Angelina S Gross1, Andreas Zimmermann2, Tobias Pendl1, Sabrina Schroeder3, Hannes Schoenlechner1, Oskar Knittelfelder4, Laura Lamplmayr1, Ana Santiso1, Andreas Aufschnaiter5, Daniel Waltenstorfer1, Sandra Ortonobes Lara1, Sarah Stryeck6, Christina Kast1, Christoph Ruckenstuhl1, Sebastian J Hofer3, Birgit Michelitsch7, Martina Woelflingseder1, Rolf Müller8, Didac Carmona-Gutierrez1, Tobias Madl9, Sabrina Büttner5, Kai-Uwe Fröhlich1, Andrej Shevchenko4, Tobias Eisenberg10. 1. Institute of Molecular Biosciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria. 2. Institute of Molecular Biosciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria; Central Lab Gracia, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria. 3. Institute of Molecular Biosciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria; BioTechMed-Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria. 4. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany. 5. Institute of Molecular Biosciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria; Department of Molecular Biosciences, Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, 114 19 Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Gottfried Schatz Research Center for Cell Signaling, Metabolism, and Aging, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria. 7. Institute of Molecular Biosciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria; Division of Plastic, Aesthetic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria. 8. Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany. 9. BioTechMed-Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria; Gottfried Schatz Research Center for Cell Signaling, Metabolism, and Aging, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria. 10. Institute of Molecular Biosciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria; Central Lab Gracia, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria; BioTechMed-Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria. Electronic address: tobias.eisenberg@uni-graz.at.
Abstract
Autophagy, a membrane-dependent catabolic process, ensures survival of aging cells and depends on the cellular energetic status. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (Acc1) connects central energy metabolism to lipid biosynthesis and is rate-limiting for the de novo synthesis of lipids. However, it is unclear how de novo lipogenesis and its metabolic consequences affect autophagic activity. Here, we show that in aging yeast, autophagy levels highly depend on the activity of Acc1. Constitutively active Acc1 (acc1S/A ) or a deletion of the Acc1 negative regulator, Snf1 (yeast AMPK), shows elevated autophagy levels, which can be reversed by the Acc1 inhibitor soraphen A. Vice versa, pharmacological inhibition of Acc1 drastically reduces cell survival and results in the accumulation of Atg8-positive structures at the vacuolar membrane, suggesting late defects in the autophagic cascade. As expected, acc1S/A cells exhibit a reduction in acetate/acetyl-CoA availability along with elevated cellular lipid content. However, concomitant administration of acetate fails to fully revert the increase in autophagy exerted by acc1S/A Instead, administration of oleate, while mimicking constitutively active Acc1 in WT cells, alleviates the vacuolar fusion defects induced by Acc1 inhibition. Our results argue for a largely lipid-dependent process of autophagy regulation downstream of Acc1. We present a versatile genetic model to investigate the complex relationship between acetate metabolism, lipid homeostasis, and autophagy and propose Acc1-dependent lipogenesis as a fundamental metabolic path downstream of Snf1 to maintain autophagy and survival during cellular aging.
Autophagy, a membrane-dependent catabolic process, ensures survival of aging cells and depends on the cellular energetic status. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (Acc1) connects central energy metabolism to lipid biosynthesis and is rate-limiting for the de novo synthesis of lipids. However, it is unclear how de novo lipogenesis and its metabolic consequences affect autophagic activity. Here, we show that in aging yeast, autophagy levels highly depend on the activity of Acc1. Constitutively active Acc1 (acc1S/A ) or a deletion of the Acc1 negative regulator, Snf1 (yeastAMPK), shows elevated autophagy levels, which can be reversed by the Acc1 inhibitor soraphen A. Vice versa, pharmacological inhibition of Acc1 drastically reduces cell survival and results in the accumulation of Atg8-positive structures at the vacuolar membrane, suggesting late defects in the autophagic cascade. As expected, acc1S/A cells exhibit a reduction in acetate/acetyl-CoA availability along with elevated cellular lipid content. However, concomitant administration of acetate fails to fully revert the increase in autophagy exerted by acc1S/A Instead, administration of oleate, while mimicking constitutively active Acc1 in WT cells, alleviates the vacuolar fusion defects induced by Acc1 inhibition. Our results argue for a largely lipid-dependent process of autophagy regulation downstream of Acc1. We present a versatile genetic model to investigate the complex relationship between acetate metabolism, lipid homeostasis, and autophagy and propose Acc1-dependent lipogenesis as a fundamental metabolic path downstream of Snf1 to maintain autophagy and survival during cellular aging.
As age-associated diseases compromise human health span and are becoming increasingly prevalent, a better understanding of the aging process is urgently needed (1, 2). Autophagy, an intracellular degradation mechanism, is crucial for healthy aging and ensures cellular and organismal homeostasis (3–5). Macroautophagy (hereafter termed autophagy) mediates the incorporation of bulk cellular material into double-membrane vesicles, termed “autophagosomes.” The engulfed material, ranging from specific proteins to whole organelles, is then targeted to lysosomes for degradation. Therefore, autophagy ensures proteostasis as well as cellular homeostasis (6), whereas, in turn, loss of autophagy accelerates aging and favors the development of disease in many organisms (3, 4). Autophagy is under strict metabolic control (7, 8) and thus may also depend on a balanced lipid metabolism; in fact, the function of diverse classes of lipids in the regulation and execution of autophagy is an emerging research topic (9). However, to what extent de novo lipogenesis contributes to the control of autophagy in aging remains largely elusive.Eukaryotic model organisms, such as the baker's yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae, have been instrumental in deciphering mechanisms of cellular aging and autophagy (10–12). For instance, one of the aging paradigms in yeast, chronological life span (i.e. the survival time of a culture in the stationary, post-mitotic phase), serves as a model for post-mitotic aging in human cells and recapitulates the cytoprotective function of autophagy in higher organisms (13, 14), yet the importance of maintaining lipid homeostasis for cell survival and autophagy during chronological aging has hardly been addressed (15). A comprehensive understanding of yeastlipid metabolism is available (16, 17). Observations in lipid droplet (LD)-deficient yeast (i.e. yeast unable to synthesize the major neutral lipids) suggest an important role of LDs during the acute induction of autophagy after nitrogen starvation (18, 19). However, a direct requirement of LDs for autophagy has been questioned, because LD-deficient yeast cells still induce autophagy upon rapamycin treatment (20). LD-deficient yeast also displays functional autophagy after nitrogen starvation when combined with a concomitant reduction of de novo fatty acid (FA) synthesis, withdrawal of inositol, or restoration of phospholipid (PL) composition by deletion of the transcriptional repressor OPI1 (21, 22). Velázquez et al. (21) therefore proposed that free fatty acid (FFA)-induced ER stress limits nitrogen starvation–induced autophagy of yeast cells lacking LDs. Thus, the ability to buffer FFAs through triglyceride (TG) synthesis and storage into LDs may represent the prime function of LDs in the control of autophagy. Overall, these studies suggest that LDs regulate autophagy through balancing the cellular lipidome rather than by a direct action of TGs.Cytosolic acetyl-CoA carboxylase (Acc1) activity is essential for cell growth in yeast (23). Acc1 catalyzes the initial and rate-limiting step of de novo FA synthesis by producing malonyl-CoA through carboxylation of acetyl-CoA. This activity is controlled by the glucose-sensing kinase Snf1, the homolog of the mammalianAMP-activated kinase (AMPK), which inhibits Acc1 by phosphorylation of Ser-659 and Ser-1157 (24–26). Accordingly, yeast cells carrying a constitutively active Acc1 mutant with a serine 1157-to-alanine mutation (hereafter referred to as acc1) display increased neutral lipid levels. This increase can be further enhanced by additional mutation of serine 659 to alanine. Thus, the acc1-S1157A mutation partly uncouples Acc1 from the control by AMPK, allowing for the investigation of specific Acc1-dependent effects without interfering with the many other targets of AMPK (24). Acute inhibition of Acc1 delays cell growth and proliferation, whereas it depletes intracellular lipid stores. Interestingly, LDs (i) increase in number and size when yeast enters stationary phase (24, 27), (ii) become gradually degraded in an age-dependent manner through an autophagy-dependent process termed “lipophagy” (27–30), and (iii) may provide lipid building blocks for the production of membranes when cells re-enter the cell cycle (31). However, it has not been formally addressed whether the increased production or accumulation of LDs upon entry into stationary phase is also required for cell survival during post-mitotic aging.We have previously shown that impaired mitochondrial utilization of acetate due to deletion of the mitochondrial CoA-transferase ACH1 causes excess secretion of acetate and up-regulation of acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 (Acs2)-dependent hyperacetylation of histones (32). This metabolic shift of acetate toward the nucleo-cytosolic pathway of acetyl-CoA synthesis led to transcriptional defects of autophagy-related genes (such as ATG7) with a block in autophagy and loss of survival of chronologically aging yeast. This block of autophagy could be overcome by limiting nucleo-cytosolic acetyl-CoA production through depletion of Acs2, which also restored survival of aging cells (32). Interestingly, the pathways of acetyl-CoA generation from acetate, which is relevant for histone acetylation, and the utilization of acetyl-CoA for de novo lipogenesis appear metabolically related (33). However, how acetyl-CoA consumption by de novo lipogenesis affects acetate metabolism, autophagy, and cell survival has not been investigated.In the present study, we asked whether de novo FA biosynthesis is important for the ability of cells to maintain autophagic flux and survival during aging. We demonstrate that the rate-limiting step of FA biosynthesis catalyzed by Acc1 is crucial for the regulation of autophagy and survival in chronologically aging yeast. Our data show that regulation of autophagy by Acc1 depends on a combination of metabolic consequences that involve alterations in both acetate (upstream of Acc1) and lipid (downstream of Acc1) metabolism.
Results
Acc1 activity controls autophagy in aging yeast
To address the potential role of de novo lipogenesis in the regulation of acetate/acetyl-CoA availability and autophagy, we decided to target the rate-limiting enzyme of FA biosynthesis, Acc1 (Fig. 1A). For this purpose, we used the acc1 mutant, which expresses constitutively active Acc1 due to S1157A mutation (24). In agreement with previously published observations (24, 25), acc1 cells displayed increased neutral lipid levels compared with WT cells (Fig. 1B), as quantified by flow cytometry after staining with the fluorescent neutral lipid dye BODIPYTM 493/503 (34), hereafter referred to as BODIPY. We hypothesized that enhanced de novo lipogenesis in the acc1 mutant entails metabolic consequences that stimulate autophagy. In fact, acc1 mutation was sufficient to strongly induce autophagy after 2 days of chronological aging as monitored by quantifying immunoblotting-detectable free GFP (Fig. 1, C and D). This so-called “GFP liberation assay” makes use of yeast strains carrying an N-terminally GFP-tagged version of the autophagy machinery protein Atg8. Upon autophagic delivery of the fusion protein to the vacuole, Atg8 is rapidly degraded, whereas GFP remains more stable, and thus, increased levels of GFP are indicative of efficient autophagic flux (35, 36).
Figure 1.
Acc1 activity correlates with autophagy levels. WT and acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells were aged until the indicated time points on 2% glucose minimal medium. SorA or the solvent DMSO was applied 6 h after inoculation where indicated. A, schematic overview of the Acc1-regulated metabolic pathway. Acc1 activity can be modulated by SorA treatment (inhibition, red color) or the S1157A point mutation (activation, blue color). B, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining in a time course experiment. Relative fluorescence units were normalized to the WT at 24 h (n = 4). C and D, representative immunoblots (C) and quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (D), indicating autophagic flux (GFP liberation assay) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells after 2 days of aging. Blots were probed with Acc1-, GFP-, or GAPDH-specific antibodies, and immunoblot signals were normalized to the WT. (n = 4). E and F, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining in a time course experiment (E) or after 24 h of incubation (day 1 of aging) (F). The arrow in E indicates the time of SorA application. Relative fluorescence units were normalized to the WT control at 24 h (n = 4 in E; n = 7 in F). G and H, representative immunoblots (G) and densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (H, left) or full-length GFP-Atg8/GAPDH levels (H, right) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells at the indicated age (G) or after 2 days of aging (H). (n = 7). I, representative micrographs of 3-day-old cells according to G and H, demonstrating vacuolar localization of GFP indicative of autophagy (arrows show examples of autophagic cells) or punctate structures of GFP-Atg8. The arrowheads depict examples of cells with presumably enlarged pre-autophagosomal structures (1 fluorescence dot/cell), whereas open arrowheads show cells with accumulated autophagosomes (≥2 fluorescence puncta). Staining with PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar). Line graphs show the mean ± S.D. p values indicate main effects (G, genotype; T, time; GxT, interaction between genotype and time) of a two-way mixed-model ANOVA, with time as repeated measures in B and E, Welch's t test in D, Welch's ANOVA post hoc Games–Howell in H, and ANOVA post hoc Tukey test in F. ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective WT); ##, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective untreated control, Control). FAS, fatty acid synthase; RFU, relative fluorescence units; a.u., arbitrary units.
Acc1 activity correlates with autophagy levels. WT and acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells were aged until the indicated time points on 2% glucose minimal medium. SorA or the solvent DMSO was applied 6 h after inoculation where indicated. A, schematic overview of the Acc1-regulated metabolic pathway. Acc1 activity can be modulated by SorA treatment (inhibition, red color) or the S1157A point mutation (activation, blue color). B, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining in a time course experiment. Relative fluorescence units were normalized to the WT at 24 h (n = 4). C and D, representative immunoblots (C) and quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (D), indicating autophagic flux (GFP liberation assay) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells after 2 days of aging. Blots were probed with Acc1-, GFP-, or GAPDH-specific antibodies, and immunoblot signals were normalized to the WT. (n = 4). E and F, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining in a time course experiment (E) or after 24 h of incubation (day 1 of aging) (F). The arrow in E indicates the time of SorA application. Relative fluorescence units were normalized to the WT control at 24 h (n = 4 in E; n = 7 in F). G and H, representative immunoblots (G) and densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (H, left) or full-length GFP-Atg8/GAPDH levels (H, right) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells at the indicated age (G) or after 2 days of aging (H). (n = 7). I, representative micrographs of 3-day-old cells according to G and H, demonstrating vacuolar localization of GFP indicative of autophagy (arrows show examples of autophagic cells) or punctate structures of GFP-Atg8. The arrowheads depict examples of cells with presumably enlarged pre-autophagosomal structures (1 fluorescence dot/cell), whereas open arrowheads show cells with accumulated autophagosomes (≥2 fluorescence puncta). Staining with PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar). Line graphs show the mean ± S.D. p values indicate main effects (G, genotype; T, time; GxT, interaction between genotype and time) of a two-way mixed-model ANOVA, with time as repeated measures in B and E, Welch's t test in D, Welch's ANOVA post hoc Games–Howell in H, and ANOVA post hoc Tukey test in F. ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective WT); ##, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective untreated control, Control). FAS, fatty acid synthase; RFU, relative fluorescence units; a.u., arbitrary units.We then tested whether the inhibition of Acc1 showed opposite effects by applying the allosteric Acc1 inhibitor soraphen A (SorA) (37). Because Acc1 is essential for growth, SorA was applied to yeast cells in such a way that it did not affect cell growth during logarithmic phase, ensuring optical densities comparable with those under control conditions upon entry into stationary phase (Fig. S1). Under these conditions, the neutral lipid content of SorA-treated cells, which remained constant throughout all tested time points, was decreased compared with untreated controls (Fig. 1E), confirming a reduction of Acc1-dependent lipogenesis. Thus, the addition of SorA completely prevented the increase of the neutral lipid content during transition from logarithmic growth to the stationary post-mitotic phase. Microscopic analysis and flow cytometric quantification of BODIPY-stained stationary cultures confirmed the reduction of LDs after SorA treatment in WT cells, whereas the constitutively active mutant of Acc1 (acc1) retained neutral lipid levels comparable with the untreated WT controls (Fig. 1F and Fig. S1).Next, we explored the effects of SorA treatment on autophagy. Strikingly, SorA efficiently blocked autophagic flux of WT cells during aging, as monitored via the GFP liberation assay (Fig. 1, G and H). In WT cells, SorA treatment showed almost no free GFP generation (Fig. 1H, left) and accumulated GFP-Atg8 (Fig. 1H, right), whereas in the acc1 mutant, free GFP levels were maintained almost comparable with untreated WT cells. In line with this, microscopic analysis of GFP-Atg8 revealed vacuolar localization of GFP in a substantial fraction of 2-day-old WT cells, whereas after SorA treatment, the GFP signal appeared as punctate structures (presumably at least in part autophagosomes), indicating a block of autophagy that prevented the delivery of GFP-Atg8 to the vacuole (Fig. 1I). In contrast, SorA-treated acc1 mutant cells retained vacuolar GFP positivity and lacked accumulation of punctate GFP structures (Fig. 1I).The strains used for autophagy observation expressed GFP-tagged Atg8 under control of the endogenous ATG8 promoter, and thus the overall increase in GFP signals may also reflect induction of Atg8 expression, which is often associated with autophagy (38). To exclude the possibility that the strong increase in free GFP upon Acc1 activation was simply a result of the induction of endogenous Atg8 expression, we generated a fusion construct under the control of a copper-inducible promotor (pCUP). Using varying copper concentrations supplemented to the culture medium, we verified that in these strains GFP-Atg8 was controlled by copper addition (Fig. S1). Importantly, also these strains produced more free GFP as a result of the acc1 mutation and displayed diminished levels of free GFP along with an accumulation of GFP-Atg8 punctate structures upon SorA treatment (Fig. S1, ).We corroborated our data obtained with the GFP liberation assay by means of a second approach, the alkaline phosphatase assay. This assay measures autophagic flux via biochemical quantification of a cytosolically expressed form of the alkaline phosphatase Pho8 (Pho8ΔN60). Pho8ΔN60 only becomes activated upon autophagic delivery to and proteolytic processing within the vacuole (39). In accordance with our results above, acc1 mutant cells exhibited elevated Pho8ΔN60 activity compared with the WT, whereas SorA blocked autophagic activity almost completely in WT cells and reduced it to the levels of the WT control in the acc1 mutant condition (Fig. S1). Altogether, our data demonstrate that the constitutively active acc1 mutant promotes autophagic flux.
Acc1 drives autophagic flux downstream of yeast AMPK
In WT cells, phosphorylation of Acc1Ser-1157 (24) is catalyzed by the yeastAMPK orthologue Snf1, which controls de novo FA synthesis through inhibition of Acc1 (40). Therefore, we hypothesized that Acc1-dependent modulation of autophagy may represent an important path of Snf1 effects on autophagy during aging. To address this idea, we first tested for epistatic effects of the acc1 mutant and a deletion of SNF1. As expected, SNF1 deletion increased the levels of neutral lipids compared with WT cells and even exceeded lipid levels of the acc1 mutation (Fig. 2A). Consistently, Δsnf1 mutant yeast showed elevated autophagy levels, as assessed by GFP liberation (Fig. 2, B and C) and microscopic observation of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells (Fig. 2D). Importantly, autophagy was not further enhanced by introducing acc1 into the SNF1 deletion background (Fig. 2, B–D), suggesting that Acc1-dependent metabolic adaptations act downstream of AMPK-dependent autophagy regulation in aging yeast. We strengthened this observation by testing whether restoring WT-like activity of Acc1 would prevent the increased autophagy observed in the SNF1 deletion background. SNF1 knockout cells treated with SorA displayed neutral lipid levels close to the WT (Fig. 2E) and WT-like autophagy levels (Fig. 2, F–I). These results parallel our findings on SorA-treated acc1 cells (Fig. 1, G–I) and suggest that reducing Acc1 activity reverses elevated autophagy caused by SNF1 deletion.
Figure 2.
