bhattacharya; Sujoy Bhattacharya; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya; Md Shenuarin Bhuiyan; Sujit Kumar Bhutia; Lanrong Bi; Xiaolin Bi; Trevor J Biden; Krikor Bijian; Viktor A Billes; Nadine Binart; Claudia Bincoletto; Asa B Birgisdottir; Geir Bjorkoy; Gonzalo Blanco; Ana Blas-Garcia; Janusz Blasiak; Robert Blomgran; Klas Blomgren; Janice S Blum; Emilio Boada-Romero; Mirta Boban; Kathleen Boesze-Battaglia; Philippe Boeuf; Barry Boland; Pascale Bomont; Paolo Bonaldo; Srinivasa Reddy Bonam; Laura Bonfili; Juan S Bonifacino; Brian A Boone; Martin D Bootman; Matteo Bordi; Christoph Borner; Beat C Bornhauser; Gautam Borthakur; Jürgen Bosch; Santanu Bose; Luis M Botana; Juan Botas; Chantal M Boulanger; Michael E Boulton; Mathieu Bourdenx; Benjamin Bourgeois; Nollaig M Bourke; Guilhem Bousquet; Patricia Boya; Peter V Bozhkov; Luiz H M Bozi; Tolga O Bozkurt; Doug E Brackney; Christian H Brandts; Ralf J Braun; Gerhard H Braus; Roberto Bravo-Sagua; José M Bravo-San Pedro; Patrick Brest; Marie-Agnès Bringer; Alfredo Briones-Herrera; V Courtney Broaddus; Peter Brodersen; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Steven L Brody; Paola G Bronson; Jeff M Bronstein; Carolyn N Brown; Rhoderick E Brown; Patricia C Brum; John H Brumell; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Daniele Bruno; Robert J Bryson-Richardson; Cecilia Bucci; Carmen Buchrieser; Marta Bueno; Laura Elisa Buitrago-Molina; Simone Buraschi; Shilpa Buch; J Ross Buchan; Erin M Buckingham; Hikmet Budak; Mauricio Budini; Geert Bultynck; Florin Burada; Joseph R Burgoyne; M Isabel Burón; Victor Bustos; Sabrina Büttner; Elena Butturini; Aaron Byrd; Isabel Cabas; Sandra Cabrera-Benitez; Ken Cadwell; Jingjing Cai; Lu Cai; Qian Cai; Montserrat Cairó; Jose A Calbet; Guy A Caldwell; Kim A Caldwell; Jarrod A Call; Riccardo Calvani; Ana C Calvo; Miguel Calvo-Rubio Barrera; Niels Os Camara; Jacques H Camonis; Nadine Camougrand; Michelangelo Campanella; Edward M Campbell; François-Xavier Campbell-Valois; Silvia Campello; Ilaria Campesi; Juliane C Campos; Olivier Camuzard; Jorge Cancino; Danilo Candido de Almeida; Laura Canesi; Isabella Caniggia; Barbara Canonico; Carles Cantí; Bin Cao; Michele Caraglia; Beatriz Caramés; Evie H Carchman; Elena Cardenal-Muñoz; Cesar Cardenas; Luis Cardenas; Sandra M Cardoso; Jennifer S Carew; Georges F Carle; Gillian Carleton; Silvia Carloni; Didac Carmona-Gutierrez; Leticia A Carneiro; Oliana Carnevali; Julian M Carosi; Serena Carra; Alice Carrier; Lucie Carrier; Bernadette Carroll; A Brent Carter; Andreia Neves Carvalho; Magali Casanova; Caty Casas; Josefina Casas; Chiara Cassioli; Eliseo F Castillo; Karen Castillo; Sonia Castillo-Lluva; Francesca Castoldi; Marco Castori; Ariel F Castro; Margarida Castro-Caldas; Javier Castro-Hernandez; Susana Castro-Obregon; Sergio D Catz; Claudia Cavadas; Federica Cavaliere; Gabriella Cavallini; Maria Cavinato; Maria L Cayuela; Paula Cebollada Rica; Valentina Cecarini; Francesco Cecconi; Marzanna Cechowska-Pasko; Simone Cenci; Victòria Ceperuelo-Mallafré; João J Cerqueira; Janete M Cerutti; Davide Cervia; Vildan Bozok Cetintas; Silvia Cetrullo; Han-Jung Chae; Andrei S Chagin; Chee-Yin Chai; Gopal Chakrabarti; Oishee Chakrabarti; Tapas Chakraborty; Trinad Chakraborty; Mounia Chami; Georgios Chamilos; David W Chan; Edmond Y W Chan; Edward D Chan; H Y Edwin Chan; Helen H Chan; Hung Chan; Matthew T V Chan; Yau Sang Chan; Partha K Chandra; Chih-Peng Chang; Chunmei Chang; Hao-Chun Chang; Kai Chang; Jie Chao; Tracey Chapman; Nicolas Charlet-Berguerand; Samrat Chatterjee; Shail K Chaube; Anu Chaudhary; Santosh Chauhan; Edward Chaum; Frédéric Checler; Michael E Cheetham; Chang-Shi Chen; Guang-Chao Chen; Jian-Fu Chen; Liam L Chen; Leilei Chen; Lin Chen; Mingliang Chen; Mu-Kuan Chen; Ning Chen; Quan Chen; Ruey-Hwa Chen; Shi Chen; Wei Chen; Weiqiang Chen; Xin-Ming Chen; Xiong-Wen Chen; Xu Chen; Yan Chen; Ye-Guang Chen; Yingyu Chen; Yongqiang Chen; Yu-Jen Chen; Yue-Qin Chen; Zhefan Stephen Chen; Zhi Chen; Zhi-Hua Chen; Zhijian J Chen; Zhixiang Chen; Hanhua Cheng; Jun Cheng; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Wei Cheng; Xiaodong Cheng; Xiu-Tang Cheng; Yiyun Cheng; Zhiyong Cheng; Zhong Chen; Heesun Cheong; Jit Kong Cheong; Boris V Chernyak; Sara Cherry; Chi Fai Randy Cheung; Chun Hei Antonio Cheung; King-Ho Cheung; Eric Chevet; Richard J Chi; Alan Kwok Shing Chiang; Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Roberto Chiarelli; Mario Chiariello; Nathalia Chica; Susanna Chiocca; Mario Chiong; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Abhilash I Chiramel; Valerio Chiurchiù; Dong-Hyung Cho; Seong-Kyu Choe; Augustine M K Choi; Mary E Choi; Kamalika Roy Choudhury; Norman S Chow; Charleen T Chu; Jason P Chua; John Jia En Chua; Hyewon Chung; Kin Pan Chung; Seockhoon Chung; So-Hyang Chung; Yuen-Li Chung; Valentina Cianfanelli; Iwona A Ciechomska; Mariana Cifuentes; Laura Cinque; Sebahattin Cirak; Mara Cirone; Michael J Clague; Robert Clarke; Emilio Clementi; Eliana M Coccia; Patrice Codogno; Ehud Cohen; Mickael M Cohen; Tania Colasanti; Fiorella Colasuonno; Robert A Colbert; Anna Colell; Miodrag Čolić; Nuria S Coll; Mark O Collins; María I Colombo; Daniel A Colón-Ramos; Lydie Combaret; Sergio Comincini; Márcia R Cominetti; Antonella Consiglio; Andrea Conte; Fabrizio Conti; Viorica Raluca Contu; Mark R Cookson; Kevin M Coombs; Isabelle Coppens; Maria Tiziana Corasaniti; Dale P Corkery; Nils Cordes; Katia Cortese; Maria do Carmo Costa; Sarah Costantino; Paola Costelli; Ana Coto-Montes; Peter J Crack; Jose L Crespo; Alfredo Criollo; Valeria Crippa; Riccardo Cristofani; Tamas Csizmadia; Antonio Cuadrado; Bing Cui; Jun Cui; Yixian Cui; Yong Cui; Emmanuel Culetto; Andrea C