Literature DB >> 31206617

An Analysis of Follow-On Development in New Drug Classes, January 1986-June 2018.

Michael L Lanthier1, Kirk W Kerr2, Kathleen L Miller1.   

Abstract

Follow-on drugs-new medicines approved within an established drug class-provide incremental treatment improvements, additional choices for clinicians and patients, and potential price competition. We examine the timing, quantity, and product characteristics of within-class drug approvals for new drug classes approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since January 1986. We find that nearly two-thirds of first-in-class drugs do not face a subsequent follow-on product. Follow-on innovation within a drug class was more common and occurred more rapidly in the 1990s than during the 2000s. We also find that fewer drug classes have multiple competitors entering the market during the 2000s. First-in-class drugs treating rare disorders experienced lower rates of follow-on entry than drugs treating common medical conditions. The decreased pace of follow-on development likely results from greater industry focus on rare diseases and increasing reimbursement pressure on products lacking clear advantages over existing products. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31206617      PMCID: PMC8422864          DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.903


  10 in total

1.  "Me-too" products--friend or foe?

Authors:  Thomas H Lee
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D.

Authors:  Kiran N Meekings; Cory S M Williams; John E Arrowsmith
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  The economics of follow-on drug research and development: trends in entry rates and the timing of development.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Cherie Paquette
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Recent trends in brand-name and generic drug competition.

Authors:  Henry Grabowski; Genia Long; Richard Mortimer
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.448

5.  An improved approach to measuring drug innovation finds steady rates of first-in-class pharmaceuticals, 1987-2011.

Authors:  Michael Lanthier; Kathleen L Miller; Clark Nardinelli; Janet Woodcock
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  How many "me-too" drugs is too many?

Authors:  Joshua J Gagne; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Henry G Grabowski; Ronald W Hansen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Competitive Development in Pharmacologic Classes: Market Entry and the Timing of Development.

Authors:  J A DiMasi; R Chakravarthy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of PCSK9 Inhibitors Alirocumab and Evolocumab.

Authors:  Marian McDonagh; Kim Peterson; Brittany Holzhammer; Sergio Fazio
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2016-06

10.  Investigating the landscape of US orphan product approvals.

Authors:  Kathleen L Miller; Michael Lanthier
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.123

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.