Acc1 mediates autophagy regulation by AMPK under chronological aging conditions. WT or yeast AMPKα subunit SNF1-deleted cells (Δsnf1) combined with or without the acc1-S1157A mutation (acc1) were aged for 2 days on inositol-supplemented 2% glucose minimal medium. SorA or the solvent DMSO was applied to cultures 6 h after inoculation where indicated. A, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining. Relative fluorescence units were normalized to the WT (n = 8). B and C, representative immunoblots (B) and densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (C) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells. (n = 8). D, representative micrographs of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells according to A–C demonstrating vacuolar localization of GFP indicative of autophagy. Staining with PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. E, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining of cells with or without SorA treatment. Relative fluorescence units were normalized to the WT control (n = 8). F–H, representative immunoblots (F) and densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (G) or full-length GFP-Atg8/GAPDH levels (H) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells with or without treatment with SorA (n = 8). I, representative micrographs of cells according to E–H. PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar) ANOVA post hoc Tukey test is shown in A, C, E, G, and H. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective WT); ##, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001 (comparison as indicated). RFU, relative fluorescence units; a.u., arbitrary units.
Acc1 mediates autophagy regulation by AMPK under chronological aging conditions. WT or yeastAMPKα subunit SNF1-deleted cells (Δsnf1) combined with or without the acc1-S1157A mutation (acc1) were aged for 2 days on inositol-supplemented 2% glucose minimal medium. SorA or the solvent DMSO was applied to cultures 6 h after inoculation where indicated. A, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining. Relative fluorescence units were normalized to the WT (n = 8). B and C, representative immunoblots (B) and densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (C) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells. (n = 8). D, representative micrographs of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells according to A–C demonstrating vacuolar localization of GFP indicative of autophagy. Staining with PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. E, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining of cells with or without SorA treatment. Relative fluorescence units were normalized to the WT control (n = 8). F–H, representative immunoblots (F) and densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (G) or full-length GFP-Atg8/GAPDH levels (H) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells with or without treatment with SorA (n = 8). I, representative micrographs of cells according to E–H. PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar) ANOVA post hoc Tukey test is shown in A, C, E, G, and H. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective WT); ##, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001 (comparison as indicated). RFU, relative fluorescence units; a.u., arbitrary units.As noted above, deletion of SNF1 had an even stronger effect on lipid levels than the acc1 mutation. Because the acc1 strain carries a single mutation at Ser-1157, this could be explained by the additional Snf1-dependent phosphorylation site present at Ser-659, which presumably remained under the control of Snf1. In contrast to the epistatic effect on autophagy levels, the double mutant acc1Δsnf1 showed an additive increase in neutral lipid levels compared with the single mutations (Fig. 2A). This adds a layer of complexity to the Acc1-Snf1 metabolic interaction that could be explained by several other targets of the Snf1 kinase (41) or putatively other kinases that may target the mutated Ser-1157 site. To minimize pleiotropic effects of modulating kinase signaling upstream of Acc1, we focused on the acc1 mutant strain as a tool to gain further mechanistic insight into autophagy regulation at the cross-roads of acetyl-CoA and lipid metabolism.
Enhanced lipogenesis reduces acetate/acetyl-CoA availability concomitant with increased autophagy
We next characterized the metabolic consequences of Acc1 modulation in detail. Acc1 mutation entailed reduced levels of the acetyl-CoA precursor acetate, which, in aging yeast, is indicative of nucleocytosolic acetyl-CoA availability (32). Both extracellular and intracellular levels of acetate were strongly decreased in acc1 compared with WT cells (Fig. 3, A and B), which may represent the consequence of augmented utilization of acetyl-CoA for FA biosynthesis. The availability of nucleo-cytosolic acetyl-CoA can be rate-limiting for acetylation of histones (42) and represents an important metabolic repressor of autophagy in yeast and mammalian cells (32, 43). Consistently, the reduction in acetate induced by ACC1 mutation translated into decreased global acetylation of histone H3 at lysine residues 14 and 18 (Fig. 3, C and D). In agreement with our earlier findings (11, 44), the changes in histone acetylation inversely correlated with the abundance of the autophagy-essential protein Atg7, which increased in acc1 compared with age-matched WT cells after 2 days of chronological aging (Fig. 3, E and F).
Figure 3.
Acc1 activation stimulates autophagy in concert with changes in acetate/acetyl-CoA metabolism. WT or acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells with or without supplementation of acetate or mevalonate as indicated were aged to the indicated time points. A and B, extracellular (A) and intracellular (B) acetate quantified by NMR from medium samples and cell extracts, respectively (n = 4). C and D, representative immunoblots (C) and densitometric quantification (D) of histone H3 lysine acetylation after 2 days of aging. Blots were probed with acetylated lysine 14 (K14Ac) or 18 (K18Ac) specific antibodies or antibodies reacting to total H3 or GAPDH, which served as loading control (n = 11–12 for K14Ac, n = 8 for K18Ac). E and F, representative immunoblots (E) and quantification (F) of C-terminally 6×HA-tagged Atg7 (Atg7-HA) using HA-specific antibodies. GAPDH served as loading control (n = 3–4). G and H, extracellular (culture supernatant) acetate (G) and flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining (H), obtained from cultures receiving three consecutive additions of 100 mg/liter acetate to the medium (+ Ac). Arrows depict the times of acetate supplementation at 28, 34, and 40 h of incubation (n = 4). I and J, representative immunoblots of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells (I) and quantification of free GFP/GAPDH levels (J) by densitometry, after 2 days of aging according to G and H (n = 4). K, relative ergosterol levels (WT-normalized) quantified from shotgun MS-based lipidomics of lipid cell extracts (n = 4). L–N, representative immunoblots (L), densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (M), and neutral lipids after BODIPY staining (N) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells after 2 days of aging and treatment with mevalonate (n = 8). O, representative micrographs of 2-day-old GFP-Atg8–expressing cells after mevalonate treatment. Staining with PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. Line graphs show means ± S.D. (error bars). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. p values indicate main effects (genotype (G), time (T), and interaction between genotype and time (GxT)) of a two-way mixed-model ANOVA, with time as repeated measures in A and G. Welch's t test is used in B, D, F, and K, and ANOVA post hoc Tukey test is used in H, J, M, and N. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the WT); ###, p < 0.001 (compared with acc1). RFU, relative fluorescence units; a.u., arbitrary units.
Acc1 activation stimulates autophagy in concert with changes in acetate/acetyl-CoA metabolism. WT or acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells with or without supplementation of acetate or mevalonate as indicated were aged to the indicated time points. A and B, extracellular (A) and intracellular (B) acetate quantified by NMR from medium samples and cell extracts, respectively (n = 4). C and D, representative immunoblots (C) and densitometric quantification (D) of histone H3 lysine acetylation after 2 days of aging. Blots were probed with acetylated lysine 14 (K14Ac) or 18 (K18Ac) specific antibodies or antibodies reacting to total H3 or GAPDH, which served as loading control (n = 11–12 for K14Ac, n = 8 for K18Ac). E and F, representative immunoblots (E) and quantification (F) of C-terminally 6×HA-tagged Atg7 (Atg7-HA) using HA-specific antibodies. GAPDH served as loading control (n = 3–4). G and H, extracellular (culture supernatant) acetate (G) and flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining (H), obtained from cultures receiving three consecutive additions of 100 mg/liter acetate to the medium (+ Ac). Arrows depict the times of acetate supplementation at 28, 34, and 40 h of incubation (n = 4). I and J, representative immunoblots of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells (I) and quantification of free GFP/GAPDH levels (J) by densitometry, after 2 days of aging according to G and H (n = 4). K, relative ergosterol levels (WT-normalized) quantified from shotgun MS-based lipidomics of lipid cell extracts (n = 4). L–N, representative immunoblots (L), densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (M), and neutral lipids after BODIPY staining (N) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells after 2 days of aging and treatment with mevalonate (n = 8). O, representative micrographs of 2-day-old GFP-Atg8–expressing cells after mevalonate treatment. Staining with PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. Line graphs show means ± S.D. (error bars). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. p values indicate main effects (genotype (G), time (T), and interaction between genotype and time (GxT)) of a two-way mixed-model ANOVA, with time as repeated measures in A and G. Welch's t test is used in B, D, F, and K, and ANOVA post hoc Tukey test is used in H, J, M, and N. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the WT); ###, p < 0.001 (compared with acc1). RFU, relative fluorescence units; a.u., arbitrary units.We next aimed to test whether decreased acetate/acetyl-CoA availability or rather the downstream lipidomic changes are causal for changes in autophagy in acc1 cells. To reduce the neutral lipid content without directly affecting Acc1 enzymatic activity, we blocked de novo biosynthesis of FAs one step downstream of Acc1 using the FA synthase inhibitor cerulenin (45). Cerulenin successfully reduced the neutral lipid content as well as autophagic activity of acc1 cells to the levels of the WT (Fig. S2, ). However, cerulenin also restored extracellular acetate levels (Fig. S2), demonstrating the close metabolic interaction of these associated pathways. Interestingly, high concentrations of cerulenin (>0.8 μm) completely blunted the acc1-dependent increase in neutral lipids and retained lipid levels comparable with those in WT. Under these conditions, however, autophagy was blocked below WT levels with a concomitant increase of acetate, arguing in favor of autophagy repression by elevated levels of acetate and presumably increased acetyl-CoA availability. Next, we restored the decreased acetate levels of acc1 cultures to the concentrations observed for WT cells using three consecutive supplementations of acetate (Fig. 3G). However, neutral lipid levels (Fig. 3H) as well as autophagy (Fig. 3 (I and J) and Fig. S1 () remained significantly increased compared with WT cells, demonstrating that reduction of extracellular acetate alone is not sufficient to explain the activation of autophagy in acc1 cells.Alterations in acetate/acetyl-CoA availability may also translate into changes in mevalonate pathway metabolites (Fig. S3), including the final product of this pathway, ergosterol (46). However, under aging conditions, the single mutation of Ser-1157 (acc1 mutant) almost completely retained WT-like levels of ergosterol (Fig. 3K). To rule out a contribution of other mevalonate pathway metabolites to autophagy regulation, we supplemented mevalonate to acc1 cultures, assuming that it would replenish a potential decrease of downstream metabolites. Mevalonate is the product of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme of this pathway. Supplementing previously reported concentrations of mevalonate (47) completely reversed cell death induced by the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin in both aging WT and acc1 cells (Fig. S3) and restored lowered neutral lipid levels of acc1 cells after fluvastatin treatment (Fig. S3). However, mevalonate supplementation did not prevent the strong increase in autophagy in acc1 compared with WT cells, evident from an increased free GFP generation and elevated number and intensity of vacuolar GFP-positive cells (Fig. 3, L–O), irrespective of mevalonate treatment, at least after 2 days of aging.
Inhibition of Acc1 shortens the chronological life span of yeast without alterations in acetate metabolism
We next analyzed whether the reduced LD formation of SorA-treated cells affected general cell viability (48) or the principal capability to form new membranes, a process also crucial for autophagosome formation. For instance, the ability to reinitiate growth when stationary yeast are transferred into fresh medium requires utilization of lipid stores, presumably by providing essential lipid building blocks for membrane biology (31). To compare the growth reinitiation capacity of SorA-treated with that of untreated (control) cells, post-mitotic cultures (Main culture after 25 h, Fig. S4) were again transferred into the respective fresh media containing SorA or not (Shift culture), and their growth was followed by automated optical density (OD) measurements. This experiment revealed similar initial growth kinetics of SorA-treated compared with untreated control cells (first 4 h of the Shift culture, Fig. S4) but expectedly exhibited slowed growth at later time points (>4-h time points of the Shift culture, Fig. S4). This suggests that under the selected experimental conditions of the Main culture, SorA-treated post-mitotic yeast still contained sufficient lipid stores to maintain general cell viability and generate new functional membranes early during aging.Because functional autophagy is required for stress resistance and cell survival in aging yeast (11, 49), we now tested whether the SorA-induced block in autophagy affected chronological life span. SorA treatment dramatically shortened the life span of WT cells (Fig. 4A). Compared with untreated controls, SorA-treated cells displayed reduced clonogenic survival assessed by cfu (Fig. 4A) as well as an elevated number of propidium iodide (PrI)-positive cells (Fig. 4B), indicative of increased cell death (48). In contrast, SorA failed to reduce the life span of acc1 mutant cells (Fig. 4, A and B), consistent with our observation that acc1 retained autophagic activity under this condition (Fig. 1, G–I). We observed similar effects in the SNF1 deletion background, which lacks Acc1 inhibition by phosphorylation; the toxic effects of SorA after 2 days of aging were significantly reduced in Δsnf1 cells, possibly as a result of maintained autophagic levels (Fig. S4). These findings go in line with the allosteric mode of action of SorA to inhibit Acc1 (50) and argue for an Acc1-specific mechanism of SorA-induced cell death and inhibition of autophagy.
Figure 4.
Inhibition of Acc1 accelerates aging without alterations in acetate/acetyl-CoA metabolism. WT and acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells with or without SorA treatment were aged until the indicated time points on 2% glucose minimal medium. A, survival analysis of chronologically aging yeast assessed by cfu (clonogenicity) (n = 8). B, cell death assessed by PrI staining (PrI-positive cells) of cells according to A and quantified using flow cytometry (n = 8). C, extracellular acetate quantified enzymatically from culture supernatants (n = 4). D and E, densitometry-based quantification (D) and representative immunoblots (E) of histone H3 lysine 14 (K14) or 18 (K18) acetylation in WT cells (with and without SorA treatment) after 2 days of aging (n = 8). F and G, quantification (F) of C-terminally 6×HA-tagged Atg7 (Atg7–6HA) after 2 days of aging normalized to GAPDH by densitometry of immunoblots representatively shown in G (n = 7–8). Line graphs show means ± S.D. (error bars). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. p values indicate main effects (time (T), genotype (G), and respective interactions (GxT)) of a two-way mixed-model ANOVA with time as repeated measures in B. ANOVA post hoc Tukey test is used in F, and Welch's t test is used in C and D. ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective untreated control; Control); #, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective WT). a.u., arbitrary units.
Inhibition of Acc1 accelerates aging without alterations in acetate/acetyl-CoA metabolism. WT and acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells with or without SorA treatment were aged until the indicated time points on 2% glucose minimal medium. A, survival analysis of chronologically aging yeast assessed by cfu (clonogenicity) (n = 8). B, cell death assessed by PrI staining (PrI-positive cells) of cells according to A and quantified using flow cytometry (n = 8). C, extracellular acetate quantified enzymatically from culture supernatants (n = 4). D and E, densitometry-based quantification (D) and representative immunoblots (E) of histone H3 lysine 14 (K14) or 18 (K18) acetylation in WT cells (with and without SorA treatment) after 2 days of aging (n = 8). F and G, quantification (F) of C-terminally 6×HA-tagged Atg7 (Atg7–6HA) after 2 days of aging normalized to GAPDH by densitometry of immunoblots representatively shown in G (n = 7–8). Line graphs show means ± S.D. (error bars). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. p values indicate main effects (time (T), genotype (G), and respective interactions (GxT)) of a two-way mixed-model ANOVA with time as repeated measures in B. ANOVA post hoc Tukey test is used in F, and Welch's t test is used in C and D. ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective untreated control; Control); #, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective WT). a.u., arbitrary units.As a result of reduced de novo production of lipids, inhibition of Acc1 may also affect the FA precursor acetyl-CoA. We reasoned that increased availability of acetyl-CoA may in turn lead to elevated histone acetylation and reduced ATG7 transcription (32). However, treatment with SorA neither increased the levels of acetate (Fig. 4C) nor acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 14 or 18 (Fig. 4, D and E). It also failed to significantly reduce the protein levels of Atg7 (Fig. 4, F and G). This goes in line with the observation that GFP-Atg8 is sufficiently expressed and accumulates upon SorA treatment (Fig. 1 (G and H), right). Moreover, Atg7 protein levels remained unchanged in acc1 compared with WT cells when treated with SorA (WT + SorA compared with acc1 + SorA condition; Fig. 4 (F and G)), despite complete restoration of both SorA-induced depletion of neutral lipids (Fig. 1F) and autophagic activity in acc1 cells (Fig. 1, G–I). At this point, we again addressed the potential contribution of the mevalonate pathway, because excess acetyl-CoA may also be shuttled into ergosterol biosynthesis. However, ergosterol levels remained constant irrespective of SorA treatment (Fig. S4). In addition, exposure to fluvastatin at subtoxic levels in WT cells (Fig. S4), which should reverse any potential flux into the mevalonate pathway, did not restore autophagy in WT cells treated with SorA, whereas the BODIPY-detectable neutral lipid levels were affected, confirming the effectiveness of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (Fig. S4, ). In sum, maintenance of physiological rates of autophagy in aging post-mitotic yeast requires functional Acc1, whereas inhibition of Acc1 blocks autophagy and reduces life span independent of upstream acetate/acetyl-CoA or mevalonate metabolism.
Acc1-dependent regulation of autophagy is independent of triglyceride formation and acts downstream of inositol availability
Constitutive activation of Acc1 enhanced autophagy concomitant with a strong increase in BODIPY-detectable neutral lipids. Neutral lipids are normally stored in LDs, which are mainly composed of steryl esters (SE) and TG. Mass spectrometry–based quantification of SE and TG levels revealed TG as the main neutral lipid class that increased in response to Acc1-mediated lipogenesis (Fig. S5) and decreased upon SorA-mediated inhibition of Acc1 (Fig. S5). In contrast, SE levels were only slightly augmented in response to acc1 mutation (Fig. S5) and were not affected by treatment with SorA (Fig. S5). We therefore asked whether formation of TG was essential for enhanced autophagy in acc1 cells and deleted the two enzymes responsible for TG formation from diacylglycerols (Lro1 and Dga1). Both in WT (containing TG) and Δlro1Δdga1 (devoid of TG) yeast strains, modulation of Acc1 activity resulted in comparable autophagic flux changes as indicated by GFP liberation and microscopic observation of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells (Fig. S5, ). Thus, this argues for a TG-independent mechanism of autophagy regulation by Acc1 metabolic effects.Another reported downstream consequence of constitutive Acc1 activation involves lipid metabolism-dependent alterations in inositol availability. Constitutive Acc1 was shown to cause inositol auxotrophy as a result of Opi1 nuclear translocation and thus suppression of INO1 transcription (24, 51). Moreover, culturing yeast in inositol-free medium ameliorated the autophagy impairment of LD-deficientyeast subjected to nitrogen starvation, presumably by modulating PL composition (21). We therefore asked whether changes in inositol availability may explain the increased autophagic activity upon Acc1 activation. Notably, our standard experimental conditions contained sufficient amount of inositol in the growth medium to allow WT-like growth of acc1 cultures (Fig. S1). Nevertheless, to rule out autophagy induction by inositol depletion, we supplemented the growth medium with excess amounts of inositol. NMR spectroscopy–based quantification of inositol from both cellular extracts and culture supernatants confirmed similar availability of inositol in acc1 and WT cells after supplementation of inositol (Fig. 5, A and B). However, excess amounts of inositol did not prevent the increased autophagy observed in acc1 mutant cells, as evident from microscopic analysis of GFP-Atg8 localization (Fig. 5C) and from GFP liberation efficiency (Fig. 5, D and E). However, inositol suppressed autophagy in WT cells along with a reduction in the protein levels of Acc1 (Fig. 5D), consistent with a pro-autophagic function of Acc1 and the fact that Acc1 is regulated by the inositol-repressible Ino2/Ino4/Opi1 circuit (23, 52). Autophagy modulation by Acc1, therefore, operates independently of the availability of inositol. Instead, Acc1 appears to function downstream of inositol, as inositol suppresses Acc1 transcription at least under the conditions of cellular aging studied herein.
Figure 5.
Acc1 promotes autophagy independent of inositol availability. WT or acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells were aged on 2% glucose minimal medium and supplemented with extra 750 μm inositol (Inositol) or the solvent water (Control). A and B, intracellular (A) and extracellular (B) inositol quantified by NMR from cell extracts and culture supernatants, respectively, after 2 days of aging. (n = 4). C–E, representative micrographs (C), immunoblots (D), and densitometric quantification of free GFP (E, left) or full-length GFP-Atg8 (E, right) normalized to GAPDH of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells after 2 days of aging. Bar, 5 μm (n = 6). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar). Dashed lines depict the lower limit of detection in A and B. p values indicate main effects (genotype (G), treatment (Trm), and interaction between genotype and treatment (GxTrm)) of a two-way ANOVA in E. **, p < 0.01 (compared with the respective untreated control; Control); ###, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective WT). n.d., not detectable. a.u., arbitrary units.