Cumino; Andrey V Cybulsky; Mark J Czaja; Stanislaw J Czuczwar; Stefania D'Adamo; Marcello D'Amelio; Daniela D'Arcangelo; Andrew C D'Lugos; Gabriella D'Orazi; James A da Silva; Hormos Salimi Dafsari; Ruben K Dagda; Yasin Dagdas; Maria Daglia; Xiaoxia Dai; Yun Dai; Yuyuan Dai; Jessica Dal Col; Paul Dalhaimer; Luisa Dalla Valle; Tobias Dallenga; Guillaume Dalmasso; Markus Damme; Ilaria Dando; Nico P Dantuma; April L Darling; Hiranmoy Das; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Santosh K Dasari; Srikanta Dash; Oliver Daumke; Adrian N Dauphinee; Jeffrey S Davies; Valeria A Dávila; Roger J Davis; Tanja Davis; Sharadha Dayalan Naidu; Francesca De Amicis; Karolien De Bosscher; Francesca De Felice; Lucia De Franceschi; Chiara De Leonibus; Mayara G de Mattos Barbosa; Guido R Y De Meyer; Angelo De Milito; Cosimo De Nunzio; Clara De Palma; Mauro De Santi; Claudio De Virgilio; Daniela De Zio; Jayanta Debnath; Brian J DeBosch; Jean-Paul Decuypere; Mark A Deehan; Gianluca Deflorian; James DeGregori; Benjamin Dehay; Gabriel Del Rio; Joe R Delaney; Lea M D Delbridge; Elizabeth Delorme-Axford; M Victoria Delpino; Francesca Demarchi; Vilma Dembitz; Nicholas D Demers; Hongbin Deng; Zhiqiang Deng; Joern Dengjel; Paul Dent; Donna Denton; Melvin L DePamphilis; Channing J Der; Vojo Deretic; Albert Descoteaux; Laura Devis; Sushil Devkota; Olivier Devuyst; Grant Dewson; Mahendiran Dharmasivam; Rohan Dhiman; Diego di Bernardo; Manlio Di Cristina; Fabio Di Domenico; Pietro Di Fazio; Alessio Di Fonzo; Giovanni Di Guardo; Gianni M Di Guglielmo; Luca Di Leo; Chiara Di Malta; Alessia Di Nardo; Martina Di Rienzo; Federica Di Sano; George Diallinas; Jiajie Diao; Guillermo Diaz-Araya; Inés Díaz-Laviada; Jared M Dickinson; Marc Diederich; Mélanie Dieudé; Ivan Dikic; Shiping Ding; Wen-Xing Ding; Luciana Dini; Jelena Dinić; Miroslav Dinic; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Marc S Dionne; Jörg H W Distler; Abhinav Diwan; Ian M C Dixon; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Ina Dobrinski; Oxana Dobrovinskaya; Radek Dobrowolski; Renwick C J Dobson; Jelena Đokić; Serap Dokmeci Emre; Massimo Donadelli; Bo Dong; Xiaonan Dong; Zhiwu Dong; Gerald W Dorn Ii; Volker Dotsch; Huan Dou; Juan Dou; Moataz Dowaidar; Sami Dridi; Liat Drucker; Ailian Du; Caigan Du; Guangwei Du; Hai-Ning Du; Li-Lin Du; André du Toit; Shao-Bin Duan; Xiaoqiong Duan; Sónia P Duarte; Anna Dubrovska; Elaine A Dunlop; Nicolas Dupont; Raúl V Durán; Bilikere S Dwarakanath; Sergey A Dyshlovoy; Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari; Leopold Eckhart; Charles L Edelstein; Thomas Efferth; Eftekhar Eftekharpour; Ludwig Eichinger; Nabil Eid; Tobias Eisenberg; N Tony Eissa; Sanaa Eissa; Miriam Ejarque; Abdeljabar El Andaloussi; Nazira El-Hage; Shahenda El-Naggar; Anna Maria Eleuteri; Eman S El-Shafey; Mohamed Elgendy; Aristides G Eliopoulos; María M Elizalde; Philip M Elks; Hans-Peter Elsasser; Eslam S Elsherbiny; Brooke M Emerling; N C Tolga Emre; Christina H Eng; Nikolai Engedal; Anna-Mart Engelbrecht; Agnete S T Engelsen; Jorrit M Enserink; Ricardo Escalante; Audrey Esclatine; Mafalda Escobar-Henriques; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Lucile Espert; Makandjou-Ola Eusebio; Gemma Fabrias; Cinzia Fabrizi; Antonio Facchiano; Francesco Facchiano; Bengt Fadeel; Claudio Fader; Alex C Faesen; W Douglas Fairlie; Alberto Falcó; Bjorn H Falkenburger; Daping Fan; Jie Fan; Yanbo Fan; Evandro F Fang; Yanshan Fang; Yognqi Fang; Manolis Fanto; Tamar Farfel-Becker; Mathias Faure; Gholamreza Fazeli; Anthony O Fedele; Arthur M Feldman; Du Feng; Jiachun Feng; Lifeng Feng; Yibin Feng; Yuchen Feng; Wei Feng; Thais Fenz Araujo; Thomas A Ferguson; Álvaro F Fernández; Jose C Fernandez-Checa; Sonia Fernández-Veledo; Alisdair R Fernie; Anthony W Ferrante; Alessandra Ferraresi; Merari F Ferrari; Julio C B Ferreira; Susan Ferro-Novick; Antonio Figueras; Riccardo Filadi; Nicoletta Filigheddu; Eduardo Filippi-Chiela; Giuseppe Filomeni; Gian Maria Fimia; Vittorio Fineschi; Francesca Finetti; Steven Finkbeiner; Edward A Fisher; Paul B Fisher; Flavio Flamigni; Steven J Fliesler; Trude H Flo; Ida Florance; Oliver Florey; Tullio Florio; Erika Fodor; Carlo Follo; Edward A Fon; Antonella Forlino; Francesco Fornai; Paola Fortini; Anna Fracassi; Alessandro Fraldi; Brunella Franco; Rodrigo Franco; Flavia Franconi; Lisa B Frankel; Scott L Friedman; Leopold F Fröhlich; Gema Frühbeck; Jose M Fuentes; Yukio Fujiki; Naonobu Fujita; Yuuki Fujiwara; Mitsunori Fukuda; Simone Fulda; Luc Furic; Norihiko Furuya; Carmela Fusco; Michaela U Gack; Lidia Gaffke; Sehamuddin Galadari; Alessia Galasso; Maria F Galindo; Sachith Gallolu Kankanamalage; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Vincent Galy; Noor Gammoh; Boyi Gan; Ian G Ganley; Feng Gao; Hui Gao; Minghui Gao; Ping Gao; Shou-Jiang Gao; Wentao Gao; Xiaobo Gao; Ana Garcera; Maria Noé Garcia; Verónica E Garcia; Francisco García-Del Portillo; Vega Garcia-Escudero; Aracely Garcia-Garcia; Marina Garcia-Macia; Diana García-Moreno; Carmen Garcia-Ruiz; Patricia García-Sanz; Abhishek D Garg; Ricardo Gargini; Tina Garofalo; Robert F Garry; Nils C Gassen; Damian Gatica; Liang Ge; Wanzhong Ge; Ruth Geiss-Friedlander; Cecilia Gelfi; Pascal Genschik; Ian E Gentle; Valeria Gerbino; Christoph Gerhardt; Kyla Germain; Marc Germain; David A Gewirtz; Elham Ghasemipour Afshar; Saeid Ghavami; Alessandra Ghigo; Manosij Ghosh; Georgios Giamas; Claudia Giampietri; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Gary E Gibson; Spencer B Gibson; Vanessa Ginet; Edward Giniger; Carlotta Giorgi; Henrique Girao; Stephen E Girardin; Mridhula Giridharan; Sandy Giuliano; Cecilia Giulivi; Sylvie Giuriato; Julien Giustiniani; Alexander Gluschko; Veit Goder; Alexander