College students in Nigeria have a low awareness of the risk of human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Lammers and van Wijnbergen[1] have noted the low risk perception of unprotected sex in Nigeria, which
invariably leads to poor awareness of HIV risk. A 2009 study reported that 74.6% of
adolescents in Nigeria were sexually active, 66.4% had multiple partners and only
38.1% always used condoms during sexual intercourse.[2] The low perception of HIV risk has increased the rate of HIV infection in
adolescent college students. There is evidence that 77% of college students in
Nigeria are at risk of HIV infection.[3] A recent study has confirmed that students (mostly adolescents) in Nigeria
and other developing countries are exposed to HIV infection.[4] HIV infections affect adolescents’ education, vocational education, and
personal and social lives. Ezegbe et al.[4] have pointed out that HIV infection can prevent adolescents from achieving
their needs in every area of life, as adolescents with HIV may experience poor
health, malnutrition, low education, lack of affection, insecurity, lack of
protection, rejection, depression, discrimination, fear, loneliness, school dropout
and suicidal thoughts.In addition, there are substantial misconceptions about HIV that lead to low HIV risk
perception.[3,5-7] In Africa as a whole, the high
level of misconceptions about HIV risk frequently undermines HIV prevention efforts.[7] For example, most adolescents obtain HIV information directly from mass media
sources; such information is often superficial and does not dispel erroneous beliefs.[8] Thus, HIV information obtained from the mass media can generate irrational
beliefs that perpetuate HIV risk in adolescents. Although peer education and social
media messaging have been used as strategies to disseminate HIV knowledge,[9,10] an educational digital
storytelling intervention (EDSI) could help adolescents to acquire a broad,
realistic knowledge of HIV.Generally, digital storytelling is considered an effective therapeutic technique for
treating behavioural problems. For instance, there is evidence that digital
storytelling (in oral, pictorial, written and film media forms) is an essential
element in learning new behaviours.[11,12] Digital storytelling has also
been used as a creative counselling tool.[13,14] A recent study revealed that
rational emotive digital storytelling (REDStory) is effective in increasing HIV
knowledge and risk perception among students.[4] Similar to REDStory, the EDSI acknowledges that the way people think, feel
and behave can make them vulnerable to HIV infection. Hence, effective HIV
interventions should consider the cognitive patterns of individuals. There is also
evidence that HIV prevention programs that incorporate cognitive and behavioural
skills training are more effective.[4,15] Therefore, the EDSI
incorporates cognitive restructuring, re-education and sexual communication to help
people alter their erroneous thoughts, emotions and behaviours, and gain the skills
to reduce risk behaviours. The EDSI is built on the assumption that Nigerian
adolescents are vulnerable to HIV infection owing to their daily patterns of
thinking, feeling and behaving. To this end, cognitive restructuring and
re-education are required to help adolescents overcome HIV risks. Thus, the
objective of this study was to investigate the impact of an EDSI on HIV risk
perception and knowledge among Nigerian adolescent college students.
Method
Ethical standards
The study procedure complied with the ethical principles of the American
Psychological Association, the Declaration of Helsinki and the Faculty of
Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. The study protocol was approved by the
ethics committee of the Department of Art Education, University of Nigeria. The
participants provided written informed consent before the beginning of the
program.
Participants
We recruited 98 adolescents who attended a federal science college in Akwa Ibom
State, Nigeria. We used G*Power 3.1 software (Heinrich-Heine-Universität
Düsseldorf, Germany)[16] to determine the appropriateness of the sample size. The G*Power analysis
showed that 98 participants were needed for an effect size of 0.60, an alpha of
0.05 and 0.80 power. The inclusion criteria were having access to social media
platforms, availability to attend all the study sessions, and willingness to
sign the informed consent form.
Measures
We used the 8-item Perceived Risk of HIV Scale (PRHS) generated by Napper, Fisher
and Reynolds.[17] The PRHS had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.77 in the present study, showing
good internal reliability. We also used the HIV Knowledge Questionnaire
(HIV-KQ-18) designed by Carey and Schroder[18] to measure HIV-related knowledge (Cronbach’s alpha was 0.87 for this
scale in the present study, indicating good internal reliability). Other details
of this instrument have been described previously.[4]
Intervention
In line with a previous study,[4] the EDSI was structured to cover 16 sessions over 8 weeks and featured a
rational emotive psychoeducational audio-visual intervention about HIV. The aim
of the EDSI was to help adolescent college students learn from and about other
people’s HIV-related lived experiences to increase their HIV risk perception.
Other details of the intervention (contents, techniques, principles,
assignments, procedures, meetings and skills) have been described previously.[4] The EDSI was delivered by therapists who were experts in the use of
digital storytelling and HIV interventions and who had qualifications in
educational technology, psychology, social work and counselling.