Acc1 promotes autophagy independent of inositol availability. WT or acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells were aged on 2% glucose minimal medium and supplemented with extra 750 μm inositol (Inositol) or the solvent water (Control). A and B, intracellular (A) and extracellular (B) inositol quantified by NMR from cell extracts and culture supernatants, respectively, after 2 days of aging. (n = 4). C–E, representative micrographs (C), immunoblots (D), and densitometric quantification of free GFP (E, left) or full-length GFP-Atg8 (E, right) normalized to GAPDH of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells after 2 days of aging. Bar, 5 μm (n = 6). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar). Dashed lines depict the lower limit of detection in A and B. p values indicate main effects (genotype (G), treatment (Trm), and interaction between genotype and treatment (GxTrm)) of a two-way ANOVA in E. **, p < 0.01 (compared with the respective untreated control; Control); ###, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective WT). n.d., not detectable. a.u., arbitrary units.
Impaired autophagy upon Acc1 inhibition manifests in vacuolar fusion defects
To characterize the mechanism by which Acc1-dependent metabolic adaptations maintain basal autophagic flux in aging yeast, we first used SorA to test whether key components of the Atg machinery were affected by Acc1 inhibition. The lipidation of Atg8 (Atg8-II), which causes a shift in electrophoretic ability, was unaffected by SorA treatment (Fig. S6), suggesting that the Atg8 lipidation machinery was functional even after Acc1 inhibition. Monitoring Ape1-RFP localization as a marker of the pre-autophagosomal structure (PAS) in the background of autophagy-incompetent ATG1 deletion strains allows for testing whether GFP-Atg8 properly localizes to the PAS, which is a prerequisite for autophagosome formation (53). Epifluorescence microscopy revealed that GFP-Atg8 co-localized with Ape1-RFP and thus did localize to the PAS (Fig. S6) irrespective of SorA treatment. This suggests that Acc1-dependent regulation of autophagy occurs downstream of Atg1. Similarly, we did not observe SorA-induced GFP-Atg8 puncta formation in the background of a VPS30 (ATG6) deletion strain, again arguing for effects of Acc1 inhibition downstream of Atg6 (Fig. S6). Because early events of the autophagy cascade and autophagic signaling appeared largely unaffected by SorA, we next monitored GFP-Atg8 puncta formation using time-resolved microscopy. At early time points (10-h culture incubation, which is 4-h after SorA application; Fig. 6A), GFP-Atg8 mainly co-localized with Ape1-RFP puncta (i.e. the PAS) in both control and SorA-treated cells. At later time points, GFP as well as RFP signals were detected within the vacuole in control cells (Fig. 6A), suggesting functional autophagy as well as a cytoplasm-to-vacuole-targeting (CVT) pathway, a biosynthetic delivery system that operates via the autophagy machinery. In contrast, from the 10-h time point (4 h after SorA application) onward, SorA-treated cells formed GFP punctate structures that did not co-localize with Ape1-RFP (Fig. 6A). This may indicate accumulation of autophagosomes in SorA-treated cells and thus a defect downstream of autophagy initiation and autophagosome formation. Interestingly, Ape1-RFP transport to the vacuole was completely abrogated in SorA-treated cells (Fig. 6A), suggesting an impaired CVT pathway. Overall, these data suggest a largely functional Atg machinery involved in the initiation and formation of autophagosomes as well as an active autophagic signaling status even after SorA treatment.
Figure 6.
Acc1 inhibition disrupts autophagosome–vacuole fusion and vacuolar acidification. WT and acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells were aged until the indicated time points on 2% glucose minimal medium. SorA or the solvent DMSO was applied to cultures 6 h after inoculation. A, representative micrographs of WT cells expressing GFP-Atg8 and the PAS marker Ape1-RFP after 10 or 14 h of incubation with SorA. Bar, 5 μm. B, representative micrographs of WT or ATG15 deletion mutant (Δatg15) cells expressing GFP-Atg8 and the vacuolar membrane marker Vph1-mCherry after 14 h of incubation with SorA. Bar, 5 μm. C, representative micrographs of cells stained with the vacuolar acidity indicator quinacrine after 24 h of incubation (day 1). Staining with PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. D, in vitro activity of the vacuolar protease Pep4 in whole-cell extracts at 14 h (top) or 24 h (bottom) after inoculation. Relative Pep4 activity was normalized to the WT (n = 3). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar). Welch's t test is used in D.
Acc1 inhibition disrupts autophagosome–vacuole fusion and vacuolar acidification. WT and acc1-S1157A mutant (acc1) yeast cells were aged until the indicated time points on 2% glucose minimal medium. SorA or the solvent DMSO was applied to cultures 6 h after inoculation. A, representative micrographs of WT cells expressing GFP-Atg8 and the PAS marker Ape1-RFP after 10 or 14 h of incubation with SorA. Bar, 5 μm. B, representative micrographs of WT or ATG15 deletion mutant (Δatg15) cells expressing GFP-Atg8 and the vacuolar membrane marker Vph1-mCherry after 14 h of incubation with SorA. Bar, 5 μm. C, representative micrographs of cells stained with the vacuolar acidity indicator quinacrine after 24 h of incubation (day 1). Staining with PrI served to exclude dead cells from analysis. Bar, 5 μm. D, in vitro activity of the vacuolar protease Pep4 in whole-cell extracts at 14 h (top) or 24 h (bottom) after inoculation. Relative Pep4 activity was normalized to the WT (n = 3). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar). Welch's t test is used in D.We next addressed later steps in the autophagic cascade by comparing deletion mutants of intravacuolar autophagic body degradation (Δatg15) with the phenotypes observed after SorA treatment. As expected, Δatg15 cells displayed intravacuolar GFP-Atg8 fluorescent structures. However, after the addition of SorA, intravacuolar GFP structures disappeared, and Δatg15 cells were indistinguishable from WT cells treated with SorA (Fig. 6B). This argues for an interference of SorA with the autophagic cascade preceding intravacuolar degradation of autophagic bodies. Strikingly, both epifluorescence (Fig. 6B) and confocal (Fig. S6) imaging revealed that the major part (∼75%; Fig. S6) of the GFP punctate structures localized adjacent to or at the vacuolar membrane, which was visualized using mCherry fusion constructs of the vacuolar proton-translocating ATPase (V-ATPase) subunit Vph1. Interestingly, we observed enhanced Vph1-mCherry fluorescence intensities (Fig. S6). Because Vph1 is required for in vivo assembly and activity of the V-ATPase (54, 55), we speculated that changes in Vph1-mCherry fluorescence intensity might indicate potential changes in vacuolar acidification. Indeed, staining with quinacrine, a dye that accumulates in acidic compartments (56, 57), revealed that SorA-treated yeast cells lacked vacuolar acidification and accumulated acidic vesicles at the surface of the vacuolar membrane (Fig. 6C). At the same time, inhibition of Acc1 did not impair the activity of the master vacuolar protease Pep4 as assayed in vitro from cellular protein extracts (Fig. 6D). This argues for intact vacuolar proteolytic activity and supports the notion that Acc1 inhibition impacts autophagic flux upstream of vacuolar degradation capacity. Altogether, these findings strongly argue for a vacuolar fusion defect upon Acc1 inhibition that translates into late-stage inhibition of autophagic flux.
Oleate supplementation mimics Acc1 activation and restores vacuolar fusion defects after Acc1 inhibition
A previous study demonstrated acc1 cells to contain an elevated lipid content predominantly composed of C18:1 (oleic acid) acyl chains (24). Consistently, supplementation of external oleate phenocopied consequences of the acc1-S1157A mutation, including inositol auxotrophy (24). We therefore asked whether an external supply of oleate would also phenocopy Acc1-dependent changes in lipid profiles and autophagy during post-mitotic aging. Indeed, after 2 days of chronological aging, oleate-supplemented WT cells displayed increased neutral lipid content (Fig. 7A) and elicited similar lipidomic changes as observed for acc1 mutant yeast (Fig. 7 (B and C) and Fig. S7). Approximately 65% of the variance in the lipid species content detected in a lipidomics analysis was shared by acc1 and oleate-treated cells (changes along principal component 1 (PC1) of a principal component analysis; Fig. S7 (). Moreover, oleate supplementation increased overall acyl chain length (Fig. 7B) but had little effects on the degree of unsaturation (Fig. S7), akin to what was observed for acc1 mutant cells compared with the WT after 2 days of aging (Fig. 7C and Fig. S7). Importantly, supplementation of oleate to aging WT yeast was sufficient to boost autophagy (Fig. 7, D–F), yet to a lesser degree than detected in acc1 cells (compare with Fig. 1). This induction occurred in an ATG6- and ATG7-dependent manner, showing that oleate induces autophagy in a canonical fashion during aging (Fig. 7F and Fig. S7 ().
Figure 7.
Supplementation of oleic acid partly mimics WT yeast cells were supplemented with 0.01 or 0.03% (w/v) oleate or the solvent tergitol (Control) 6 h after inoculation and aged until the indicated time points on 2% glucose minimal medium. SorA or the solvent DMSO was applied to cultures 6 h after inoculation where indicated. A, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining of 2-day-old WT cells supplemented with oleate. Relative fluorescence units (RFU) were normalized to the WT control (n = 4). B and C, average acyl chain length of different classes of glycerolipids calculated from the lipidomic profiles according to Fig. S7 (. B and C, the effects of 0.03% (w/v) oleate treatment (Oleate) (B) and of the acc1-S1157A mutation (acc1) (C) compared with the respective solvent-treated (Control) or WT controls, respectively (n = 4). D, representative micrographs of 2-day-old GFP-Atg8–expressing WT cells supplemented with 0.03% (w/v) oleate. Bar, 5 μm. E, quantification of free GFP/GAPDH in WT cells from immunoblots representatively shown in E. Data were normalized to the solvent control (n = 4). F, representative immunoblots of 2-day-old GFP-Atg8–expressing WT, Δatg6, or Δatg7 cells. G, representative micrographs of cells expressing GFP-Atg8 and the vacuolar membrane marker Vph1-mCherry 30 h after inoculation (day 1). Bar, 5 μm. H and I, representative immunoblots (H) and densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (I, left) or full-length GFP-Atg8/GAPDH levels (I, right) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells at 8 or 30 h after inoculation (n = 8). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar). ANOVA post hoc Tukey test is used in A, E, and I. ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective untreated control); #, p < 0.05; ###, p < 0.001 (comparison as indicated). a.u., arbitrary units.
Supplementation of oleic acid partly mimics WT yeast cells were supplemented with 0.01 or 0.03% (w/v) oleate or the solvent tergitol (Control) 6 h after inoculation and aged until the indicated time points on 2% glucose minimal medium. SorA or the solvent DMSO was applied to cultures 6 h after inoculation where indicated. A, flow cytometric quantification of neutral lipids after BODIPY staining of 2-day-old WT cells supplemented with oleate. Relative fluorescence units (RFU) were normalized to the WT control (n = 4). B and C, average acyl chain length of different classes of glycerolipids calculated from the lipidomic profiles according to Fig. S7 (. B and C, the effects of 0.03% (w/v) oleate treatment (Oleate) (B) and of the acc1-S1157A mutation (acc1) (C) compared with the respective solvent-treated (Control) or WT controls, respectively (n = 4). D, representative micrographs of 2-day-old GFP-Atg8–expressing WT cells supplemented with 0.03% (w/v) oleate. Bar, 5 μm. E, quantification of free GFP/GAPDH in WT cells from immunoblots representatively shown in E. Data were normalized to the solvent control (n = 4). F, representative immunoblots of 2-day-old GFP-Atg8–expressing WT, Δatg6, or Δatg7 cells. G, representative micrographs of cells expressing GFP-Atg8 and the vacuolar membrane marker Vph1-mCherry 30 h after inoculation (day 1). Bar, 5 μm. H and I, representative immunoblots (H) and densitometric quantification of free GFP/GAPDH (I, left) or full-length GFP-Atg8/GAPDH levels (I, right) of GFP-Atg8–expressing cells at 8 or 30 h after inoculation (n = 8). Dot plots show all data points along with the mean (line) ± S.D. (error bar). ANOVA post hoc Tukey test is used in A, E, and I. ***, p < 0.001 (compared with the respective untreated control); #, p < 0.05; ###, p < 0.001 (comparison as indicated). a.u., arbitrary units.Finally, we tested whether oleate was capable of reversing the autophagy defect induced by SorA-mediated Acc1 inhibition. The combined treatment of SorA together with 0.01 or 0.03% oleate expectedly prevented the drop in neutral lipid levels observed with SorA alone or even exceeded that of control cultures (Fig. S7). Strikingly, oleate supplementation completely prevented SorA-induced accumulation of GFP-Atg8 puncta at the vacuolar membrane and restored intravacuolar GFP signals (Fig. 7G). Consistently, the accumulation of GFP-Atg8 protein levels in SorA-treated yeast as determined via immunoblotting was reversed upon oleate supplementation and dropped again to the levels of control cultures (Fig. 7 (H and I) and Fig. S7). However, autophagic flux, as indicated by the formation of free GFP, was only partly restored by oleate (Fig. 7 (H and I) and Fig. S7), arguing for more complex FA requirements to fully restore physiological levels of autophagy. Overall, our results point to a causal role of lipidomic changes in the regulation of age-associated autophagy downstream of Acc1.
Discussion
In this study, we show that the cytosolic acetyl-CoA carboxylase Acc1 is required for efficient induction of autophagy and maintenance of cell survival in chronologically aging yeast. Constitutive activation of Acc1 through mutation of one of the yeastAMPK (Snf1) phosphorylation sites was sufficient to increase, whereas inhibition of Acc1 blocked, autophagic flux during cellular aging. Additional phosphorylation sites of Snf1 have been described for yeastAcc1 (25). These additional sites may also contribute to regulation of Acc1 activity and autophagy during post-mitotic aging. In fact, forced fatty acid synthesis by mutation of both Snf1-dependent sites together (S659A and S1157A) led to prominent metabolic alterations, including increased fatty acid and general lipid content, and, interestingly, up-regulated genes involved in autophagosome assembly (48). Indeed, deletion of Snf1 strongly induced autophagy under conditions of chronological aging in yeast and thus phenocopied our findings observed by acc1-S1157A mutation. With regard to the levels of autophagy, acc1 mutation appears epistatic to SNF1 deletion, and, more importantly, the increased autophagy mediated by SNF1 deletion could be reversed by simultaneous inhibition of Acc1. This strongly argues for Acc1 as a crucial target of Snf1-dependent autophagy control under the conditions of post-mitotic aging in yeast. Interestingly, experiments performed with mouse embryonic fibroblasts revealed a similar role of autophagy inhibition by AMPK upon glucose starvation (58). The authors of that study attributed the AMPK-mediated inhibition of autophagic flux in part to ULK1-independent suppression of lysosome acidification (58). This appears in line with our observation that direct inhibition of Acc1, which is an important function of AMPK in both yeast and mammals (59), similarly led to loss of lysosome acidification, accumulation of acidic vesicles at the lysosomal membrane, and loss of autophagic flux likely due to impaired vacuolar fusion of autophagosomes. It is thus tempting to speculate that Acc1-dependent metabolic alterations mechanistically explain AMPK-mediated effects on late-stage autophagy block upon glucose starvation. The precise role of Acc1 in translating the autophagic response to AMPK/Snf1 modulations (41) will be an important question to be addressed in future work: What is the relation of Acc1 to other autophagy-relevant targets of AMPK (e.g. ULK1/Atg1), and how does this relate to autophagy signaling by the TOR kinase complexes?Whereas the underlying mechanisms of Acc1-driven autophagy remain to be further clarified, our data suggest distinct metabolic routes of regulation (Fig. 8). On the one hand, we demonstrate that de novo FA synthesis is tightly linked to acetate/acetyl-CoA availability under specific conditions. On the other hand, lipidomic alterations are likely to contribute to the autophagic response downstream of Acc1. Acetate/acetyl-CoA availability may affect autophagy through histone acetylation and ATG gene transcription as well as via cytosolic protein acetylation (32, 43) and appears relevant in conditions of enhanced Acc1 activity. Along this line, autophagic flux was partially reduced by resupplementation of acetate to acc1 cultures (see Fig. 3J and Fig. S1 (), indicating that alterations in acetate metabolism may indeed contribute to the full autophagic response after activation of lipogenesis. The mevalonate pathway does not appear to play a major role in Acc1-modulated autophagy during aging, as acc1-induced activation of autophagy was not prevented by mevalonate supplementation. Consistently, autophagy remained also unaffected by the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin after SorA treatment.
Figure 8.
Metabolic alterations orchestrate Acc1-dependent autophagy. A scheme depicts a working model of how Acc1-dependent lipogenesis drives autophagy in aging cells. Upon Acc1 activation (or after supplementation of oleic acid), increased production of fatty acids and associated lipidomic alterations result in increased autophagic flux. In addition, autophagic activity may be co-regulated by acetate/acetyl-CoA availability upstream of Acc1's metabolic reaction. Mechanistically, Acc1-dependent metabolic consequences provide a cellular lipid profile that facilitates vacuolar fusion capacity and thus allows completion of the autophagic cascade.
