H J Wang1, Y Liu, W W Ge, L D Bian, L F Pu, Y Jiang, G F Zhu, X W Jin, J Li. 1. Department of Anethesiology and Perioperative Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Wang Hejie now works in the Department of Anesthesiology, Wenzhou Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital), Wenzhou 325027, China.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the perioperative effects of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in radical mastectomy. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients,undergoing radical mastectomy from May 2016 to Jan 2019,the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, were randomly divided into SAPB group, ESPB group and control group. Patients in SAPB group and ESPB group were received corresponding blocks before induction of general anesthesia. The control group was only received routine general anesthesia without any block. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was performed in all the patients postoperatively. The VAS score at rest or coughing and Ramsay score at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 h after operation were compared among the three groups. The intraoperative dosages of propofol and remifentanil,press times and sufentanil cumulative dosage of PCIA in 48 hours after operation, postoperative rehabilitation indicators and adverse effects were all compared. Results: In all the three groups,the VAS scores at rest and coughing increased first and then decreased 2 h to 48 h after operation. The VAS scores in SAPB group and ESPB group were lower than that in control group (P<0.05), whereas, no significant difference was observed between SAPB group and ESPB group (P>0.05). For Ramsay score, among the three groups, there were no significances of the main effects of group and time point, as well as interaction effect (all P>0.05). The intraoperative dosages of propofol and remifentanil in SAPB group and ESPB group were lower than those in control group (P<0.05), the press times and sufentanil cumulative dosage of PCIA after operation were also lower than those in control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in feeding time after operation among the three groups (P>0.05). The times of first anal exhaust, ambulation and hospitalization after operation in ESPB group and SAPB group were significantly shorter than those in control group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between ESPB group and SAPB group in postoperative rehabilitation indicators mentioned above (P>0.05). The incidences of skin itching and nausea in ESPB and SAPB groups were lower than those in control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of vomiting among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Both SAPB and ESPB can provide good and safe analgesia for radical mastectomy,with equivalent performances in analgesia and adverse effect.
RCT Entities:
Objective: To compare the perioperative effects of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in radical mastectomy. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients,undergoing radical mastectomy from May 2016 to Jan 2019,the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, were randomly divided into SAPB group, ESPB group and control group. Patients in SAPB group and ESPB group were received corresponding blocks before induction of general anesthesia. The control group was only received routine general anesthesia without any block. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was performed in all the patients postoperatively. The VAS score at rest or coughing and Ramsay score at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 h after operation were compared among the three groups. The intraoperative dosages of propofol and remifentanil,press times and sufentanil cumulative dosage of PCIA in 48 hours after operation, postoperative rehabilitation indicators and adverse effects were all compared. Results: In all the three groups,the VAS scores at rest and coughing increased first and then decreased 2 h to 48 h after operation. The VAS scores in SAPB group and ESPB group were lower than that in control group (P<0.05), whereas, no significant difference was observed between SAPB group and ESPB group (P>0.05). For Ramsay score, among the three groups, there were no significances of the main effects of group and time point, as well as interaction effect (all P>0.05). The intraoperative dosages of propofol and remifentanil in SAPB group and ESPB group were lower than those in control group (P<0.05), the press times and sufentanil cumulative dosage of PCIA after operation were also lower than those in control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in feeding time after operation among the three groups (P>0.05). The times of first anal exhaust, ambulation and hospitalization after operation in ESPB group and SAPB group were significantly shorter than those in control group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between ESPB group and SAPB group in postoperative rehabilitation indicators mentioned above (P>0.05). The incidences of skin itching and nausea in ESPB and SAPB groups were lower than those in control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of vomiting among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Both SAPB and ESPB can provide good and safe analgesia for radical mastectomy,with equivalent performances in analgesia and adverse effect.
Entities:
Keywords:
Analgesia; Breast neoplasms; Nerve block; Ultrasonography,doppler