Literature DB >> 31208985

Compromising Outcomes.

Peter B Imrey1,2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; data dredging; multiple testing; p-hacking; publication guidelines; research ethics

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31208985      PMCID： PMC6622432          DOI： 10.1681/ASN.2019010057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN： 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


× No keyword cloud information.
  29 in total

1.  Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Mette T Haahr; Peter C Gøtzsche; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Karmela Krleza-Jerić; Isabelle Schmid; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sylvain Mathieu; Isabelle Boutron; David Moher; Douglas G Altman; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Jamie J Kirkham; Kerry M Dwan; Douglas G Altman; Carrol Gamble; Susanna Dodd; Rebecca Smyth; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-15

5.  Comparison of randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of reports in surgery journals.

Authors:  Rachel Rosenthal; Kerry Dwan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.

Authors:  Gerjon Hannink; Hein G Gooszen; Maroeska M Rovers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.

Authors:  Paul Glasziou; Douglas G Altman; Patrick Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Mike Clarke; Steven Julious; Susan Michie; David Moher; Elizabeth Wager
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.

Authors:  Kerry Dwan; Douglas G Altman; Juan A Arnaiz; Jill Bloom; An-Wen Chan; Eugenia Cronin; Evelyne Decullier; Philippa J Easterbrook; Erik Von Elm; Carrol Gamble; Davina Ghersi; John P A Ioannidis; John Simes; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.

Authors:  Kerry Dwan; Carrol Gamble; Paula R Williamson; Jamie J Kirkham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.