Goginashvili; Jakub Golab; David C Goldstone; Anna Golebiewska; Luciana R Gomes; Rodrigo Gomez; Rubén Gómez-Sánchez; Maria Catalina Gomez-Puerto; Raquel Gomez-Sintes; Qingqiu Gong; Felix M Goni; Javier González-Gallego; Tomas Gonzalez-Hernandez; Rosa A Gonzalez-Polo; Jose A Gonzalez-Reyes; Patricia González-Rodríguez; Ing Swie Goping; Marina S Gorbatyuk; Nikolai V Gorbunov; Kıvanç Görgülü; Roxana M Gorojod; Sharon M Gorski; Sandro Goruppi; Cecilia Gotor; Roberta A Gottlieb; Illana Gozes; Devrim Gozuacik; Martin Graef; Markus H Gräler; Veronica Granatiero; Daniel Grasso; Joshua P Gray; Douglas R Green; Alexander Greenhough; Stephen L Gregory; Edward F Griffin; Mark W Grinstaff; Frederic Gros; Charles Grose; Angelina S Gross; Florian Gruber; Paolo Grumati; Tilman Grune; Xueyan Gu; Jun-Lin Guan; Carlos M Guardia; Kishore Guda; Flora Guerra; Consuelo Guerri; Prasun Guha; Carlos Guillén; Shashi Gujar; Anna Gukovskaya; Ilya Gukovsky; Jan Gunst; Andreas Günther; Anyonya R Guntur; Chuanyong Guo; Chun Guo; Hongqing Guo; Lian-Wang Guo; Ming Guo; Pawan Gupta; Shashi Kumar Gupta; Swapnil Gupta; Veer Bala Gupta; Vivek Gupta; Asa B Gustafsson; David D Gutterman; Ranjitha H B; Annakaisa Haapasalo; James E Haber; Aleksandra Hać; Shinji Hadano; Anders J Hafrén; Mansour Haidar; Belinda S Hall; Gunnel Halldén; Anne Hamacher-Brady; Andrea Hamann; Maho Hamasaki; Weidong Han; Malene Hansen; Phyllis I Hanson; Zijian Hao; Masaru Harada; Ljubica Harhaji-Trajkovic; Nirmala Hariharan; Nigil Haroon; James Harris; Takafumi Hasegawa; Noor Hasima Nagoor; Jeffrey A Haspel; Volker Haucke; Wayne D Hawkins; Bruce A Hay; Cole M Haynes; Soren B Hayrabedyan; Thomas S Hays; Congcong He; Qin He; Rong-Rong He; You-Wen He; Yu-Ying He; Yasser Heakal; Alexander M Heberle; J Fielding Hejtmancik; Gudmundur Vignir Helgason; Vanessa Henkel; Marc Herb; Alexander Hergovich; Anna Herman-Antosiewicz; Agustín Hernández; Carlos Hernandez; Sergio Hernandez-Diaz; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Amaury Herpin; Judit Herreros; Javier H Hervás; Daniel Hesselson; Claudio Hetz; Volker T Heussler; Yujiro Higuchi; Sabine Hilfiker; Joseph A Hill; William S Hlavacek; Emmanuel A Ho; Idy H T Ho; Philip Wing-Lok Ho; Shu-Leong Ho; Wan Yun Ho; G Aaron Hobbs; Mark Hochstrasser; Peter H M Hoet; Daniel Hofius; Paul Hofman; Annika Höhn; Carina I Holmberg; Jose R Hombrebueno; Chang-Won Hong Yi-Ren Hong; Lora V Hooper; Thorsten Hoppe; Rastislav Horos; Yujin Hoshida; I-Lun Hsin; Hsin-Yun Hsu; Bing Hu; Dong Hu; Li-Fang Hu; Ming Chang Hu; Ronggui Hu; Wei Hu; Yu-Chen Hu; Zhuo-Wei Hu; Fang Hua; Jinlian Hua; Yingqi Hua; Chongmin Huan; Canhua Huang; Chuanshu Huang; Chuanxin Huang; Chunling Huang; Haishan Huang; Kun Huang; Michael L H Huang; Rui Huang; Shan Huang; Tianzhi Huang; Xing Huang; Yuxiang Jack Huang; Tobias B Huber; Virginie Hubert; Christian A Hubner; Stephanie M Hughes; William E Hughes; Magali Humbert; Gerhard Hummer; James H Hurley; Sabah Hussain; Salik Hussain; Patrick J Hussey; Martina Hutabarat; Hui-Yun Hwang; Seungmin Hwang; Antonio Ieni; Fumiyo Ikeda; Yusuke Imagawa; Yuzuru Imai; Carol Imbriano; Masaya Imoto; Denise M Inman; Ken Inoki; Juan Iovanna; Renato V Iozzo; Giuseppe Ippolito; Javier E Irazoqui; Pablo Iribarren; Mohd Ishaq; Makoto Ishikawa; Nestor Ishimwe; Ciro Isidoro; Nahed Ismail; Shohreh Issazadeh-Navikas; Eisuke Itakura; Daisuke Ito; Davor Ivankovic; Saška Ivanova; Anand Krishnan V Iyer; José M Izquierdo; Masanori Izumi; Marja Jäättelä; Majid Sakhi Jabir; William T Jackson; Nadia Jacobo-Herrera; Anne-Claire Jacomin; Elise Jacquin; Pooja Jadiya; Hartmut Jaeschke; Chinnaswamy Jagannath; Arjen J Jakobi; Johan Jakobsson; Bassam Janji; Pidder Jansen-Dürr; Patric J Jansson; Jonathan Jantsch; Sławomir Januszewski; Alagie Jassey; Steve Jean; Hélène Jeltsch-David; Pavla Jendelova; Andreas Jenny; Thomas E Jensen; Niels Jessen; Jenna L Jewell; Jing Ji; Lijun Jia; Rui Jia; Liwen Jiang; Qing Jiang; Richeng Jiang; Teng Jiang; Xuejun Jiang; Yu Jiang; Maria Jimenez-Sanchez; Eun-Jung Jin; Fengyan Jin; Hongchuan Jin; Li Jin; Luqi Jin; Meiyan Jin; Si Jin; Eun-Kyeong Jo; Carine Joffre; Terje Johansen; Gail V W Johnson; Simon A Johnston; Eija Jokitalo; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Leo A B Joosten; Joaquin Jordan; Bertrand Joseph; Dianwen Ju; Jeong-Sun Ju; Jingfang Ju; Esmeralda Juárez; Delphine Judith; Gábor Juhász; Youngsoo Jun; Chang Hwa Jung; Sung-Chul Jung; Yong Keun Jung; Heinz Jungbluth; Johannes Jungverdorben; Steffen Just; Kai Kaarniranta; Allen Kaasik; Tomohiro Kabuta; Daniel Kaganovich; Alon Kahana; Renate Kain; Shinjo Kajimura; Maria Kalamvoki; Manjula Kalia; Danuta S Kalinowski; Nina Kaludercic; Ioanna Kalvari; Joanna Kaminska; Vitaliy O Kaminskyy; Hiromitsu Kanamori; Keizo Kanasaki; Chanhee Kang; Rui Kang; Sang Sun Kang; Senthilvelrajan Kaniyappan; Tomotake Kanki; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Arthi Kanthasamy; Marc Kantorow; Orsolya Kapuy; Michalis V Karamouzis; Md Razaul Karim; Parimal Karmakar; Rajesh G Katare; Masaru Kato; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Anu Kauppinen; Gur P Kaushal; Susmita Kaushik; Kiyoshi Kawasaki; Kemal Kazan; Po-Yuan Ke; Damien J Keating; Ursula Keber; John H Kehrl; Kate E Keller; Christian W Keller; Jongsook Kim Kemper; Candia M Kenific; Oliver Kepp; Stephanie Kermorgant; Andreas Kern; Robin Ketteler; Tom G Keulers; Boris Khalfin; Hany Khalil; Bilon Khambu; Shahid Y Khan; Vinoth Kumar Megraj Khandelwal; Rekha Khandia; Widuri Kho; Noopur V Khobrekar; Sataree Khuansuwan; Mukhran Khundadze; Samuel A Killackey; Dasol Kim; Deok Ryong Kim; Do-Hyung Kim; Dong-Eun Kim; Eun Young Kim; Eun-Kyoung Kim; Hak-Rim Kim; Hee-Sik Kim; Jeong Hun Kim; Jin Kyung Kim; Jin-Hoi Kim; Joungmok