Metabolic alterations orchestrate Acc1-dependent autophagy. A scheme depicts a working model of how Acc1-dependent lipogenesis drives autophagy in aging cells. Upon Acc1 activation (or after supplementation of oleic acid), increased production of fatty acids and associated lipidomic alterations result in increased autophagic flux. In addition, autophagic activity may be co-regulated by acetate/acetyl-CoA availability upstream of Acc1's metabolic reaction. Mechanistically, Acc1-dependent metabolic consequences provide a cellular lipid profile that facilitates vacuolar fusion capacity and thus allows completion of the autophagic cascade.The autophagy block after inhibition of Acc1 by SorA appears to be solely dependent on downstream metabolic alterations, because acetate levels, the acetylation status of histones, and ATG gene expression all remained largely unaffected under this condition. Thus, the route of acetate utilization by de novo lipogenesis at normal physiological rates does not appear to be rate-limiting for histone acetylation. This is in contrast to the role of the mitochondrial path of acetate utilization catalyzed by the CoA-transferase Ach1, which causes histone hyperacetylation when impaired (32, 60). Based on the observed metabolic consequences of the acc1 mutant background, it will be interesting to test (although counterintuitive at first sight) whether increased utilization of acetate/acetyl-CoA through enhanced lipogenesis could counteract pathologies associated with protein hyperacetylation, such as maladaptive metabolic responses to alcohol (61) or even chronic high-fat diet (62).In support of the notion that lipids (downstream of Acc1-dependent lipogenesis) are important as pro-autophagic molecules, oleate supplementation to aging WT yeast mimicked aspects of the activity-enhancing acc1-S1157A mutation, including increased neutral lipid content, increased overall acyl chain length of various lipid species, and enhanced autophagic activity. This goes in line with the previously reported shift of the cellular FA content from C16 to C18 (including increased oleate content) upon S1157A mutation of Acc1 (24). Interestingly, supplementation of oleate to growing mammalian cells also induces autophagy in an acute response, yet in a noncanonical way (63). Similarly, yeast lipophagy is activated in an ATG6-independent fashion (63). Our data suggest that, during chronological aging, a well-described and physiologically relevant scenario of stationary (post-mitotic) yeast cells (10, 64–66), the supplementation of oleate drives canonical autophagy, as the liberation of GFP from GFP-Atg8 was completely blunted by deletion of ATG6 or ATG7.The crucial involvement of lipids to facilitate autophagy downstream of Acc1 is underlined by our finding that external oleate (i) prevents the accumulation of GFP-Atg8 punctate structures and (ii) partly restores autophagic flux in cells treated with the Acc1 inhibitor SorA. The fact that SorA treatment produced Ape1-negative GFP-Atg8 puncta at or in close proximity to the vacuolar membrane strongly suggests formation of autophagosomes, which, however, fail to fuse with the vacuole. These results thus argue for late-stage inhibition of autophagy and go hand in hand with the observation that SorA-treated yeast cells fail to induce vacuole acidification, a process interlinked with normal vacuolar function and, for instance, homotypic fusion of vacuoles (67). We have not tested the possibility that, in addition to fusion defects, SorA treatment affects autophagosome formation rate (i.e. the number or formation kinetics of autophagosomes). Nevertheless, the accumulation of GFP-Atg8 punctate structures argues for autophagosomes that fail to fuse with the vacuole, resulting in the lack of GFP liberation and therefore impaired autophagic flux. Of note, we observed a considerable (∼25%) fraction of GFP-Atg8 punctate structures apart from Vph1-mCherry–positive membranes (Fig. S7). Therefore, we cannot fully rule out mislocalization of GFP-Atg8 to other compartments upon SorA treatment. For instance, a similar phenotype has been observed upon mutation of the cis-Golgi–localized t-SNARE protein Sed5 (68). Sed5-1 mutant cells display defects in vesicular transport due to impaired membrane fusion, resulting in dispersedly distributed Atg8 dots, which raises the possibility of parallels to our observations.Intriguingly, the precise cellular lipid composition is pivotal for vacuolar fusion capacity and involves various classes of lipids, including DGs, phosphatidic acids, and PI phosphates (69). We therefore propose a lipid-dependent process downstream of Acc1 that facilitates or prevents vacuolar acidification, vacuolar fusion competence, and thus the capacity to promote or block autophagic flux, respectively. However, whether Acc1-dependent lipidomic alterations directly impact vacuolar fusion capacity or, alternatively, act via regulation of vacuolar acidification, which is a prerequisite for vacuolar fusion in yeast (67), remains an open question. Although oleate restored the vacuolar fusion defects, it failed to recover cell survival of SorA-treated yeast upon aging (data not shown), which is consistent with the incomplete restoration of autophagic flux. The lipid requirements that fully complement Acc1 defects are expected to be complex and may require the supplementation of other FA molecules beside oleate. Identifying these additional FAs may uncover the lipidomic needs to maintain full autophagic flux and cell survival in post-mitotic aging.We extend previous findings that functional lipid storage and associated metabolism are crucial for autophagy regulation in yeast, in particular after nitrogen starvation (18–20). In this context, LDs mainly act by buffering FFAs to limit FFA-induced ER stress and by modulating PL compositions (21). For these reasons, de novo synthesis of FA rather appears to block autophagy in LD-deficient yeast (21). Here, we used WT cells, which are fully capable of TG and SE production. In our model, the biosynthesis of FAs seems essential for autophagy and cell survival, at least during chronological aging. Despite increased production of FAs and associated elevation of several distinct lipid species upon activated lipogenesis, Acc1 activity positively correlates with autophagic flux in WT cells likely because neutral lipid storages succeed to buffer excess FFAs, thus limiting FFA-induced stress. We further asked whether TGs themselves were essential molecules to mediate the effects downstream of Acc1 during cellular aging. However, the formation of TGs appeared dispensable to maintain normal autophagy in post-mitotic yeast, as deletion of TG synthesis did not change physiological rates of autophagy or prevent the autophagy-inducing effects of enhancing Acc1 activity. Notably, the ability to form SE could be sufficient to replace some functions of TGs, such as buffering FFA, even in the absence of TG synthesis. Whether TG formation becomes more important in Acc1-induced autophagy under conditions in which cells cannot produce SE and to what extent SE may replace TG function should be addressed in more detail. Despite being prominently affected in their abundance, our data show that TGs are not essential for Acc1-dependent effects on autophagy and thus point to other classes of lipids.Interestingly, both conditions that we here show to promote autophagy (i.e. enhancing Acc1 activity or supplementing oleate) were previously demonstrated to display inositol auxotrophy (25). This raises the question of whether changes in inositol, previously linked to autophagy regulation (70, 71), mediate Acc1- and oleate-dependent autophagy. This would be in line with previous work showing that inositol depletion restores autophagy in LD-deficient cells upon nitrogen starvation (21). Nevertheless, our data and those of Velazquez et al. (21) suggest that not inositol itself, but rather its effects on the precise cellular lipid composition, determine autophagic activity. In line with this, we found that inositol supplementation suppressed autophagy along with a reduction in Acc1 protein levels, arguing for Acc1 to act even downstream of inositol.Oleate supplementation was shown to extend the life span of flies and worms (72, 73). Moreover, previous studies have revealed Acc1 to be required for dietary restriction-induced longevity and starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster (74). Therefore, it appears plausible that Acc1 represents an important link between the metabolic regulation of autophagy and healthy aging. Autophagy is required for life span extension upon dietary or caloric restriction in several organisms (5, 75, 76). We demonstrate that Acc1 is required for autophagy at least in post-mitotic models of cellular aging. Thus, Acc1-dependent de novo lipogenesis could be an important contributor to known health-promoting dietary regimes, which induce or enable the autophagic response. In particular, this may be crucial in the absence of external lipid sources and thus supports the idea that lipogenesis can have important beneficial effects, for instance, in conditions of lipid-associated disorders (77). Acc1 has been demonstrated to regulate Th17 cell–dependent autoimmune responses in mice (78). Moreover, inhibition of Acc1 impaired survival and stress resistance of cancer cells in culture (79, 80) and has been shown to be required for growth and viability of non-small-cell lung cancer in vivo in preclinical animal models (81). Additional work will be necessary to investigate a potential role of autophagy under such pathophysiological conditions. Despite the concept that cancer cells exhibit dependence on de novo lipogenesis, which may fulfill their lipid biosynthetic demands, autophagy promotion by Acc1 could be of similar importance; given its essential role in cancer cell viability and growth of certain types of cancers or specific tumor contexts, autophagy is similarly suspected to provide tumors with metabolic flexibility (82). Understanding the mechanisms of Acc1-dependent autophagy regulation may therefore help to develop more efficient strategies against age-associated disease.
Experimental procedures
Yeast strains and molecular biology
All experiments were carried out in S. cerevisiae BY4741 WT yeast and respective mutant strains depicted in Table S1. BY4741acc1-S1157A (acc1 mutant resulted from crossing and subsequent tetrad dissection of BY4741 Mat a WT and a BY4742 Mat α strain harboring the acc1-S1157A mutation (gift from S. D. Kohlwein (24)). Mutants were selected on YPD plates containing 1 μg/ml soraphen A. EGFP-Atg8 fusion strains were generated by recombination after linear PCR fragment transformation as described previously (83) using a modified pYM-N37 plasmid (pYM-pATG8) as template and primers as described (32), which generates EGFP-ATG8 fusion constructs under control of the endogenous pATG8 promoter. Similarly, 3HA tagging of Atg8 and introduction of a MET25 promoter was conducted using pYM-N36 as a template. To generate respective strains with a copper-controlled promotor (CUP1) the pYM-N4 plasmid (83) was used as a template. C-terminally 6×HA-tagged ATG7 strains were generated as described (32). SNF1 and ATG15 knockout strains were generated using pFA-hphNT1 (83) and pUG6 plasmids as templates (84), respectively. Deletion of PEP4 was performed in BY4741 WT and Δatg7 strains using pUG27 as a template. For all primers used in this study, see Table S2. All mutants were selected on SD −His or YPD plates containing 250 μg/ml nourseothricin (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog no. 74667), 300 μg/ml hygromycin B (Invivogen, catalog no. ant hg 5), or 300 μg/ml G418 (Carl Roth, catalog no. 0239) or as appropriate. Strains containing Ape1-RFP fusions were derived from transformation of the AflII linearized integrative plasmid pPS128 (53) (kindly provided by F. Reggiori and D. J. Klionsky) and selection on SD −Leu plates. For all strains generated herein, at least three different clones were tested for comparable phenotype and, to rule out clonogenic variations, used for the experiments throughout this study.
Chronological aging experiments and yeast culture conditions
Chronological aging experiments were performed as described using SC 2% glucose medium and culturing at 28 °C under shaking conditions (145 rpm). Clonogenic survival was determined by plating 500 cells on YPD agar and calculating the cfu after 2 days of incubation at 28 °C (64). Cell death was quantified by flow cytometry after PrI staining (11, 85). For inositol supplementation experiments, myoinositol (Sigma, I5125) was added at a final concentration of 750 μm prior to inoculation. Experiments with SNF1 deletion strains were performed with medium containing 150 μm myoinositol. For soraphen A (37) treatment, cells were inoculated from fresh overnight cultures to an OD of 0.3 at 600 nm (Genesys 10uv photometer, corresponds to ∼6 × 106 cells/ml) and grown to an OD600 of ∼1.5 (mid- to late LOG phase) before 0.5 μg/ml soraphen A was added from a stock solution (10 mg/ml in DMSO stored at −20 °C). Final DMSO concentration was 0.25%. Soraphen A was isolated from the myxobacterium Sorrangium cellulosum according to published procedures (86). Oleate addition (0.01 or 0.03% (w/v) and added at a culture density of OD600 ∼1.5) resulted from a 100-fold stock solution (1 or 3%, respectively, sodium oleate, Sigma-Aldrich, O7501) dissolved in 10% Tergitol® (Type NP-40, Sigma-Aldrich, NP40S) solubilized by briefly heating to 40 °C. Control cultures received DMSO or Tergitol as appropriate. Mevalonate was purchased in its lactone form (Sigma-Aldrich, M4667) and dissolved in 0.1 m NaOH at a concentration of 2 g/ml (stock solution, stored at 4 °C). The stock was added to yeast cultures at a final concentration of 40 mg/ml (47) prior to inoculation. Notably, the pH of the medium was checked after mevalonate was supplemented and found be unchanged. Fluvastatin (Sigma-Aldrich, SML0038) was dissolved in a stock solution (200 mm in DMSO, stored at −20 °C) and added to yeast cultures at a final concentration of 20 μm at a culture density of OD600 ∼1.5. This concentration has been previously shown to inhibit yeastHMG-CoA reductase (87). Control cultures received comparable amounts of the solvent DMSO.For growth kinetics (growth curve) determination, automated optical density measurements were performed using a Bioscreen CTM (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd., Finland), equipped with Honeycomb 2 (sterilized) plates, and applying the following settings: temperature, 28 °C; OD measurement every 30 min with 600-nm filter; continuous shaking; stopping shaking 5 s before OD measurement; shaking speed “normal”; shaking amplitude “medium”. Cells from main experimental cultures were used either directly (main cultures) or after shift to fresh medium by washing once with water and inoculating at a density of 0.3 OD (shift cultures). Then cultures were transferred to the Honeycomb plates (300-μl volume), and continuing growth within the Honeycomb plates was monitored for the indicated time intervals.
Yeast autophagy measurements
Autophagy was assayed either by immunoblotting-based GFP liberation assays (88, 89) (for detailed Western blotting procedure, see below) or monitoring GFP-Atg8 localization using epifluorescence microscopy of strains harboring chromosomally GFP-tagged Atg8 under the control of its endogenous promoter (pATG8-EGFP-ATG8 strains) as described (32) or with expression driven by the copper-inducible pCUP1 promoter. To induce expression of the pCUP1 promoter, copper sulfate (stock solution: 250 mm in double-distilled H2O) was added to the growth medium at final concentrations of 1.6 or 3.1 μm (as indicated) prior to inoculation. Note that the minimal medium used already contained copper sulfate at a concentration of 40 μg/liter (∼0.25 μm), allowing baseline expression of GFP-Atg8 even without the addition of copper. Atg8 lipidation was monitored using strains expressing N-terminally 3×HA-tagged Atg8 strains under the control of the MET25 promoter in the PEP4 deletion background (88, 89). For microscopic analyses, PrI staining served to exclude dead, potentially autofluorescent cells visualized by standard rhodamine filters. Vacuolar alkaline phosphatase activity of the strain carrying the Pho8ΔN60 variant was assessed according to published methods (39) with modifications as described (32). Briefly, ∼1 × 108 cells were harvested and disrupted with 100 μl of acid-washed glass beads, and protein concentration was measured using a Bio-Rad protein assay. 1 μg of total protein obtained from 3-day-old cultures was used for the assay.
Protein extracts and immunoblotting
Protein extracts were obtained from chemical cell lysis (90), and an equivalent of 0.2 A600 (∼1 × 107 cells) were loaded to 12.5%, 7.5% (for Acc1 protein detection), or 15% (for histone acetylation blots) denaturing SDS-polyacrylamide gels. For the Atg8 lipidation assay, 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels contained 6 m urea, as described before (89, 91). Immunoblotting followed standard protocols with transfer of proteins to either 0.45 or 0.2 μm (for the Atg8 lipidation assay) polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad) and subsequent probing with antibodies specific for HA (Sigma-Aldrich, H9658, 1:10,000), GFP (Roche Applied Science, catalog no. 11814460001, 1:5,000), Acc1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA5-17564, 1:500), or GAPDH (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA5-15738, 1:10,000). Signals were recorded digitally using ClarityTM ECL (Bio-Rad) detected by ChemiDocTM Touch (Bio-Rad) with automatically determined exposure times to avoid signal saturation. Histone acetylation was assessed using acetylated lysine site-specific antibodies (catalog nos. 07-353 (1:5,000) and 07-354 (1:10,000), Upstate, Millipore; catalog no. ab1791 (1:5,000), Abcam). To this end, acid extracts of yeast cells (92), immunoblot procedures, and quantification (expressed as ratios of acetylated lysine per total histone signals) were performed essentially as described, using protein loading amounts previously determined to be in the linear detection range (11). In general, quantification of immunoblotting signals from automatically determined optimal exposures was obtained by using the rectangular volume tool of Image LabTM software (Bio-Rad) version 5.2.1 with background correction set to “local background.” For comparison of signals from different blots (polyvinylidene difluoride membranes), each blot was normalized to the respective average signals of all samples (individual blots of one experiment always contained the same number of samples per group) before data were pooled for further analysis and the indicated normalizations.
Measurement of Pep4 activity
Biochemical measurement of Pep4 activity from whole-cell extracts was performed with a fluorometric Cathepsin D activity assay kit (Abcam; ab65302) as described recently (56). In brief, 2 × 106 cells were collected at the indicated time points and resuspended in 200 μl of supplied CD cell lysis buffer. Homogenization was performed with 100 μl of glass beads (500-μm diameter) per sample for 3 × 1 min in a cooled cell disruptor (BioSpec, Mini-Beadbeater-96). Samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 × g, 4 °C, and supernatants were transferred into fresh tubes. Protein concentrations were determined with a Bradford assay (Bio-Rad), and a volume corresponding to 0.1 μg of protein was used for the activity assay according to the manufacturer's protocol. Samples were incubated for 2 h at 28 °C, and the fluorescence signal was analyzed with a Tecan Genios Pro microplate reader (excitation, 328 nm; emission, 460 nm). Of note, lysates treated with 150 μm pepstatin A were used as background control and subtracted from all samples.
Epifluorescence microscopy
16-Bit images were taken with a Leica DM6B-Z epifluorescence microscope equipped with a Leica-DFC9000GT camera using an HC PL APO ×100/8 NA 1.4 oil lens. The GFP filter set (470ex, 525em) was used for detection of GFP, and the TXR filter set (560ex, 630em) was used for detection of RFP or mCherry. The software Leica Application Suite X 3.6.0.20104 was used to capture images with exposure times adjusted to avoid signal saturation and using the autofocus module applied at DIC filter conditions. Raw images were exported as TIF files and further processed using the open-source software Fiji (93). 16-Bit images were converted to 8-bit, and the same display range settings were applied to all images of a given set of samples.
Automated GFP puncta analysis
16-Bit images were taken with a Leica DM6B-Z epifluorescence microscope equipped with a Leica-DFC9000GT camera using an HC PL APO ×100/8 NA 1.4 oil lens. Exposure was set to 500 ms for GFP (470ex, 525em) and 600 ms for TXR/mCherry (560ex, 630em) channels. Raw images were exported as TIF files and analyzed using an automated macro in Fiji (ImageJ 1.52n). First, lower and upper limits of the display range were set to 1,000–50,000 for GFP and 2000–65535 for mCherry, respectively. Total GFP puncta were quantified by down-sampling the GFP image to 8-bit and using the “Find maxima” command (prominence set to 12). Nonvacuolar GFP puncta were quantified by excluding Vph1-mCherry–stained vacuoles, which were segmented by down-sampling the mCherry image to 8-bit and applying automated thresholding (Huang method).
Confocal microscopy
Specimens were prepared on agar slides for immobilization of yeast cells. Colocalization of endogenously mCherry-tagged Vph1 and GFP-Atg8 was analyzed with a Leica SP5 confocal microscope equipped with a Leica HCX PL APO ×63 NA 1.4 oil immersion objective. The GFP signal was exited at 488 nm and measured between 500 and 530 nm, and mCherry was excited at 555 nm and detected between 590 and 650 nm. Z-Stacks were acquired using 63 × 63 × 125 (x/y/z)-nm sampling and processed with the open-source software Fiji (93). Image noise was reduced in Z-stacks with three-dimensional Gaussian filtering (xσ = yσ = zσ = 1), followed by background subtraction (rolling ball radius = 50 pixels) and projection of data via the maximum-intensity projection method.Quinacrine/PrI co-stained cells were visualized with a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope, equipped with a Zeiss Plan-Apochromat 63× NA 1.4 DIC M27 oil immersion objective. Quinacrine was exited at 488 nm and measured between 500 and 530 nm, and PrI was exited at 563 nm and detected between 590 and 650 nm. The Fiji plugin “Iterative Deconvolve 3D” (94) was used for image restoration, which is in part based on the DAMAS algorithm. Thereby, five iterations were applied. Deconvolution of the slightly undersampled image achieved higher contrast of vesicular structures than by the use of Gaussian filtering as described above. All pictures within an experiment were captured and processed in the same way.
Quinacrine staining
To visualize acidic cellular compartments, quinacrine staining was performed as described recently (56). Therefore, ∼1 × 108 cells were harvested at the indicated time points and washed with 500 μl of YEPD medium, containing 100 mm HEPES (pH 7.6). After centrifugation (16,000 × g, 1 min, room temperature) samples were resuspended in 500 μl of YEPD medium containing 100 mm HEPES (pH 7.6) as well as 400 μm quinacrine and were incubated for 10 min at 28 °C and 145 rpm. Subsequently, cells were incubated for 5 min on ice and after centrifugation (16,000 × g, 1 min, 4 °C) washed twice in 500 μl of ice-cold HEPES buffer (pH 7.6) containing 2% d-glucose. Afterward, cells were resuspended in the same solution, additionally containing 100 μg/liter PrI, and incubated for 10 min on ice in the dark.
Yeast neutral lipid measurements
Lipid droplets were visualized, and neutral lipid content was quantified using BODIPYTM 493/503 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, D3922). Approximately 5 × 106 cells were stained in PBS containing 1 μg/ml BODIPYTM 493/503 and 0.1 μg/ml PrI for 15 min in the dark. Cells were harvested via centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 5 min and washed once with PBS, and the pellet was resuspended in 250 μl of PBS. Staining was visualized by epifluorescence microscopy (standard GFP filters) or quantified by flow cytometry. For quantification, 30,000 cells were analyzed using BD LSR Fortessa (488-nm excitation, 530/30-nm detection), and the mean fluorescence peak area was evaluated using BD FACSDiva 8.0. Dead (PrI-positive) cells (488-nm excitation, 695/40-nm detection) were excluded from analysis.
Determination of metabolites from yeast culture medium and cell extracts
Metabolites from yeast culture medium
Acetic acid from crude culture supernatants (appropriately diluted with water) was enzymatically measured using the Acetic Acid (Acetate Kinase Manual Format) kit (Megazyme, K-ACETRM) following the manufacturer's microplate protocol.
Metabolites from cell extracts
Methanol cell extracts and respective culture supernatants were applied to metabolite analysis by NMR for simultaneous comparison of intracellular and extracellular acetate and inositol.
Quenching of cells for metabolite analysis
Culture aliquots of ∼20 OD600 equivalents were harvested by filtration using replaceable 0.45-μm sterile filters (OmniporeTM membrane filters, JHWP02500), washed once (on filter) with 5 ml of double-distilled H2O, and immediately quenched by deep-freezing the filters in liquid nitrogen. The filtration and washing step was performed in less than 30 s until the freezing step.
