Ahmet Avsar1,2, Alberto Ciarrocchi3,4, Michele Pizzochero5, Dmitrii Unuchek3,4, Oleg V Yazyev5, Andras Kis6,7. 1. Electrical Engineering Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. ahmet.avsar@epfl.ch. 2. Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. ahmet.avsar@epfl.ch. 3. Electrical Engineering Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. 4. Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. 5. Institute of Physics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. 6. Electrical Engineering Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. andras.kis@epfl.ch. 7. Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. andras.kis@epfl.ch.
Abstract
Defects are ubiquitous in solids and often introduce new properties that are absent in pristine materials. One of the opportunities offered by these crystal imperfections is an extrinsically induced long-range magnetic ordering1, a long-time subject of theoretical investigations1-3. Intrinsic, two-dimensional (2D) magnetic materials4-7 are attracting increasing attention for their unique properties, which include layer-dependent magnetism4 and electric field modulation6. Yet, to induce magnetism into otherwise non-magnetic 2D materials remains a challenge. Here we investigate magneto-transport properties of ultrathin PtSe2 crystals and demonstrate an unexpected magnetism. Our electrical measurements show the existence of either ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic ground-state orderings that depends on the number of layers in this ultrathin material. The change in the device resistance on the application of a ~25 mT magnetic field is as high as 400 Ω with a magnetoresistance value of 5%. Our first-principles calculations suggest that surface magnetism induced by the presence of Pt vacancies and the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) exchange couplings across ultrathin films of PtSe2 are responsible for the observed layer-dependent magnetism. Given the existence of such unavoidable growth-related vacancies in 2D materials8,9, these findings can expand the range of 2D ferromagnets into materials that would otherwise be overlooked.
Defects are ubiquitous in solids and often introduce new properties that are absent in pristine materials. One of the opportunities offered by these crystal imperfections is an extrinsically induced long-range magnetic ordering1, a long-time subject of theoretical investigations1-3. Intrinsic, two-dimensional (2D) magnetic materials4-7 are attracting increasing attention for their unique properties, which include layer-dependent magnetism4 and electric field modulation6. Yet, to induce magnetism into otherwise non-magnetic 2D materials remains a challenge. Here we investigate magneto-transport properties of ultrathin PtSe2 crystals and demonstrate an unexpected magnetism. Our electrical measurements show the existence of either ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic ground-state orderings that depends on the number of layers in this ultrathin material. The change in the device resistance on the application of a ~25 mT magnetic field is as high as 400 Ω with a magnetoresistance value of 5%. Our first-principles calculations suggest that surface magnetism induced by the presence of Pt vacancies and the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) exchange couplings across ultrathin films of PtSe2 are responsible for the observed layer-dependent magnetism. Given the existence of such unavoidable growth-related vacancies in 2D materials8,9, these findings can expand the range of 2D ferromagnets into materials that would otherwise be overlooked.
While intrinsically magnetic materials are rare in nature, long-range magnetism
can be introduced into non-magnetic 2D materials through adatom intercalation,10 proximity coupling,11 and defect engineering12
thanks to their large surface area to volume ratios. The latter strategy has been
predicted for several 2D metallic materials including graphene,2 but this has not been experimentally realized yet. Recently,
PtSe2 has been considered to be an ideal platform for investigating
defect-induced magnetization.13,14 First-principles calculations show that Se and
especially Pt vacancies in monolayer PtSe2 have a strong influence on its
electronic properties; a large magnetic moment of up to 6
µ is expected for single or double Pt vacancies.
Such defects in 2D materials can either form naturally during the growth/annealing
processes8 or they can be intentionally
created post-synthesis, e.g., under electron beam irradiation.15 Point defects including Pt vacancies are present at the topmost
layers in chemical vapor transport-grown PtSe2.9 Considering the existence of these unavoidable point defects in as-grown
material9 and its metallic behavior above a
critical thickness,16,17 PtSe2 holds a great promise for spintronic
applications.We obtain thin, ribbon-shaped PtSe2 flakes by mechanical exfoliation
from chemical vapor transport -grown bulk crystals (HQ Graphene) onto a
Si/SiO2 (270 nm) substrate. In total, ten devices were characterized with
PtSe2 thickness varying between ~ 4.15 nm to ~ 14 nm, as
determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM), allowing us to study the thickness
dependence of the magnetism. Non-magnetic metallic Palladium (Pd)
contacts (80 nm thick) were formed using electron beam lithography and electron beam
evaporation techniques. These non-magnetic Pd contacts were fabricated to exclude any
influence of the contact on the magnetic response of the device. Due to the ribbon-like
shape of our crystals, devices were fabricated in the two-terminal geometry. An AFM
image of a completed device is shown in Figure 1a.