Kim; Ju Hwan Kim; Keun Il Kim; Peter K Kim; Seong-Jun Kim; Scot R Kimball; Adi Kimchi; Alec C Kimmelman; Tomonori Kimura; Matthew A King; Kerri J Kinghorn; Conan G Kinsey; Vladimir Kirkin; Lorrie A Kirshenbaum; Sergey L Kiselev; Shuji Kishi; Katsuhiko Kitamoto; Yasushi Kitaoka; Kaio Kitazato; Richard N Kitsis; Josef T Kittler; Ole Kjaerulff; Peter S Klein; Thomas Klopstock; Jochen Klucken; Helene Knævelsrud; Roland L Knorr; Ben C B Ko; Fred Ko; Jiunn-Liang Ko; Hotaka Kobayashi; Satoru Kobayashi; Ina Koch; Jan C Koch; Ulrich Koenig; Donat Kögel; Young Ho Koh; Masato Koike; Sepp D Kohlwein; Nur M Kocaturk; Masaaki Komatsu; Jeannette König; Toru Kono; Benjamin T Kopp; Tamas Korcsmaros; Gözde Korkmaz; Viktor I Korolchuk; Mónica Suárez Korsnes; Ali Koskela; Janaiah Kota; Yaichiro Kotake; Monica L Kotler; Yanjun Kou; Michael I Koukourakis; Evangelos Koustas; Attila L Kovacs; Tibor Kovács; Daisuke Koya; Tomohiro Kozako; Claudine Kraft; Dimitri Krainc; Helmut Krämer; Anna D Krasnodembskaya; Carole Kretz-Remy; Guido Kroemer; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Kazuyuki Kuchitsu; Sabine Kuenen; Lars Kuerschner; Thomas Kukar; Ajay Kumar; Ashok Kumar; Deepak Kumar; Dhiraj Kumar; Sharad Kumar; Shinji Kume; Caroline Kumsta; Chanakya N Kundu; Mondira Kundu; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Lukasz Kurgan; Tatiana G Kutateladze; Ozlem Kutlu; SeongAe Kwak; Ho Jeong Kwon; Taeg Kyu Kwon; Yong Tae Kwon; Irene Kyrmizi; Albert La Spada; Patrick Labonté; Sylvain Ladoire; Ilaria Laface; Frank Lafont; Diane C Lagace; Vikramjit Lahiri; Zhibing Lai; Angela S Laird; Aparna Lakkaraju; Trond Lamark; Sheng-Hui Lan; Ane Landajuela; Darius J R Lane; Jon D Lane; Charles H Lang; Carsten Lange; Ülo Langel; Rupert Langer; Pierre Lapaquette; Jocelyn Laporte; Nicholas F LaRusso; Isabel Lastres-Becker; Wilson Chun Yu Lau; Gordon W Laurie; Sergio Lavandero; Betty Yuen Kwan Law; Helen Ka-Wai Law; Rob Layfield; Weidong Le; Herve Le Stunff; Alexandre Y Leary; Jean-Jacques Lebrun; Lionel Y W Leck; Jean-Philippe Leduc-Gaudet; Changwook Lee; Chung-Pei Lee; Da-Hye Lee; Edward B Lee; Erinna F Lee; Gyun Min Lee; He-Jin Lee; Heung Kyu Lee; Jae Man Lee; Jason S Lee; Jin-A Lee; Joo-Yong Lee; Jun Hee Lee; Michael Lee; Min Goo Lee; Min Jae Lee; Myung-Shik Lee; Sang Yoon Lee; Seung-Jae Lee; Stella Y Lee; Sung Bae Lee; Won Hee Lee; Ying-Ray Lee; Yong-Ho Lee; Youngil Lee; Christophe Lefebvre; Renaud Legouis; Yu L Lei; Yuchen Lei; Sergey Leikin; Gerd Leitinger; Leticia Lemus; Shuilong Leng; Olivia Lenoir; Guido Lenz; Heinz Josef Lenz; Paola Lenzi; Yolanda León; Andréia M Leopoldino; Christoph Leschczyk; Stina Leskelä; Elisabeth Letellier; Chi-Ting Leung; Po Sing Leung; Jeremy S Leventhal; Beth Levine; Patrick A Lewis; Klaus Ley; Bin Li; Da-Qiang Li; Jianming Li; Jing Li; Jiong Li; Ke Li; Liwu Li; Mei Li; Min Li; Min Li; Ming Li; Mingchuan Li; Pin-Lan Li; Ming-Qing Li; Qing Li; Sheng Li; Tiangang Li; Wei Li; Wenming Li; Xue Li; Yi-Ping Li; Yuan Li; Zhiqiang Li; Zhiyong Li; Zhiyuan Li; Jiqin Lian; Chengyu Liang; Qiangrong Liang; Weicheng Liang; Yongheng Liang; YongTian Liang; Guanghong Liao; Lujian Liao; Mingzhi Liao; Yung-Feng Liao; Mariangela Librizzi; Pearl P Y Lie; Mary A Lilly; Hyunjung J Lim; Thania R R Lima; Federica Limana; Chao Lin; Chih-Wen Lin; Dar-Shong Lin; Fu-Cheng Lin; Jiandie D Lin; Kurt M Lin; Kwang-Huei Lin; Liang-Tzung Lin; Pei-Hui Lin; Qiong Lin; Shaofeng Lin; Su-Ju Lin; Wenyu Lin; Xueying Lin; Yao-Xin Lin; Yee-Shin Lin; Rafael Linden; Paula Lindner; Shuo-Chien Ling; Paul Lingor; Amelia K Linnemann; Yih-Cherng Liou; Marta M Lipinski; Saška Lipovšek; Vitor A Lira; Natalia Lisiak; Paloma B Liton; Chao Liu; Ching-Hsuan Liu; Chun-Feng Liu; Cui Hua Liu; Fang Liu; Hao Liu; Hsiao-Sheng Liu; Hua-Feng Liu; Huifang Liu; Jia Liu; Jing Liu; Julia Liu; Leyuan Liu; Longhua Liu; Meilian Liu; Qin Liu; Wei Liu; Wende Liu; Xiao-Hong Liu; Xiaodong Liu; Xingguo Liu; Xu Liu; Xuedong Liu; Yanfen Liu; Yang Liu; Yang Liu; Yueyang Liu; Yule Liu; J Andrew Livingston; Gerard Lizard; Jose M Lizcano; Senka Ljubojevic-Holzer; Matilde E LLeonart; David Llobet-Navàs; Alicia Llorente; Chih Hung Lo; Damián Lobato-Márquez; Qi Long; Yun Chau Long; Ben Loos; Julia A Loos; Manuela G López; Guillermo López-Doménech; José Antonio López-Guerrero; Ana T López-Jiménez; Óscar López-Pérez; Israel López-Valero; Magdalena J Lorenowicz; Mar Lorente; Peter Lorincz; Laura Lossi; Sophie Lotersztajn; Penny E Lovat; Jonathan F Lovell; Alenka Lovy; Péter Lőw; Guang Lu; Haocheng Lu; Jia-Hong Lu; Jin-Jian Lu; Mengji Lu; Shuyan Lu; Alessandro Luciani; John M Lucocq; Paula Ludovico; Micah A Luftig; Morten Luhr; Diego Luis-Ravelo; Julian J Lum; Liany Luna-Dulcey; Anders H Lund; Viktor K Lund; Jan D Lünemann; Patrick Lüningschrör; Honglin Luo; Rongcan Luo; Shouqing Luo; Zhi Luo; Claudio Luparello; Bernhard Lüscher; Luan Luu; Alex Lyakhovich; Konstantin G Lyamzaev; Alf Håkon Lystad; Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk; Alvin C Ma; Changle Ma; Mengxiao Ma; Ning-Fang Ma; Quan-Hong Ma; Xinliang Ma; Yueyun Ma; Zhenyi Ma; Ormond A MacDougald; Fernando Macian; Gustavo C MacIntosh; Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Kay F Macleod; Sandra Maday; Frank Madeo; Muniswamy Madesh; Tobias Madl; Julio Madrigal-Matute; Akiko Maeda; Yasuhiro Maejima; Marta Magarinos; Poornima Mahavadi; Emiliano Maiani; Kenneth Maiese; Panchanan Maiti; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Barbara Majello; Michael B Major; Elena Makareeva; Fayaz Malik; Karthik Mallilankaraman; Walter Malorni; Alina Maloyan; Najiba Mammadova; Gene Chi Wai Man; Federico Manai; Joseph D Mancias; Eva-Maria Mandelkow; Michael A Mandell; Angelo A Manfredi; Masoud H Manjili; Ravi Manjithaya; Patricio Manque; Bella