Procedure
We used a group randomized controlled trial design procedure involving pre-test,
post-test and follow-up. We randomly assigned participants into either a
treatment group or a no-treatment control group using computer-generated random
numbers. The participants in the treatment group received the EDSI whereas the
participants in the control group received no intervention. Pre-test, post-test
and follow-up data for the two groups were collected and subjected to repeated
measures analysis of variance by experts. There were 2 months between the
pre-test and post-test. Follow-up occurred 2 months after the post-test day. We
observed a dropout of 23 participants (15 from the treatment group and 8 from
the no-treatment control group), whose data were excluded from the analysis.
Both the participants and the data analysts were blinded, as in our previous
study.[4,19]
Results
There were 49 participants in the treatment group (23 males, 26 females; mean
age ± standard deviation = 20.43 ± 0.89 years). There were 49 participants in the
no-treatment control group (25 males, 24 females; mean age ± standard deviation =
21.67 ± 0.73 years). The pre-test assessment showed no significant difference
between the treatment and no-treatment control groups in perceived risk of HIV and
HIV knowledge, F(1,75) = .074, = .001, ΔR2 = .−013; confidence interval (CI) for the
treatment group = 30.18 to 32.87; CI for the no-treatment control group = 30.13 to
32.44; and F(1,75) = .126, = .001, ΔR2 = .−013; CI for the treatment group = 18.53
to 19.40; CI for the control group = 18.67 to 19.46. After the EDSI, we observed a
significant increase in HIV risk perception and HIV knowledge among adolescents in
the treatment group compared with those in the no-treatment control group,
F(1,75) = 717.92, P = .000, = .908, ΔR2 = .907; CI for the treatment group = 11.52
to 12.82; CI for the control group = 29.80 to 32.14 and
F(1,75) = 2972.19, P = .000, = .976, ΔR2 = .976; CI for the treatment group = 48.44
to 50.72; CI for the control group = 18.69 to 19.50. The follow-up assessment showed
that adolescents who had participated in the EDSI retained an increased HIV risk
perception and HIV knowledge compared with adolescents in the no-treatment control
group, F(1,75) = 809.32, P = .000, = .917, ΔR2 = .916; CI for the treatment group = 9.20
to 10.79; CI for the control group = 29.76 to 32.13 and
F(1,75) = 3048.68, P = .000, = .977, ΔR2 = .977; CI for the treatment group = 48.79
to 51.08; CI for the control group = 18.62 to 19.42.
Discussion
This study investigated the impact of an EDSI on HIV risk perception and knowledge
among Nigerian adolescent college students. The pre-test measure showed that
adolescents had low HIV risk perception and low HIV knowledge, a finding that
supports previous study findings.[1-4] The post-test and follow-up
measures indicated that the EDSI was effective in increasing HIV risk perception and
knowledge among adolescents who received the intervention compared with those in the
control group. The findings support previous evidence that HIV prevention programs
that incorporate cognitive and behavioural skills training are more effective.[15] Moreover, the current results support recent findings that a REDStory
intervention program was effective in increasing schoolchildren’s perceived risk of HIV.[4] The findings also support previous evidence that digital storytelling is an
essential element in learning new behaviours[11,12] and is a useful creative
counselling tool.[13,14]The study findings indicate that educational technologists, counsellors,
psychologists and medical professionals should consider the development and
implementation of educational digital storytelling to increase HIV risk perception
and knowledge in different sectors of society. However, it is important that future
researchers address the present study limitations of the small sample size, the lack
of qualitative data and the limited participant information collected.
Conclusion
The study objective, which was to investigate the impact of an EDSI on HIV risk
perception and knowledge among Nigerian adolescent college students, was achieved.
We conclude that the EDSI should be used to help increase adolescents’ HIV risk
perception and knowledge and that further research and policy changes are needed to
support the full implementation of the EDSI in different sectors of Nigerian society
and in other parts of the world. We therefore call for more studies on the use of
the EDSI to increase HIV risk perception and knowledge.
Authors: Jennifer A Smith; Monisha Sharma; Carol Levin; Jared M Baeten; Heidi van Rooyen; Connie Celum; Timothy B Hallett; Ruanne V Barnabas Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Kayode T Ijadunola; Titilayo C Abiona; Olusola O Odu; Macellina Y Ijadunola Journal: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 1.848
Authors: Kadija M Tahlil; Laura Rachal; Titi Gbajabiamila; Ucheoma Nwaozuru; Chisom Obiezu-Umeh; Takhona Hlatshwako; Mandikudza Tembo; Nicola Willis; Carine Oum Nyagog; Susan Vorkoper; Rachel Sturke; Nora E Rosenberg; Victor Ojo; Isaac Moses; Nadia Ahmed; Kristin Beima-Sofie; Sarah T Roberts; Brenda Kateera; Eleanor Namisoke-Magongo; Michael T Mbizvo; Juliet Iwelunmor; Oliver Ezechi; Joseph D Tucker Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2022-07-12
Authors: Theresa Onyema Ofoegbu; Uche D Asogwa; Chimaobi Samuel Ogbonna; Henry E Aloh; Chiedu Eseadi; Michael Eskay; Godfrey C Nji; Oliver Rotachukwu Ngwoke; Christian Iheanacho Agboti; Robert Azu Nnachi; Oluomachi Charity Nnachi; Mkpoikanke S Otu Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 1.817