Longitudinal device resistance was characterized as a function of back-gate voltage
(VBG), source-drain bias (VSD), magnetic field and
temperature.
Figure 1
Device structure and basic characterization.
a, An AFM image of the device A. Height scale bar is ± 40 nm.
Following the black dashed line, we measure a height of 5.2 nm and a width of
0.6 µm for this device. b, VBG dependence of
ISD measured at fixed VSD = 0.05 V, 0.1 V and 0.2 V.
c, Output characteristics of the device as a function of
VSD at fixed VBG = 0 V. All charge transport
measurements were performed at 1.5 K.
We first discuss the charge transport properties of a device based on a 5.2 nm
thick PtSe2 crystal (device A). Figure
1b shows the gate-voltage (VBG) dependence of source-drain current
ISD at fixed bias-voltage (VSD) values of 50, 100 and 200 mV
where we observe nearly gate-independent transport characteristics. This indicates that
5.2 nm PtSe2 is metallic, in good agreement with recent findings. This is
also confirmed by the observation of nearly linear
ISD-VSD relation even at low temperatures (Figure 1c) and by studying the temperature dependence
of the device resistance (Supplementary Information 1). Since semiconducting behavior was observed in
thinner samples (it is also challenging to electrically probe magnetism in such
resistive samples (Supplementary
Information 2-3)), we focus on crystals thicker than 4.15 nm for the
remainder of this manuscript.We utilize magnetoresistance measurements as a sensing tool to characterize the
magnetism in PtSe2. For this, we sweep an out-of-plane magnetic field (B)
while recording the device resistance. As shown in Figure
2a, we observe a hysteresis loop with minima at ± 25 mT under backward
and forward scans. Such hysteretic behavior and the presence of a minor loop (Supplementary Information 4) are
the hallmarks of ferromagnetism and were previously observed in ferromagnetic metals
such as Cobalt (Co) under the same measurement geometry.18 We extract a coercive field of ~ 25 mT which is also comparable to
the one observed in Co wires.18 We observe a
similar magnetoresistance response in five different samples with comparable coercive
field values (Supplementary
Information 5). We also note that, just like the total device resistance, the
change in the device resistance under a magnetic field is almost insensitive to the
VBG (Supplementary
Information 6).
Figure 2
Bias and temperature dependent magnetoresistance measurements in device
A.
a, Magnetic field dependence of the device resistance measured at T
= 1.6 K. The red (black) arrow represents sweep direction from 0.2 T (-0.2 T) to
–0.2 T (0.2 T). b, Source-drain bias (VSD)
dependences of the change in the device resistance under the magnetic field
(ΔR) and the longitudinal device resistance (R). Inset shows the
resistance change under magnetic field acquired at fixed biases of
VSD = 1 mV, 3 mV and 50 mV. ΔR is calculated by
subtracting a polynomial fitting from the device resistance (Supplementary Information
15). c, Temperature dependence of ΔR and R. Inset
shows the magnetic field dependence of the resistance change measured at T = 1.5
K, 13 K and 16 K.
Next, we study the dependence of the change of device resistance (ΔR) on
the bias voltage and the temperature. Figure 2b
shows the VSD dependence of ΔR measured at 1.6 K. The signal increases
from ΔR = 30 Ω to 400 Ω as the bias is reduced from 50 mV to 1 mV.
The extracted MR percental variation is 5% at low biases (Supplementary Information 7). As
shown in Figure 2b, dependencies of both ΔR
and device resistance on VSD are similar and could be due to slightly
non-linear charge injection at low biases. Its physical origin needs further
investigation. Following, we present the temperature dependence of the magnetoresistance
measured at a fixed bias of VSD = 5 mV (Figure
2c). ΔR has a very weak temperature dependence in the 1.5 K < T
< 13 K range. Raising the temperature just slightly over 13 K quickly suppresses
the magnetic response of the device. The temperature dependence of device resistance
also shows a similar sudden drop when T is raised above 13 K, which could be related to
the suppression of spin-dependent scattering. The resistance keeps increasing as the
temperature is further increased, due to the metallic nature of PtSe2 (Supplementary Information 1).In contrast to this hysteretic magneto-transport response, another subset
containing five out of ten characterized devices shows different characteristics (Supplementary Information 8-9).