Generation of methanol cell extracts from quenched cells
Quenched cells (frozen cells on filter) were resuspended in 500 μl of ice cold methanol/H2O (2:1) by vortexing thoroughly. 400 μl of the cell suspension were transferred into fresh tube and homogenized with glass beads for 2 × 1 min in a cooled cell disruptor (BioSpec, Mini-Beadbeater-96). The remaining aliquot of intact cells was used for cell count determination by CASY technology (OLS OMNI Life Science, Bremen, Germany), which served to normalize metabolite abundancies after NMR-based profiling. The cell homogenate was then placed on dry ice for 30 min and subsequently stored at −20 °C for 1 h. Next, 200 μl of methanol/H2O (2:1) were added prior to centrifugation at 18,000 × g, 4 °C for 30 min. 500 μl of the supernatant was transferred to a protein LoBind tube (Eppendorf) and stored at −80 °C prior to NMR metabolic profiling.
Reagents for NMR metabolic profiling
Methanol, sodium phosphate, dibasic (Na2HPO4), sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid (32% m/v), and sodium azide (NaN3) were obtained from VWR International (Darmstadt, Germany). 3-(Trimethylsilyl)propionic-2,2,3,3-d4 acid sodium salt (TSP) was obtained from Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany). Deuterium oxide (D2O) was obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (Tewksbury, MA). Deionized water was purified using an in-house Milli-Q® Advantage water purification system from Millipore (Schwalbach, Germany).
NMR metabolic profiling
All chemicals were used without further purification. The phosphate buffer solution (NMR buffer) was prepared by dissolving 5.56 g of anhydrous NaH2PO4, 0.4 g of TSP, and 0.2 g of NaN3, in 500 ml of deionized water and adjusted to pH 7.4 with 1 m NaOH and HCl. The phosphate buffer was lyophilized and redissolved in D2O. Supernatants after methanol extraction were dried by vacuum evaporation using a SpeedVac. 500 μl of NMR buffer in D2O were added to the dried samples, redissolved, and transferred to 5-mm NMR tubes. Metabolites were measured as described previously (95, 96) and detailed below. All NMR experiments were performed at 310 K on a Bruker Avance III 500-MHz spectrometer equipped with a TXI probe head. The one-dimensional CPMG (Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill) pulse sequence (cpmgpr1d, 512 scans, 73,728 points in F1, 12,019.230-Hz spectral width, 1,024 transients, recycle delay 4 s), with water suppression using presaturation, was used for 1H one-dimensional NMR experiments. Bruker Topspin version 3.1 was used for NMR data acquisition. The spectra for all samples were automatically processed (exponential line broadening of 0.3 Hz), phased, and referenced to TSP at 0.0 ppm using Bruker Topspin 3.1 software (Bruker GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany). Metabolites of interest (acetate, inositol) were quantified using Chenomx NMR Suite Professional 8.2 (Chenomx Inc.) with the existing Chenomx Inc. library and processed one-dimensional CPMG spectra.
Lipid profiling from yeast cells
Standards for lipid quantification
Synthetic lipid standards were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. (Alabaster, AL). All used solvents were of at least HPLC grade. Stocks of internal standards were stored in glass ampoules at −20 °C until used for the preparation of internal standard mix in 10:3 MTBE/MeOH. 700 μl of internal standard mix contained the following: 1,778 pmol of cholesterol D7, 1,040 pmol of cholesterol ester 16:0 D5, 521 pmol of 50:0 TG D5, 145 pmol of 34:0 DG D5, 550 pmol of 25:0 PC, 435 pmol of LPC, 107 pmol of 25:0 PS, 295 pmol 25:0 PE, 85 pmol of 13:0 LPE, 192 pmol of 25:0 PI, 109 pmol of 25:0 PG, 73 pmol of 30:1 Cer, 123 pmol of 25:0 PA, 91 pmol of 13:0 LPA, 32 pmol of 13:0 LPI.
Lipid extraction and quantification by shotgun MS
2 OD600 units (∼1 × 108 cells) of yeast were homogenized with 0.5-mm zirconia beads in a cooled cell disruptor for 2 × 10 min at 30 Hz in 300 μl of isopropyl alcohol. The whole homogenate was evaporated in a vacuum desiccator to complete dryness. Lipid extraction was performed according to Refs. 97–99. In brief, 700 μl of internal standard mix in 10:3 MTBE/MeOH was added to each sample and vortexed for 1 h at 4 °C. After the addition of 140 μl, H2O samples were vortexed for another 15 min. Phase separation was induced by centrifugation at 13,400 rpm for 15 min. The organic phase was transferred to a glass vial and evaporated. Samples were reconstituted in 300 μl of 1:2 MeOH/CHCl3. For lipidome and PS measurements, 5 μl of sample were diluted with 95 μl of 4:2:1 isopropyl alcohol/MeOH/CHCl3 + 7.5 mm ammonium formate and 4:1 EtOH/CHCl3 + 0.1% trimethylamine, respectively. Mass spectrometric analysis was performed on a Q Exactive instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a robotic nanoflow ion source TriVersa NanoMate (Advion BioSciences, Ithaca, NY) using nanoelectrospray chips with a diameter of 4.1 μm. The ion source was controlled by the Chipsoft 8.3.1 software (Advion BioSciences). Ionization voltage was +0.96 kV in positive and −0.96 kV in negative mode; back pressure was set at 1.25 p.s.i. in both modes. Samples were analyzed by polarity switching (99). The temperature of the ion transfer capillary was 200 °C; S-lens RF level was set to 50%. Each sample was analyzed for 5.7 min. FT-MS spectra were acquired within the range of m/z 400–1,000 from 0 to 1.5 min in positive and within the range of m/z 350–1,000 from 4.2 to 5.7 min in negative mode at a mass resolution of R at m/z 200 = 140,000, automated gain control (AGC) of 3 × 106, and a maximal injection time of 3,000 ms. Ergosterol was determined by parallel reaction monitoring FT-MS/MS between 1.5 and 4.2 min. For FT-MS/MS, microscans were set to 1, isolation window to 0.8 Da, normalized collision energy to 12.5%, AGC to 5 × 104, and maximum injection time to 3,000 ms. PS was additionally measured for 1.5 min in negative FT-MS mode with the same parameters as mentioned above. All acquired spectra were filtered by PeakStrainer (https://git.mpi-cbg.de/labShevchenko/PeakStrainer/wikis/home) (100). Lipids were identified by LipidXplorer software (101). Molecular Fragmentation Query Language (MFQL) queries were compiled for ergosterol, ergosterol esters, PC, LPC, PE, LPE, PI, LPI, Cer, PA, LPA, PG, PS, TG, and DG lipid classes. The identification relied on accurately determined intact lipid masses (mass accuracy better than 5 ppm) and a signal/noise threshold higher than 3 and additional confirmation by targeted MS/MS in a separate measurement for PL and DG species. Lipids identified in the FT-MS measurements were combined in an inclusion list for positive and negative mode and were subjected to targeted MS/MS using these settings: positive and negative FT-MS from 0 to 0.5 min and 11 to 11.5 min, respectively, R at m/z 200 = 140,000, AGC 3 × 106, IT 3,000 ms, m/z 350–1,000 for positive mode, and m/z 350–1,500 for negative mode. FT-MS/MS settings were as follows: positive and negative FT-MS from 0.5 to 10.5 min and 11.5 to 35 min, respectively, R at m/z 200 = 140,000, AGC 2 × 104, IT 650 ms, isolation window 0.8 Da, fixed first mass m/z 120, and NCE 15 and 25% for positive and negative mode, respectively. Lipids were quantified by comparing the isotopically corrected abundances of their molecular ions with the abundances of internal standards of the same lipid class.
Lipid data processing
Isotopically corrected abundances of lipid species containing saturated or monounsaturated fatty acyl chains of even length were normalized to the mean abundances of the respective control condition (i.e. WT cells or tergitol (vehicle)–treated cells for comparing the acc1 or oleate-treated conditions, respectively) and subjected to principal component analysis using the web-based MetaboAnalyst 4.0 platform (102) without further data normalization or scaling.
Statistical analysis of the experimental data
Data are presented as dot plots with lines depicting the mean and error bars showing S.D. or as line graphs showing means ± S.D. The indicated sample size (see the figure legends) always refers to biological replicates (number of independent cultures per condition). If not otherwise stated, statistical testing was performed using ORIGIN PRO 2016 or IBM SPSS statistics software (version 23). Welch's t test (unpaired) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc tests were used for comparisons between two or multiple groups, respectively. Where appropriate, a two-way ANOVA was applied (independent or mixed design) and was Greenhouse-Geisser–corrected (for mixed-design two-way ANOVA) in the case of sphericity violation as tested by Mauchly's test. The two-way ANOVA was followed by testing simple main effects (i.e. multiple comparisons of different levels of each factor that were Tukey-corrected if the factor had more than two levels) in the case of main factor (103) or interaction significance. The reported significance values are always two-sided. Normal distribution of data was confirmed using Shapiro–Wilk's test or judged based on visual inspection of Q-Q plots. Homogeneity of variance was tested using Levene's test. Data violating these assumptions were transformed to meet the assumptions. Welch's test (Welch's corrected ANOVA) with Games-Howell–corrected post hoc comparisons were applied whenever homogeneity of variance was an issue.
Author contributions
A. S. G., A. Z., T. P., S. Schroeder, H. S., O. K., L. L., A. Santiso, D. W., A. A., S. O. L., S. Stryeck, C. K., C. R., S. J. H., B. M., M. W., T. E. performed experiments and analyzed data. R. M. provided soraphen A. D. C.-G., T. M., S. B., K.-U. F., and A. Shevchenko contributed with significant discussions, funding, or interpretation of data. T. E., A. S. G., and S. Schroeder designed and conceived the study. All authors have read and approved the manuscript and their authorship.
Authors: M K Shirra; J Patton-Vogt; A Ulrich; O Liuta-Tehlivets; S D Kohlwein; S A Henry; K M Arndt Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: M F Manolson; D Proteau; R A Preston; A Stenbit; B T Roberts; M A Hoyt; D Preuss; J Mulholland; D Botstein; E W Jones Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1992-07-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: T Kirisako; M Baba; N Ishihara; K Miyazawa; M Ohsumi; T Yoshimori; T Noda; Y Ohsumi Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 1999-10-18 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Daniel J Klionsky; Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz; Sara Abdelfatah; Mahmoud Abdellatif; Asghar Abdoli; Steffen Abel; Hagai Abeliovich; Marie H Abildgaard; Yakubu Princely Abudu; Abraham Acevedo-Arozena; Iannis E Adamopoulos; Khosrow Adeli; Timon E Adolph; Annagrazia Adornetto; Elma Aflaki; Galila Agam; Anupam Agarwal; Bharat B Aggarwal; Maria Agnello; Patrizia Agostinis; Javed N Agrewala; Alexander Agrotis; Patricia V Aguilar; S Tariq Ahmad; Zubair M Ahmed; Ulises Ahumada-Castro; Sonja Aits; Shu Aizawa; Yunus Akkoc; Tonia Akoumianaki; Hafize Aysin Akpinar; Ahmed M Al-Abd; Lina Al-Akra; Abeer Al-Gharaibeh; Moulay A Alaoui-Jamali; Simon Alberti; Elísabet Alcocer-Gómez; Cristiano Alessandri; Muhammad Ali; M Abdul Alim Al-Bari; Saeb Aliwaini; Javad Alizadeh; Eugènia Almacellas; Alexandru Almasan; Alicia Alonso; Guillermo D Alonso; Nihal Altan-Bonnet; Dario C Altieri; Élida M C Álvarez; Sara Alves; Cristine Alves da Costa; Mazen M Alzaharna; Marialaura Amadio; Consuelo Amantini; Cristina Amaral; Susanna Ambrosio; Amal O Amer; Veena Ammanathan; Zhenyi An; Stig U Andersen; Shaida A Andrabi; Magaiver Andrade-Silva; Allen M Andres; Sabrina Angelini; David Ann; Uche C Anozie; Mohammad Y Ansari; Pedro Antas; Adam Antebi; Zuriñe Antón; Tahira Anwar; Lionel Apetoh; Nadezda Apostolova; Toshiyuki Araki; Yasuhiro Araki; Kohei Arasaki; Wagner L Araújo; Jun Araya; Catherine Arden; Maria-Angeles Arévalo; Sandro Arguelles; Esperanza Arias; Jyothi Arikkath; Hirokazu Arimoto; Aileen R Ariosa; Darius Armstrong-James; Laetitia Arnauné-Pelloquin; Angeles Aroca; Daniela S Arroyo; Ivica Arsov; Rubén Artero; Dalia Maria Lucia Asaro; Michael Aschner; Milad Ashrafizadeh; Osnat Ashur-Fabian; Atanas G Atanasov; Alicia K Au; Patrick Auberger; Holger W Auner; Laure Aurelian; Riccardo Autelli; Laura Avagliano; Yenniffer Ávalos; Sanja Aveic; Célia Alexandra Aveleira; Tamar Avin-Wittenberg; Yucel Aydin; Scott Ayton; Srinivas Ayyadevara; Maria Azzopardi; Misuzu Baba; Jonathan M Backer; Steven K Backues; Dong-Hun Bae; Ok-Nam Bae; Soo Han Bae; Eric H Baehrecke; Ahruem Baek; Seung-Hoon Baek; Sung Hee Baek; Giacinto Bagetta; Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; Hua Bai; Jie Bai; Xiyuan Bai; Yidong Bai; Nandadulal Bairagi; Shounak Baksi; Teresa Balbi; Cosima T Baldari; Walter Balduini; Andrea Ballabio; Maria Ballester; Salma Balazadeh; Rena Balzan; Rina Bandopadhyay; Sreeparna Banerjee; Sulagna Banerjee; Ágnes Bánréti; Yan Bao; Mauricio S Baptista; Alessandra Baracca; Cristiana Barbati; Ariadna Bargiela; Daniela Barilà; Peter G Barlow; Sami J Barmada; Esther Barreiro; George E Barreto; Jiri Bartek; Bonnie Bartel; Alberto Bartolome; Gaurav R Barve; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Diane C Bassham; Robert C Bast; Alakananda Basu; Henri Batoko; Isabella Batten; Etienne E Baulieu; Bradley L Baumgarner; Jagadeesh Bayry; Rupert Beale; Isabelle Beau; Florian Beaumatin; Luiz R G Bechara; George R Beck; Michael F Beers; Jakob Begun; Christian Behrends; Georg M N Behrens; Roberto Bei; Eloy Bejarano; Shai Bel; Christian Behl; Amine Belaid; Naïma Belgareh-Touzé; Cristina Bellarosa; Francesca Belleudi; Melissa Belló Pérez; Raquel Bello-Morales; Jackeline Soares de Oliveira Beltran; Sebastián Beltran; Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook; Mykolas Bendorius; Bruno A Benitez; Irene Benito-Cuesta; Julien Bensalem; Martin W Berchtold; Sabina Berezowska; Daniele Bergamaschi; Matteo Bergami; Andreas Bergmann; Laura Berliocchi; Clarisse Berlioz-Torrent; Amélie Bernard; Lionel Berthoux; Cagri G Besirli; Sebastien Besteiro; Virginie M Betin; Rudi Beyaert; Jelena S Bezbradica; Kiran Bhaskar; Ingrid Bhatia-Kissova; Resham Bhattacharya; Sujoy Bhattacharya; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya; Md Shenuarin Bhuiyan; Sujit Kumar Bhutia; Lanrong Bi; Xiaolin Bi; Trevor J Biden; Krikor Bijian; Viktor A Billes; Nadine Binart; Claudia Bincoletto; Asa B Birgisdottir; Geir Bjorkoy; Gonzalo Blanco; Ana Blas-Garcia; Janusz Blasiak; Robert Blomgran; Klas Blomgren; Janice S Blum; Emilio Boada-Romero; Mirta Boban; Kathleen Boesze-Battaglia; Philippe Boeuf; Barry Boland; Pascale Bomont; Paolo Bonaldo; Srinivasa Reddy Bonam; Laura Bonfili; Juan S Bonifacino; Brian A Boone; Martin D Bootman; Matteo Bordi; Christoph Borner; Beat C Bornhauser; Gautam Borthakur; Jürgen Bosch; Santanu Bose; Luis M Botana; Juan Botas; Chantal M Boulanger; Michael E Boulton; Mathieu Bourdenx; Benjamin Bourgeois; Nollaig M Bourke; Guilhem Bousquet; Patricia Boya; Peter V Bozhkov; Luiz H M Bozi; Tolga O Bozkurt; Doug E Brackney; Christian H Brandts; Ralf J Braun; Gerhard H Braus; Roberto