Literature DB >> 31206600

Evaluating important change in cutaneous disease activity as an efficacy measure for clinical trials in dermatomyositis.

S Ahmed1,2, S Chakka1,2, J Concha1,2, R Krain1,2, R Feng3, V P Werth1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients may experience improved quality of life (QoL) without complete clearance of skin disease. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CDASI-A) score correlates with the Symptoms and Emotions subscales of Skindex-29, a measure of QoL, down to CDASI-A scores of 7 points (for Symptoms) and 10 points (for Emotions).
OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to define an important change in disease activity, as measured by the CDASI-A, that results in a meaningful change in QoL in patients with dermatomyositis.
METHODS: In 103 patients, we assessed the percentage change and actual change in CDASI-A scores needed to achieve a meaningful improvement in QoL, using linear regression models.
RESULTS: We found that meaningful improvement correlates with 7·86 points (P < 0·001) in Symptoms, and 10·29 points (P < 0·001) in Emotions, after correlating Skindex-29 to an established definition of meaningful change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). For patients with initial CDASI-A scores > 14 points, a 40% change in CDASI-A between the first two visits suggests a meaningful change in Skindex-29. In patients with moderate initial CDASI-A (15-26 points), the changes in CDASI-A resulting in meaningful changes in Symptoms and Emotions were 6 points (P < 0·001) and 7 points (P < 0·001), respectively. For initial CDASI-A scores in the severe range (27-35 points), an improvement in CDASI-A by 11 points (P = 0·030) and 9 points (P = 0·021) leads to a meaningful change in Symptoms and Emotions, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an initial CDASI-A score > 14 points, a 40% change in the CDASI-A score can be used to indicate a meaningful change in QoL in future dermatomyositis trials. What's already known about this topic? The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) is a validated disease assessment tool used to capture the extent of cutaneous activity and damage. The Skindex-29 and Dermatology Life Quality Index are standardized and validated measures of quality of life (QoL) for clinical trials and correlate with CDASI Activity (CDASI-A) scores. What does this study add? We identified what change in Skindex-29 scores over two consecutive visits would indicate an important change (a minimal clinically important difference) in QoL. We determined which change in CDASI-A scores over two consecutive visits would lead to a meaningful change in QoL. For patients with an initial CDASI-A score > 14 points, a 40% change in the CDASI-A score over two visits is associated with a meaningful change in QoL. What are the clinical implications of this work? Clinical trials can consider using a 40% change in the CDASI-A score as an end point when assessing the clinical efficacy of drugs. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31206600      PMCID: PMC6917999          DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  13 in total

Review 1.  An overview of polymyositis and dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Andrew R Findlay; Namita A Goyal; Tahseen Mozaffar
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 2.  The Dermatology Life Quality Index 1994-2007: a comprehensive review of validation data and clinical results.

Authors:  M K A Basra; R Fenech; R M Gatt; M S Salek; A Y Finlay
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Skindex, a quality-of-life measure for patients with skin disease: reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Authors:  M M Chren; R J Lasek; L M Quinn; E N Mostow; S J Zyzanski
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Quality of life in dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Renato Goreshi; Monika Chock; Kristen Foering; Rui Feng; Joyce Okawa; Matt Rose; David Fiorentino; Victoria Werth
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Validation of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index: characterizing disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change.

Authors:  C O Anyanwu; D F Fiorentino; L Chung; C Dzuong; Y Wang; J Okawa; K Carr; K J Propert; V P Werth
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  Evaluation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the CDASI and the CAT-BM.

Authors:  Renato Goreshi; Joyce Okawa; Matt Rose; Rui Feng; Lela A Lee; Christopher B Hansen; Carolyn A Bangert; M Kari Connolly; Mark D Davis; Jeff P Callen; Nicole M Fett; Steven S Fakharzadeh; Jennie T Clarke; Victoria P Werth
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; J Singer; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-12

8.  Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use.

Authors:  A Y Finlay; G K Khan
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.470

9.  Improvement in the cutaneous disease activity of patients with dermatomyositis is associated with a better quality of life.

Authors:  E S Robinson; R Feng; J Okawa; V P Werth
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  Cutaneous dermatomyositis disease course followed over time using the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index.

Authors:  Peter B Chansky; Jeannette M Olazagasti; Rui Feng; Victoria P Werth
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 15.487

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The validity and utility of the Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) as a clinical outcome instrument in dermatomyositis: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  S Ahmed; K L Chen; V P Werth
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Apremilast in Recalcitrant Cutaneous Dermatomyositis: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carole Bitar; Thien Ninh; Katherine Brag; Soraya Foutouhi; Stella Radosta; Jade Meyers; Melody Baddoo; Delong Liu; Brittany Stumpf; Paul W Harms; Nakhle S Saba; Erin Boh
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  Preliminary definition of cutaneous flare in dermatomyositis: A retrospective review.

Authors:  Joshua Dan; Mohsen Afarideh; Grant Sprow; Emily Keyes; DeAnna Diaz; Thomas Vazquez; Nilesh Kodali; Victoria P Werth
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 15.487

4.  Study of Tofacitinib in Refractory Dermatomyositis: An Open-Label Pilot Study of Ten Patients.

Authors:  Julie J Paik; Livia Casciola-Rosen; Joseph Yusup Shin; Jemima Albayda; Eleni Tiniakou; Doris G Leung; Laura Gutierrez-Alamillo; Jamie Perin; Liliana Florea; Corina Antonescu; Sherry G Leung; Grazyna Purwin; Andrew Koenig; Lisa Christopher-Stine
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 5.  The Meaning and Reliability of Minimal Important Differences (MIDs) for Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures (ClinROMs) in Dermatology-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Reinhart Speeckaert; Arno Belpaire; Sandrine Herbelet; Marijn M Speeckaert; Nanja van Geel
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 6.  Comparison of Guidelines for Management of Pemphigus: a Review of Systemic Corticosteroids, Rituximab, and Other Immunosuppressive Therapies.

Authors:  Haiqin Zhu; Meng Pan; Wenzhe Zhao; Jingying Wang
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 8.667

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.