B Manshian; Raquel Manzano; Claudia Manzoni; Kai Mao; Cinzia Marchese; Sandrine Marchetti; Anna Maria Marconi; Fabrizio Marcucci; Stefania Mardente; Olga A Mareninova; Marta Margeta; Muriel Mari; Sara Marinelli; Oliviero Marinelli; Guillermo Mariño; Sofia Mariotto; Richard S Marshall; Mark R Marten; Sascha Martens; Alexandre P J Martin; Katie R Martin; Sara Martin; Shaun Martin; Adrián Martín-Segura; Miguel A Martín-Acebes; Inmaculada Martin-Burriel; Marcos Martin-Rincon; Paloma Martin-Sanz; José A Martina; Wim Martinet; Aitor Martinez; Ana Martinez; Jennifer Martinez; Moises Martinez Velazquez; Nuria Martinez-Lopez; Marta Martinez-Vicente; Daniel O Martins; Joilson O Martins; Waleska K Martins; Tania Martins-Marques; Emanuele Marzetti; Shashank Masaldan; Celine Masclaux-Daubresse; Douglas G Mashek; Valentina Massa; Lourdes Massieu; Glenn R Masson; Laura Masuelli; Anatoliy I Masyuk; Tetyana V Masyuk; Paola Matarrese; Ander Matheu; Satoaki Matoba; Sachiko Matsuzaki; Pamela Mattar; Alessandro Matte; Domenico Mattoscio; José L Mauriz; Mario Mauthe; Caroline Mauvezin; Emanual Maverakis; Paola Maycotte; Johanna Mayer; Gianluigi Mazzoccoli; Cristina Mazzoni; Joseph R Mazzulli; Nami McCarty; Christine McDonald; Mitchell R McGill; Sharon L McKenna; BethAnn McLaughlin; Fionn McLoughlin; Mark A McNiven; Thomas G McWilliams; Fatima Mechta-Grigoriou; Tania Catarina Medeiros; Diego L Medina; Lynn A Megeney; Klara Megyeri; Maryam Mehrpour; Jawahar L Mehta; Alfred J Meijer; Annemarie H Meijer; Jakob Mejlvang; Alicia Meléndez; Annette Melk; Gonen Memisoglu; Alexandrina F Mendes; Delong Meng; Fei Meng; Tian Meng; Rubem Menna-Barreto; Manoj B Menon; Carol Mercer; Anne E Mercier; Jean-Louis Mergny; Adalberto Merighi; Seth D Merkley; Giuseppe Merla; Volker Meske; Ana Cecilia Mestre; Shree Padma Metur; Christian Meyer; Hemmo Meyer; Wenyi Mi; Jeanne Mialet-Perez; Junying Miao; Lucia Micale; Yasuo Miki; Enrico Milan; Małgorzata Milczarek; Dana L Miller; Samuel I Miller; Silke Miller; Steven W Millward; Ira Milosevic; Elena A Minina; Hamed Mirzaei; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Mehdi Mirzaei; Amit Mishra; Nandita Mishra; Paras Kumar Mishra; Maja Misirkic Marjanovic; Roberta Misasi; Amit Misra; Gabriella Misso; Claire Mitchell; Geraldine Mitou; Tetsuji Miura; Shigeki Miyamoto; Makoto Miyazaki; Mitsunori Miyazaki; Taiga Miyazaki; Keisuke Miyazawa; Noboru Mizushima; Trine H Mogensen; Baharia Mograbi; Reza Mohammadinejad; Yasir Mohamud; Abhishek Mohanty; Sipra Mohapatra; Torsten Möhlmann; Asif Mohmmed; Anna Moles; Kelle H Moley; Maurizio Molinari; Vincenzo Mollace; Andreas Buch Møller; Bertrand Mollereau; Faustino Mollinedo; Costanza Montagna; Mervyn J Monteiro; Andrea Montella; L Ruth Montes; Barbara Montico; Vinod K Mony; Giacomo Monzio Compagnoni; Michael N Moore; Mohammad A Moosavi; Ana L Mora; Marina Mora; David Morales-Alamo; Rosario Moratalla; Paula I Moreira; Elena Morelli; Sandra Moreno; Daniel Moreno-Blas; Viviana Moresi; Benjamin Morga; Alwena H Morgan; Fabrice Morin; Hideaki Morishita; Orson L Moritz; Mariko Moriyama; Yuji Moriyasu; Manuela Morleo; Eugenia Morselli; Jose F Moruno-Manchon; Jorge Moscat; Serge Mostowy; Elisa Motori; Andrea Felinto Moura; Naima Moustaid-Moussa; Maria Mrakovcic; Gabriel Muciño-Hernández; Anupam Mukherjee; Subhadip Mukhopadhyay; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Victoriano Mulero; Sylviane Muller; Christian Münch; Ashok Munjal; Pura Munoz-Canoves; Teresa Muñoz-Galdeano; Christian Münz; Tomokazu Murakawa; Claudia Muratori; Brona M Murphy; J Patrick Murphy; Aditya Murthy; Timo T Myöhänen; Indira U Mysorekar; Jennifer Mytych; Seyed Mohammad Nabavi; Massimo Nabissi; Péter Nagy; Jihoon Nah; Aimable Nahimana; Ichiro Nakagawa; Ken Nakamura; Hitoshi Nakatogawa; Shyam S Nandi; Meera Nanjundan; Monica Nanni; Gennaro Napolitano; Roberta Nardacci; Masashi Narita; Melissa Nassif; Ilana Nathan; Manabu Natsumeda; Ryno J Naude; Christin Naumann; Olaia Naveiras; Fatemeh Navid; Steffan T Nawrocki; Taras Y Nazarko; Francesca Nazio; Florentina Negoita; Thomas Neill; Amanda L Neisch; Luca M Neri; Mihai G Netea; Patrick Neubert; Thomas P Neufeld; Dietbert Neumann; Albert Neutzner; Phillip T Newton; Paul A Ney; Ioannis P Nezis; Charlene C W Ng; Tzi Bun Ng; Hang T T Nguyen; Long T Nguyen; Hong-Min Ni; Clíona Ní Cheallaigh; Zhenhong Ni; M Celeste Nicolao; Francesco Nicoli; Manuel Nieto-Diaz; Per Nilsson; Shunbin Ning; Rituraj Niranjan; Hiroshi Nishimune; Mireia Niso-Santano; Ralph A Nixon; Annalisa Nobili; Clevio Nobrega; Takeshi Noda; Uxía Nogueira-Recalde; Trevor M Nolan; Ivan Nombela; Ivana Novak; Beatriz Novoa; Takashi Nozawa; Nobuyuki Nukina; Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer; Jesper Nylandsted; Tracey R O'Donovan; Seónadh M O'Leary; Eyleen J O'Rourke; Mary P O'Sullivan; Timothy E O'Sullivan; Salvatore Oddo; Ina Oehme; Michinaga Ogawa; Eric Ogier-Denis; Margret H Ogmundsdottir; Besim Ogretmen; Goo Taeg Oh; Seon-Hee Oh; Young J Oh; Takashi Ohama; Yohei Ohashi; Masaki Ohmuraya; Vasileios Oikonomou; Rani Ojha; Koji Okamoto; Hitoshi Okazawa; Masahide Oku; Sara Oliván; Jorge M A Oliveira; Michael Ollmann; James A Olzmann; Shakib Omari; M Bishr Omary; Gizem Önal; Martin Ondrej; Sang-Bing Ong; Sang-Ging Ong; Anna Onnis; Juan A Orellana; Sara Orellana-Muñoz; Maria Del Mar Ortega-Villaizan; Xilma R Ortiz-Gonzalez; Elena Ortona; Heinz D Osiewacz; Abdel-Hamid K Osman; Rosario Osta; Marisa S Otegui; Kinya Otsu; Christiane Ott; Luisa Ottobrini; Jing-Hsiung James Ou; Tiago F Outeiro; Inger Oynebraten; Melek Ozturk; Gilles Pagès; Susanta Pahari; Marta Pajares; Utpal B Pajvani; Rituraj Pal; Simona Paladino; Nicolas Pallet; Michela Palmieri; Giuseppe Palmisano; Camilla Palumbo; Francesco