Literature DB >> 31206642

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.

Rapeepat Auekitrungrueng1, Dangcheewan Tinnangwattana1, Charuwan Tantipalakorn1, Cholaros Charoenratana1, Thitikarn Lerthiranwong1, Chanane Wanapirak1, Theera Tongsong1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules and risk of malignancy index (RMI 1/RMI 2) scoring to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of a cohort of patients scheduled for surgery for adnexal masses in a tertiary center between April 2010 and March 2018. Ultrasound examinations were performed by general gynecologists within 24 hours prior to surgery to evaluate sonographic features. Demographic data and preoperative CA 125 levels were recorded. IOTA rules and RMI scoring were applied to predict malignancy and prospectively recorded. Final diagnosis was based on pathological or intraoperative diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total of 479 masses met the inclusion criteria and were retrieved from the database: 334 (69.7%) benign and 145 (30.3%) malignant. IOTA rules could be applied to 392 (81.8%) masses and were inconclusive in 87 (18.2%). Sensitivity and specificity of IOTA rules (83.8% and 92.0%, respectively) were significantly higher than RMI 1 (77.2% and 86.8%, respectively) and RMI 2 (82.1% and 82.6%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: IOTA simple rules had higher diagnostic accuracy compared with RMI to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses; however, nearly 20% of IOTA results were inconclusive and needed expert consultation.
© 2019 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign adnexal mass; International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules; Malignant adnexal mass; Risk of malignancy index (RMI); Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31206642     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

Review 1.  Management of adnexal masses' torsion during pregnancy.

Authors:  Alpha Boubacar Conte; Solène Nyingone; Sofia Jayi; Bineta Jho Diagne; Fatima Zohra Fdili Alaoui; Hikmat Chaara; Moulay Abdelilah Melhouf
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-09-04

2.  Predicting Malignancy in Adnexal Masses by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis-Simple Rules.

Authors:  Vrushti Solanki; Pratibha Singh; Charu Sharma; Navdeep Ghuman; Binit Sureka; Shashank Shekhar; Meenakshi Gothwal; Garima Yadav
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2021-01-21

3.  Early-Stage Ovarian Malignancy Score versus Risk of Malignancy Indices: Accuracy and Clinical Utility for Preoperative Diagnosis of Women with Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Phichayut Phinyo; Jayanton Patumanond; Panprapha Saenrungmuaeng; Watcharin Chirdchim; Tanyong Pipanmekaporn; Apichat Tantraworasin; Theera Tongsong; Charuwan Tantipalakorn
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.

Authors:  Wen Ting Xie; Yao Qin Wang; Zhi Sheng Xiang; Zhong Shi Du; Shi Xin Huang; Yi Jie Chen; Li Na Tang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 4.234

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.