Bravo-Sagua; José M Bravo-San Pedro; Patrick Brest; Marie-Agnès Bringer; Alfredo Briones-Herrera; V Courtney Broaddus; Peter Brodersen; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Steven L Brody; Paola G Bronson; Jeff M Bronstein; Carolyn N Brown; Rhoderick E Brown; Patricia C Brum; John H Brumell; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Daniele Bruno; Robert J Bryson-Richardson; Cecilia Bucci; Carmen Buchrieser; Marta Bueno; Laura Elisa Buitrago-Molina; Simone Buraschi; Shilpa Buch; J Ross Buchan; Erin M Buckingham; Hikmet Budak; Mauricio Budini; Geert Bultynck; Florin Burada; Joseph R Burgoyne; M Isabel Burón; Victor Bustos; Sabrina Büttner; Elena Butturini; Aaron Byrd; Isabel Cabas; Sandra Cabrera-Benitez; Ken Cadwell; Jingjing Cai; Lu Cai; Qian Cai; Montserrat Cairó; Jose A Calbet; Guy A Caldwell; Kim A Caldwell; Jarrod A Call; Riccardo Calvani; Ana C Calvo; Miguel Calvo-Rubio Barrera; Niels Os Camara; Jacques H Camonis; Nadine Camougrand; Michelangelo Campanella; Edward M Campbell; François-Xavier Campbell-Valois; Silvia Campello; Ilaria Campesi; Juliane C Campos; Olivier Camuzard; Jorge Cancino; Danilo Candido de Almeida; Laura Canesi; Isabella Caniggia; Barbara Canonico; Carles Cantí; Bin Cao; Michele Caraglia; Beatriz Caramés; Evie H Carchman; Elena Cardenal-Muñoz; Cesar Cardenas; Luis Cardenas; Sandra M Cardoso; Jennifer S Carew; Georges F Carle; Gillian Carleton; Silvia Carloni; Didac Carmona-Gutierrez; Leticia A Carneiro; Oliana Carnevali; Julian M Carosi; Serena Carra; Alice Carrier; Lucie Carrier; Bernadette Carroll; A Brent Carter; Andreia Neves Carvalho; Magali Casanova; Caty Casas; Josefina Casas; Chiara Cassioli; Eliseo F Castillo; Karen Castillo; Sonia Castillo-Lluva; Francesca Castoldi; Marco Castori; Ariel F Castro; Margarida Castro-Caldas; Javier Castro-Hernandez; Susana Castro-Obregon; Sergio D Catz; Claudia Cavadas; Federica Cavaliere; Gabriella Cavallini; Maria Cavinato; Maria L Cayuela; Paula Cebollada Rica; Valentina Cecarini; Francesco Cecconi; Marzanna Cechowska-Pasko; Simone Cenci; Victòria Ceperuelo-Mallafré; João J Cerqueira; Janete M Cerutti; Davide Cervia; Vildan Bozok Cetintas; Silvia Cetrullo; Han-Jung Chae; Andrei S Chagin; Chee-Yin Chai; Gopal Chakrabarti; Oishee Chakrabarti; Tapas Chakraborty; Trinad Chakraborty; Mounia Chami; Georgios Chamilos; David W Chan; Edmond Y W Chan; Edward D Chan; H Y Edwin Chan; Helen H Chan; Hung Chan; Matthew T V Chan; Yau Sang Chan; Partha K Chandra; Chih-Peng Chang; Chunmei Chang; Hao-Chun Chang; Kai Chang; Jie Chao; Tracey Chapman; Nicolas Charlet-Berguerand; Samrat Chatterjee; Shail K Chaube; Anu Chaudhary; Santosh Chauhan; Edward Chaum; Frédéric Checler; Michael E Cheetham; Chang-Shi Chen; Guang-Chao Chen; Jian-Fu Chen; Liam L Chen; Leilei Chen; Lin Chen; Mingliang Chen; Mu-Kuan Chen; Ning Chen; Quan Chen; Ruey-Hwa Chen; Shi Chen; Wei Chen; Weiqiang Chen; Xin-Ming Chen; Xiong-Wen Chen; Xu Chen; Yan Chen; Ye-Guang Chen; Yingyu Chen; Yongqiang Chen; Yu-Jen Chen; Yue-Qin Chen; Zhefan Stephen Chen; Zhi Chen; Zhi-Hua Chen; Zhijian J Chen; Zhixiang Chen; Hanhua Cheng; Jun Cheng; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Wei Cheng; Xiaodong Cheng; Xiu-Tang Cheng; Yiyun Cheng; Zhiyong Cheng; Zhong Chen; Heesun Cheong; Jit Kong Cheong; Boris V Chernyak; Sara Cherry; Chi Fai Randy Cheung; Chun Hei Antonio Cheung; King-Ho Cheung; Eric Chevet; Richard J Chi; Alan Kwok Shing Chiang; Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Roberto Chiarelli; Mario Chiariello; Nathalia Chica; Susanna Chiocca; Mario Chiong; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Abhilash I Chiramel; Valerio Chiurchiù; Dong-Hyung Cho; Seong-Kyu Choe; Augustine M K Choi; Mary E Choi; Kamalika Roy Choudhury; Norman S Chow; Charleen T Chu; Jason P Chua; John Jia En Chua; Hyewon Chung; Kin Pan Chung; Seockhoon Chung; So-Hyang Chung; Yuen-Li Chung; Valentina Cianfanelli; Iwona A Ciechomska; Mariana Cifuentes; Laura Cinque; Sebahattin Cirak; Mara Cirone; Michael J Clague; Robert Clarke; Emilio Clementi; Eliana M Coccia; Patrice Codogno; Ehud Cohen; Mickael M Cohen; Tania Colasanti; Fiorella Colasuonno; Robert A Colbert; Anna Colell; Miodrag Čolić; Nuria S Coll; Mark O Collins; María I Colombo; Daniel A Colón-Ramos; Lydie Combaret; Sergio Comincini; Márcia R Cominetti; Antonella Consiglio; Andrea Conte; Fabrizio Conti; Viorica Raluca Contu; Mark R Cookson; Kevin M Coombs; Isabelle Coppens; Maria Tiziana Corasaniti; Dale P Corkery; Nils Cordes; Katia Cortese; Maria do Carmo Costa; Sarah Costantino; Paola Costelli; Ana Coto-Montes; Peter J Crack; Jose L Crespo; Alfredo Criollo; Valeria Crippa; Riccardo Cristofani; Tamas Csizmadia; Antonio Cuadrado; Bing Cui; Jun Cui; Yixian Cui; Yong Cui; Emmanuel Culetto; Andrea C Cumino; Andrey V Cybulsky; Mark J Czaja; Stanislaw J Czuczwar; Stefania D'Adamo; Marcello D'Amelio; Daniela D'Arcangelo; Andrew C D'Lugos; Gabriella D'Orazi; James A da Silva; Hormos Salimi Dafsari; Ruben K Dagda; Yasin Dagdas; Maria Daglia; Xiaoxia Dai; Yun Dai; Yuyuan Dai; Jessica Dal Col; Paul Dalhaimer; Luisa Dalla Valle; Tobias Dallenga; Guillaume Dalmasso; Markus Damme; Ilaria Dando; Nico P Dantuma; April L Darling; Hiranmoy Das; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Santosh K Dasari; Srikanta Dash; Oliver Daumke; Adrian N Dauphinee; Jeffrey S Davies; Valeria A Dávila; Roger J Davis; Tanja Davis; Sharadha Dayalan Naidu; Francesca De Amicis; Karolien De Bosscher; Francesca De Felice; Lucia De Franceschi; Chiara De Leonibus; Mayara G de Mattos Barbosa; Guido R Y De Meyer; Angelo De Milito; Cosimo De Nunzio; Clara De Palma; Mauro De Santi; Claudio De Virgilio; Daniela De Zio; Jayanta Debnath; Brian J DeBosch; Jean-Paul Decuypere; Mark A Deehan; Gianluca Deflorian; James DeGregori; Benjamin Dehay; Gabriel Del Rio; Joe R Delaney; Lea M D Delbridge; Elizabeth Delorme-Axford; M Victoria Delpino; Francesca Demarchi; Vilma Dembitz; Nicholas D Demers; Hongbin Deng; Zhiqiang Deng; Joern Dengjel; Paul Dent; Donna Denton; Melvin L DePamphilis; Channing J Der; Vojo Deretic; Albert Descoteaux; Laura Devis; Sushil Devkota; Olivier Devuyst; Grant Dewson; Mahendiran Dharmasivam; Rohan Dhiman; Diego di Bernardo; Manlio Di Cristina; Fabio Di Domenico; Pietro Di Fazio; Alessio Di Fonzo; Giovanni Di Guardo; Gianni M Di Guglielmo; Luca Di Leo; Chiara Di Malta; Alessia Di Nardo; Martina Di Rienzo; Federica Di Sano; George Diallinas; Jiajie Diao; Guillermo Diaz-Araya; Inés Díaz-Laviada; Jared M Dickinson; Marc Diederich; Mélanie Dieudé; Ivan Dikic; Shiping Ding; Wen-Xing Ding; Luciana Dini; Jelena Dinić; Miroslav Dinic; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Marc S Dionne; Jörg H W Distler; Abhinav Diwan; Ian M C Dixon; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Ina Dobrinski; Oxana Dobrovinskaya; Radek Dobrowolski; Renwick C J Dobson; Jelena Đokić; Serap Dokmeci Emre; Massimo Donadelli; Bo Dong; Xiaonan Dong; Zhiwu Dong; Gerald W Dorn Ii; Volker Dotsch; Huan Dou; Juan Dou; Moataz Dowaidar; Sami Dridi; Liat Drucker; Ailian Du; Caigan Du; Guangwei Du; Hai-Ning Du; Li-Lin Du; André du Toit; Shao-Bin Duan; Xiaoqiong Duan; Sónia P Duarte; Anna Dubrovska; Elaine A Dunlop; Nicolas Dupont; Raúl V Durán; Bilikere S Dwarakanath; Sergey A Dyshlovoy; Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari; Leopold Eckhart; Charles L Edelstein; Thomas Efferth; Eftekhar Eftekharpour; Ludwig Eichinger; Nabil Eid; Tobias Eisenberg; N Tony Eissa; Sanaa Eissa; Miriam Ejarque; Abdeljabar El Andaloussi; Nazira El-Hage; Shahenda El-Naggar; Anna Maria Eleuteri; Eman S El-Shafey; Mohamed Elgendy; Aristides G Eliopoulos; María M Elizalde; Philip M Elks; Hans-Peter Elsasser; Eslam S Elsherbiny; Brooke M Emerling; N C Tolga Emre; Christina H Eng; Nikolai Engedal; Anna-Mart Engelbrecht; Agnete S T Engelsen; Jorrit M Enserink; Ricardo Escalante; Audrey Esclatine; Mafalda Escobar-Henriques; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Lucile Espert; Makandjou-Ola Eusebio; Gemma Fabrias; Cinzia Fabrizi; Antonio Facchiano; Francesco Facchiano; Bengt Fadeel; Claudio Fader; Alex C Faesen; W Douglas Fairlie; Alberto Falcó; Bjorn H Falkenburger; Daping Fan; Jie Fan; Yanbo Fan; Evandro F Fang; Yanshan Fang; Yognqi Fang; Manolis Fanto; Tamar Farfel-Becker; Mathias Faure; Gholamreza Fazeli; Anthony O Fedele; Arthur M Feldman; Du Feng; Jiachun Feng; Lifeng Feng; Yibin Feng; Yuchen Feng; Wei Feng; Thais Fenz Araujo; Thomas A Ferguson; Álvaro F Fernández; Jose C Fernandez-Checa; Sonia Fernández-Veledo; Alisdair R Fernie; Anthony W Ferrante; Alessandra Ferraresi; Merari F Ferrari; Julio C B Ferreira; Susan Ferro-Novick; Antonio Figueras; Riccardo Filadi; Nicoletta Filigheddu; Eduardo Filippi-Chiela; Giuseppe Filomeni; Gian Maria Fimia; Vittorio Fineschi; Francesca Finetti; Steven Finkbeiner; Edward A Fisher; Paul B Fisher; Flavio Flamigni; Steven J Fliesler; Trude H Flo; Ida Florance; Oliver Florey; Tullio Florio; Erika Fodor; Carlo Follo; Edward A Fon; Antonella Forlino; Francesco Fornai; Paola Fortini; Anna Fracassi; Alessandro Fraldi; Brunella Franco; Rodrigo Franco; Flavia Franconi; Lisa B Frankel; Scott L Friedman; Leopold F Fröhlich; Gema Frühbeck; Jose M Fuentes; Yukio Fujiki; Naonobu Fujita; Yuuki Fujiwara; Mitsunori Fukuda; Simone Fulda; Luc Furic; Norihiko Furuya; Carmela Fusco; Michaela U Gack; Lidia Gaffke; Sehamuddin Galadari; Alessia Galasso; Maria F Galindo; Sachith Gallolu Kankanamalage; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Vincent Galy; Noor Gammoh; Boyi Gan; Ian G Ganley; Feng Gao; Hui Gao; Minghui Gao; Ping Gao; Shou-Jiang Gao; Wentao Gao; Xiaobo Gao; Ana Garcera; Maria Noé Garcia; Verónica E Garcia; Francisco García-Del Portillo; Vega Garcia-Escudero; Aracely Garcia-Garcia; Marina Garcia-Macia; Diana García-Moreno; Carmen Garcia-Ruiz; Patricia García-Sanz; Abhishek D Garg; Ricardo Gargini; Tina Garofalo; Robert F Garry; Nils C Gassen; Damian Gatica; Liang Ge; Wanzhong Ge; Ruth Geiss-Friedlander; Cecilia Gelfi; Pascal Genschik; Ian E Gentle; Valeria Gerbino; Christoph Gerhardt; Kyla Germain; Marc Germain; David A Gewirtz; Elham Ghasemipour Afshar; Saeid Ghavami; Alessandra Ghigo; Manosij Ghosh; Georgios Giamas; Claudia Giampietri; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Gary E Gibson; Spencer B Gibson; Vanessa Ginet; Edward Giniger; Carlotta Giorgi; Henrique Girao; Stephen E Girardin; Mridhula Giridharan; Sandy Giuliano; Cecilia Giulivi; Sylvie Giuriato; Julien Giustiniani; Alexander Gluschko; Veit Goder; Alexander Goginashvili; Jakub Golab; David C Goldstone; Anna Golebiewska; Luciana R Gomes; Rodrigo Gomez; Rubén Gómez-Sánchez; Maria Catalina Gomez-Puerto; Raquel Gomez-Sintes; Qingqiu Gong; Felix M Goni; Javier González-Gallego; Tomas Gonzalez-Hernandez; Rosa A Gonzalez-Polo; Jose A Gonzalez-Reyes; Patricia González-Rodríguez; Ing Swie Goping; Marina S Gorbatyuk; Nikolai V Gorbunov; Kıvanç Görgülü; Roxana M Gorojod; Sharon M Gorski; Sandro Goruppi; Cecilia Gotor; Roberta A Gottlieb; Illana Gozes; Devrim Gozuacik; Martin Graef; Markus H Gräler; Veronica Granatiero; Daniel Grasso; Joshua P Gray; Douglas R Green; Alexander Greenhough; Stephen L Gregory; Edward F Griffin; Mark W Grinstaff; Frederic Gros; Charles Grose; Angelina S Gross; Florian Gruber; Paolo Grumati; Tilman Grune; Xueyan Gu; Jun-Lin Guan; Carlos M Guardia; Kishore Guda; Flora Guerra; Consuelo Guerri; Prasun Guha; Carlos Guillén; Shashi Gujar; Anna Gukovskaya; Ilya Gukovsky; Jan Gunst; Andreas Günther; Anyonya R Guntur; Chuanyong Guo; Chun Guo; Hongqing Guo; Lian-Wang Guo; Ming Guo; Pawan Gupta; Shashi Kumar Gupta; Swapnil Gupta; Veer Bala Gupta; Vivek Gupta; Asa B Gustafsson; David D Gutterman; Ranjitha H B; Annakaisa Haapasalo; James E Haber; Aleksandra Hać; Shinji Hadano; Anders J Hafrén; Mansour Haidar; Belinda S Hall; Gunnel Halldén; Anne Hamacher-Brady; Andrea Hamann; Maho Hamasaki; Weidong Han; Malene Hansen; Phyllis I Hanson; Zijian Hao; Masaru Harada; Ljubica Harhaji-Trajkovic; Nirmala Hariharan; Nigil Haroon; James Harris; Takafumi Hasegawa; Noor Hasima Nagoor; Jeffrey A Haspel; Volker Haucke; Wayne D Hawkins; Bruce A Hay; Cole M Haynes; Soren B Hayrabedyan; Thomas S Hays; Congcong He; Qin He; Rong-Rong He; You-Wen He; Yu-Ying He; Yasser Heakal; Alexander M Heberle; J Fielding Hejtmancik; Gudmundur Vignir Helgason; Vanessa Henkel; Marc Herb; Alexander Hergovich; Anna Herman-Antosiewicz; Agustín Hernández; Carlos Hernandez; Sergio Hernandez-Diaz; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Amaury Herpin; Judit Herreros; Javier H Hervás; Daniel Hesselson; Claudio Hetz; Volker T Heussler; Yujiro Higuchi; Sabine Hilfiker; Joseph A Hill; William S Hlavacek; Emmanuel A Ho; Idy H T Ho; Philip Wing-Lok Ho; Shu-Leong Ho; Wan Yun Ho; G Aaron Hobbs; Mark Hochstrasser; Peter H M Hoet; Daniel Hofius; Paul Hofman; Annika Höhn; Carina I Holmberg; Jose R Hombrebueno; Chang-Won Hong Yi-Ren Hong; Lora V Hooper; Thorsten Hoppe; Rastislav Horos; Yujin Hoshida; I-Lun Hsin; Hsin-Yun Hsu; Bing Hu; Dong Hu; Li-Fang Hu; Ming Chang Hu; Ronggui Hu; Wei Hu; Yu-Chen Hu; Zhuo-Wei Hu; Fang Hua; Jinlian Hua; Yingqi Hua; Chongmin Huan; Canhua Huang; Chuanshu Huang; Chuanxin Huang; Chunling Huang; Haishan Huang; Kun Huang; Michael L H Huang; Rui Huang; Shan Huang; Tianzhi Huang; Xing Huang; Yuxiang Jack Huang; Tobias B Huber; Virginie Hubert; Christian A Hubner; Stephanie M Hughes; William E Hughes; Magali Humbert; Gerhard Hummer; James H Hurley; Sabah Hussain; Salik Hussain; Patrick J Hussey; Martina Hutabarat; Hui-Yun Hwang; Seungmin Hwang; Antonio Ieni; Fumiyo Ikeda; Yusuke Imagawa; Yuzuru Imai; Carol Imbriano; Masaya Imoto; Denise M Inman; Ken Inoki; Juan Iovanna; Renato V Iozzo; Giuseppe Ippolito; Javier E Irazoqui; Pablo Iribarren; Mohd Ishaq; Makoto Ishikawa; Nestor Ishimwe; Ciro Isidoro; Nahed Ismail; Shohreh Issazadeh-Navikas; Eisuke Itakura; Daisuke Ito; Davor Ivankovic; Saška Ivanova; Anand Krishnan V Iyer; José M Izquierdo; Masanori Izumi; Marja Jäättelä; Majid Sakhi Jabir; William T Jackson; Nadia Jacobo-Herrera; Anne-Claire Jacomin; Elise Jacquin; Pooja Jadiya; Hartmut Jaeschke; Chinnaswamy Jagannath; Arjen J Jakobi; Johan Jakobsson; Bassam Janji; Pidder Jansen-Dürr; Patric J Jansson; Jonathan Jantsch; Sławomir Januszewski; Alagie Jassey; Steve Jean; Hélène Jeltsch-David; Pavla Jendelova; Andreas Jenny; Thomas E Jensen; Niels Jessen; Jenna L Jewell; Jing Ji; Lijun Jia; Rui Jia; Liwen Jiang; Qing Jiang; Richeng Jiang; Teng Jiang; Xuejun Jiang; Yu Jiang; Maria Jimenez-Sanchez; Eun-Jung Jin; Fengyan Jin; Hongchuan Jin; Li Jin; Luqi Jin; Meiyan Jin; Si Jin; Eun-Kyeong Jo; Carine Joffre; Terje Johansen; Gail V W Johnson; Simon A Johnston; Eija Jokitalo; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Leo A B Joosten; Joaquin Jordan; Bertrand Joseph; Dianwen Ju; Jeong-Sun Ju; Jingfang Ju; Esmeralda Juárez; Delphine Judith; Gábor Juhász; Youngsoo Jun; Chang Hwa Jung; Sung-Chul Jung; Yong Keun Jung; Heinz Jungbluth; Johannes Jungverdorben; Steffen Just; Kai Kaarniranta; Allen Kaasik; Tomohiro Kabuta; Daniel Kaganovich; Alon Kahana; Renate Kain; Shinjo Kajimura; Maria Kalamvoki; Manjula Kalia; Danuta S Kalinowski; Nina Kaludercic; Ioanna Kalvari; Joanna