Pampaloni; Lifeng Pan; Qingjun Pan; Wenliang Pan; Xin Pan; Ganna Panasyuk; Rahul Pandey; Udai B Pandey; Vrajesh Pandya; Francesco Paneni; Shirley Y Pang; Elisa Panzarini; Daniela L Papademetrio; Elena Papaleo; Daniel Papinski; Diana Papp; Eun Chan Park; Hwan Tae Park; Ji-Man Park; Jong-In Park; Joon Tae Park; Junsoo Park; Sang Chul Park; Sang-Youel Park; Abraham H Parola; Jan B Parys; Adrien Pasquier; Benoit Pasquier; João F Passos; Nunzia Pastore; Hemal H Patel; Daniel Patschan; Sophie Pattingre; Gustavo Pedraza-Alva; Jose Pedraza-Chaverri; Zully Pedrozo; Gang Pei; Jianming Pei; Hadas Peled-Zehavi; Joaquín M Pellegrini; Joffrey Pelletier; Miguel A Peñalva; Di Peng; Ying Peng; Fabio Penna; Maria Pennuto; Francesca Pentimalli; Cláudia Mf Pereira; Gustavo J S Pereira; Lilian C Pereira; Luis Pereira de Almeida; Nirma D Perera; Ángel Pérez-Lara; Ana B Perez-Oliva; María Esther Pérez-Pérez; Palsamy Periyasamy; Andras Perl; Cristiana Perrotta; Ida Perrotta; Richard G Pestell; Morten Petersen; Irina Petrache; Goran Petrovski; Thorsten Pfirrmann; Astrid S Pfister; Jennifer A Philips; Huifeng Pi; Anna Picca; Alicia M Pickrell; Sandy Picot; Giovanna M Pierantoni; Marina Pierdominici; Philippe Pierre; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Karolina Pierzynowska; Federico Pietrocola; Miroslawa Pietruczuk; Claudio Pignata; Felipe X Pimentel-Muiños; Mario Pinar; Roberta O Pinheiro; Ronit Pinkas-Kramarski; Paolo Pinton; Karolina Pircs; Sujan Piya; Paola Pizzo; Theo S Plantinga; Harald W Platta; Ainhoa Plaza-Zabala; Markus Plomann; Egor Y Plotnikov; Helene Plun-Favreau; Ryszard Pluta; Roger Pocock; Stefanie Pöggeler; Christian Pohl; Marc Poirot; Angelo Poletti; Marisa Ponpuak; Hana Popelka; Blagovesta Popova; Helena Porta; Soledad Porte Alcon; Eliana Portilla-Fernandez; Martin Post; Malia B Potts; Joanna Poulton; Ted Powers; Veena Prahlad; Tomasz K Prajsnar; Domenico Praticò; Rosaria Prencipe; Muriel Priault; Tassula Proikas-Cezanne; Vasilis J Promponas; Christopher G Proud; Rosa Puertollano; Luigi Puglielli; Thomas Pulinilkunnil; Deepika Puri; Rajat Puri; Julien Puyal; Xiaopeng Qi; Yongmei Qi; Wenbin Qian; Lei Qiang; Yu Qiu; Joe Quadrilatero; Jorge Quarleri; Nina Raben; Hannah Rabinowich; Debora Ragona; Michael J Ragusa; Nader Rahimi; Marveh Rahmati; Valeria Raia; Nuno Raimundo; Namakkal-Soorappan Rajasekaran; Sriganesh Ramachandra Rao; Abdelhaq Rami; Ignacio Ramírez-Pardo; David B Ramsden; Felix Randow; Pundi N Rangarajan; Danilo Ranieri; Hai Rao; Lang Rao; Rekha Rao; Sumit Rathore; J Arjuna Ratnayaka; Edward A Ratovitski; Palaniyandi Ravanan; Gloria Ravegnini; Swapan K Ray; Babak Razani; Vito Rebecca; Fulvio Reggiori; Anne Régnier-Vigouroux; Andreas S Reichert; David Reigada; Jan H Reiling; Theo Rein; Siegfried Reipert; Rokeya Sultana Rekha; Hongmei Ren; Jun Ren; Weichao Ren; Tristan Renault; Giorgia Renga; Karen Reue; Kim Rewitz; Bruna Ribeiro de Andrade Ramos; S Amer Riazuddin; Teresa M Ribeiro-Rodrigues; Jean-Ehrland Ricci; Romeo Ricci; Victoria Riccio; Des R Richardson; Yasuko Rikihisa; Makarand V Risbud; Ruth M Risueño; Konstantinos Ritis; Salvatore Rizza; Rosario Rizzuto; Helen C Roberts; Luke D Roberts; Katherine J Robinson; Maria Carmela Roccheri; Stephane Rocchi; George G Rodney; Tiago Rodrigues; Vagner Ramon Rodrigues Silva; Amaia Rodriguez; Ruth Rodriguez-Barrueco; Nieves Rodriguez-Henche; Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha; Jeroen Roelofs; Robert S Rogers; Vladimir V Rogov; Ana I Rojo; Krzysztof Rolka; Vanina Romanello; Luigina Romani; Alessandra Romano; Patricia S Romano; David Romeo-Guitart; Luis C Romero; Montserrat Romero; Joseph C Roney; Christopher Rongo; Sante Roperto; Mathias T Rosenfeldt; Philip Rosenstiel; Anne G Rosenwald; Kevin A Roth; Lynn Roth; Steven Roth; Kasper M A Rouschop; Benoit D Roussel; Sophie Roux; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Ajit Roy; Aurore Rozieres; Diego Ruano; David C Rubinsztein; Maria P Rubtsova; Klaus Ruckdeschel; Christoph Ruckenstuhl; Emil Rudolf; Rüdiger Rudolf; Alessandra Ruggieri; Avnika Ashok Ruparelia; Paola Rusmini; Ryan R Russell; Gian Luigi Russo; Maria Russo; Rossella Russo; Oxana O Ryabaya; Kevin M Ryan; Kwon-Yul Ryu; Maria Sabater-Arcis; Ulka Sachdev; Michael Sacher; Carsten Sachse; Abhishek Sadhu; Junichi Sadoshima; Nathaniel Safren; Paul Saftig; Antonia P Sagona; Gaurav Sahay; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mustafa Sahin; Ozgur Sahin; Sumit Sahni; Nayuta Saito; Shigeru Saito; Tsunenori Saito; Ryohei Sakai; Yasuyoshi Sakai; Jun-Ichi Sakamaki; Kalle Saksela; Gloria Salazar; Anna Salazar-Degracia; Ghasem H Salekdeh; Ashok K Saluja; Belém Sampaio-Marques; Maria Cecilia Sanchez; Jose A Sanchez-Alcazar; Victoria Sanchez-Vera; Vanessa Sancho-Shimizu; J Thomas Sanderson; Marco Sandri; Stefano Santaguida; Laura Santambrogio; Magda M Santana; Giorgio Santoni; Alberto Sanz; Pascual Sanz; Shweta Saran; Marco Sardiello; Timothy J Sargeant; Apurva Sarin; Chinmoy Sarkar; Sovan Sarkar; Maria-Rosa Sarrias; Surajit Sarkar; Dipanka Tanu Sarmah; Jaakko Sarparanta; Aishwarya Sathyanarayan; Ranganayaki Sathyanarayanan; K Matthew Scaglione; Francesca Scatozza; Liliana Schaefer; Zachary T Schafer; Ulrich E Schaible; Anthony H V Schapira; Michael Scharl; Hermann M Schatzl; Catherine H Schein; Wiep Scheper; David Scheuring; Maria Vittoria Schiaffino; Monica Schiappacassi; Rainer Schindl; Uwe Schlattner; Oliver Schmidt; Roland Schmitt; Stephen D Schmidt; Ingo Schmitz; Eran Schmukler; Anja Schneider; Bianca E Schneider; Romana Schober; Alejandra C Schoijet; Micah B Schott; Michael Schramm; Bernd Schröder; Kai Schuh; Christoph Schüller; Ryan J Schulze; Lea Schürmanns; Jens C Schwamborn; Melanie Schwarten; Filippo