Matthew G Kirkpatrick1, Tess Boley Cruz2, Jennifer B Unger2, Josseline Herrera2, Sara Schiff2, Jon-Patrick Allem2. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, 2001 N. Soto Street, Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: mgkirkpa@usc.edu. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, 2001 N. Soto Street, Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Manufacturers of e-cigarette-related products are using cartoons as a marketing strategy, despite restrictions on cartoon marketing for combustible cigarettes. Here, we examined associations between exposure to e-liquid packaging with cartoons (operationally defined as recognition of actual marketing images) and e-cigarette use, susceptibility to use, and expectations of benefits and risks of use. METHODS: U.S. adults completed online surveys assessing e-cigarette use. In Study 1, participants (N = 778; Mean age = 23.5 years; 62% women) completed a questionnaire assessing expectations about benefits and risks of use. Then they were presented with 22 e-liquid package images (with and without cartoons) and were asked to endorse whether they recognized the products. In Study 2, participants (N = 522; Mean age = 30.4; 55% women) were presented with 24 e-liquid images (with and without cartoons) and asked to rate product appeal. RESULTS: For Study 1, among never users, cartoon recognition was associated with greater likelihood of being susceptible to use e-cigarettes, and with expectations of taste enjoyment and social facilitation. For Study 2, there was no significant difference between cartoon and non-cartoon images on appeal ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Cartoon-based marketing exposure - as measured by recognition of e-liquid package images - was associated with susceptibility to use e-cigarettes, which is consistent with previous research on the use of cartoons to promote combustible cigarettes. These data suggest that restrictions on the use of cartoon-based marketing strategies for e-cigarettes should be similar to those for cigarettes, to reduce susceptibility and perceived benefits among non-users.
BACKGROUND: Manufacturers of e-cigarette-related products are using cartoons as a marketing strategy, despite restrictions on cartoon marketing for combustible cigarettes. Here, we examined associations between exposure to e-liquid packaging with cartoons (operationally defined as recognition of actual marketing images) and e-cigarette use, susceptibility to use, and expectations of benefits and risks of use. METHODS: U.S. adults completed online surveys assessing e-cigarette use. In Study 1, participants (N = 778; Mean age = 23.5 years; 62% women) completed a questionnaire assessing expectations about benefits and risks of use. Then they were presented with 22 e-liquid package images (with and without cartoons) and were asked to endorse whether they recognized the products. In Study 2, participants (N = 522; Mean age = 30.4; 55% women) were presented with 24 e-liquid images (with and without cartoons) and asked to rate product appeal. RESULTS: For Study 1, among never users, cartoon recognition was associated with greater likelihood of being susceptible to use e-cigarettes, and with expectations of taste enjoyment and social facilitation. For Study 2, there was no significant difference between cartoon and non-cartoon images on appeal ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Cartoon-based marketing exposure - as measured by recognition of e-liquid package images - was associated with susceptibility to use e-cigarettes, which is consistent with previous research on the use of cartoons to promote combustible cigarettes. These data suggest that restrictions on the use of cartoon-based marketing strategies for e-cigarettes should be similar to those for cigarettes, to reduce susceptibility and perceived benefits among non-users.
Authors: Tess Boley Cruz; Rob McConnell; Brittany Wagman Low; Jennifer B Unger; Mary Ann Pentz; Robert Urman; Kiros Berhane; Chih Ping Chou; Fei Liu; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: J R DiFranza; J W Richards; P M Paulman; N Wolf-Gillespie; C Fletcher; R D Jaffe; D Murray Journal: JAMA Date: 1991-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Cheng-Wei I Chuang; Steve Sussman; Matthew D Stone; Raina D Pang; Chih-Ping Chou; Adam M Leventhal; Matthew G Kirkpatrick Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Amanda L Johnson; Lauren K Collins; Andrea C Villanti; Jennifer L Pearson; Raymond S Niaura Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Steven H Kelder; Dale S Mantey; Duncan Van Dusen; Kathleen Case; Alexandra Haas; Andrew E Springer Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Isabell Katharina Rumrich; Otto Hänninen; Matti Viluksela; Kirsi Vähäkangas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 3.390