Literature DB >> 31206637

Comparing surgical and nonsurgical larynx-preserving treatments with total laryngectomy for locally advanced laryngeal cancer.

Sagar A Patel1,2, Muhammad M Qureshi1, Michael A Dyer1, Scharukh Jalisi3, Gregory Grillone3, Minh Tam Truong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The declining 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with laryngeal cancer has been associated with increased nonsurgical management of stage III/IV disease. To further assess this hypothesis, the authors evaluated recent OS trends and patterns of use between larynx-preserving approaches with chemoradiation (CRT) or partial laryngectomy (PL) and total laryngectomy (TL) stratified by tumor and nodal burden.
METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify 8703 patients with stage III/IV (excluding T1 tumors) laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated between 2003 and 2011 with CRT or upfront PL or TL with or without adjuvant therapy. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Among patients with non-T4, low nodal burden (T2N1 or T3N0-N1) disease, no survival differences were observed between CRT, PL, and TL. Patients who had non-T4, high nodal burden (T2-T3N2-N3) disease who underwent TL with or without adjuvant treatment had a higher risk of death compared with those who received CRT (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.51; P = .016). For T4N0-N3 tumors, TL compared with CRT was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92; P = .002). No statistically significant difference in outcome was noted between CRT and PL for all stage groups. The use of CRT has declined and receipt of TL has increased since 2006 for T4 disease, whereas PL rates have remained stably low.
CONCLUSIONS: No survival differences were noted between surgical and nonsurgical approaches for patients with non-T4, low nodal burden laryngeal cancer. Patients with non-T4, high nodal burden disease may benefit from definitive CRT. Total laryngectomy remains advantageous in patients with T4 disease.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck; laryngeal cancer; laryngectomy; larynx preservation; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31206637     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  Throat Microbial Community Structure and Functional Changes in Postsurgery Laryngeal Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Chi-Yao Hsueh; Hongli Gong; Ning Cong; Ji Sun; Hui-Ching Lau; Yang Guo; Qiang Huang; Xiaohui Yuan; Ming Zhang; Lei Tao; Liang Zhou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of treatment modalities for selected advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Aihemaiti Wushouer; Wenming Li; Minfa Zhang; Dapeng Lei; Xinliang Pan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Efficacy of non-surgical larynx-preservation comprehensive treatment in advanced laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Nan-Xiang Chen; Wen-Jun Fan; Lin Ma; Jia-Ling Wang; Wen-Ming Wu; Xin-Xin Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 4.  Review of recent treatment trends of laryngeal cancer in Poland: a population-based study.

Authors:  Anna Rzepakowska; Michał Żurek; Kazimierz Niemczyk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Bioinformatics analysis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: seeking key candidate genes and pathways.

Authors:  Jinhua Ma; Xiaodong Hu; Baoqiang Dai; Qiang Wang; Hongqin Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  [Larynx preservation: recommendations for decision-making in T3 laryngeal cancer patients].

Authors:  Gerhard Dyckhoff; Rolf Warta; Christel Herold-Mende; Peter K Plinkert; Heribert Ramroth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 1.330

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.