Literature DB >> 31207316

Which NDI domains best predict change in physical function in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery?

Michael E Steinhaus1, Sravisht Iyer2, Francis Lovecchio1, Daniel Stein1, Thomas Ross1, Jingyan Yang3, Virginie Lafage1, Todd J Albert1, Han Jo Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Physical function is a critical aspect of patient outcomes. NDI is a widely validated outcome measure in cervical spine disease, yet to what extent its individual domains predict changes in physical function remains unknown.
PURPOSE: To examine the impact of individual NDI domains on changes in physical function in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Prospective Cohort Study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, excluding those undergoing surgery for instability due to trauma. OUTCOME MEASURES: Absolute change in outcome measures (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Physical Function [PF], Short Form 36 [SF-36] Physical Component Score [PCS], and Neck Disability Index [NDI]) from pre- to postoperatively, correlation of NDI individual domains with PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS (preoperatively, postoperatively, and change from pre- to postoperatively).
METHODS: Patients undergoing cervical spine surgery between 2016 and 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed questionnaires (NDI, SF-36 PCS, and PROMIS PF) preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, including age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and underlying diagnoses were collected. Comparisons between NDI scores preoperatively versus postoperatively were conducted using Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Correlations of NDI individual items and PROMIS/SF-36 were assessed using Pearson correlation. A stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to identify NDI items that are independently predictive of PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS.
RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were included in the study, with mean age 56.9 years (range 24.4-84.9). Each of the NDI domains as well as PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS demonstrated significant improvement following cervical spine surgery (p<.001). Changes in all NDI domains demonstrated significant negative correlation with changes in PROMIS PF, with recreation (R=-0.537, p<.001), work (R=-0.514, p<.001), and pain intensity (R=-0.488, p<.001) having the greatest negative correlation. Changes in all NDI domains demonstrated significant negative correlation with changes in SF-36 PCS, with recreation (R=-0.451, p<.001), work (R=-0.443, p<.001), lifting (R=-0.373, p<.001), and driving (R=-0.373, p<.001) having the greatest negative correlation. For PROMIS PF, the NDI domains that were independently associated with changes in PF were work (R=-0.092, p=.001), pain intensity (R=-0.089, p=.003), and recreation (R=-0.067, p=.004). For SF-36 PCS, the NDI items that were independently associated with changes in PCS were work (R=-0.269, p=.003) and recreation (R=-0.215, p=.002).
CONCLUSIONS: All NDI domains improve significantly after cervical spine surgery and demonstrate significant correlation with changes in PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS. The work, recreation, and pain intensity domains were the only independent predictors of physical function changes postoperatively. Considering physical function, our findings highlight the importance of presenting changes in individual NDI domains in addition to the total score.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical myelopathy; Cervical radiculopathy; Cervical spine surgery; Outcomes reporting; Patient-reported outcomes; Physical function

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31207316     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  5 in total

1.  Validating the VR-12 Physical Function Instrument After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with SF-12, PROMIS, and NDI.

Authors:  Nathaniel W Jenkins; James M Parrish; Michael T Nolte; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-11-09

2.  Cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige LP cervical disc replacement: radiological results and clinical impacts from a single-center experience.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu; Hua Chen; Beiyu Wang; Ying Hong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Validation for Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study.

Authors:  James M Parrish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Cara E Geoghegan; Shruthi Mohan; Caroline N Jadczak; David P Matichak; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Concomitant Treatment with Chuna Manual Therapy and Usual Care for Whiplash Injuries: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Byung-Jun Kim; A-La Park; Man-Suk Hwang; In Heo; Sun-Young Park; Jae-Heung Cho; Koh-Woon Kim; Jun-Hwan Lee; In-Hyuk Ha; Kyoung-Sun Park; Eui-Hyoung Hwang; Byung-Cheul Shin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Preoperative Neck Disability Severity Limits Extent of Postoperative Improvement Following Cervical Spine Procedures.

Authors:  Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Shruthi Mohan; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-06-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.