Kaminska; Vitaliy O Kaminskyy; Hiromitsu Kanamori; Keizo Kanasaki; Chanhee Kang; Rui Kang; Sang Sun Kang; Senthilvelrajan Kaniyappan; Tomotake Kanki; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Arthi Kanthasamy; Marc Kantorow; Orsolya Kapuy; Michalis V Karamouzis; Md Razaul Karim; Parimal Karmakar; Rajesh G Katare; Masaru Kato; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Anu Kauppinen; Gur P Kaushal; Susmita Kaushik; Kiyoshi Kawasaki; Kemal Kazan; Po-Yuan Ke; Damien J Keating; Ursula Keber; John H Kehrl; Kate E Keller; Christian W Keller; Jongsook Kim Kemper; Candia M Kenific; Oliver Kepp; Stephanie Kermorgant; Andreas Kern; Robin Ketteler; Tom G Keulers; Boris Khalfin; Hany Khalil; Bilon Khambu; Shahid Y Khan; Vinoth Kumar Megraj Khandelwal; Rekha Khandia; Widuri Kho; Noopur V Khobrekar; Sataree Khuansuwan; Mukhran Khundadze; Samuel A Killackey; Dasol Kim; Deok Ryong Kim; Do-Hyung Kim; Dong-Eun Kim; Eun Young Kim; Eun-Kyoung Kim; Hak-Rim Kim; Hee-Sik Kim; Jeong Hun Kim; Jin Kyung Kim; Jin-Hoi Kim; Joungmok Kim; Ju Hwan Kim; Keun Il Kim; Peter K Kim; Seong-Jun Kim; Scot R Kimball; Adi Kimchi; Alec C Kimmelman; Tomonori Kimura; Matthew A King; Kerri J Kinghorn; Conan G Kinsey; Vladimir Kirkin; Lorrie A Kirshenbaum; Sergey L Kiselev; Shuji Kishi; Katsuhiko Kitamoto; Yasushi Kitaoka; Kaio Kitazato; Richard N Kitsis; Josef T Kittler; Ole Kjaerulff; Peter S Klein; Thomas Klopstock; Jochen Klucken; Helene Knævelsrud; Roland L Knorr; Ben C B Ko; Fred Ko; Jiunn-Liang Ko; Hotaka Kobayashi; Satoru Kobayashi; Ina Koch; Jan C Koch; Ulrich Koenig; Donat Kögel; Young Ho Koh; Masato Koike; Sepp D Kohlwein; Nur M Kocaturk; Masaaki Komatsu; Jeannette König; Toru Kono; Benjamin T Kopp; Tamas Korcsmaros; Gözde Korkmaz; Viktor I Korolchuk; Mónica Suárez Korsnes; Ali Koskela; Janaiah Kota; Yaichiro Kotake; Monica L Kotler; Yanjun Kou; Michael I Koukourakis; Evangelos Koustas; Attila L Kovacs; Tibor Kovács; Daisuke Koya; Tomohiro Kozako; Claudine Kraft; Dimitri Krainc; Helmut Krämer; Anna D Krasnodembskaya; Carole Kretz-Remy; Guido Kroemer; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Kazuyuki Kuchitsu; Sabine Kuenen; Lars Kuerschner; Thomas Kukar; Ajay Kumar; Ashok Kumar; Deepak Kumar; Dhiraj Kumar; Sharad Kumar; Shinji Kume; Caroline Kumsta; Chanakya N Kundu; Mondira Kundu; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Lukasz Kurgan; Tatiana G Kutateladze; Ozlem Kutlu; SeongAe Kwak; Ho Jeong Kwon; Taeg Kyu Kwon; Yong Tae Kwon; Irene Kyrmizi; Albert La Spada; Patrick Labonté; Sylvain Ladoire; Ilaria Laface; Frank Lafont; Diane C Lagace; Vikramjit Lahiri; Zhibing Lai; Angela S Laird; Aparna Lakkaraju; Trond Lamark; Sheng-Hui Lan; Ane Landajuela; Darius J R Lane; Jon D Lane; Charles H Lang; Carsten Lange; Ülo Langel; Rupert Langer; Pierre Lapaquette; Jocelyn Laporte; Nicholas F LaRusso; Isabel Lastres-Becker; Wilson Chun Yu Lau; Gordon W Laurie; Sergio Lavandero; Betty Yuen Kwan Law; Helen Ka-Wai Law; Rob Layfield; Weidong Le; Herve Le Stunff; Alexandre Y Leary; Jean-Jacques Lebrun; Lionel Y W Leck; Jean-Philippe Leduc-Gaudet; Changwook Lee; Chung-Pei Lee; Da-Hye Lee; Edward B Lee; Erinna F Lee; Gyun Min Lee; He-Jin Lee; Heung Kyu Lee; Jae Man Lee; Jason S Lee; Jin-A Lee; Joo-Yong Lee; Jun Hee Lee; Michael Lee; Min Goo Lee; Min Jae Lee; Myung-Shik Lee; Sang Yoon Lee; Seung-Jae Lee; Stella Y Lee; Sung Bae Lee; Won Hee Lee; Ying-Ray Lee; Yong-Ho Lee; Youngil Lee; Christophe Lefebvre; Renaud Legouis; Yu L Lei; Yuchen Lei; Sergey Leikin; Gerd Leitinger; Leticia Lemus; Shuilong Leng; Olivia Lenoir; Guido Lenz; Heinz Josef Lenz; Paola Lenzi; Yolanda León; Andréia M Leopoldino; Christoph Leschczyk; Stina Leskelä; Elisabeth Letellier; Chi-Ting Leung; Po Sing Leung; Jeremy S Leventhal; Beth Levine; Patrick A Lewis; Klaus Ley; Bin Li; Da-Qiang Li; Jianming Li; Jing Li; Jiong Li; Ke Li; Liwu Li; Mei Li; Min Li; Min Li; Ming Li; Mingchuan Li; Pin-Lan Li; Ming-Qing Li; Qing Li; Sheng Li; Tiangang Li; Wei Li; Wenming Li; Xue Li; Yi-Ping Li; Yuan Li; Zhiqiang Li; Zhiyong Li; Zhiyuan Li; Jiqin Lian; Chengyu Liang; Qiangrong Liang; Weicheng Liang; Yongheng Liang; YongTian Liang; Guanghong Liao; Lujian Liao; Mingzhi Liao; Yung-Feng Liao; Mariangela Librizzi; Pearl P Y Lie; Mary A Lilly; Hyunjung J Lim; Thania R R Lima; Federica Limana; Chao Lin; Chih-Wen Lin; Dar-Shong Lin; Fu-Cheng Lin; Jiandie D Lin; Kurt M Lin; Kwang-Huei Lin; Liang-Tzung Lin; Pei-Hui Lin; Qiong Lin; Shaofeng Lin; Su-Ju Lin; Wenyu Lin; Xueying Lin; Yao-Xin Lin; Yee-Shin Lin; Rafael Linden; Paula Lindner; Shuo-Chien Ling; Paul Lingor; Amelia K Linnemann; Yih-Cherng Liou; Marta M Lipinski; Saška Lipovšek; Vitor A Lira; Natalia Lisiak; Paloma B Liton; Chao Liu; Ching-Hsuan Liu; Chun-Feng Liu; Cui Hua Liu; Fang Liu; Hao Liu; Hsiao-Sheng Liu; Hua-Feng Liu; Huifang Liu; Jia Liu; Jing Liu; Julia Liu; Leyuan Liu; Longhua Liu; Meilian Liu; Qin Liu; Wei Liu; Wende Liu; Xiao-Hong Liu; Xiaodong Liu; Xingguo Liu; Xu Liu; Xuedong Liu; Yanfen Liu; Yang Liu; Yang Liu; Yueyang Liu; Yule Liu; J Andrew Livingston; Gerard Lizard; Jose M Lizcano; Senka Ljubojevic-Holzer; Matilde E LLeonart; David Llobet-Navàs; Alicia Llorente; Chih Hung Lo; Damián Lobato-Márquez; Qi Long; Yun Chau Long; Ben Loos; Julia A Loos; Manuela G López; Guillermo López-Doménech; José Antonio López-Guerrero; Ana T López-Jiménez; Óscar López-Pérez; Israel López-Valero; Magdalena J Lorenowicz; Mar Lorente; Peter Lorincz; Laura Lossi; Sophie Lotersztajn; Penny E Lovat; Jonathan F Lovell; Alenka Lovy; Péter Lőw; Guang Lu; Haocheng Lu; Jia-Hong Lu; Jin-Jian Lu; Mengji Lu; Shuyan Lu; Alessandro Luciani; John M Lucocq; Paula Ludovico; Micah A Luftig; Morten Luhr; Diego Luis-Ravelo; Julian J Lum; Liany Luna-Dulcey; Anders H Lund; Viktor K Lund; Jan D Lünemann; Patrick Lüningschrör; Honglin Luo; Rongcan Luo; Shouqing Luo; Zhi Luo; Claudio Luparello; Bernhard Lüscher; Luan Luu; Alex Lyakhovich; Konstantin G Lyamzaev; Alf Håkon Lystad; Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk; Alvin C Ma; Changle Ma; Mengxiao Ma; Ning-Fang Ma; Quan-Hong Ma; Xinliang Ma; Yueyun Ma; Zhenyi Ma; Ormond A MacDougald; Fernando Macian; Gustavo C MacIntosh; Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Kay F Macleod; Sandra Maday; Frank Madeo; Muniswamy Madesh; Tobias Madl; Julio Madrigal-Matute; Akiko Maeda; Yasuhiro Maejima; Marta Magarinos; Poornima Mahavadi; Emiliano Maiani; Kenneth Maiese; Panchanan Maiti; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Barbara Majello; Michael B Major; Elena Makareeva; Fayaz Malik; Karthik Mallilankaraman; Walter Malorni; Alina Maloyan; Najiba Mammadova; Gene Chi Wai Man; Federico Manai; Joseph D Mancias; Eva-Maria Mandelkow; Michael A Mandell; Angelo A Manfredi; Masoud H Manjili; Ravi Manjithaya; Patricio Manque; Bella B Manshian; Raquel Manzano; Claudia Manzoni; Kai Mao; Cinzia Marchese; Sandrine Marchetti; Anna Maria Marconi; Fabrizio Marcucci; Stefania Mardente; Olga A Mareninova; Marta Margeta; Muriel Mari; Sara Marinelli; Oliviero Marinelli; Guillermo Mariño; Sofia Mariotto; Richard S Marshall; Mark R Marten; Sascha Martens; Alexandre P J Martin; Katie R Martin; Sara Martin; Shaun Martin; Adrián Martín-Segura; Miguel A Martín-Acebes; Inmaculada Martin-Burriel; Marcos Martin-Rincon; Paloma Martin-Sanz; José A Martina; Wim Martinet; Aitor Martinez; Ana Martinez; Jennifer Martinez; Moises Martinez Velazquez; Nuria Martinez-Lopez; Marta Martinez-Vicente; Daniel O Martins; Joilson O Martins; Waleska K Martins; Tania Martins-Marques; Emanuele Marzetti; Shashank Masaldan; Celine Masclaux-Daubresse; Douglas G Mashek; Valentina Massa; Lourdes Massieu; Glenn R Masson; Laura Masuelli; Anatoliy I Masyuk; Tetyana V Masyuk; Paola Matarrese; Ander Matheu; Satoaki Matoba; Sachiko Matsuzaki; Pamela Mattar; Alessandro Matte; Domenico Mattoscio; José L Mauriz; Mario Mauthe; Caroline Mauvezin; Emanual Maverakis; Paola Maycotte; Johanna Mayer; Gianluigi Mazzoccoli; Cristina Mazzoni; Joseph R Mazzulli; Nami McCarty; Christine McDonald; Mitchell R McGill; Sharon L McKenna; BethAnn McLaughlin; Fionn McLoughlin; Mark A McNiven; Thomas G McWilliams; Fatima Mechta-Grigoriou; Tania Catarina Medeiros; Diego L Medina; Lynn A Megeney; Klara Megyeri; Maryam Mehrpour; Jawahar L Mehta; Alfred J Meijer; Annemarie H Meijer; Jakob Mejlvang; Alicia Meléndez; Annette Melk; Gonen Memisoglu; Alexandrina F Mendes; Delong Meng; Fei Meng; Tian Meng; Rubem Menna-Barreto; Manoj B Menon; Carol Mercer; Anne E Mercier; Jean-Louis Mergny; Adalberto Merighi; Seth D Merkley; Giuseppe Merla; Volker Meske; Ana Cecilia Mestre; Shree Padma Metur; Christian Meyer; Hemmo Meyer; Wenyi Mi; Jeanne Mialet-Perez; Junying Miao; Lucia Micale; Yasuo Miki; Enrico Milan; Małgorzata Milczarek; Dana L Miller; Samuel I Miller; Silke Miller; Steven W Millward; Ira Milosevic; Elena A Minina; Hamed Mirzaei; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Mehdi Mirzaei; Amit Mishra; Nandita Mishra; Paras Kumar Mishra; Maja Misirkic Marjanovic; Roberta Misasi; Amit Misra; Gabriella Misso; Claire Mitchell; Geraldine Mitou; Tetsuji Miura; Shigeki Miyamoto; Makoto Miyazaki; Mitsunori Miyazaki; Taiga Miyazaki; Keisuke Miyazawa; Noboru Mizushima; Trine H Mogensen; Baharia Mograbi; Reza Mohammadinejad; Yasir Mohamud; Abhishek Mohanty; Sipra Mohapatra; Torsten Möhlmann; Asif Mohmmed; Anna Moles; Kelle H Moley; Maurizio Molinari; Vincenzo Mollace; Andreas Buch Møller; Bertrand Mollereau; Faustino Mollinedo; Costanza Montagna; Mervyn J Monteiro; Andrea Montella; L Ruth Montes; Barbara Montico; Vinod K Mony; Giacomo Monzio Compagnoni; Michael N Moore; Mohammad A Moosavi; Ana L Mora; Marina Mora; David Morales-Alamo; Rosario Moratalla; Paula I Moreira; Elena Morelli; Sandra Moreno; Daniel Moreno-Blas; Viviana Moresi; Benjamin Morga; Alwena H Morgan; Fabrice Morin; Hideaki Morishita; Orson L Moritz; Mariko Moriyama; Yuji Moriyasu; Manuela Morleo; Eugenia Morselli; Jose F Moruno-Manchon; Jorge Moscat; Serge Mostowy; Elisa Motori; Andrea Felinto Moura; Naima Moustaid-Moussa; Maria Mrakovcic; Gabriel Muciño-Hernández; Anupam Mukherjee; Subhadip Mukhopadhyay; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Victoriano Mulero; Sylviane Muller; Christian Münch; Ashok Munjal; Pura Munoz-Canoves; Teresa Muñoz-Galdeano; Christian Münz; Tomokazu Murakawa; Claudia Muratori; Brona M Murphy; J Patrick Murphy; Aditya Murthy; Timo T Myöhänen; Indira U Mysorekar; Jennifer Mytych; Seyed Mohammad Nabavi; Massimo Nabissi; Péter Nagy; Jihoon Nah; Aimable Nahimana; Ichiro Nakagawa; Ken Nakamura; Hitoshi Nakatogawa; Shyam S Nandi; Meera Nanjundan; Monica Nanni; Gennaro Napolitano; Roberta Nardacci; Masashi Narita; Melissa Nassif; Ilana Nathan; Manabu Natsumeda; Ryno J Naude; Christin Naumann; Olaia Naveiras; Fatemeh Navid; Steffan T Nawrocki; Taras Y Nazarko; Francesca Nazio; Florentina Negoita; Thomas Neill; Amanda L Neisch; Luca M Neri; Mihai G Netea; Patrick Neubert; Thomas P Neufeld; Dietbert Neumann; Albert Neutzner; Phillip T Newton; Paul A Ney; Ioannis P Nezis; Charlene C W Ng; Tzi Bun Ng; Hang T T Nguyen; Long T Nguyen; Hong-Min Ni; Clíona Ní Cheallaigh; Zhenhong Ni; M Celeste Nicolao; Francesco Nicoli; Manuel Nieto-Diaz; Per Nilsson; Shunbin Ning; Rituraj Niranjan; Hiroshi Nishimune; Mireia Niso-Santano; Ralph A Nixon; Annalisa Nobili; Clevio Nobrega; Takeshi Noda; Uxía Nogueira-Recalde; Trevor M Nolan; Ivan Nombela; Ivana Novak; Beatriz Novoa; Takashi Nozawa; Nobuyuki Nukina; Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer; Jesper Nylandsted; Tracey R O'Donovan; Seónadh M O'Leary; Eyleen J O'Rourke; Mary P O'Sullivan; Timothy E O'Sullivan; Salvatore Oddo; Ina Oehme; Michinaga Ogawa; Eric Ogier-Denis; Margret H Ogmundsdottir; Besim Ogretmen; Goo Taeg Oh; Seon-Hee Oh; Young J Oh; Takashi Ohama; Yohei Ohashi; Masaki Ohmuraya; Vasileios Oikonomou; Rani Ojha; Koji Okamoto; Hitoshi Okazawa; Masahide Oku; Sara Oliván; Jorge M A Oliveira; Michael Ollmann; James A Olzmann; Shakib Omari; M Bishr Omary; Gizem Önal; Martin Ondrej; Sang-Bing Ong; Sang-Ging Ong; Anna Onnis; Juan A Orellana; Sara Orellana-Muñoz; Maria Del Mar Ortega-Villaizan; Xilma R Ortiz-Gonzalez; Elena Ortona; Heinz D Osiewacz; Abdel-Hamid K Osman; Rosario Osta; Marisa S Otegui; Kinya Otsu; Christiane Ott; Luisa Ottobrini; Jing-Hsiung James Ou; Tiago F Outeiro; Inger Oynebraten; Melek Ozturk; Gilles Pagès; Susanta Pahari; Marta Pajares; Utpal B Pajvani; Rituraj Pal; Simona Paladino; Nicolas Pallet; Michela Palmieri; Giuseppe Palmisano; Camilla Palumbo; Francesco Pampaloni; Lifeng Pan; Qingjun Pan; Wenliang Pan; Xin Pan; Ganna Panasyuk; Rahul Pandey; Udai B Pandey; Vrajesh Pandya; Francesco Paneni; Shirley Y Pang; Elisa Panzarini; Daniela L Papademetrio; Elena Papaleo; Daniel Papinski; Diana Papp; Eun Chan Park; Hwan Tae Park; Ji-Man Park; Jong-In Park; Joon Tae Park; Junsoo Park; Sang Chul Park; Sang-Youel Park; Abraham H Parola; Jan B Parys; Adrien Pasquier; Benoit Pasquier; João F Passos; Nunzia Pastore; Hemal H Patel; Daniel Patschan; Sophie Pattingre; Gustavo Pedraza-Alva; Jose Pedraza-Chaverri; Zully Pedrozo; Gang Pei; Jianming Pei; Hadas Peled-Zehavi; Joaquín M Pellegrini; Joffrey Pelletier; Miguel A Peñalva; Di Peng; Ying Peng; Fabio Penna; Maria Pennuto; Francesca Pentimalli; Cláudia Mf Pereira; Gustavo J S Pereira; Lilian C Pereira; Luis Pereira de Almeida; Nirma D Perera; Ángel Pérez-Lara; Ana B Perez-Oliva; María Esther Pérez-Pérez; Palsamy Periyasamy; Andras Perl; Cristiana Perrotta; Ida Perrotta; Richard G Pestell; Morten Petersen; Irina Petrache; Goran Petrovski; Thorsten Pfirrmann; Astrid S Pfister; Jennifer A Philips; Huifeng Pi; Anna Picca; Alicia M Pickrell; Sandy Picot; Giovanna M Pierantoni; Marina Pierdominici; Philippe Pierre; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Karolina Pierzynowska; Federico Pietrocola; Miroslawa Pietruczuk; Claudio Pignata; Felipe X Pimentel-Muiños; Mario Pinar; Roberta O Pinheiro; Ronit Pinkas-Kramarski; Paolo Pinton; Karolina Pircs; Sujan Piya; Paola Pizzo; Theo S Plantinga; Harald W Platta; Ainhoa Plaza-Zabala; Markus Plomann; Egor Y Plotnikov; Helene Plun-Favreau; Ryszard Pluta; Roger Pocock; Stefanie Pöggeler; Christian Pohl; Marc Poirot; Angelo Poletti; Marisa Ponpuak; Hana Popelka; Blagovesta Popova; Helena Porta; Soledad Porte Alcon; Eliana Portilla-Fernandez; Martin Post; Malia B Potts; Joanna Poulton; Ted Powers; Veena Prahlad; Tomasz K Prajsnar; Domenico Praticò; Rosaria Prencipe; Muriel Priault; Tassula Proikas-Cezanne; Vasilis J Promponas; Christopher G Proud; Rosa Puertollano; Luigi Puglielli; Thomas Pulinilkunnil; Deepika Puri; Rajat Puri; Julien Puyal; Xiaopeng Qi; Yongmei Qi; Wenbin Qian; Lei Qiang; Yu Qiu; Joe Quadrilatero; Jorge Quarleri; Nina Raben; Hannah Rabinowich; Debora Ragona; Michael J Ragusa; Nader Rahimi; Marveh Rahmati; Valeria Raia; Nuno Raimundo; Namakkal-Soorappan Rajasekaran; Sriganesh Ramachandra Rao; Abdelhaq Rami; Ignacio Ramírez-Pardo; David B Ramsden; Felix Randow; Pundi N Rangarajan; Danilo Ranieri; Hai Rao; Lang Rao; Rekha Rao; Sumit Rathore; J Arjuna Ratnayaka; Edward A Ratovitski; Palaniyandi Ravanan; Gloria Ravegnini; Swapan K Ray; Babak Razani; Vito Rebecca; Fulvio Reggiori; Anne Régnier-Vigouroux; Andreas S