In Figure 3a, we show the magnetic field dependence
(forward and backward sweep directions) of the device resistance for one of these
devices (device B), which exhibits plateaus with two different values. Here, we observe
the lower plateau at low fields in the -30 mT < B < 30 mT range, whereas a
sharp jump to the high plateau is observed for fields above |30| mT. The height of the
jump in this device is ΔR ~ 2 Ω and depends on the VSD,
as shown in Figure 3b. The width and height of this
plateau are also strongly sensitive to the temperature, as the signal completely
disappears above 5 K (Figure 3c). Here, we are
confident that the transition between these plateaus is a result of the switching
between antiferromagnetic ordering at low fields into a fully spin polarized state at
higher fields due to the metamagnetic effect.19
Such magneto-transport response with two plateaus was previously observed in
semiconducting bilayer CrI3-based tunneling devices.20,21 It was shown that each
CrI3 layer has initially opposite spin polarization at low fields and
that the application of a field above the coercive field reverses the magnetization of
one of CrI3 layers causing both layers to have the same spin polarization.
Additionally, the observation of very sharp switching between low and high plateaus
indicates the out-of-plane direction magneto-crystalline anisotropy of PtSe2,
in good agreement with recent predictions.14 If
the anisotropy had in-plane components, the switching would occur gradually with the
field.
Figure 3
Bias and temperature dependent magnetoresistance measurements in device B
(~ 9 nm thick).
a, Magnetic field dependence of the device resistance. The red
(black) arrow represents the sweep direction from positive (negative) to
negative (positive) values. b, VSD dependence of the
magneto-resistance change measured at T = 1.5 K. Scale bar is 5 Ω. Curves
shown for sweeps at 0.1 V ≤ VSD ≤ 0.45 V are offset for
clarity. c, Temperature dependence of ΔR measured at fixed
bias of VSD = 0.1 V. Scale bar is 2 Ω. Curves shown for sweeps
at 2.75 K ≤ T ≤ 7.8 K are offset for clarity.
After presenting the existence of both ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic
ordering in metallic PtSe2, we next check if there is a layer dependent
magnetization. The natural way to investigate this dependence would be to compare
magneto-transport response of mono and bilayer PtSe2. PtSe2 is
however extremely resistive in this thickness range.16 Instead, we have characterized two adjacent devices prepared under
identical conditions. As confirmed by the AFM scan, thickness of PtSe2
crystals in these devices differs by only one layer, as shown in Figure 4a-b, which allows us to investigate layer-dependent
magnetism. While the device with a 6.45 nm thick (10-11 layers-device C)
PtSe2 shows the characteristic response with two plateaus (Figure 4c), the device with an extra layer (device D)
shows ferromagnetic response (Figure 4d). This
observation indicates the layer-dependent magnetism in PtSe2. To further
investigate this effect, we prepared another PtSe2 device (device E)
containing additional one-layer thick fragments on the channel surface, as revealed by
AFM imaging (Figure 4e). Magneto-transport response
of this sample is very intriguing: both ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic ordering
coexist (Figure 4f). This measurement also allows
us to directly conclude that the switching fields for these two contrasting magnetic
orderings are different. Here, the strong layer-dependent relationship between different
mechanisms could be stabilizing magnetic ordering differently and hence results in
different switching fields. This observation is in good agreement with the different
coercive fields probed by magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements for even and odd
layers of insulating CrI3 magnets.4
Existence of either ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic ground state orderings depending
on the number of layers is intriguing.
Figure 4
Layer-dependent magnetoresistance measurements.
a, Optical and AFM images of a completed PtSe2 device and
its crystal, respectively. Dashed area represents the scanned AFM region.
b. Cross-sectional plots along the red and black lines in
a. AFM scans show that crystals used in device C and device D
has one-layer difference (~ 0.6 nm) in their heights. c,
Magnetic field dependence of ΔR measured from the device C (6.45 nm
thick). d, Magnetic field dependence of ΔR measured from
device D (~ 7.05 nm thick). e, AFM image of a
PtSe2 crystal having multiple one-layer thick fragments on its
surface. Top inset shows the cross-sectional plots along the black line in
e. Black color arrows in e and top-inset
e indicate the one-layer thick fragments. Bottom-inset e
shows the optical image of the corresponding device. Black solid line represents
the scale bar (5 µm) f, Magnetic field dependence of
ΔR measured from the device E shown in e. We would like to
note that the change in device resistance in these samples has opposite sign
compared to the thinner devices shown in Fig.
2-a and Fig.
S4-a. Such opposite switching signs were previously observed in Co
and CoFe films.35 To determine the origin
of this behavior, the effect of the number of layers, distribution of defects
and their effect on magnetism need to be extensively investigated.