Scialo; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Melanie J Scott; Kathleen W Scotto; A Ivana Scovassi; Andrea Scrima; Aurora Scrivo; David Sebastian; Salwa Sebti; Simon Sedej; Laura Segatori; Nava Segev; Per O Seglen; Iban Seiliez; Ekihiro Seki; Scott B Selleck; Frank W Sellke; Joshua T Selsby; Michael Sendtner; Serif Senturk; Elena Seranova; Consolato Sergi; Ruth Serra-Moreno; Hiromi Sesaki; Carmine Settembre; Subba Rao Gangi Setty; Gianluca Sgarbi; Ou Sha; John J Shacka; Javeed A Shah; Dantong Shang; Changshun Shao; Feng Shao; Soroush Sharbati; Lisa M Sharkey; Dipali Sharma; Gaurav Sharma; Kulbhushan Sharma; Pawan Sharma; Surendra Sharma; Han-Ming Shen; Hongtao Shen; Jiangang Shen; Ming Shen; Weili Shen; Zheni Shen; Rui Sheng; Zhi Sheng; Zu-Hang Sheng; Jianjian Shi; Xiaobing Shi; Ying-Hong Shi; Kahori Shiba-Fukushima; Jeng-Jer Shieh; Yohta Shimada; Shigeomi Shimizu; Makoto Shimozawa; Takahiro Shintani; Christopher J Shoemaker; Shahla Shojaei; Ikuo Shoji; Bhupendra V Shravage; Viji Shridhar; Chih-Wen Shu; Hong-Bing Shu; Ke Shui; Arvind K Shukla; Timothy E Shutt; Valentina Sica; Aleem Siddiqui; Amanda Sierra; Virginia Sierra-Torre; Santiago Signorelli; Payel Sil; Bruno J de Andrade Silva; Johnatas D Silva; Eduardo Silva-Pavez; Sandrine Silvente-Poirot; Rachel E Simmonds; Anna Katharina Simon; Hans-Uwe Simon; Matias Simons; Anurag Singh; Lalit P Singh; Rajat Singh; Shivendra V Singh; Shrawan K Singh; Sudha B Singh; Sunaina Singh; Surinder Pal Singh; Debasish Sinha; Rohit Anthony Sinha; Sangita Sinha; Agnieszka Sirko; Kapil Sirohi; Efthimios L Sivridis; Panagiotis Skendros; Aleksandra Skirycz; Iva Slaninová; Soraya S Smaili; Andrei Smertenko; Matthew D Smith; Stefaan J Soenen; Eun Jung Sohn; Sophia P M Sok; Giancarlo Solaini; Thierry Soldati; Scott A Soleimanpour; Rosa M Soler; Alexei Solovchenko; Jason A Somarelli; Avinash Sonawane; Fuyong Song; Hyun Kyu Song; Ju-Xian Song; Kunhua Song; Zhiyin Song; Leandro R Soria; Maurizio Sorice; Alexander A Soukas; Sandra-Fausia Soukup; Diana Sousa; Nadia Sousa; Paul A Spagnuolo; Stephen A Spector; M M Srinivas Bharath; Daret St Clair; Venturina Stagni; Leopoldo Staiano; Clint A Stalnecker; Metodi V Stankov; Peter B Stathopulos; Katja Stefan; Sven Marcel Stefan; Leonidas Stefanis; Joan S Steffan; Alexander Steinkasserer; Harald Stenmark; Jared Sterneckert; Craig Stevens; Veronika Stoka; Stephan Storch; Björn Stork; Flavie Strappazzon; Anne Marie Strohecker; Dwayne G Stupack; Huanxing Su; Ling-Yan Su; Longxiang Su; Ana M Suarez-Fontes; Carlos S Subauste; Selvakumar Subbian; Paula V Subirada; Ganapasam Sudhandiran; Carolyn M Sue; Xinbing Sui; Corey Summers; Guangchao Sun; Jun Sun; Kang Sun; Meng-Xiang Sun; Qiming Sun; Yi Sun; Zhongjie Sun; Karen K S Sunahara; Eva Sundberg; Katalin Susztak; Peter Sutovsky; Hidekazu Suzuki; Gary Sweeney; J David Symons; Stephen Cho Wing Sze; Nathaniel J Szewczyk; Anna Tabęcka-Łonczynska; Claudio Tabolacci; Frank Tacke; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Marco Tafani; Mitsuo Tagaya; Haoran Tai; Stephen W G Tait; Yoshinori Takahashi; Szabolcs Takats; Priti Talwar; Chit Tam; Shing Yau Tam; Davide Tampellini; Atsushi Tamura; Chong Teik Tan; Eng-King Tan; Ya-Qin Tan; Masaki Tanaka; Motomasa Tanaka; Daolin Tang; Jingfeng Tang; Tie-Shan Tang; Isei Tanida; Zhipeng Tao; Mohammed Taouis; Lars Tatenhorst; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Allen Taylor; Gregory A Taylor; Joan M Taylor; Elena Tchetina; Andrew R Tee; Irmgard Tegeder; David Teis; Natercia Teixeira; Fatima Teixeira-Clerc; Kumsal A Tekirdag; Tewin Tencomnao; Sandra Tenreiro; Alexei V Tepikin; Pilar S Testillano; Gianluca Tettamanti; Pierre-Louis Tharaux; Kathrin Thedieck; Arvind A Thekkinghat; Stefano Thellung; Josephine W Thinwa; V P Thirumalaikumar; Sufi Mary Thomas; Paul G Thomes; Andrew Thorburn; Lipi Thukral; Thomas Thum; Michael Thumm; Ling Tian; Ales Tichy; Andreas Till; Vincent Timmerman; Vladimir I Titorenko; Sokol V Todi; Krassimira Todorova; Janne M Toivonen; Luana Tomaipitinca; Dhanendra Tomar; Cristina Tomas-Zapico; Sergej Tomić; Benjamin Chun-Kit Tong; Chao Tong; Xin Tong; Sharon A Tooze; Maria L Torgersen; Satoru Torii; Liliana Torres-López; Alicia Torriglia; Christina G Towers; Roberto Towns; Shinya Toyokuni; Vladimir Trajkovic; Donatella Tramontano; Quynh-Giao Tran; Leonardo H Travassos; Charles B Trelford; Shirley Tremel; Ioannis P Trougakos; Betty P Tsao; Mario P Tschan; Hung-Fat Tse; Tak Fu Tse; Hitoshi Tsugawa; Andrey S Tsvetkov; David A Tumbarello; Yasin Tumtas; María J Tuñón; Sandra Turcotte; Boris Turk; Vito Turk; Bradley J Turner; Richard I Tuxworth; Jessica K Tyler; Elena V Tyutereva; Yasuo Uchiyama; Aslihan Ugun-Klusek; Holm H Uhlig; Marzena Ułamek-Kozioł; Ilya V Ulasov; Midori Umekawa; Christian Ungermann; Rei Unno; Sylvie Urbe; Elisabet Uribe-Carretero; Suayib Üstün; Vladimir N Uversky; Thomas Vaccari; Maria I Vaccaro; Björn F Vahsen; Helin Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg; Rut Valdor; Maria J Valente; Ayelén Valko; Richard B Vallee; Angela M Valverde; Greet Van den Berghe; Stijn van der Veen; Luc Van Kaer; Jorg van Loosdregt; Sjoerd J L van Wijk; Wim Vandenberghe; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Marcos A Vannier-Santos; Nicola Vannini; M Cristina Vanrell; Chiara Vantaggiato; Gabriele Varano; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Máté Varga; M Helena Vasconcelos; Somya Vats; Demetrios G Vavvas; Ignacio Vega-Naredo; Silvia Vega-Rubin-de-Celis; Guillermo Velasco; Ariadna P Velázquez; Tibor Vellai; Edo Vellenga; Francesca Velotti; Mireille Verdier; Panayotis Verginis; Isabelle Vergne; Paul Verkade; Manish Verma; Patrik Verstreken; Tim Vervliet; Jörg Vervoorts; Alexandre T Vessoni; Victor M Victor; Michel Vidal; Chiara