| Literature DB >> 31208425 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: By identifying the occupations of women with breast cancer who have performance problems, to examine the impact of the application of occupation-based problem-solving strategies (OB-PSS) training on cancer-related fatigue, depression, and quality of life.Entities:
Keywords: Activity performance; Breast Cancer; Occupational therapy; Problem solving; Quality of life; Rehabilitation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31208425 PMCID: PMC6580619 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1170-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes ISSN: 1477-7525 Impact factor: 3.186
Findings related to the demographic information about women (N = 22)
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Stage of Cancer | ||
| Stage 1 | 9 | 40,9 |
| Stage 2 | 15 | 59,1 |
| Drug Use | ||
| Yes | 19 | 86.4 |
| No | 3 | 13,6 |
| Drug use for depression | ||
| Yes | 8 | 36,6 |
| No | 14 | 63,4 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 16 | 72,7 |
| Single | 2 | 9,1 |
| Widow | 4 | 18,2 |
| Level of education | ||
| Primary school | 0 | 0 |
| Middle school | 2 | 9,1 |
| High school | 9 | 40,9 |
| University | 11 | 50,0 |
| Work status (Before medical treatment) | ||
| Yes | 12 | 54,5 |
| No | 10 | 45,5 |
| Work status (After medical treatment) | ||
| Yes | 3 | 13,6 |
| No | 19 | 86,4 |
All the activities with performance problems determined by COPM
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| SELF-CARE | 45 | 40,90 |
| Personal Care | 35 | 31,81 |
| Dressing (upper body) | 17 | 15,45 |
| Dressing bra | 8 | 7,27 |
| Dressing t-shirt | 6 | 5,45 |
| Dressing shirt | 3 | 2,72 |
| Bathing | 13 | 11,81 |
| Hair washing | 7 | 6,36 |
| Back washing | 4 | 3,63 |
| Body washing | 2 | 1,81 |
| Personal hygiene | 5 | 4,54 |
| Hair scanning | 4 | 3,63 |
| Teeth brushing | 1 | 0,9 |
| Functional Mobilite | 5 | 4,54 |
| In-bed mobilizing | 5 | 4,54 |
| Community Management | 5 | 4,54 |
| Driving a car | 3 | 2,72 |
| Shopping | 2 | 1,81 |
| PRODUCTIVITY | 50 | 45,45 |
| Paid/ Unpaid Work | 6 | 5,45 |
| Writing on whiteboard | 3 | 2,72 |
| Using a computer | 1 | 0,9 |
| Writing on paper | 2 | 1,81 |
| Household Management | 44 | 40,0 |
| Cleaning home | 28 | 25,45 |
| Vacuuming the carpet | 11 | 10,0 |
| Hanging curtains | 9 | 8,18 |
| Mopping the floor | 3 | 2,72 |
| Hanging clothes | 2 | 1,81 |
| Dusting | 2 | 1,81 |
| Ironing | 1 | 0,9 |
| Cooking | 16 | 14,54 |
| Stirring | 5 | 4,54 |
| Opening the jar | 5 | 4,54 |
| Carrying teapot | 3 | 2,72 |
| Using a knife | 3 | 2,72 |
| Play/school | 0 | 0 |
| LEISURE | 15 | 13,65 |
| Quiet Recreation (Hobbies etc.) | 8 | 7,29 |
| Knitting | 6 | 5,45 |
| Reading a book | 1 | 0,9 |
| Painting | 1 | 0,9 |
| Active Recreation (Sports etc.) | 3 | 2,72 |
| Dancing (Tango) | 1 | 0,9 |
| Hiking | 1 | 0,9 |
| Fitness | 1 | 0,9 |
| Socialization | 4 | 3,63 |
| Relatives visit | 4 | 3,63 |
| TOTAL | 110 | 100 |
Note: COPM Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Findings concerning OB-PSS steps (N = 110 activities)
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Stage 1. Setting a measurable, realistic and attainable goal for the solution of activities | 110 | 100 |
| Stage 2. Considering and studying the pros and cons of possible solutions by making a brainstorming through the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance | 110 | 100 |
| Stage 3. After deciding on a possible solution, making up a plan and stepping into action | 110 | 100 |
| -Adaptation of the activity | 64 | 58.1 |
| Who | 10 | 9.7 |
| Where | 19 | 18.5 |
| When | 10 | 9.7 |
| How | 29 | 28.2 |
| What | 35 | 33.9 |
| -Finding out the new activity | 8 | 7.2 |
| -Planning the steps of the activity | 28 | 25.6 |
| -Bringing together activity-related information and resources | 10 | 9.1 |
| Stage 4. Evaluation of the solution process | 110 | 100 |
| Successful | 98 | 89 |
| Unsuccessful | 12 | 11 |
Note: OB-PSS Occupation-based problem solving strategies
Comparison of COPM, CFS, BDI and EORTC-QOL averages according to pre and post interventions
| Pre-Intervention | Post-Intervention | t | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPM | Performance | 2,96 ± 0,97 | 6,81 ± 1,04 | −16,96 | < 0.01* |
| Satisfaction | 2,67 ± 1,33 | 7,03 ± 1,28 | −12,56 | < 0.01* | |
| CFS | Physical function | 15,59 ± 4,11 | 7,04 ± 3,73 | 9,45 | < 0.01* |
| Affective function | 11,77 ± 2,32 | 7,81 ± 1,73 | 8,06 | < 0.01* | |
| Cognitive function | 3,72 ± 1,54 | 1,59 ± 1,89 | 4,57 | < 0.01* | |
| Total function | 27,13 ± 4,57 | 20,40 ± 4,45 | 6,51 | < 0.01* | |
| Z | p | ||||
| BDI | Total score | 18,86 ± 6,54 | 6,86 ± 3,82 | − 4120 | < 0.01* |
| EORTC-QOL-C30 | General Health Status | 6,59 ± 2,01 | 11,27 ± 1,63 | −4,14 | < 0.01* |
| Functional Status | 34,36 ± 6,48 | 22,13 ± 3,74 | −4,11 | < 0.01* | |
| Symptom Scale | 26,40 ± 3,96 | 17,95 ± 3,53 | − 4,10 | < 0.01* | |
| Total Score | 67,36 ± 8,63 | 51,36 ± 5,00 | −4,11 | < 0.01* | |
| EORTC-QOL-BR23 | Functional Status | 18,50 ± 2,46 | 16,22 ± 2,58 | −3,26 | < 0.01* |
| Symptom Scale | 36,18 ± 3,34 | 27,18 ± 4,39 | −3,47 | < 0.01* | |
| Total Score | 54,68 ± 5,02 | 43,40 ± 4,83 | −3,57 | < 0.01* | |
Note: COPM Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, CFS Cancer Fatigue Scale, BDI Beck Depression Inventory, The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 and BR23 (EORTC QOL-C30 - EORT QOL-BR23); COPM and CFS averages (Paired student-t test), BDI and EORTC-QOL averages (Wilcoxon signed rank test); *p < 0.01