In the following, we propose a theoretical picture to interpret the observed
effects. As pristine PtSe2 does not present any intrinsic spin-polarization,
neither in bulk nor in multilayer form, we suggest that the observed magnetism
originates from lattice imperfections (Supplementary Information 10). The appropriate model describing the
interaction between magnetic impurities mediated by conduction electrons is the
well-established RKKY model.22–24 According to this, the dependence of magnetic
exchange coupling J on the distance R reads as
J(R) ≈ cos(2kα, with
k being the Fermi wavevector of the metal hosting
the magnetic impurities. The Fermi surface of PtSe2 is composed of closed
electron and hole pockets located at kz = 0 and electron
pockets at kz = ±0.6
π/c.25,26 The latter give rise to an oscillating and
power-law decaying contribution to J(R) in the direction normal to the
PtSe2 layers with a period of approximately two layers, as schematically
shown in Figure 5a. Hence, we see that adding or
removing one layer from metallic PtSe2 is sufficient to
change the sign of the magnetic exchange coupling, thereby realizing a
thickness-dependent ferro- or anti-ferromagnetic configuration. This observation is also
in a good agreement with the summary of devices measured at fixed bias of VSD
= 50 mV and 100 mV. As shown in Fig. 5a-inset and
Supplementary Information
12, we observe that MR decreases as crystal thickness increases,
layer-dependent magnetism exist and magnetism is not detectable in thicker crystals.
Figure 5
Theoretical investigations of PtSe2.
a, Schematic illustration showing the oscillating RKKY interaction
across the PtSe2 slab and the corresponding ground-state magnetic
configurations. Inset plot shows the thickness dependence of MR curves for
studied samples at fixed VSD of 50 mV and 100 mV. b,
Atomic structure and spin density (turquoise) around a surface VPt
defect (red, dotted circle) in multilayer PtSe2. Grey (orange) balls
represent Pt (Se) atoms. Isosurfaces contour is set to 0.003 e
Å-3. c, Electronic density of states of
multilayer PtSe2 with (blue) and without (red) a surface Pt vacancy
defect. In green, the difference between spin majority and spin minority states.
Fermi level is set to zero (vertical dashed line).
Next, we step from model interactions to first-principles calculations performed
on realistic models in order to suggest which type of defects may be responsible for the
magnetic response observed in our samples. Earlier experimental investigations revealed
the abundance of vacancy point defects in PtSe2 films.9 Motivated by this, we assess the impact of such defects on the
magnetic properties of PtSe2 by introducing Se (VSe) and Pt
(VPt) vacancy in both metallic multilayer and bulk PtSe2
models. In analogy with other transition metal dichalcogenides,27 we find that the VSe defect does not lead to
magnetism (Supplementary Information
10). On the other hand, the introduction of the VPt defect at the
surface of the multilayer model induces a local magnetic moment of ~1.2
μB per defect. We further observe that the spin density around the
VPt defect mostly localizes on the neighboring selenium atoms within its
first coordination shell, as shown in Figure 5b.
Additionally, the investigation of the electronic density of states reported in Figure 5c indicates that the local magnetic moments
stem from defect-induced spin-split states that emerge around the Fermi level.
Remarkably, we find that the same defect does not lead to a local magnetic moment when
forming in the bulk (Supplementary
Information 10,12). Similarly,
extrinsic adsorbents do not induce magnetism (Supplementary Information 11). It is worth noting in this context
that PtSe2 is more prone to hosting metal atom vacancies than conventional,
group VI dichalcogenides (e.g. MoS2) as a consequence of the substantially
lower formation energy that this defect exhibits in the former material9 as compared to the latter.27In contrast to recently discovered intrinsic ferromagnets,4–6 PtSe2
has some key advantages for immediate research: it is stable in its pristine form (Supplementary Information 13)
without the need for an encapsulation process,17
it can be easily grown with various scalable methods,28 and readily isolated from its as-prepared substrate which makes it
transferrable onto any arbitrary substrate.28
Compared to these intrinsic metallic ferromagnets, the currently observed critical
temperature in PtSe2 is small. This could be in principle improved by control
of the vacancy concentration (to increase the concentration and total magnitude of the
resulting magnetic moment), control of crystal thickness (to control the sign of the
coupling and the switching fields as discussed above) and Fermi level energy (to
modulate the density of states at the Fermi level) in future experiments.Contrary to the assumption that defects in 2D materials are detrimental for the
overall crystal quality, defect engineering could be a key approach to enriching their
functionality by inducing magnetism in air-stable materials. In the case of
PtSe2, combining the defect-induced magnetism with unique
thickness-dependent properties could have several applications for realizing spintronic
devices using atomically thin materials.29–31 Thin semiconducting
PtSe2 could be utilized as a magnetic substrate for proximity
studies.32,33 On the other hand, thick metallic PtSe2 could be integrated
into lateral and vertical spin torque devices,34
tunneling magneto-resistance devices,35 and spin
valve devices36 for generating spin polarized
charge carriers.