Vidoni; Otilia V Vieira; Richard D Vierstra; Sonia Viganó; Helena Vihinen; Vinoy Vijayan; Miquel Vila; Marçal Vilar; José M Villalba; Antonio Villalobo; Beatriz Villarejo-Zori; Francesc Villarroya; Joan Villarroya; Olivier Vincent; Cecile Vindis; Christophe Viret; Maria Teresa Viscomi; Dora Visnjic; Ilio Vitale; David J Vocadlo; Olga V Voitsekhovskaja; Cinzia Volonté; Mattia Volta; Marta Vomero; Clarissa Von Haefen; Marc A Vooijs; Wolfgang Voos; Ljubica Vucicevic; Richard Wade-Martins; Satoshi Waguri; Kenrick A Waite; Shuji Wakatsuki; David W Walker; Mark J Walker; Simon A Walker; Jochen Walter; Francisco G Wandosell; Bo Wang; Chao-Yung Wang; Chen Wang; Chenran Wang; Chenwei Wang; Cun-Yu Wang; Dong Wang; Fangyang Wang; Feng Wang; Fengming Wang; Guansong Wang; Han Wang; Hao Wang; Hexiang Wang; Hong-Gang Wang; Jianrong Wang; Jigang Wang; Jiou Wang; Jundong Wang; Kui Wang; Lianrong Wang; Liming Wang; Maggie Haitian Wang; Meiqing Wang; Nanbu Wang; Pengwei Wang; Peipei Wang; Ping Wang; Ping Wang; Qing Jun Wang; Qing Wang; Qing Kenneth Wang; Qiong A Wang; Wen-Tao Wang; Wuyang Wang; Xinnan Wang; Xuejun Wang; Yan Wang; Yanchang Wang; Yanzhuang Wang; Yen-Yun Wang; Yihua Wang; Yipeng Wang; Yu Wang; Yuqi Wang; Zhe Wang; Zhenyu Wang; Zhouguang Wang; Gary Warnes; Verena Warnsmann; Hirotaka Watada; Eizo Watanabe; Maxinne Watchon; Anna Wawrzyńska; Timothy E Weaver; Grzegorz Wegrzyn; Ann M Wehman; Huafeng Wei; Lei Wei; Taotao Wei; Yongjie Wei; Oliver H Weiergräber; Conrad C Weihl; Günther Weindl; Ralf Weiskirchen; Alan Wells; Runxia H Wen; Xin Wen; Antonia Werner; Beatrice Weykopf; Sally P Wheatley; J Lindsay Whitton; Alexander J Whitworth; Katarzyna Wiktorska; Manon E Wildenberg; Tom Wileman; Simon Wilkinson; Dieter Willbold; Brett Williams; Robin S B Williams; Roger L Williams; Peter R Williamson; Richard A Wilson; Beate Winner; Nathaniel J Winsor; Steven S Witkin; Harald Wodrich; Ute Woehlbier; Thomas Wollert; Esther Wong; Jack Ho Wong; Richard W Wong; Vincent Kam Wai Wong; W Wei-Lynn Wong; An-Guo Wu; Chengbiao Wu; Jian Wu; Junfang Wu; Kenneth K Wu; Min Wu; Shan-Ying Wu; Shengzhou Wu; Shu-Yan Wu; Shufang Wu; William K K Wu; Xiaohong Wu; Xiaoqing Wu; Yao-Wen Wu; Yihua Wu; Ramnik J Xavier; Hongguang Xia; Lixin Xia; Zhengyuan Xia; Ge Xiang; Jin Xiang; Mingliang Xiang; Wei Xiang; Bin Xiao; Guozhi Xiao; Hengyi Xiao; Hong-Tao Xiao; Jian Xiao; Lan Xiao; Shi Xiao; Yin Xiao; Baoming Xie; Chuan-Ming Xie; Min Xie; Yuxiang Xie; Zhiping Xie; Zhonglin Xie; Maria Xilouri; Congfeng Xu; En Xu; Haoxing Xu; Jing Xu; JinRong Xu; Liang Xu; Wen Wen Xu; Xiulong Xu; Yu Xue; Sokhna M S Yakhine-Diop; Masamitsu Yamaguchi; Osamu Yamaguchi; Ai Yamamoto; Shunhei Yamashina; Shengmin Yan; Shian-Jang Yan; Zhen Yan; Yasuo Yanagi; Chuanbin Yang; Dun-Sheng Yang; Huan Yang; Huang-Tian Yang; Hui Yang; Jin-Ming Yang; Jing Yang; Jingyu Yang; Ling Yang; Liu Yang; Ming Yang; Pei-Ming Yang; Qian Yang; Seungwon Yang; Shu Yang; Shun-Fa Yang; Wannian Yang; Wei Yuan Yang; Xiaoyong Yang; Xuesong Yang; Yi Yang; Ying Yang; Honghong Yao; Shenggen Yao; Xiaoqiang Yao; Yong-Gang Yao; Yong-Ming Yao; Takahiro Yasui; Meysam Yazdankhah; Paul M Yen; Cong Yi; Xiao-Ming Yin; Yanhai Yin; Zhangyuan Yin; Ziyi Yin; Meidan Ying; Zheng Ying; Calvin K Yip; Stephanie Pei Tung Yiu; Young H Yoo; Kiyotsugu Yoshida; Saori R Yoshii; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Bahman Yousefi; Boxuan Yu; Haiyang Yu; Jun Yu; Jun Yu; Li Yu; Ming-Lung Yu; Seong-Woon Yu; Victor C Yu; W Haung Yu; Zhengping Yu; Zhou Yu; Junying Yuan; Ling-Qing Yuan; Shilin Yuan; Shyng-Shiou F Yuan; Yanggang Yuan; Zengqiang Yuan; Jianbo Yue; Zhenyu Yue; Jeanho Yun; Raymond L Yung; David N Zacks; Gabriele Zaffagnini; Vanessa O Zambelli; Isabella Zanella; Qun S Zang; Sara Zanivan; Silvia Zappavigna; Pilar Zaragoza; Konstantinos S Zarbalis; Amir Zarebkohan; Amira Zarrouk; Scott O Zeitlin; Jialiu Zeng; Ju-Deng Zeng; Eva Žerovnik; Lixuan Zhan; Bin Zhang; Donna D Zhang; Hanlin Zhang; Hong Zhang; Hong Zhang; Honghe Zhang; Huafeng Zhang; Huaye Zhang; Hui Zhang; Hui-Ling Zhang; Jianbin Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; Jing-Pu Zhang; Kalin Y B Zhang; Leshuai W Zhang; Lin Zhang; Lisheng Zhang; Lu Zhang; Luoying Zhang; Menghuan Zhang; Peng Zhang; Sheng Zhang; Wei Zhang; Xiangnan Zhang; Xiao-Wei Zhang; Xiaolei Zhang; Xiaoyan Zhang; Xin Zhang; Xinxin Zhang; Xu Dong Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yanjin Zhang; Yi Zhang; Ying-Dong Zhang; Yingmei Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yuchen Zhang; Zhe Zhang; Zhengguang Zhang; Zhibing Zhang; Zhihai Zhang; Zhiyong Zhang; Zili Zhang; Haobin Zhao; Lei Zhao; Shuang Zhao; Tongbiao Zhao; Xiao-Fan Zhao; Ying Zhao; Yongchao Zhao; Yongliang Zhao; Yuting Zhao; Guoping Zheng; Kai Zheng; Ling Zheng; Shizhong Zheng; Xi-Long Zheng; Yi Zheng; Zu-Guo Zheng; Boris Zhivotovsky; Qing Zhong; Ao Zhou; Ben Zhou; Cefan Zhou; Gang Zhou; Hao Zhou; Hong Zhou; Hongbo Zhou; Jie Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jiyong Zhou; Kailiang Zhou; Rongjia Zhou; Xu-Jie Zhou; Yanshuang Zhou; Yinghong Zhou; Yubin Zhou; Zheng-Yu Zhou; Zhou Zhou; Binglin Zhu; Changlian Zhu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Haining Zhu; Hongxin Zhu; Hua Zhu; Wei-Guo Zhu; Yanping Zhu; Yushan Zhu; Haixia Zhuang; Xiaohong Zhuang; Katarzyna Zientara-Rytter; Christine M Zimmermann; Elena Ziviani; Teresa Zoladek; Wei-Xing Zong; Dmitry B Zorov; Antonio Zorzano; Weiping Zou; Zhen Zou; Zhengzhi Zou; Steven Zuryn; Werner Zwerschke; Beate Brand-Saberi; X Charlie Dong; Chandra Shekar Kenchappa; Zuguo Li; Yong Lin; Shigeru Oshima; Yueguang Rong; Judith C Sluimer; Christina L Stallings; Chun-Kit Tong Journal: Autophagy Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 13.391