Reichert; David Reigada; Jan H Reiling; Theo Rein; Siegfried Reipert; Rokeya Sultana Rekha; Hongmei Ren; Jun Ren; Weichao Ren; Tristan Renault; Giorgia Renga; Karen Reue; Kim Rewitz; Bruna Ribeiro de Andrade Ramos; S Amer Riazuddin; Teresa M Ribeiro-Rodrigues; Jean-Ehrland Ricci; Romeo Ricci; Victoria Riccio; Des R Richardson; Yasuko Rikihisa; Makarand V Risbud; Ruth M Risueño; Konstantinos Ritis; Salvatore Rizza; Rosario Rizzuto; Helen C Roberts; Luke D Roberts; Katherine J Robinson; Maria Carmela Roccheri; Stephane Rocchi; George G Rodney; Tiago Rodrigues; Vagner Ramon Rodrigues Silva; Amaia Rodriguez; Ruth Rodriguez-Barrueco; Nieves Rodriguez-Henche; Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha; Jeroen Roelofs; Robert S Rogers; Vladimir V Rogov; Ana I Rojo; Krzysztof Rolka; Vanina Romanello; Luigina Romani; Alessandra Romano; Patricia S Romano; David Romeo-Guitart; Luis C Romero; Montserrat Romero; Joseph C Roney; Christopher Rongo; Sante Roperto; Mathias T Rosenfeldt; Philip Rosenstiel; Anne G Rosenwald; Kevin A Roth; Lynn Roth; Steven Roth; Kasper M A Rouschop; Benoit D Roussel; Sophie Roux; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Ajit Roy; Aurore Rozieres; Diego Ruano; David C Rubinsztein; Maria P Rubtsova; Klaus Ruckdeschel; Christoph Ruckenstuhl; Emil Rudolf; Rüdiger Rudolf; Alessandra Ruggieri; Avnika Ashok Ruparelia; Paola Rusmini; Ryan R Russell; Gian Luigi Russo; Maria Russo; Rossella Russo; Oxana O Ryabaya; Kevin M Ryan; Kwon-Yul Ryu; Maria Sabater-Arcis; Ulka Sachdev; Michael Sacher; Carsten Sachse; Abhishek Sadhu; Junichi Sadoshima; Nathaniel Safren; Paul Saftig; Antonia P Sagona; Gaurav Sahay; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mustafa Sahin; Ozgur Sahin; Sumit Sahni; Nayuta Saito; Shigeru Saito; Tsunenori Saito; Ryohei Sakai; Yasuyoshi Sakai; Jun-Ichi Sakamaki; Kalle Saksela; Gloria Salazar; Anna Salazar-Degracia; Ghasem H Salekdeh; Ashok K Saluja; Belém Sampaio-Marques; Maria Cecilia Sanchez; Jose A Sanchez-Alcazar; Victoria Sanchez-Vera; Vanessa Sancho-Shimizu; J Thomas Sanderson; Marco Sandri; Stefano Santaguida; Laura Santambrogio; Magda M Santana; Giorgio Santoni; Alberto Sanz; Pascual Sanz; Shweta Saran; Marco Sardiello; Timothy J Sargeant; Apurva Sarin; Chinmoy Sarkar; Sovan Sarkar; Maria-Rosa Sarrias; Surajit Sarkar; Dipanka Tanu Sarmah; Jaakko Sarparanta; Aishwarya Sathyanarayan; Ranganayaki Sathyanarayanan; K Matthew Scaglione; Francesca Scatozza; Liliana Schaefer; Zachary T Schafer; Ulrich E Schaible; Anthony H V Schapira; Michael Scharl; Hermann M Schatzl; Catherine H Schein; Wiep Scheper; David Scheuring; Maria Vittoria Schiaffino; Monica Schiappacassi; Rainer Schindl; Uwe Schlattner; Oliver Schmidt; Roland Schmitt; Stephen D Schmidt; Ingo Schmitz; Eran Schmukler; Anja Schneider; Bianca E Schneider; Romana Schober; Alejandra C Schoijet; Micah B Schott; Michael Schramm; Bernd Schröder; Kai Schuh; Christoph Schüller; Ryan J Schulze; Lea Schürmanns; Jens C Schwamborn; Melanie Schwarten; Filippo Scialo; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Melanie J Scott; Kathleen W Scotto; A Ivana Scovassi; Andrea Scrima; Aurora Scrivo; David Sebastian; Salwa Sebti; Simon Sedej; Laura Segatori; Nava Segev; Per O Seglen; Iban Seiliez; Ekihiro Seki; Scott B Selleck; Frank W Sellke; Joshua T Selsby; Michael Sendtner; Serif Senturk; Elena Seranova; Consolato Sergi; Ruth Serra-Moreno; Hiromi Sesaki; Carmine Settembre; Subba Rao Gangi Setty; Gianluca Sgarbi; Ou Sha; John J Shacka; Javeed A Shah; Dantong Shang; Changshun Shao; Feng Shao; Soroush Sharbati; Lisa M Sharkey; Dipali Sharma; Gaurav Sharma; Kulbhushan Sharma; Pawan Sharma; Surendra Sharma; Han-Ming Shen; Hongtao Shen; Jiangang Shen; Ming Shen; Weili Shen; Zheni Shen; Rui Sheng; Zhi Sheng; Zu-Hang Sheng; Jianjian Shi; Xiaobing Shi; Ying-Hong Shi; Kahori Shiba-Fukushima; Jeng-Jer Shieh; Yohta Shimada; Shigeomi Shimizu; Makoto Shimozawa; Takahiro Shintani; Christopher J Shoemaker; Shahla Shojaei; Ikuo Shoji; Bhupendra V Shravage; Viji Shridhar; Chih-Wen Shu; Hong-Bing Shu; Ke Shui; Arvind K Shukla; Timothy E Shutt; Valentina Sica; Aleem Siddiqui; Amanda Sierra; Virginia Sierra-Torre; Santiago Signorelli; Payel Sil; Bruno J de Andrade Silva; Johnatas D Silva; Eduardo Silva-Pavez; Sandrine Silvente-Poirot; Rachel E Simmonds; Anna Katharina Simon; Hans-Uwe Simon; Matias Simons; Anurag Singh; Lalit P Singh; Rajat Singh; Shivendra V Singh; Shrawan K Singh; Sudha B Singh; Sunaina Singh; Surinder Pal Singh; Debasish Sinha; Rohit Anthony Sinha; Sangita Sinha; Agnieszka Sirko; Kapil Sirohi; Efthimios L Sivridis; Panagiotis Skendros; Aleksandra Skirycz; Iva Slaninová; Soraya S Smaili; Andrei Smertenko; Matthew D Smith; Stefaan J Soenen; Eun Jung Sohn; Sophia P M Sok; Giancarlo Solaini; Thierry Soldati; Scott A Soleimanpour; Rosa M Soler; Alexei Solovchenko; Jason A Somarelli; Avinash Sonawane; Fuyong Song; Hyun Kyu Song; Ju-Xian Song; Kunhua Song; Zhiyin Song; Leandro R Soria; Maurizio Sorice; Alexander A Soukas; Sandra-Fausia Soukup; Diana Sousa; Nadia Sousa; Paul A Spagnuolo; Stephen A Spector; M M Srinivas Bharath; Daret St Clair; Venturina Stagni; Leopoldo Staiano; Clint A Stalnecker; Metodi V Stankov; Peter B Stathopulos; Katja Stefan; Sven Marcel Stefan; Leonidas Stefanis; Joan S Steffan; Alexander Steinkasserer; Harald Stenmark; Jared Sterneckert; Craig Stevens; Veronika Stoka; Stephan Storch; Björn Stork; Flavie Strappazzon; Anne Marie Strohecker; Dwayne G Stupack; Huanxing Su; Ling-Yan Su; Longxiang Su; Ana M Suarez-Fontes; Carlos S Subauste; Selvakumar Subbian; Paula V Subirada; Ganapasam Sudhandiran; Carolyn M Sue; Xinbing Sui; Corey Summers; Guangchao Sun; Jun Sun; Kang Sun; Meng-Xiang Sun; Qiming Sun; Yi Sun; Zhongjie Sun; Karen K S Sunahara; Eva Sundberg; Katalin Susztak; Peter Sutovsky; Hidekazu Suzuki; Gary Sweeney; J David Symons; Stephen Cho Wing Sze; Nathaniel J Szewczyk; Anna Tabęcka-Łonczynska; Claudio Tabolacci; Frank Tacke; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Marco Tafani; Mitsuo Tagaya; Haoran Tai; Stephen W G Tait; Yoshinori Takahashi; Szabolcs Takats; Priti Talwar; Chit Tam; Shing Yau Tam; Davide Tampellini; Atsushi Tamura; Chong Teik Tan; Eng-King Tan; Ya-Qin Tan; Masaki Tanaka; Motomasa Tanaka; Daolin Tang; Jingfeng Tang; Tie-Shan Tang; Isei Tanida; Zhipeng Tao; Mohammed Taouis; Lars Tatenhorst; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Allen Taylor; Gregory A Taylor; Joan M Taylor; Elena Tchetina; Andrew R Tee; Irmgard Tegeder; David Teis; Natercia Teixeira; Fatima Teixeira-Clerc; Kumsal A Tekirdag; Tewin Tencomnao; Sandra Tenreiro; Alexei V Tepikin; Pilar S Testillano; Gianluca Tettamanti; Pierre-Louis Tharaux; Kathrin Thedieck; Arvind A Thekkinghat; Stefano Thellung; Josephine W Thinwa; V P Thirumalaikumar; Sufi Mary Thomas; Paul G Thomes; Andrew Thorburn; Lipi Thukral; Thomas Thum; Michael Thumm; Ling Tian; Ales Tichy; Andreas Till; Vincent Timmerman; Vladimir I Titorenko; Sokol V Todi; Krassimira Todorova; Janne M Toivonen; Luana Tomaipitinca; Dhanendra Tomar; Cristina Tomas-Zapico; Sergej Tomić; Benjamin Chun-Kit Tong; Chao Tong; Xin Tong; Sharon A Tooze; Maria L Torgersen; Satoru Torii; Liliana Torres-López; Alicia Torriglia; Christina G Towers; Roberto Towns; Shinya Toyokuni; Vladimir Trajkovic; Donatella Tramontano; Quynh-Giao Tran; Leonardo H Travassos; Charles B Trelford; Shirley Tremel; Ioannis P Trougakos; Betty P Tsao; Mario P Tschan; Hung-Fat Tse; Tak Fu Tse; Hitoshi Tsugawa; Andrey S Tsvetkov; David A Tumbarello; Yasin Tumtas; María J Tuñón; Sandra Turcotte; Boris Turk; Vito Turk; Bradley J Turner; Richard I Tuxworth; Jessica K Tyler; Elena V Tyutereva; Yasuo Uchiyama; Aslihan Ugun-Klusek; Holm H Uhlig; Marzena Ułamek-Kozioł; Ilya V Ulasov; Midori Umekawa; Christian Ungermann; Rei Unno; Sylvie Urbe; Elisabet Uribe-Carretero; Suayib Üstün; Vladimir N Uversky; Thomas Vaccari; Maria I Vaccaro; Björn F Vahsen; Helin Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg; Rut Valdor; Maria J Valente; Ayelén Valko; Richard B Vallee; Angela M Valverde; Greet Van den Berghe; Stijn van der Veen; Luc Van Kaer; Jorg van Loosdregt; Sjoerd J L van Wijk; Wim Vandenberghe; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Marcos A Vannier-Santos; Nicola Vannini; M Cristina Vanrell; Chiara Vantaggiato; Gabriele Varano; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Máté Varga; M Helena Vasconcelos; Somya Vats; Demetrios G Vavvas; Ignacio Vega-Naredo; Silvia Vega-Rubin-de-Celis; Guillermo Velasco; Ariadna P Velázquez; Tibor Vellai; Edo Vellenga; Francesca Velotti; Mireille Verdier; Panayotis Verginis; Isabelle Vergne; Paul Verkade; Manish Verma; Patrik Verstreken; Tim Vervliet; Jörg Vervoorts; Alexandre T Vessoni; Victor M Victor; Michel Vidal; Chiara Vidoni; Otilia V Vieira; Richard D Vierstra; Sonia Viganó; Helena Vihinen; Vinoy Vijayan; Miquel Vila; Marçal Vilar; José M Villalba; Antonio Villalobo; Beatriz Villarejo-Zori; Francesc Villarroya; Joan Villarroya; Olivier Vincent; Cecile Vindis; Christophe Viret; Maria Teresa Viscomi; Dora Visnjic; Ilio Vitale; David J Vocadlo; Olga V Voitsekhovskaja; Cinzia Volonté; Mattia Volta; Marta Vomero; Clarissa Von Haefen; Marc A Vooijs; Wolfgang Voos; Ljubica Vucicevic; Richard Wade-Martins; Satoshi Waguri; Kenrick A Waite; Shuji Wakatsuki; David W Walker; Mark J Walker; Simon A Walker; Jochen Walter; Francisco G Wandosell; Bo Wang; Chao-Yung Wang; Chen Wang; Chenran Wang; Chenwei Wang; Cun-Yu Wang; Dong Wang; Fangyang Wang; Feng Wang; Fengming Wang; Guansong Wang; Han Wang; Hao Wang; Hexiang Wang; Hong-Gang Wang; Jianrong Wang; Jigang Wang; Jiou Wang; Jundong Wang; Kui Wang; Lianrong Wang; Liming Wang; Maggie Haitian Wang; Meiqing Wang; Nanbu Wang; Pengwei Wang; Peipei Wang; Ping Wang; Ping Wang; Qing Jun Wang; Qing Wang; Qing Kenneth Wang; Qiong A Wang; Wen-Tao Wang; Wuyang Wang; Xinnan Wang; Xuejun Wang; Yan Wang; Yanchang Wang; Yanzhuang Wang; Yen-Yun Wang; Yihua Wang; Yipeng Wang; Yu Wang; Yuqi Wang; Zhe Wang; Zhenyu Wang; Zhouguang Wang; Gary Warnes; Verena Warnsmann; Hirotaka Watada; Eizo Watanabe; Maxinne Watchon; Anna Wawrzyńska; Timothy E Weaver; Grzegorz Wegrzyn; Ann M Wehman; Huafeng Wei; Lei Wei; Taotao Wei; Yongjie Wei; Oliver H Weiergräber; Conrad C Weihl; Günther Weindl; Ralf Weiskirchen; Alan Wells; Runxia H Wen; Xin Wen; Antonia Werner; Beatrice Weykopf; Sally P Wheatley; J Lindsay Whitton; Alexander J Whitworth; Katarzyna Wiktorska; Manon E Wildenberg; Tom Wileman; Simon Wilkinson; Dieter Willbold; Brett Williams; Robin S B Williams; Roger L Williams; Peter R Williamson; Richard A Wilson; Beate Winner; Nathaniel J Winsor; Steven S Witkin; Harald Wodrich; Ute Woehlbier; Thomas Wollert; Esther Wong; Jack Ho Wong; Richard W Wong; Vincent Kam Wai Wong; W Wei-Lynn Wong; An-Guo Wu; Chengbiao Wu; Jian Wu; Junfang Wu; Kenneth K Wu; Min Wu; Shan-Ying Wu; Shengzhou Wu; Shu-Yan Wu; Shufang Wu; William K K Wu; Xiaohong Wu; Xiaoqing Wu; Yao-Wen Wu; Yihua Wu; Ramnik J Xavier; Hongguang Xia; Lixin Xia; Zhengyuan Xia; Ge Xiang; Jin Xiang; Mingliang Xiang; Wei Xiang; Bin Xiao; Guozhi Xiao; Hengyi Xiao; Hong-Tao Xiao; Jian Xiao; Lan Xiao; Shi Xiao; Yin Xiao; Baoming Xie; Chuan-Ming Xie; Min Xie; Yuxiang Xie; Zhiping Xie; Zhonglin Xie; Maria Xilouri; Congfeng Xu; En Xu; Haoxing Xu; Jing Xu; JinRong Xu; Liang Xu; Wen Wen Xu; Xiulong Xu; Yu Xue; Sokhna M S Yakhine-Diop; Masamitsu Yamaguchi; Osamu Yamaguchi; Ai Yamamoto; Shunhei Yamashina; Shengmin Yan; Shian-Jang Yan; Zhen Yan; Yasuo Yanagi; Chuanbin Yang; Dun-Sheng Yang; Huan Yang; Huang-Tian Yang; Hui Yang; Jin-Ming Yang; Jing Yang; Jingyu Yang; Ling Yang; Liu Yang; Ming Yang; Pei-Ming Yang; Qian Yang; Seungwon Yang; Shu Yang; Shun-Fa Yang; Wannian Yang; Wei Yuan Yang; Xiaoyong Yang; Xuesong Yang; Yi Yang; Ying Yang; Honghong Yao; Shenggen Yao; Xiaoqiang Yao; Yong-Gang Yao; Yong-Ming Yao; Takahiro Yasui; Meysam Yazdankhah; Paul M Yen; Cong Yi; Xiao-Ming Yin; Yanhai Yin; Zhangyuan Yin; Ziyi Yin; Meidan Ying; Zheng Ying; Calvin K Yip; Stephanie Pei Tung Yiu; Young H Yoo; Kiyotsugu Yoshida; Saori R Yoshii; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Bahman Yousefi; Boxuan Yu; Haiyang Yu; Jun Yu; Jun Yu; Li Yu; Ming-Lung Yu; Seong-Woon Yu; Victor C Yu; W Haung Yu; Zhengping Yu; Zhou Yu; Junying Yuan; Ling-Qing Yuan; Shilin Yuan; Shyng-Shiou F Yuan; Yanggang Yuan; Zengqiang Yuan; Jianbo Yue; Zhenyu Yue; Jeanho Yun; Raymond L Yung; David N Zacks; Gabriele Zaffagnini; Vanessa O Zambelli; Isabella Zanella; Qun S Zang; Sara Zanivan; Silvia Zappavigna; Pilar Zaragoza; Konstantinos S Zarbalis; Amir Zarebkohan; Amira Zarrouk; Scott O Zeitlin; Jialiu Zeng; Ju-Deng Zeng; Eva Žerovnik; Lixuan Zhan; Bin Zhang; Donna D Zhang; Hanlin Zhang; Hong Zhang; Hong Zhang; Honghe Zhang; Huafeng Zhang; Huaye Zhang; Hui Zhang; Hui-Ling Zhang; Jianbin Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; Jing-Pu Zhang; Kalin Y B Zhang; Leshuai W Zhang; Lin Zhang; Lisheng Zhang; Lu Zhang; Luoying Zhang; Menghuan Zhang; Peng Zhang; Sheng Zhang; Wei Zhang; Xiangnan Zhang; Xiao-Wei Zhang; Xiaolei Zhang; Xiaoyan Zhang; Xin Zhang; Xinxin Zhang; Xu Dong Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yanjin Zhang; Yi Zhang; Ying-Dong Zhang; Yingmei Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yuchen Zhang; Zhe Zhang; Zhengguang Zhang; Zhibing Zhang; Zhihai Zhang; Zhiyong Zhang; Zili Zhang; Haobin Zhao; Lei Zhao; Shuang Zhao; Tongbiao Zhao; Xiao-Fan Zhao; Ying Zhao; Yongchao Zhao; Yongliang Zhao; Yuting Zhao; Guoping Zheng; Kai Zheng; Ling Zheng; Shizhong Zheng; Xi-Long Zheng; Yi Zheng; Zu-Guo Zheng; Boris Zhivotovsky; Qing Zhong; Ao Zhou; Ben Zhou; Cefan Zhou; Gang Zhou; Hao Zhou; Hong Zhou; Hongbo Zhou; Jie Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jiyong Zhou; Kailiang Zhou; Rongjia Zhou; Xu-Jie Zhou; Yanshuang Zhou; Yinghong Zhou; Yubin Zhou; Zheng-Yu Zhou; Zhou Zhou; Binglin Zhu; Changlian Zhu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Haining Zhu; Hongxin Zhu; Hua Zhu; Wei-Guo Zhu; Yanping Zhu; Yushan Zhu; Haixia Zhuang; Xiaohong Zhuang; Katarzyna Zientara-Rytter; Christine M Zimmermann; Elena Ziviani; Teresa Zoladek; Wei-Xing Zong; Dmitry B Zorov; Antonio Zorzano; Weiping Zou; Zhen Zou; Zhengzhi Zou; Steven Zuryn; Werner Zwerschke; Beate Brand-Saberi; X Charlie Dong; Chandra Shekar Kenchappa; Zuguo Li; Yong Lin; Shigeru Oshima; Yueguang Rong; Judith C Sluimer; Christina L Stallings; Chun-Kit Tong Journal: Autophagy Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 13.391
Authors: Yadong Sun; Niklas Berleth; Wenxian Wu; David Schlütermann; Jana Deitersen; Fabian Stuhldreier; Lena Berning; Annabelle Friedrich; Seda Akgün; María José Mendiburo; Sebastian Wesselborg; Marcus Conrad; Carsten Berndt; Björn Stork Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Christian Schlein; Alexander W Fischer; Frederike Sass; Anna Worthmann; Klaus Tödter; Michelle Y Jaeckstein; Janina Behrens; Matthew D Lynes; Michael A Kiebish; Niven R Narain; Val Bussberg; Abena Darkwah; Naja Zenius Jespersen; Søren Nielsen; Camilla Scheele; Michaela Schweizer; Ingke Braren; Alexander Bartelt; Yu-Hua Tseng; Joerg Heeren; Ludger Scheja Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 9.423