Methods
Device fabrication
PtSe2 crystals were obtained by mechanical exfoliation from
bulk crystals (HQ Graphene) onto a doped Si substrate with 270 nm of
SiO2. The substrate was imaged by using a color camera equipped
optical microscope (Olympus BX51M). The thickness of selected crystals was
determined by using AFM topography imaging (Asylum Research Cypher). Metallic
contacts were prepared using e-beam lithography (Raith EBPG 5000+, 100 keV
thermal field emission gun with a beam does of ~ 950
µC/cm2) and e-beam evaporation of Pd (Alliance-Concept EVA
760, 80 nm thick), without the use of any adhesion layers such as Cr or Ti.
Measurements
Cryogenic measurements were performed in an ICE Oxford liquid helium
continuous flow cryo-magnetic system with a base temperature of ~ 1.5 K.
Drain currents were measured using a Keithley Sourcemeter 2450, while a Keithley
Sourcemeter 2400 was used for applying bias through the SiO2 gate
dielectric. The drain voltage was varying between 1 mV to 1 V, while the source
was grounded. Electronic transport measurements were carried out in a
two-terminal configuration.
First-principles calculations
First-principles calculations have been performed within the generalized
gradient approximation to density functional theory devised by Perdew, Burke and
Ernzerhof.37 Geometry optimizations
have been carried out with the VASP code,38,39 using a kinetic energy
cutoff of 400 eV and k-meshes equivalent to 18
k-points per unit cell along each periodic direction.
During geometry optimizations, lattice constants and interlayer spacing were
constrained to their experimental values of 3.73 Å and 5.08 Å,
respectively, while the tolerance on atomic forces was set to 0.02 eV/Å.
The electronic density of states has been calculated with the SIESTA code,40 using a fine mesh equivalent to 120
k-points and a smearing of 0.02 eV. The adopted multilayer
and bulk PtSe2 models consist of a a 6-layer thick 3 × 3
supercell and a periodic 3 × 3 × 2 supercell, respectively. In the
case of multilayer models, the defects are placed in the topmost layer and a
vacuum region of 15 Å was introduced to separate periodic images.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary information is available for this paper at
https://www.nature.com/nnano/.
Authors: D R Klein; D MacNeill; J L Lado; D Soriano; E Navarro-Moratalla; K Watanabe; T Taniguchi; S Manni; P Canfield; J Fernández-Rossier; P Jarillo-Herrero Journal: Science Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Tiancheng Song; Xinghan Cai; Matisse Wei-Yuan Tu; Xiaoou Zhang; Bevin Huang; Nathan P Wilson; Kyle L Seyler; Lin Zhu; Takashi Taniguchi; Kenji Watanabe; Michael A McGuire; David H Cobden; Di Xiao; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu Journal: Science Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Z Guguchia; A Kerelsky; D Edelberg; S Banerjee; F von Rohr; D Scullion; M Augustin; M Scully; D A Rhodes; Z Shermadini; H Luetkens; A Shengelaya; C Baines; E Morenzoni; A Amato; J C Hone; R Khasanov; S J L Billinge; E Santos; A N Pasupathy; Y J Uemura Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Qing Hua Wang; Amilcar Bedoya-Pinto; Mark Blei; Avalon H Dismukes; Assaf Hamo; Sarah Jenkins; Maciej Koperski; Yu Liu; Qi-Chao Sun; Evan J Telford; Hyun Ho Kim; Mathias Augustin; Uri Vool; Jia-Xin Yin; Lu Hua Li; Alexey Falin; Cory R Dean; Fèlix Casanova; Richard F L Evans; Mairbek Chshiev; Artem Mishchenko; Cedomir Petrovic; Rui He; Liuyan Zhao; Adam W Tsen; Brian D Gerardot; Mauro Brotons-Gisbert; Zurab Guguchia; Xavier Roy; Sefaattin Tongay; Ziwei Wang; M Zahid Hasan; Joerg Wrachtrup; Amir Yacoby; Albert Fert; Stuart Parkin; Kostya S Novoselov; Pengcheng Dai; Luis Balicas; Elton J G Santos Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 18.027
Authors: Roman Kempt; Sebastian Lukas; Oliver Hartwig; Maximilian Prechtl; Agnieszka Kuc; Thomas Brumme; Sha Li; Daniel Neumaier; Max C Lemme; Georg S Duesberg; Thomas Heine Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 17.521